Abraham, Werner and Sjaak de Meij (eds.) 1986, Topic, Focus, and Configurationality, Amsterdam: John Benjamins
Ackerman, Farrel 1984, ‘Verbal modifiers as argument taking predicates: complex verbs as predicate complexes in Hungarian’, Groninger Arbeiten zur Germanistischen Linguistik 25: 23–71
Ackerman, Farrel 1987, ‘Pronominal incorporation: the case of prefixal adverbs’, in Kenesei (ed.) 1987, pp. 213–260
Ackerman, Farrel and Webelhuth, Gert 1997, ‘The composition of (dis)continuous predicates: lexical or syntactic?’, Acta Linguistica Hungarica 44, 317–340
Alberti, Gábor 1995, ‘Role assignment in Hungarian possessive constructions’, in Kenesei (ed.) 1995, pp. 11–28
Alberti, Gábor 1997a, Argument Selection, Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang
Alberti, Gábor 1997b, ‘Restrictions on the degree of referentiality of arguments in Hungarian sentences’, Acta Linguistica Hungarica 44: 341–362
Alberti, Gábor 1998, ‘On passivization in Hungarian’, in de Groot and Kenesei (eds.) 1998, pp. 103–122
Alberti, Gábor 1999, ‘Climbing for aspect’, paper presented at the Workshop on verb clusters Dutch–Hungarian Study Center, Öttevény, Oct. 1999
Alberti, Gábor and István Kenesei (eds.) 2000, Approaches to Hungarian 7, Szeged: JATE
Alberti, Gábor and Anna Medve 2000, ‘Focus constructions and the “scope-inversion puzzle” in Hungarian’, in Alberti and Kenesei (eds.) 2000, pp. 93–118
Alexiadou, Artemis and Anagnostopoulou, Elena 1998, ‘Parametrizing AGR: word order, V-movement and EPP-checking’, Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 16: 491–539
Baker, Mark 1985, ‘The mirror principle and morphosyntactic explanation’, Linguistic Inquiry 16: 373–415
Bánréti, Zoltán 1994, ‘Coordination’, in Kiefer and É. Kiss (eds.) 1994, pp. 355–414
Bartos, Huba 1997, ‘On “subjective” and “objective” agreement in Hungarian’, Acta Linguistica Hungarica 44: 363–384
Bartos, Huba 1999a, Morfoszintaxis és interpretáció: a magyar inflexiós jelenségek szintaktikai háttere, Ph.D. dissertation, Budapest: ELTE
Bartos, Huba 1999b. ‘Verbal complexes and morpho-syntactic merger’, paper presented at the Workshop on verb clusters Dutch–Hungarian Study Center, Öttevény, Oct. 1999
Bartos, Huba 2000a, ‘Az alanyi és a tárgyas ragozásról’, in Büky and Maleczki (eds.) 2000, pp. 153–170
Bartos, Huba 2000b, ‘Topics, quantifiers, subjects: the preverbal field in Chinese and Hungarian’, paper presented at the International Symposium on Topic and Focus in Chinese, June 21–22, 2000, Hong Kong Polytechnic University, to appear in Sze-Wing Tang and Dingxu Shi (eds.), Topic and Focus in Chinese
Bartos, Huba 2000c, ‘Affix order in Hungarian and the Mirror Principle’, in Alberti and Kenesei (eds.) 2000, 53–70
Bartos, Huba 2001, ‘Mutatónévmási módosítók a magyar főnévi szerkezetekben: egyezés vagy osztozás?’, in Marianne Bakró-Nagy, Zoltán Bánréti and Katalin É. Kiss (eds.), Újabb eredmények a strukturális magyar nyelvtan és a nyelvtörténet köréből, Budapest: Osiris
Beghelli, Filippo and Tim Stowell 1997, ‘Distributivity and negation: the syntax of each and every’, in Szabolcsi (ed.) 1997b, pp. 71–108
Bittner, Maria and Hale, Ken 1996, ‘The structural determination of case and agreement’, Linguistic Inquiry 27: 1–68
