Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
  • Get access
    Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
  • Cited by 6
  • Print publication year: 2008
  • Online publication date: September 2009

15 - Methods of ingestion and incisal designs

    • By Kalpana R. Agrawal, Department of Anatomy, Laboratory Block, Faculty of Medicine Building, 21 Sassoon Road, Hong Kong, K. Y. Ang, Department of Biological Sciences, National University of Singapore, 14 Science Drive 4, Singapore 117543, Republic of Singapore, Zhongquan Sui, Department of Botany, University of Hong Kong, Pokfulam Road, Hong Kong, Hugh T. W. Tan, Department of Biological Sciences, National University of Singapore, 14 Science Drive 4, Singapore 117543, Republic of Singapore, Peter W. Lucas, Department of Anthropology, George Washington University, 2110 G St NW, Washington, DC 20052, USA
  • Edited by Joel D. Irish, University of Alaska, Fairbanks, Greg C. Nelson, University of Oregon
  • Publisher: Cambridge University Press
  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511542442.015
  • pp 349-363

Summary

Introduction

Those who research in food texture have long known that the first bite is a critical element of the feeding process. It is probable that many sensory decisions about the nature of the food mechanical properties that control particle fracture are made at this point (Bourne, 2002; Vincent et al., 2002). At least this is likely to be true for homogeneous foods that do not change much in texture as they are chewed (but is much less valid for industrially processed foods that melt or dissolve in the mouth). This “fact” appears to be recognized culturally, and is often imbued with social importance, such as when someone is expected or encouraged to express his or her appreciation of a dish at a social occasion immediately after “trying” something by biting into it (Visser, 1991). Taste is, of course, involved in such assessments, but texture nearly always has a role too.

Despite this interest, the first bite has not been the subject of much mechanical investigation. What happens when humans bite into food particles with their incisors? Is there simply flow of the food particle as the upper and/or lower teeth ease their way through it so as to eventually contact? It might be felt that the name “incision” implies that this is what happens. However, is fracture of the food particle involved?

