Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-5g6vh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T20:59:10.242Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

13 - Ethical Issues in Biohistory: No Easy Answers!

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 January 2017

Christopher M. Stojanowski
Affiliation:
Arizona State University
William N. Duncan
Affiliation:
East Tennessee State University
Get access

Summary

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Studies in Forensic Biohistory
Anthropological Perspectives
, pp. 288 - 314
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2017

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abadie, A. and Gay, S. (2006). The impact of presumed consent legislation on cadaveric organ donation: A cross-country study. Journal of Health Economics, 25(4), 599620.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ajita, R. and Singh, Y. I. (2007). Body donation and its relevance in anatomy learning: A review. Journal of the Anatomical Society of India, 56(1), 4447.Google Scholar
Allen, M. J. (2011). “Sacrilege of a strange, contemporary kind”: The Unknown Soldier and the imagined community after the Vietnam War. History & Memory, 23(2), 90131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, B. and Harvey, T. (1996). Alterations in cortical thickness and neuronal density in the frontal cortex of Albert Einstein. Neuroscience Letters, 210(3), 161164.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Andrews, L. B. (1998). Do the dead have interests? Policy issues for research after life (with D. Nelkin). American Journal of Law and Medicine, 24(2–3), 261291.Google Scholar
Andrews, L. B. (2005). Harnessing the benefits of biobanks. The Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics, 33(1), 2230.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Andrews, L. B. and Nelkin, D. (2001). Body Bazaar: The Market for Human Tissue in the Biotechnology Age (1st edition). New York: Crown Publishers.Google Scholar
Andrews, L. B., Buenger, N. Bridge, J., et al. (2004). Constructing ethical guidelines for biohistory. Science, 304(5668), 215216.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Aubry, B. S. (2009). Population Structure and Interregional Interaction in Pre-Hispanic Meso-America: A Biodistance Study. PhD dissertation, Ohio State University.Google Scholar
Baglow, J. S. (2007). The rights of the corpse. Mortality, 12(3), 223239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baldwin Smith, L. (2012). Henry VIII. Gloucesteshire: Amberley Publishing.Google Scholar
Ben-Ari, Y. (2008). Neuro-archaeology: Pre-symptomatic architecture and signature of neurological disorders. Trends in Neuroscience, 31(12), 626636.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Biller, J. (2008). The Interface of Neurology & Internal Medicine. Philadelphia, PA: Wolters Kluwer Health/Lippincott Wiliams & Wilkins.Google Scholar
Bolnick, D. A., Bonine, H. M., Mata-Míguez, J., et al. (2012). Nondestructive sampling of human skeletal remains yields ancient nuclear and mitochondrial DNA. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 147(2), 293300.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Boulware, L. E., Ratner, L. E., Cooper, L. A., et al. (2004). Whole body donation for medical science: A population-based study. Clinical Anatomy, 17(7), 570577.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bourne, W. M. (1980). One-year observation of transplanted human corneal endothelium. Ophthalmology, 87(7), 673679.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Boutin, A. (2011). Crafting a bioarchaeology of personhood: Osteobiographical narratives from Alalakh. In Breathing New Life into the Evidence of Death, eds. Baadsgaard, A., Boutin, Alexis T., and Buikstra, Jane E.. Santa Fe, NM: School for Advanced Research Press, pp. 109133.Google Scholar
Boutin, A. (2012). Written in stone, written in bone: The osteobiography of a Bronze Age craftsman from Alalakh. In The Bioarchaeology of Individuals, eds. Stodder, A. L. W. and Palkovich, A. M.. Gainesville, FL: University Press of Florida, pp. 193214.Google Scholar
Boutin, A. (2016). Exploring the social construction of disability: An application of the bioarchaeology of personhood model to a pathological skeleton from Ancient Bahrain. International Journal of Paleopathology, 12, 1728.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Braudy, L. (1986). The Frenzy of Renown: A History of Fame. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Brück, J. (2006). Fragmentation, personhood and the social construction of technology in Middle and Late Bronze Age Britain. Cambridge Archaeological Journal, 16(3), 297315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buenger, N. (2004). Connective tissues: Ethical guidelines for biohistorical research. Journal of the American Institute for Conservation, 43(3), 227236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buikstra, J. E., Baadsgaard, A., and Boutin, A. T. (2012). Breathing new life into the evidence of death: Introduction. In Breathing New Life into the Evidence of Death: Contemporary Approaches to Bioarchaeology, eds. Baadsgaard, A., Boutin, A. T., and Buikstra, J. E.. Santa Fe, NM: School for Advanced Research Press, pp. 328.Google Scholar