Borer, Hagit 1989, ‘Anaphoric Agr’, in Osvaldo Jaeggli and Ken J. Safir (eds.), The null subject parameter, Dordrecht: Kluwer, pp. 69–109
Brassai, Sámuel 1860, 1863–65, ‘A magyar mondat’, Magyar Akadémiai Értesítő. A Nyelv- és Széptudományi Osztály Közlönye 1: 279–399; 3: 3–128, 173–409
Bresnan, Joan 1982, ‘Control and complementation’, Linguistic Inquiry 13: 343–434
Bródy, Michael 1990a, ‘Remarks on the order of elements in the Hungarian focus field’, in Kenesei (ed.) 1990, pp. 95–122
Bródy, Michael 1990b, ‘Some remarks on the focus field in Hungarian’, University College London Working Papers in Linguistics 2, 201–225
Bródy, Michael 1995, ‘Focus and checking theory’, in Kenesei (ed.) 1995, pp. 29–44
Bródy, Michael 1999, ‘Word order, restructuring and mirror theory’, ms., University College London / Linguistic Institute of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences
Bródy, Michael 2000, ‘Mirror theory: Syntactic representation in perfect syntax’, Linguistic Inquiry 31: 29–56
Bródy, Michael and Anna Szabolcsi 2000, ‘Overt scope: a case study in Hungarian’, ms., University College London / New York University
Büky, László and Márta Maleczki (eds.) 1995, A mai magyar nyelv leírásának újabb módszerei II, Szeged: JATE
Büky, László and Márta Maleczki (eds.) 1998, A mai magyar nyelv leírásának újabb módszerei III, Szeged: JATE
Büky, László and Márta Maleczki (eds.) 2000, A mai magyar nyelv leírásának újabb módszerei IV, Szeged: JATE
Cardinaletti, Anna and Michal Starke 1999, ‘The typology of structural deficiency: a case study of three classes of pronouns’, in Henk van Riemsdijk (ed.), Clitics in the Languages of Europe, Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 145–233
Chomsky, Noam 1976, ‘Conditions on rules of grammar’, Linguistic Analysis 2: 303–349
Chomsky, Noam 1981, Lectures on Government and Binding, Dordrecht: Reidel
Chomsky, Noam 1986, Knowledge of Language, New York: Praeger
Chomsky, Noam 1995, The Minimalist Program, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
Chomsky, Noam and Morris Halle 1968, The Sound Pattern of English, New York: Harper and Row
Cinque, Guglielmo 1997, Adverbs and Functional Heads: A Crosslinguistic Perspective, New York/Oxford: Oxford University Press
Comorovski, Ileana 1996, Interrogative Phrases and the Syntax–Semantics Interface, Dordrecht: Kluwer
Csirmaz, Anikó and Balázs Surányi 1998, ‘Are there expletives in Hungarian?’, paper presented at the First Conference on Linguistic Theory in Eastern European Languages, April 19–21, Szeged University
Dalmi, Gréte 1995, Hungarian Infinitival Constructions, Master of philosophy Thesis, University of Sydney
Diesing, M. 1992, ‘Bare plural subjects and the derivation of logical representations’, Linguistic Inquiry 23: 353–380
Dikken, Marcel den 1995, Particles: On the Syntax of Verb–Particle, Triadic, and Causative Constructions, New York/Oxford: Oxford University Press
Dikken, Marcel den 1999a, ‘On the structural representation of possession and agreement: the case of (anti-)agreement in Hungarian possessed nominal phrases’, in Kenesei (ed.) 1999, pp. 137–178
Dikken, Marcel den 1999b, ‘Agreement and clause union’, ms., City University of New York
Dikken, Marcel den 2000, ‘A tárgyi személyes névmások szerkezete és az egyeztetés’, in Büky and Maleczki (eds.) 2000, pp. 171–180
