Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
  • Print publication year: 2014
  • Online publication date: May 2014

Chapter 10 - Plasticity in auditory functions

from Section 2 - Functional plasticity in the central nervous system

References

1. KnudsenEI. Experience alters the spatial tuning of auditory units in the optic tectum during a sensitive period in the barn owl. J Neurosci 1985; 5: 3094–109.
2. BlauertJ. Spatial Hearing. 2nd edn. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1996.
3. MiddlebrooksJC, GreenDM. Sound localization by human listeners. Annu Rev Psychol 1991; 42: 135–59.
4. SterbingSJ, HartungK, HoffmannKP. Spatial tuning to virtual sounds in the inferior colliculus of the guinea pig. J Neurophysiol 2003; 90: 2648–59.
5. HofmanPM, Van RiswickJG, Van OpstalAJ. Relearning sound localization with new ears. Nat Neurosci 1998; 1: 417–21.
6. WightmanF, KistlerD. Of vulcan ears, human ears and “earprints”. Nat Neurosci 1998; 1: 337–9.
7. LessardN, PareM, LeporeF, et al. Early-blind human subjects localize sound sources better than sighted subjects. Nature 1998; 395: 278–80.
8. RauscheckerJP, KniepertU. Enhanced precision of auditory localization behavior in visually deprived cats. Eur J Neurosci 1994; 6: 149–60.
9. KingAJ, ParsonsC. Improved auditory spatial acuity in visually deprived ferrets. Eur J Neurosci 1999; 11: 3945–56.
10. KingAJ, SempleDJ. Improvement in auditory spatial acuity following early visual deprivation in ferrets. Soc Neurosci Abstr 1996; 22: 129.4.
11. MuchnikC, EfratiM, NemethE, et al. Central auditory skills in blind and sighted subjects. Scand Audiol 1991; 20: 19–23.
12. RöderB, Teder-SalejarviW, SterrA, et al. Improved auditory spatial tuning in blind humans. Nature 1999; 400: 162–6.
13. RiceCE. Early blindness, early experience, and perceptual enhancement. Res Bull Am Found Blind 1970; 22: 1–22.
14. RiceCE, FeinsteinSH, SchustermanRJ. Echo-detection ability of the blind: size and distance factor. J Exp Psychol 1965; 70: 246–51.
15. RauscheckerJP, HenningP. Crossmodal expansion of cortical maps in early blindness. In KaasJ, ed. The Mutable Brain. Singapore: Harwood Academic Publishers, 2001; 243–59.
16. RauscheckerJP. Compensatory plasticity and sensory substitution in the cerebral cortex. Trend Neurosci 1995; 18: 36–43.
17. RauscheckerJP, HarrisLR. Auditory compensation of the effects of visual deprivation in the cat’s superior colliculus. Exp Brain Res 1983; 50: 69–83.
18. MeredithMA, ClemoHR. Auditory cortical projection from the anterior ectosylvian sulcus (Field AES) to the superior colliculus in the cat: an anatomical and electrophysiological study. J Comp Neurol 1989; 289: 687–707.
19. RauscheckerJP, KorteM. Auditory compensation for early blindness in cat cerebral cortex. J Neurosci 1993; 13: 4538–48.
20. KorteM, RauscheckerJP. Auditory spatial tuning of cortical neurons is sharpened in cats with early blindness. J Neurophysiol 1993; 70: 1717–21.
21. RauscheckerJP. Auditory reassignment. In BollerF, GrafmanJ, eds. Handbook of Neuropsychology, Plasticity and Rehabilitation. 2nd edn. Vol. 9. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 2002; 167–76.
22. UhlF, FranzenP, PodrekaI, et al. Increased regional cerebral blood flow in inferior occipital cortex and cerebellum of early blind humans. Neurosci Lett 1993; 150: 162–4.
23. Wanet-DefalqueMC, VeraartC, De VolderA, et al. High metabolic activity in the visual cortex of early blind human subjects. Brain Res 1988; 446: 369–73.
24. ArnoP, De VolderAG, VanlierdeA, et al. Occipital activation by pattern recognition in the early blind using auditory substitution for vision. Neuroimage 2001; 13: 632–45.
25. BüchelC, PriceC, FrackowiakRS, et al. Different activation patterns in the visual cortex of late and congenitally blind subjects. Brain 1998; 121: 409–19.
26. De VolderAG, Catalan-AhumadaM, RobertA, et al. Changes in occipital cortex activity in early blind humans using a sensory substitution device. Brain Res 1999; 826: 128–34.
