Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-jr42d Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T00:55:21.637Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

“Global” Supervenient Determination: Too Permissive?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 March 2010

Elias E. Savellos
Affiliation:
State University of New York
Umit D. Yalcin
Affiliation:
East Carolina University
Get access

Summary

Introduction

Everything whatever is determined by the physical. So goes the sweeping physicalist slogan. The thesis is “global” in the sense, among others, of being about all things and their properties everywhere everywhen. For each thing in the world and for any nonphysical property it may have – mental, semantic, valuational, whatever – physical conditions determine whether it has that property. An equivalent formulation of the thesis, current in the literature, is this: given the physical conditions that obtain in our world, and given any other world in which the same physical conditions obtain, the two worlds are the same as regards what things have what nonphysical properties. Worlds that are physical duplicates are duplicates in nonphysical conditions as well.

Which worlds? Probably the physically possible worlds (the ppws) – those in which the laws of physics hold. The sweeping thesis is not meant as a logically or conceptually necessary truth, and as we will see in Section 5, the empirical evidence for it warrants generalization only over the ppws. In any case, the thesis is “global” in a further sense: it generalizes over all the relevant worlds and over whole worlds to boot. This is especially clear in the following formulation, also current: in ppws, the physical conditions φ determine the nonphysical conditions ψ iff

(D) Given any two ppws, if the same φ-conditions obtain in both, the same ψ-conditions obtain in both,

where the same physical (or other) conditions obtain in both of two worlds just in case, for each such condition χ, χ obtains in one iff χ obtains in the other.

Type
Chapter
Information
Supervenience
New Essays
, pp. 73 - 100
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×