Dikken, Marcel den and Anastasia Giannakidou 2000, ‘What the hell?’, to appear in NELS 31
Dimitrova-Vulchanova, Mila 1998, ‘Fragments of Balkan Nominal Structure’, in Artemis Alexiadou and Chris Wilder (eds.), Possessors, Predicates and Movement in the Determiner Phrase, Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 333–360
Dobrovie-Sorin, Carmen 1993, Romanian Syntax, Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter
Kiss, É. Katalin 1977, ‘Topic and focus in Hungarian syntax’, Montreal Working Papers in Linguistics 8, 1–42
Kiss, É. Katalin 1981, ‘Syntactic relations in Hungarian, a ‘free’ word order language’, Linguistic Inquiry 12: 185–215
Kiss, É. Katalin 1985–1986, ‘Parasitic chains’, The Linguistic Review 5: 41–74
É. Kiss, Katalin 1987a, Configurationality in Hungarian, Dordrecht: Reidel
É. Kiss, Katalin 1987b, ‘Is the VP universal?’ in Kenesei (ed.) 1987, pp. 13–87
Kiss, É. Katalin 1988, ‘Még egyszer a magyar mondat intonációjáról és hangsúlyozásáról’, Nyelvtudományi Közlemények 89: 1–52
É. Kiss, Katalin 1990, ‘Why noun–complement clauses are barriers’, in Joan Mascaro and Marina Nespor (eds.), A Festschrift for Henk van Riemsdijk, Dordrecht: Foris, pp. 265–277
É. Kiss, Katalin 1991a, ‘Logical structure in syntactic structure: the case of Hungarian’, in James Huang and Robert May (eds.), Logical Structure and Syntactic Structure, Dordrecht: Reidel, pp. 111–148
É. Kiss, Katalin 1991b, ‘On the locality condition of anaphora and pronominal variable binding’, in Jan Koster and Eric Reuland (eds.), Long Distance Anaphora, Cambridge University Press, pp. 245–261
É. Kiss, Katalin 1991c, ‘An argument for movement’, in K. Netter and H. Haider (eds.), Representation versus Derivation, Dordrecht: Reidel, pp. 199–217
É. Kiss, Katalin 1992, ‘Az egyszerű mondat szerkezete’, in Kiefer (ed.) 1992b, pp. 79–178
Kiss, É. Katalin 1993, ‘Wh-movement and specificity’, Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 11: 85–120
É. Kiss, Katalin 1994a, ‘Sentence structure and word order’, in Kiefer and É. Kiss (eds.) 1994, pp. 1–90
É. Kiss, Katalin 1994b, ‘Scrambling as the base generation of random complement order’, in Norbert Corver and Henk van Riemsdijk (eds.), Studies on Scrambling. Movement and Non-movement Approaches to Free-word-order Phenomena, Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 221–256
Kiss, É. Katalin 1995a, ‘Multiple topic, one focus?’, GLOW Newsletter 34: 73
É. Kiss, Katalin 1995b, ‘Többszörös fókusz a magyar mondatszerkezetben’, in Büky and Maleczki (eds.) 1995, pp. 47–66
É. Kiss, Katalin 1995c, ‘The definiteness effect revisited’, in Kenesei (ed.) 1995, pp. 63–88
Kiss, É. Katalin 1996, ‘Two subject positions in English’, The Linguistic Review 13: 119–142
Kiss, É. Katalin 1998a, ‘Multiple topic, one focus?’ Acta Linguistica Hungarica 45: 3–30
Kiss, É. Katalin 1998b, ‘Identificational focus versus information focus’, Language 74: 245–273
É. Kiss, Katalin 1998c, ‘Discourse-configurationality in the languages of Europe’, in Anna Siewierska (ed.), Constituent Order in the Languages of Europe, Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 681–729
É. Kiss, Katalin 1998d, ‘Mondattan’, in K. É. Kiss, Ferenc Kiefer, and Péter Siptár, Új magyar nyelvtan, Budapest: Osiris, pp. 15–185
