Skip to main content Accessibility help
  • Print publication year: 2014
  • Online publication date: June 2014

Chapter 13 - Peripheral nerve stimulation

from Section 2 - Therapeutic technology

Related content

Powered by UNSILO


1. DeSantana JM, Walsh DM, Vance C, et al. Effectiveness of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation for treatment of hyperalgesia and pain. Curr Rheumatol Rep 2008; 10: 492–9.
2. Erlanger J, Blair EA. Comparative observations on motor and sensory fibers with special reference to repetitiousness. Am J Physiol 1938; 121: 431–53.
3. Levin MF, Hui-Chan CWY. Relief of hemiparetic spasticity by TENS is associated with improvement in reflex and voluntary motor functions. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1992; 85: 131–42.
4. Tekeoglu Y, Adak B, Goksoy T. Effect of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) on Barthel activities of daily living (ADL) index score following stroke. Clin Rehabil 1998; 12: 277–80.
5. Peurala SH, Pitkänen K, Sivenius J, et al. Cutaneous electrical stimulation may enhance sensorimotor recovery in chronic stroke. Clin Rehabil 2002; 16: 709–16.
6. Ng SS, Hui-Chan CW. Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation combined with task-related training improves lower limb functions in subjects with chronic stroke. Stroke 2007; 38: 2953–9.
7. Eek E, Engardt M. Assessment of the perceptual threshold of touch (PTT) with high-frequency transcutaneous electric nerve stimulation (Hf/TENS) in elderly patients with stroke: a reliability study. Clin Rehabil 2003; 17: 825–34.
8. Sonde L, Gip C, Fernaeus SE, et al. Stimulation with low frequency (1.7 Hz) transcutaneous electric nerve stimulation (low-TENS) increases motor function of the post-stroke paretic arm. Scand J Rehabil Med 1998; 30: 95–9.
9. Yan T, Hui-Chan CW. Transcutaneous electrical stimulation on acupuncture points improves muscle function in subjects after acute stroke: a randomized controlled trial. J Rehabil Med 2009; 41: 312–16.
10. Ng SS, Hui-Chan CW. Does the use of TENS increase the effectiveness of exercise for improving walking after stroke? A randomized controlled clinical trial. Clin Rehabil 2009; 23: 1093–103.
11. Johansson BB, Haker E, von Arbin M, et al. Acupuncture and transcutaneous nerve stimulation in stroke rehabilitation: a randomized, controlled trial. Stroke 2001; 32: 707–13.
12. Golaszewski SM, Bergmann J, Christova M, et al. Increased motor cortical excitability after whole-hand electrical stimulation: a TMS study. Clin Neurophysiol 2010; 121: 248–54.
13. Golaszewski SM, Siedentopf CM, Koppelstaetter F, et al. Modulatory effects on human sensorimotor cortex by whole-hand afferent electrical stimulation. Neurology 2004; 62: 2262–9.
14. Dimitrijevic MM, Soroker N. Mesh glove.2. Modulation of residual upper limb motor control after stroke with whole-hand electric stimulation. Scand J Rehab Med 1994; 26: 187–90.
15. Woolsey CN. Patterns of Localization in Sensory and Motor Areas of the Cerebral Cortex. Milbank Symposium: The Biology of Mental Health and Disease. New York, NY: Hoeber, 1952.
16. Asanuma H. Functional role of sensory inputs to the motor cortex. Prog Neurobiol 1981; 16: 241–62.
17. Kaas JH. Plasticity of sensory and motor maps in adult mammals. Annu Rev Neurosci 1991; 14: 137–67.
18. Xerri C, Merzenich MM, Peterson BE, et al. Plasticity of primary somatosensory cortex paralleling sensorimotor skill recovery from stroke in adult monkeys. J Neurophysiol 1998; 79: 2119–48.
19. Recanzone GH, Allard TT, Jenkins WM, et al. Receptive-field changes induced by peripheral nerve stimulation in SI of adult cats. J Neurophysiol 1990; 63: 1213–25.
20. Mack KJ, Mack PA. Induction of transcription factors in somatosensory cortex after tactile stimulation. Brain Res Mol Brain Res 1992; 12: 141–7.
21. Nudo RJ, Wise BM, SiFuentes F, et al. Neural substrates for the effects of rehabilitative training on motor recovery after ischemic infarct. Science 1996; 272: 1791–4.
22. Luft AR, Kaelin-Lang A, Hauser T, et al. Modulation of rodent cortical motor excitability by somatosensory input. Exp Brain Res 2002; 142: 562–9.
23. Buitrago MM, Luft AR, Thakor NV, et al. Effects of somatosensory electrical stimulation on neuronal injury after global hypoxia-ischemia. Exp Brain Res 2004; 158: 336–44.