27. SadatoN, Pascual-LeoneA, GrafmanJ, et al. Activation of the primary visual cortex by Braille reading in blind subjects. Nature 1996; 380: 526–8.
28. WeeksR, HorwitzB, Aziz-SultanA, et al. A positron emission tomographic study of auditory localisation in the congenitally blind. J Neurosci 2000; 20: 2664–72.
29. BusharaKO, WeeksRA, IshiiK, et al. Modality-specific frontal and parietal areas for auditory and visual spatial localization in humans. Nat Neurosci 1999; 2: 759–66.
30. WeeksRA, Aziz-SultanA, BusharaKO, et al. A PET study of human auditory spatial processing. Neurosci Lett 1999; 262: 155–8.
31. RauscheckerJP, ScottS. Maps and streams in the auditory cortex: non-human primates illuminate human speech processing. Nat Neurosci 2009; 12: 718–24.
32. RauscheckerJP, TianB. Mechanisms and streams for processing of “what” and “where” in auditory cortex. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2000; 97: 11800–6.
33. LewisJW, Van EssenDC. Corticocortical connections of visual, sensorimotor, and multimodal processing areas in the parietal lobe of the macaque monkey. J Comp Neurol 2000; 428: 112–37.
34. RomanskiLM, TianB, FritzJ, et al. Dual streams of auditory afferents target multiple domains in the primate prefrontal cortex. Nat Neurosci 1999; 2: 1131–6.
35. TalairachJ, TournouxP. A Coplanar Sterotaxic Atlas of the Human Brain. Stuttgart: Thieme Verlag, 1988.
36. MesulamMM. Spatial attention and neglect: parietal, frontal and cingulate contributions to the mental representation and attentional targeting of salient extrapersonal events. Philos Trans Roy Soc Lond B Biol Sci 1999; 354: 1325–46.
37. KujalaT, AlhoK, PaavilainenP, et al. Neural plasticity in processing sound location by the early blind: an event-related potential study. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1992; 84: 469–72.
38. KujalaT, HuotilainenM, SinkkonenJ, et al. Visual cortex activation in blind humans during sound discrimination. Neurosci Lett 1995; 183: 143–6.
39. FishmanMC, MichaelP. Integration of auditory information in the cat’s visual cortex. Vision Res 1973; 13: 1415–19.
40. SpinelliDN, StarrA, BarrettTW. Auditory specificity in unit recordings from cat’s visual cortex. Exp Neurol 1968; 22: 75–84.
41. InnocentiGM, ClarkeS. Bilateral transitory projection from auditory cortex in kittens. Dev Brain Res 1984; 14: 143–8.
42. FalchierA, ClavagnierS, BaroneP, et al. Anatomical evidence of multimodal integration in primate striate cortex. J Neurosci 2002; 22: 5749–59.
43. RocklandKS, OjimaH. Multisensory convergence in calcarine visual areas in macaque monkey. Int J Psychophysiol 2003; 50: 19–26.
44. Pascual-LeoneA, HamiltonR. The metamodal organization of the brain. Prog Brain Res 2001; 134: 427–445.
45. RenierLA, AnurovaI, De VolderAG, et al. Multi-modal versus modality-specific activation within the “what” and “where” processing streams for sounds and vibro-tactile stimuli. J Neurosci 2009; 29: 10950–60.
46. RenierLA, AnurovaI, De VolderAG, et al. Preserved functional specialization for spatial processing in the occipital cortex of the early blind. Neuron 2010; 68: 138–48.
47. LennebergEH. Biological Foundations of Language. New York, NY: Wiley, 1967.
48. JohnsonJS, NewportEL. Critical period effects in second language learning: the influence of maturational state on the acquisition of English as a second language. Cognit Psychol 1989; 21: 60–99.
49. HauserMD. The Evolution of Communication. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1996.
50. SeyfarthRM, CheneyDL, MarlerP. Monkey responses to three different alarm calls: evidence of predator classification and semantic communication. Science 1980; 210: 801–3.
51. ZolothSR, PetersenMR, BeecherMD, et al. Species-specific perceptual processing of vocal sounds by monkeys. Science 1979; 204: 870–3.
52. HauserMD. Articulatory and social factors influence the acoustic structure of rhesus monkey vocalizations: a learned mode of production?J Acoust Soc Am 1992; 91: 2175–9.
53. DoupeAJ, KuhlPK. Birdsong and human speech: common themes and mechanisms. Annu Rev Neurosci 1999; 22: 567–631.
54. GentnerTQ, MargoliashD. Neuronal populations and single cells representing learned auditory objects. Nature 2003; 424: 669–74.