É. Kiss, Katalin 1999a, ‘Verbal prefixes or postpositions? Postpositional aspectualizers in Hungarian’, in de Groot and Kenesei (eds.), pp. 123–148
É. Kiss, Katalin 1999b, ‘Strategies of complex predicate formation and the Hungarian Verbal Complex’, in Kenesei (ed.) 1999, pp. 115–136
É. Kiss, Katalin 2000a, ‘The Hungarian noun phrase is like the English noun phrase’, in Alberti and Kenesei (eds.) 2000, pp. 119–150
É. Kiss, Katalin 2000b, ‘A [+referáló] és [+specifikus] jegyek ellenőrzése a kontrasztív topik esetében’, in Büky and Maleczki (eds.) 2000, pp. 85–97
É. Kiss, Katalin 2001, ‘Parasitic chains revisited’, in Peter W. Culicover and Paul M. Postal (eds.), Parasitic Gaps, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 99–123
É. Kiss, Katalin to appear, ‘The EPP in a topic-prominent language’, in Peter Svenonius (ed.), Subjects, Topics, and the EPP, Oxford-New York: Oxford University Press
É. Kiss, Katalin and Ferenc Kiefer (eds.) 1994, The Syntactic Structure of Hungarian: Syntax and Semantics 27, San Diego / New York: Academic Press
É. Kiss, Katalin, Ferenc Kiefer, and Péter Siptár 1998, Új Magyar Nyelvtan, Budapest: Osiris
Emonds, Joseph 1978, A Transformational Approach to English Syntax, New York: Academic Press
Enç, Mürvet 1991, ‘The semantics of specificity’, Linguistic Inquiry 22: 21–25
Farkas, Donka 1986, ‘The syntactic position of focus in Hungarian’, Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 4: 77–96
Farkas, Donka 1987, ‘Direct object pro in Hungarian’, in Kenesei (ed.) 1987, pp. 191–211
Farkas, Donka 1990, ‘Two cases of underspecification in morphology’, Linguistic Inquiry 21: 539–550
Giannakidou, Anastasia 2000, ‘Negative … concord?’ Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 18: 457–523
Giannakidou, Anastasia and J. Quer 1995, ‘Two mechanisms for the licensing of indefinites’, in L. Gabriele et al. (eds.), Papers from the 6th Annual Meeting of the Formal Linguistics Society of Midamerica, Bloomington, IN: IULC Publications
Greenberg, Joseph H. 1966, ‘Some universals of grammar with particular reference to the order of meaningful elements’, in Joseph Greenberg (ed.), Universals of Language, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 73–113
Grimshaw, Jane 1990, Argument Structure, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
Grimshaw, Jane 1991, ‘Extended projection’, ms., Brandeis University
Groot, Casper de 1981, ‘Sentence intertwining in Hungarian’, in M. A. Bolkenstein et al. (eds.), Predication and Expression in Functional Grammar, New York: Academic Press, 41–64
Groot, Casper de and István Kenesei (eds.) 1998, Approaches to Hungarian 5, Szeged: JATE
Gyuris, Beáta 1999, ‘The interpretation of adverbial quantifiers in contrastive topic in Hungarian’, in Matako Hirotani and Andries Coetze (eds.), Proceedings of NELS 30, Amherst, MA: University of Massachusetts, pp. 259–274
Gyuris, Beáta 2000, ‘Contrastive topics crosslinguistically’, paper presented at the 2nd International Conference in Contrastive Semantics and Pragmatics, Sept. 11–13, Cambridge
Haader, Lea 1998, ‘A mondatátszövődés a nyelvhasználat szemszögéből’, Magyar Nyelvőr 122: 318–324
Haegeman, Liliane 1995, The Syntax of Negation, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Haegeman, Liliane and Zanuttini, R. 1991, ‘Negative heads and the Neg Criterion’, The Linguistic Review 8: 233–251
