Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-tn8tq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-04T04:24:01.539Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

15 - A simulation analysis of environmental factors and ecological processes in North American boreal forests

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 January 2010

Herman H. Shugart
Affiliation:
University of Virginia
Gordon B. Bonan
Affiliation:
National Center for Atmospheric Research, Boulder, Colorado
Get access

Summary

Introduction

The boreal forest biome is a broad circumpolar mixture of cool coniferous and deciduous tree species that covers approximately 17% of the world's land surface area. Throughout this region, the landscape is a mosaic of forest vegetation types. For example, in interior Alaska above-ground tree biomass ranges from 26 t ha−1 for black spruce (Picea mariana (Mill.) B.S.P.) forests growing on cold, wet, permafrost soils to 250 t ha−1 for white spruce (Picea glauca (Moench) Voss) forests on warm, permafrostfree sites (Van Cleve et al. 1983b). In northern Quebec, above-ground tree biomass averages 20 t ha−1 in nutrient-poor black spruce–lichen woodlands and 108 t ha−1 in more fertile black spruce–moss forests (Moore & Verspoor 1973). In the warmer jack pine (Pinus banksiana Lamb.) forests of New Brunswick, above-ground tree biomass ranges from 0.8 t ha−1 for recent burns to 91.1 t ha−1 for more mature stands (MacLean & Wein l976).

Numerous researchers have examined specific aspects of boreal forests, but no one has formulated a unifying model of the boreal forest biome, a paradigm to link the pattern of forest vegetation with causal environmental factors. Our most detailed understanding of the ecology of boreal forests comes from interior Alaska, where interactions among soil temperature, permafrost, soil moisture, the forest floor, litter quality, nutrient availability, and fire largely control forest productivity and vegetation patterns (Lutz 1956a; Heilman 1966; Viereck 1973, 1975; Van Cleve, Barney & Schlentner 1981; Van Cleve & Viereck 1981; Van Cleve et al. 1983a,b; Van Cleve & Yarie 1986).

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×