55. JusczykPW. The Discovery of Spoken Language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1997.
56. WerkerJF, LoganJS. Cross-language evidence for three factors in speech perception. Percept Psychophys 1985; 37: 35–44.
57. LivelySE, LoganJS, PisoniDB. Training Japanese listeners to identify English /r/ and /l/. II: the role of phonetic environment and talker variability in learning new perceptual categories. J Acoust Soc Am 1993; 94: 1242–55.
58. LoganJS, LivelySE, PisoniDB. Training Japanese listeners to identify English /r/ and /l/: a first report. J Acoust Soc Am 1991; 89: 874–86.
59. KuhlPK. A new view of language acquisition. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2000; 97: 11850–7.
60. KuhlPK, WilliamsKA, LacerdaF, et al. Linguistic experience alters phonetic perception in infants by 6 months of age. Science 1992; 255: 606–8.
61. BinderJR, FrostJA, HammekeTA, et al. Human temporal lobe activation by speech and nonspeech sounds. Cereb Cortex 2000; 10: 512–28.
62. BinderJR, LiebenthalE, PossingET, et al. Neural correlates of sensory and decision processes in auditory object identification. Nat Neurosci 2004; 7: 295–301.
63. ScottSK, BlankCC, RosenS, et al. Identification of a pathway for intelligible speech in the left temporal lobe. Brain 2000; 123: 2400–6.
64. ZatorreRJ, BouffardM, BelinP. Sensitivity to auditory object features in human temporal neocortex. J Neurosci 2004; 24: 3637–42.
65. KohonenT, HariR. Where the abstract feature maps of the brain might come from. Trends Neurosci 1999; 22: 135–9.
66. OjemannGA, WhitakerHA. The bilingual brain. Arch Neurol 1978; 35: 409–12.
67. KimKH, RelkinNR, LeeKM, et al. Distinct cortical areas associated with native and second languages. Nature 1997; 388: 171–4.
68. GaabN, SchlaugG. Musicians differ from nonmusicians in brain activation despite performance matching. Ann NY Acad Sci 2003; 999: 385–8.
69. GaserC, SchlaugG. Brain structures differ between musicians and non-musicians. J Neurosci 2003; 23: 9240–5.
70. SchlaugG, JanckeL, HuangY, et al. In vivo evidence of structural brain asymmetry in musicians. Science 1995; 267: 699–701.
71. PantevC, OostenveldR, EngelienA, et al. Increased auditory cortical representation in musicians. Nature 1998; 392: 811–14.
72. PantevC, RossB, FujiokaT, et al. Music and learning-induced cortical plasticity. Ann NY Acad Sci 2003; 999: 438–50.
73. ShahinA, BosnyakDJ, TrainorLJ, et al. Enhancement of neuroplastic P2 and N1c auditory evoked potentials in musicians. J Neurosci 2003; 23: 5545–52.
74. TrainorLJ, ShahinA, RobertsLE. Effects of musical training on the auditory cortex in children. Ann NY Acad Sci 2003; 999: 506–13.
75. HebbDO. The Organization of Behavior. New York, NY: Wiley, 1949.
76. RauscheckerJP. Mechanisms of visual plasticity: Hebb synapses, NMDA receptors and beyond. Physiol Rev 1991; 71: 587–615.
77. RecanzoneGH, SchreinerCE, MerzenichMM. Plasticity in the frequency representation of primary auditory cortex following discrimination training in adult owl monkeys. J Neurosci 1993; 13: 87–103.
78. KilgardMP, MerzenichMM. Cortical map reorganization enabled by nucleus basalis activity. Science 1998; 279: 1714–18.
79. WeinbergerNM. The nucleus basalis and memory codes: auditory cortical plasticity and the induction of specific, associative behavioral memory. Neurobiol Learn Mem 2003; 80: 268–284.
80. CotzinM, DallenbachKM. “Facial vision:” the role of pitch and loudness in the perception of obstacles by the blind. Am J Psychol 1950; 63: 485–515.
81. KelloggWN. Sonar system of the blind. Science 1962; 137: 399–404.
82. AmediA, FloelA, KnechtS, et al. Transcranial magnetic stimulation of the occipital pole interferes with verbal processing in blind subjects. Nat Neurosci 2004; 7: 1266–70.
83. RöderB, StockO, BienS, et al. Speech processing activates visual cortex in congenitally blind humans. Eur J Neurosci 2002; 16: 930–6.