Hallman, Peter 1998, ‘Reiterative syntax’, in J. Black and V. Motapayane (eds.), Clitics, Pronouns, and Movements. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 87–131
Herburger, Elena 1997, ‘Focus and weak noun phrases’, Natural Language Semantics 5: 53–78
Horvath, Julia 1986a, Focus in the Theory of Grammar and the Syntax of Hungarian, Dordrecht: Foris
Horvath, Julia 1986b, ‘Remarks on the configurationality issue’, in Abraham and de Meij (eds.) 1986, pp. 65–87
Horvath, Julia 1987, ‘On models with a VP-less phrase structure’, in Kenesei (ed.) 1987, pp. 133–165
Horvath, Julia 1990, ‘Parasitic gap constructions: an adjunct/argument asymmetry’, in Kenesei (ed.) 1990, pp. 65–94
Horvath, Julia 1992, ‘Anti-c-command and case-compatibility in the licensing of parasitic chains’, The Linguistic Review 9, 183–218
Horvath, Julia 1995, ‘Partial wh-movement and wh-scope-markers’, in Kenesei (ed.) 1995, pp. 89–124
Horvath, Julia 1997, ‘The status of “Wh-expletives” and the partial Wh-movement construction in Hungarian’, Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 15: 509–572
Horvath, Julia 1998, ‘Wh-phrases and the wh-scope-marker strategy in Hungarian interrogatives’, Acta Linguistica Hungarica 45: 31–60
Hunyadi, László 1986, ‘The expression of logical scope in Hungarian: on its syntax and semantics’, in Abraham and de Meij (eds.) 1986, pp. 89–102
Hunyadi, László 1997, Hungarian Sentence Prosody and Universal Grammar: Studies in Applied Linguistics 3, Debrecen: Kossuth Lajos University
Hunyadi, László 1999, ‘The outlines of a metrical syntax of Hungarian’, Acta Linguistica Hungarica 46, 69–94
Jacobs, Joachim 1986, ‘The syntax of focus and adverbials in German’, in Abraham and de Meij (eds.) 1986, pp. 103–127
Jakab, Edit 1998, talk presented at the Fourth International Conference on the Structure of Hungarian, Pécs: Janus Pannonius University
Kálmán, C. György et al. 1989, A magyar segédigék rendszere. Általános Nyelvészeti Tanulmányok 17: 49–103
Kálmán, László et al. 1986, ‘Hocus, focus, and verb types in Hungarian infinitive constructions’, in Abraham and de Meij (eds.) 1986, pp. 129–142
Kálmán, László 1990, ‘Deferred information: the semantics of commitment’, in László Kálmán and László Pólos (eds.), Papers from the Second Symposium on Logic and Language, Budapest: Akadémiai Kiadó, pp. 125–157
Kálmán, László 1995, ‘Definiteness effect verbs in Hungarian’, in Kenesei (ed.) 1995, pp. 221–242
Kayne, Richard 1994, The Antisymmetry of Syntax, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
Kenesei, István (ed.) 1985, Approaches to Hungarian 1, Szeged: JATE
Kenesei, István 1986, ‘On the logic of Hungarian word order’, in Abraham and de Meij (eds.) 1986, pp. 143–159
Kenesei, István (ed.) 1987, Approaches to Hungarian 2, Szeged: JATE
Kenesei, István 1989, ‘On the interaction of lexical structure and logical form in pronominal binding’, in László Marácz and Pietr Muysken (eds.), Configurationality: The Typology of Asymmetries, Dordrecht: Reidel
Kenesei, István (ed.) 1990, Approaches to Hungarian 3, Szeged: JATE
Kenesei, István 1992, ‘Az alárendelt mondatok szerkezete’, in Kiefer (ed.) 1992b, pp. 529–714