References
Agrawal, K. R. and Lucas, P. W. (2003). Mechanics of the first bite. Proceedings of the Royal Society London series B, 270, 1277–82
Ang, K. Y., Lucas, P. W., and Tan, H. T. W. (2006). Incisal orientation and biting efficiency. Journal of Human Evolution, 50, 663–72
Ashby, M. F. and Jones, D. R. H. (1996). Engineering Materials 1, 2nd edn. Oxford: Butterworth Heineman.
Atkins, A. G. and Mai, Y.-W. (1985). Elastic and Plastic Fracture. Chichester: Ellis Horwood
Bourne, M. C. (2002). Food Texture and Viscosity. 2nd edn. New York: Academic Press
Eriksson, O., Fr, E. M. iis, and Löfgren, P. (2000). Seed size, fruit size, and dispersal systems in angiosperms from the early Cretaceous to the late Tertiary. The American Naturalist, 156, 47–58
Gautier-Hion, A., Duplantier, J. M., Quris, R . et al. (1985). Fruit characters as a basis of fruit choice and seed dispersal in a tropical forest vertebrate community. Oecologia, 65, 324–37
Gibson, L. J. and Ashby, M. F. (1997). Cellular Solids: Structure and Properties, 2nd edn. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Hopson, J. A. (2001). Origin of mammals. In Palaeobiology II, ed. Briggs, D. E. G. and Crowther, P. R.. London: Blackwell, pp. 88–94
Hylander, W. L. (1978). Incisal bite force direction in humans and the functional significance of mammalian mandibular translation. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 48, 1–7
Janson, C. H. (1983). Adaptation of fruit morphology to dispersal agents in a neotropical forest. Science, 219, 187–9
Jordano, P. (1995). Angiosperm fleshy fruits and seed dispersers – a comparative analysis of adaptation and constraints in plant-animal interactions. The American Naturalist, 145, 163–91
Kendall, K. (1978). Complexities of compression failure. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London series A, 361, 245–63
Kendall, K. (2001). Molecular Adhesion. New York: Kluwer/Plenum Press
Lawn, B. R. (1993). Fracture of Brittle Solids, 2nd edn. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Leighton, M. (1993). Modeling dietary selectivity by Bornean orangutans: evidence for integration of multiple criteria in fruit selection. International Journal of Primatology, 14, 257–313
Lucas, P. W. (1989). A new theory relating seed processing by primates to their relative tooth sizes. In The Growing Scope of Human Biology, ed. Schmitt, L. H., Freedman, L. and Bruce, N. W.. Perth, Australia: Centre for Human Biology, University of Western Australia, pp. 37–49
Lucas, P. W. (2004). Dental Functional Morphology: How Teeth Work. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Lucas, P. W. and Corlett, R. T. (1991). The relationship between the diet of Macaca fascicularis and forest phenology. Folia Primatologica, 57, 201–15
Martin, R. D. (1990). Primate Origins and Evolution. Princeton: Princeton University Press
Osborn, J. W., Baragar, F. A., and Grey, P. E. (1986). The functional advantage of proclined incisors in man. In Teeth Revisited: Proceedings of VII International Symposium on Dental Morphology, ed. Russell, D. E., Santoro, J. P. and Sigognean-Russell, D.. Memoirs du Musee National d'Histoire Naturelle, Paris (Serie C), 53, 445–58
Paphangkorakit, J. and Osborn, J. W. (1997). Effect of jaw opening on the direction and magnitude of human incisal bite forces. Journal of Dental Research, 76, 561–7
Rhee, Y.-W., Kim, H.-W., Deng, Y., and Lawn, B. R. (2001). Brittle fracture versus quasi plasticity in ceramics: a simple predictive index. Journal of the American Ceramic Society, 84, 561–5
Ross, C. F. and Kay, R. F. (2004). Anthropoid Origins: New Visions. New York: Kluwer Academic
Sirianni, J. E. (1979). Craniofacial morphology of the underbite trait in Presbytis. Journal of Dental Research, 58, 1655
Sui, Z. Q., Agrawal, K. R., Corke, H., and Lucas, P. W. (2006). Biting efficiency in relation to incisal angulation. Archives of Oral Biology, 51, 491–7
Swindler, D. R. (2002). Primate Dentition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Ungar, P. S. (1992). Incisal microwear and feeding behavior of four Sumatran anthropoids. Ph.D. Dissertation, State University of New York at Stony Brook
Ungar, P. S. (1994). Patterns of ingestive behavior and anterior tooth use differences in sympatric anthropoid primates. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 95, 197–219
Vincent, J. F. V. (1990). Fracture properties of plants. Advances in Botanical Research, 17, 235–87
Vincent, J. F. V., Saunders, D. E. J., and Beyts, P. (2002). The use of stress intensity factor to quantify “hardness” and “crunchiness” objectively. Journal of Texture Studies, 33, 149–59
Visser, M. (1991). The Rituals of Dinner. Canada: HarperCollins
Whitten, A. J. (1982). Diet and feeding behaviour of kloss gibbons on Siberut Island, Indonesia. Folia Primatologica, 37, 177–208
Williams, J. G. (1998). Friction and plasticity effects in wedge splitting and cutting fracture tests. Journal of Materials Science, 33, 5351–7
Wilsea, M., Johnson, K. L., and Ashby, M. F. (1975). Indentation of foamed plastics. International Journal of Mechanical Sciences, 17, 457–60
Yamashita, N. (2003). Food procurement and tooth use in the sympatric lemur species. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 121, 125–33
Zingeser, M. R. (1970). The morphological basis of the underbite trait in langurs (P. melalophos and T. cristatus) with an analysis of adaptive and evolutionary implications. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 32, 179–86