84. MeijerPB. An experimental system for auditory image representations. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 1992; 39: 112–121.
85. AmediA, SternWM, CamprodonJA, et al. Shape conveyed by visual-to-auditory sensory substitution activates the lateral occipital complex. Nat Neurosci 2007; 10: 687–9.
86. RenierL, CollignonO, PoirierC, et al. Cross-modal activation of visual cortex during depth perception using auditory substitution of vision. Neuroimage 2005; 26: 573–80.
87. RenierL, De VolderAG, RauscheckerJP. Cortical plasticity and preserved function in early blindness. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 2013 [Epub ahead of print]
88. PlazaP. Looking into Brain Activation Using a Sensory Substitution Prosthesis: Seeing with Sound. Ph.D. Thesis, Université Catholique de Louvain, School of Medicine, Belgium, 2013.
89. NevilleHJ, LawsonD. Attention to central and peripheral visual space in a movement detection task: an event-related potential and behavioral study. II. Congenitally deaf adults. Brain Res 1987; 405: 268–83.
90. NishimuraH, HaskikawaK, DoiK, et al. Sign language “heard” in the auditory cortex. Nature 1999; 397: 116.
91. PetittoLA, ZatorreRJ, GaunaK, et al. Speech-like cerebral activity in profoundly deaf people processing signed languages: implications for the neural basis of human language. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2000; 97: 13961–6.
92. FinneyEM, FineI, DobkinsKR. Visual stimuli activate auditory cortex in the deaf. Nat Neurosci 2001; 4: 1171–3.
93. FinneyEM, ClementzBA, HickokG, et al. Visual stimuli activate auditory cortex in deaf subjects: evidence from MEG. NeuroReport 2003; 14: 1425–7.
94. NevilleHJ, BavelierD, CorinaD, et al. Cerebral organization for language in deaf and hearing subjects: biological constraints and effects of experience. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1998; 95: 922–9.
95. LevänenS, HamdorfD. Feeling vibrations: enhanced tactile sensitivity in congenitally deaf humans. Neurosci Lett 2001; 301: 75–7.
96. LevänenS, JousmakiV, HariR. Vibration-induced auditory-cortex activation in a congenitally deaf adult. Curr Biol 1998; 8: 869–72.
97. GravelJS, WallaceIF, RubenRJ. Auditory consequences of early mild hearing loss associated with otitis media. Acta Otolaryngol 1996; 116: 219–21.
98. DobieRA, BerlinCI. Influence of otitis media on hearing and development. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1979; Suppl. 88: 48–53.
99. MooreDR, HutchingsME, MeyerSE. Binaural masking level differences in children with a history of otitis media. Audiology 1991; 30: 91–101.
100. WieselTN. Postnatal development of the visual cortex and the influence of environment. Nature 1982; 299: 583–91.
101. MooreDR, HartleyDE, HoganSC. Effects of otitis media with effusion (OME) on central auditory function. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 2003; 67: S63–7.
102. de Villers-SidaniE, ChangEF, BaoS, et al. Critical period window for spectral tuning defined in the primary auditory cortex (A1) in the rat. J Neurosci 2007; 27: 180–9.
103. BlakemoreC. Sensitive and vulnerable periods in the development of the visual system. Ciba Found Symp 1991; 156: 129–47.
104. HubelDH, WieselTN. The period of susceptibility to the physiological effects of unilateral eye closure in kittens. J Physiol 1970; 206: 419–36.
105. MooreDR, HineJE, JiangZD, et al. Conductive hearing loss produces a reversible binaural hearing impairment. J Neurosci 1999; 19: 8704–11.
106. ZhouX, MerzenichMM. Intensive training in adults refines A1 representations degraded in an early postnatal critical period. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2007; 104: 15935–40.
107. SommersMS. Speech perception in older adults: the importance of speech-specific cognitive abilities. J Am Geriatr Soc 1997; 45: 633–7.
108. RauscheckerJP. Cortical control of the thalamus: top-down processing and plasticity. Nat Neurosci 1998; 1: 179–80.
109. GehrSE, SommersMS. Age differences in backward masking. J Acoust Soc Am 1999; 106: 2793–9.
110. LoebGE. The functional replacement of the ear. Sci Am 1985; 252: 104–11.
111. RauscheckerJP. Making brain circuits listen. Science 1999; 285: 1686–7.
112. RauscheckerJP, ShannonRV. Sending sound to the brain. Science 2002; 295: 1025–9.
113. SvirskyMA, RobbinsAM, KirkKI, et al. Language development in profoundly deaf children with cochlear implants. Psychol Sci 2000; 11: 153–8.