Kenesei, István 1994, ‘Subordinate clauses’, in Kiefer and É. Kiss (eds.) 1994, pp. 275–354
Kenesei, István (ed.) 1995, Approaches to Hungarian 5, Szeged: JATE
Kenesei, István 1998, ‘Adjuncts and arguments in VP-focus in Hungarian’, Acta Linguistica Hungarica 45: 61–88
Kenesei, István (ed.) 1999, Crossing Boundaries, Amsterdam: John Benjamins
Kenesei, István 2000, ‘Van-e segédige a magyarban?’, in Kenesei (ed.), Igei vonzatstruktúrák a magyarban, Budapest: Osiris, pp. 157–196
Kenesei, István and Csaba Pléh (eds.) 1992, Approaches to Hungarian 4, Szeged: JATE
Khalaily, Shamir 1995, ‘QR and the minimalist theory of syntax: the case of universally and negative quantified expressions in Palestinian Arabic’, ms., University of Leiden
Kiefer, Ferenc 1967, On Emphasis and Word Order in Hungarian, Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press
Kiefer, Ferenc 1992a, ‘Az aspektus és a mondat szerkezete’, in Kiefer (ed.) 1992b, pp. 797–886
Kiefer, Ferenc (ed.) 1992b, Strukturális magyar nyelvtan 1. Mondattan, Budapest: Akadémiai Kiadó
Kiefer, Ferenc 1994a, ‘Aspect and syntactic structure’, in Kiefer and É. Kiss (eds.) 1994, pp. 415–464
Kiefer, Ferenc 1994b, ‘Some peculiarities in the aspectual system of Hungarian’, in C. Bache, H. Basbøll, and C. E. Lindberg (eds.), Tense–Aspect–Aspectuality, Berlin: de Gruyter
Kiefer, Ferenc (ed.) 2000, Strukturális magyar nyelvtan 3: Morfológia, Budapest: Akadémiai Kiadó
Kiefer, Ferenc and Katalin É. Kiss (eds.) 1994, The Syntactic Structure of Hungarian: Syntax and Semantics 27. San Diego / New York: Academic Press
Kinyalolo, Kasangati 1990, Syntactic Dependencies and the Spec–Head Agreement Hypothesis in KiLega, Ph.D. dissertation, UCLA
Komlósy, András 1985, ‘Predicate complementation’, in Kenesei (ed.) 1985, pp. 53–75
Komlósy, András 1992, ‘Régensek és vonzatok’, in Kiefer (ed.) 1992b, pp. 299–529
Komlósy, András 1994, ‘Complements and adjuncts’, in É. Kiss and Kiefer (eds.) 1994, pp. 91–178
Koopman, Hilda and Anna Szabolcsi 2000, Verbal Complexes, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
Kratzer, Angelika 1995, ‘Stage-level and individual-level predicates’, in G. N. Carlson and F. J. Pelletier (eds.), The Generic Book, Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press, pp. 125–175
Krifka, Manfred 1992, ‘A framework for focus-sensitive quantification’, in Ch. Barker and David Dowty (eds.), SALT II. Proceedings from the Second Conference on Semantics and Linguistic Theory, Working Papers in Linguistics 40, Columbus, OH: Ohio State University, pp. 215–236
Kuno, Susumu 1973, Japanese Grammar, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
Laczkó, Tibor 1985, ‘Deverbal nominals and their complements in noun phrases’, in Kenesei (ed.), pp. 93–119
Laczkó, Tibor 1990, ‘On arguments and adjuncts of derived nominals: a lexical-functional approach’, in Kenesei (ed.) 1990, pp. 123–147
Laczkó, Tibor 1995a, The Syntax of Hungarian Noun Phrases: MetaLinguistica 2, Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang
Laczkó, Tibor 1995b, ‘On the status of való in adjectivalized constituents in noun phrases’, in Kenesei (ed.) 1995, pp. 125–152
Ladusaw, William 1992. ‘Expressing negation’, in Ch. Barker and D. Dowty (eds.), SALT II. Proceedings from the Second Conference on Semantics and Linguistic Theory, Working Papers in Linguistics 40, Columbus, OH: Ohio State University, pp. 237–259