24. Davis MF, Lay CC, Chen-Bee CH, et al. Amount but not pattern of protective sensory stimulation alters recovery after permanent middle cerebral artery occlusion. Stroke 2011; 42: 792–8.
25. Aschersleben G, Gehrke J, Prinz W. Tapping with peripheral nerve block: a role for tactile feedback in the timing of movements. Exp Brain Res 2001; 136: 331–9.
26. Sanes JN, Mauritz KH, Evarts EV, et al. Motor deficits in patients with large-fiber sensory neuropathy. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1984; 81: 979–82.
27. Reding MJ, Potes E. Rehabilitation outcome following initial unilateral hemispheric stroke. Life table analysis approach. Stroke 1988; 19: 1354–8.
28. Karni A, Meyer G, Rey-Hipolito C, et al. The acquisition of skilled motor performance: fast and slow experience-driven changes in primary motor cortex. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1998; 95: 861–8.
29. Liepert J, Bauder H, Miltner WHR, et al. Treatment-induced cortical reorganization after stroke in humans. Stroke 2000; 31: 1210–16.
30. Hamdy S, Rothwell JC, Aziz Q, et al. Long-term reorganization of human motor cortex driven by short-term sensory stimulation. Nat Neurosci 1998; 1: 64–8.
31. Fraser C, Power M, Hamdy S, et al. Driving plasticity in human motor cortex is associated with improved motor function after brain injury. Neuron 2002; 34: 831–40.
32. Ridding MC, Brouwer B, Miles TS, et al. Changes in muscle responses to stimulation of the motor cortex induced by peripheral nerve stimulation in human subjects. Exp Brain Res 2000; 131: 135–43.
33. Panizza M, Nilsson J, Roth, BJ, et al. The time constants of motor and sensory peripheral nerve fibers measured with the method of latent addition. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1994; 93: 147–54.
34. Ridding MC, McKay DR, Thompson PD, et al. Changes in corticomotor representations induced by prolonged peripheral nerve stimulation in humans. Clin Neurophysiol 2001; 112: 1461–19.
35. McKay D, Brooker R, Giacomin P, et al. Time course of induction of increased human motor cortex excitability by nerve stimulation. Neuroreport 2002; 13: 1271–3.
36. Kaelin-Lang A, Luft AR, Sawaki L, et al. Modulation of human corticomotor excitability by somatosensory input. J Physiol 2002; 540: 623–33.
37. Wu CW, van Gelderen P, Hanakawa T, et al. Enduring representational plasticity after somatosensory stimulation. Neuroimage 2005; 27: 872–84.
38. Conforto AB, Kaelin-Lang A, Cohen LG. Increase in hand muscle strength of stroke patients after somatosensory stimulation. Ann Neurol 2002; 51: 122–5.
39. Sawaki L, Wu CW, Kaelin-Lang A, et al. Effects of somatosensory stimulation on use-dependent plasticity in chronic stroke. Stroke 2006; 37: 246–7.
40. Koesler IB, Dafotakis M, Ameli M, et al. Electrical somatosensory stimulation improves movement kinematics of the affected hand following stroke. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2009; 80: 614–19.
41. Conforto AB, Cohen LG, dos Santos RL, et al. Effects of somatosensory stimulation on motor function in chronic cortico-subcortical strokes. J Neurol 2007; 254: 333–9.
42. Wu CW, Seo HJ, Cohen LG. Influence of electric somatosensory stimulation on paretic-hand function in chronic stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2006; 87: 351–7.
43. Celnik P, Hummel F, Harris-Love M, et al. Somatosensory stimulation enhances the effects of training functional hand tasks in patients with chronic stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2007; 88: 1369–76.
44. Wilson TW, Fleischer A, Archer D, et al. Oscillatory MEG motor activity reflects therapy-related plasticity in stroke patients. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2011; 25: 188–93.
45. Klaiput A, Kitisomprayoonkul W. Increased pinch strength in acute and subacute stroke patients after simultaneous median and ulnar sensory stimulation. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2009; 23: 351–6.
46. Conforto AB, Ferreiro KN, Tomasi C, et al. Effects of somatosensory stimulation on motor function after subacute stroke. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2010; 24: 263–72.