114. KlinkeR, KralA, HeidS, et al. Recruitment of the auditory cortex in congenitally deaf cats by long-term cochlear electrostimulation. Science 1999; 285: 1729–33.
115. LomberSG, MeredithMA, KralA. Cross-modal plasticity in specific auditory cortices underlies visual compensations in the deaf. Nat Neurosci 2010; 13: 1421–7.
116. KralA, HartmannR, TilleinJ, et al. Delayed maturation and sensitive periods in the auditory cortex. Audiol Neurootol 2001; 6: 346–62.
117. RauscheckerJP. Auditory cortical plasticity: a comparison with other sensory systems. Trends Neurosci 1999; 22: 74–80.
118. JastreboffPJ. Phantom auditory perception (tinnitus): mechanisms of generation and perception. Neurosci Res 1990; 8: 221–54.
119. JastreboffPJ, BrennanJF, ColemanJK, et al. Phantom auditory sensation in rats: an animal model for tinnitus. Behav Neurosci 1988; 102: 811–22.
120. LockwoodAH, SalviRJ, BurkardRF, et al. Neuroanatomy of tinnitus. Scand Audiol 1999; Suppl. 51: 47–52.
121. LockwoodAH, SalviRJ, BurkardRF. Tinnitus. N Engl J Med 2002; 347: 904–10.
122. MühlnickelW, ElbertT, TaubE, et al. Reorganization of auditory cortex in tinnitus. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1998; 95: 10340–3.
123. MühlauM, RauscheckerJP, OestreicherE, et al. Structural brain changes in tinnitus. Cerebral Cortex 2006; 16: 1283–8.
124. MatthiesC, SamiiM. Management of 1000 vestibular schwannomas (acoustic neuromas): clinical presentation. Neurosurgery 1997; 40: 1–9; discussion 9–10.
125. SeidmanMD, JacobsonGP. Update on tinnitus. Otolaryngol Clin North Am 1996; 29: 455–65.
126. NorenaAJ, EggermontJJ. Changes in spontaneous neural activity immediately after an acoustic trauma: implications for neural correlates of tinnitus. Hear Res 2003; 183: 137–53.
127. Wallhäusser-FrankeE, BraunS, LangnerG. Salicylate alters 2-DG uptake in the auditory system: a model for tinnitus? NeuroReport 1996; 7: 1585–8.
128. Wallhäusser-FrankeE, MahlkeC, OlivaR, et al. Expression of c-fos in auditory and non-auditory brain regions of the gerbil after manipulations that induce tinnitus. Exp Brain Res 2003; 153: 649–54.
129. IrvineDR, RajanR, BrownM. Injury- and use-related plasticity in adult auditory cortex. Audiol Neurootol 2001; 6: 192–95.
130. RajanR, IrvineDR, WiseLZ, et al. Effect of unilateral partial cochlear lesions in adult cats on the representation of lesioned and unlesioned cochleas in primary auditory cortex. J Comp Neurol 1993; 338: 17–49.
131. CalfordMB, RajanR, IrvineDR. Rapid changes in the frequency tuning of neurons in cat auditory cortex resulting from pure-tone-induced temporary threshold shift. Neuroscience 1993; 55: 953–64.
132. EdelineJM, WeinbergerNM. Receptive field plasticity in the auditory cortex during frequency discrimination training: selective retuning independent of task difficulty. Behav Neurosci 1993; 107: 82–103.
133. TeismannH, OkamotoH, PantevC. Short and intense tailor-made notched music training against tinnitus: the tinnitus frequency matters. PLoS One 2011; 6: e24685.
134. LeaverAM, RenierLA, ChevilletM, et al. Dysregulation of limbic and auditory networks in tinnitus. Neuron 2011; 69: 33–43.
135. RauscheckerJP, LeaverAM, MühlauM. Tuning out the noise: limbic-auditory interactions in tinnitus. Neuron 2010; 66: 819–826.
136. EngineerND, RileyJR, SealeJD, et al. Reversing pathological neural activity using targeted plasticity. Nature 2011; 470: 101–104.
137. LarsonPS, CheungSW. Deep brain stimulation in area LC controllably triggers auditory phantom percepts. Neurosurgery 2012; 70: 398–485.
138. RauscheckerJP. Adaptive plasticity and sensory substitution in the cerebral cortex. In LomberSG, EggermontJJ, eds. Reprogramming the Cerebral Cortex: Plasticity Following Central and Peripheral Lesion. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006.