Ladusaw, William 1994. ‘Thetic and categorical, stage and individual, weak and strong’, in M. Harvey and L. Santelman (eds.), SALT 4, Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, pp. 220–229
Lipták, Anikó 1998, ‘A magyar fókuszemelések egy minimalista elemzése’, in Büky and Maleczki (eds.) 1998, pp. 93–116
Lipták, Anikó 2000, ‘On the difference between focus movement and wh-movement’, GLOW Newsletter 44: 78–79
Maleczki, Márta 1992, ‘Bare common nouns and their relation to the temporal constitution of events in Hungarian’, in Paul Dekker and Martin Stokhof (eds.), Proceedings of the Eighth Amsterdam Colloquium, Institute for Logic, Language, and Computation, Amsterdam University, pp. 347–365
Maleczki, Márta 1995, ‘On the definiteness effect in Hungarian’, in Kenesei (ed.) 1995, pp. 263–284
Maleczki, Márta 1999, ‘Weak subjects in fixed space’, Acta Linguistica Hungarica 46: 95–118
Marácz, László 1986a, ‘Dressed or naked: the case of the PP in Hungarian’, in Abraham and de Meij (eds.) 1986, pp. 227–252
Marácz, László 1986b, ‘On coreferential and bound variable interpretation in non-configurational languages’, Theoretical Linguistic Research 2: 85–172
Marácz, László 1988, ‘Locality and correspondence effects in Hungarian’, in A. Cardinaletti, G. Cinque, and G. Giusti (eds.), Annali di Ca' Foscari, Constituent Structure. Papers from the 1987 GLOW Conference, Venezia, pp. 203–237
Marácz, László 1989, Asymmetries in Hungarian, Ph.D. dissertation, University of Groningen
May, Robert 1985, Logical Form, Its Structure and Derivation, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
Molnár, Valéria 1998, ‘Topic in focus: the syntax, phonology, semantics, and pragmatics of the so-called “contrastive topic” in Hungarian and German’, Acta Linguistica Hungarica 45: 89–166
Olsvay, Csaba 1999, ‘The Hungarian verbal complex: an alternative approach’, paper presented at the workshop on verb clusters Dutch–Hungarian Study Center, Öttevény, Oct. 1999
Olsvay, Csaba 2000a, ‘Formális jegyek egyeztetése a magyar nemsemleges mondatokban’, in Büky and Maleczki (eds.) 2000, pp. 119–152
Olsvay, Csaba 2000b, Negative Quantifiers in the Hungarian Sentence, MA Thesis, Eötvös Loránd University, Budapest
Payne, John and Erika Chisarik 2000, ‘Demonstrative constructions in Hungarian’, in Alberti and Kenesei (eds.) 2000, pp. 179–198
Pesetsky, David 1987, ‘Wh-in-situ: movement and unselective binding’, in Eric Reuland and Alice ter Meulen (eds.), The Representation of (In)definiteness, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 98–129
Piñon, Christopher 1992, ‘Heads in the focus field’, in Kenesei and Pléh (eds.) 1992, pp. 99–122
Piñon, Christopher 1995, ‘Around the progressive in Hungarian’, in Kenesei (ed.) 1995, pp. 153–191
Puskás, Genovéva 1998, ‘On the Neg Criterion in Hungarian’, Acta Linguistica Hungarica 45: 167–213
Puskás, Genovéva 2000, Word Order in Hungarian: The Syntax of A′ Positions, Amsterdam: John Benjamins
Rebrus, Péter 2000, ‘Morfofonológiai jelenségek a magyarban’, in Kiefer (ed.) 2000, pp. 763–949
Reinhart, Tanya 1983, Anaphora and Semantic Interpretation, London: Croom Helm
Riemsdijk, Henk van 1998, ‘Categorial feature magnetism: the endocentricity and distribution of projections’, Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics 2: 1–18
Rouveret, Alain 1991, ‘Functional categories and agreement’, The Linguistic Review 8, 353–387
Stechow, Arnim von and Susanne Uhmann 1986, ‘Some remarks on focus projection’, in Abraham and de Meij (eds.) 1986, pp. 295–320
Stowell, Timothy 1981, Origins of Phrase Structure, Ph.D. dissertation, Cambridge, MA: MIT
Surányi, Balázs 2000, ‘Operator and head movement in Hungarian: from checking to marking’, DOXIMP 4, Research Institute for Linguistics, Hungarian Academy of Sciences, Working Papers in the Theory of Grammar 7, 1: 35–45
Szabolcsi, Anna 1980, ‘Az aktuális mondattagolás szemantikájához’, Nyelvtudományi Közlemények 82: 59–82
Szabolcsi, Anna 1981a, ‘The semantics of topic-focus articulation’, in Jan Groenendijk et al. (eds.), Formal Methods in the Study of Language, Amsterdam: Matematisch Centrum
Szabolcsi, Anna 1981b, ‘The possessive construction in Hungarian: a configurational category in a non-configurational language’, Acta Linguistica Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae 31, 261–289
Szabolcsi, Anna 1981c, ‘Compositionality in focus’, Folia Linguistica 15: 141–162
Szabolcsi, Anna 1983a, ‘Focussing properties, or the trap of first order’, Theoretical Linguistics 10: 125–145
Szabolcsi, Anna 1983b, ‘The possessor that ran away from home’, The Linguistic Review 3: 89–102
Szabolcsi, Anna 1986, ‘From definiteness effect to lexical integrity’, in Abraham and de Meij (eds.) 1986, pp. 321–348
Szabolcsi, Anna 1992a, A birtokos szerkezet és az egzisztenciális mondat, Budapest: Akadémiai Kiadó
Szabolcsi, Anna 1992b, ‘Subject suppression or lexical PRO? The case of derived nominals in Hungarian’, Lingua 86, 149–176
Szabolcsi, Anna 1994a, ‘The noun phrase’, in Kiefer and É. Kiss (eds.) 1994, pp. 179–274
Szabolcsi, Anna 1994b, ‘All quantifiers are not equal: the case of focus’, Acta Linguistica Hungarica 42: 171–187
Szabolcsi, Anna 1997a, ‘Strategies for scope taking’, in Szabolcsi (ed.) 1997b, pp. 109–154
Szabolcsi, Anna (ed.) 1997b, Ways of Scope Taking, Dordrecht: Kluwer
Szabolcsi, Anna and Tibor Laczkó 1992, ‘A főnévi csoport szerkezete’, in Kiefer (ed.), pp. 179–298
Szendrői, Kriszta 1999, ‘Stress driven Focus Movement and stress avoiding verbs’, paper presented at the Workshop on verb clusters Dutch–Hungarian Study Center, Öttevény, Oct. 1999
Tóth, Ildikó 1999, ‘Negative polarity item licensing in Hungarian’, Acta Linguistica Hungarica 46: 119–142
Tóth, Ildikó 2000a, Inflected infinitives in Hungarian, Ph.D. dissertation, Tilburg University
Tóth, Ildikó 2000b, ‘-va and -ván participles in Hungarian’, in Alberti and Kenesei (eds.) 2000, pp. 237–258
Varga, László 1999, ‘Rhythmical variation in Hungarian’, Phonology 15, 227–266
Vogel, Irene and Kenesei, István 1987, ‘The interface between phonology and other components of grammar’, Phonology 4: 243–263
Williams, Edwin 1987, ‘Implicit arguments, the binding theory, and control’, Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 5: 151–180
Zanuttini, Raffaela 1997, Negation and Clausal Structure, Oxford: Oxford University Press
Zolnay, Gyula 1926, ‘Mondatátszövődés’, Értekezések a Magyar Tudományos Akadémia Nyelv- és Széptudományi Osztálya Köréből23