Callahan, J. C. (1987). On harming the dead. Ethics, 97(2), 341352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Calza, C., Anjos, M. J., de Souza, S. M. F. M., et al. (2007). X-ray microfluorescence analysis of pigments in decorative paintings from the sarcophagus cartonnage of an Egyptian mummy. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section B: Beam Interactions with Materials and Atoms, 263(1), 249252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carollo, K. (2011). First double leg transplant patient may soon walk. ABC World News, July 12.Google Scholar
Cerezo-Román, J. I. (2014). Pathways to personhood: Cremation as a social practice among the Tucson basin Hohokam. In Transformation by Fire: The Archaeology of Cremation in Cultural Context, ed. Cooney, G.. Tucson, AZ: University of Arizona Press. pp. 148167.Google Scholar
Chandler, J. J. (1984). The Einstein sign: The clinical picture of acute cholecystitis caused by ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm. The New England Journal of Medicine, 310(23), 1538.Google ScholarPubMed
Charlier, P. (2010). Une patiente d’Ambroise Paré: Autopsie des restes de Diane de Poitiers. La Revue Du Practicien, 60, 290293.Google ScholarPubMed
Charlier, P. (2012). The Saturday profile: After liberte and égalite, it’s autopsie. New York Times, July 6.Google Scholar
Charlier, P. (2014). Naming the body (or the bones): Human remains, anthropological/medical collections, religious beliefs, and restitution. Clinical Anatomy, 27(3), 291295.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Charlier, P., Huynh-Charlier, I., Brun, L., et al. (2014). Maori heads (mokomokai): The usefulness of a complete forensic analysis procedure. Forensic Science, Medicine, and Pathology, 10(3), 371379.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Claire, G. (2011). L’exposition anatomique “Our Body”: Une atteinte à la dignité du cadavre? Médecine & Droit, 108, 136142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crossland, Z. (2009a). Acts of estrangement: The post-mortem making of self and other. Archaeological Dialogues, 16(1), 102125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crossland, Z. (2009b). Of clues and signs: The dead body and its evidential traces. American Anthropologist, 111(1), 6980.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crossland, Z. (2010). Materiality and embodiment. In Oxford Handbook of Material Culture Studies, eds. Hicks, D. and Beaudry, M. C.. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 386405.Google Scholar
Davidson, G. W. (1996). Abraham Lincoln and the DNA controversy. Journal of the Abraham Lincoln Association, 17(1), 120.Google Scholar
de Baets, A. (2004). A declaration of the responsibilities of present generations toward past generations. History and Theory, 43(4), 130164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Baets, A. (2007). A successful utopia: The doctrine of human dignity. Historein: A Review of the Past and Other Stories, 7, 7185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dubernard, J. M., Petruzzo, P., Lanzetta, M., et al. (2003). Functional results of the first human double-hand transplantation. Annals of Surgery, 238(1), 128136.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Duncan, W. N. and Hageman, J. B. (2015). House or lineage? How intracemetery kinship analysis contributes to the debate in the Maya Area. In Archaeology and Bioarchaeology of Population Movement among the Prehispanic Maya, ed. Cucina, A.. New York: Springer, pp. 133142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ericson, J. E. and Buikstra, J. E. (1993). The examination and analysis of the remains of Christopher Columbus and family: Research design. Atti del Congresso Internazionale “Dai feudi Monferrini e dal Piemonte ai nuovi mondi oltre gli Oceani,” 27, 445486.Google Scholar
Erin, C. A. and Harris, J. (2003). An ethical market in human organs. Journal of Medical Ethics, 29(3), 137138.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Evans, J. A., Chenery, C. A., and Fitzpatrick, A. P. (2006). Bronze Age childhood migration of individuals near Stonehenge, revealed by strontium and oxygen isotope tooth enamel. Archaeometry, 48(2), 309321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feinberg, J. (1974). The rights of animals and unborn generations. In Philosophy and Environmental Crisis, ed. Blackstone, W.. Athens, GA: University of Georgia Press, pp. 4368.Google Scholar
Foltyn, J. L. (2008a). The corpse in contemporary culture: Identifying, transacting, and recoding the dead body in the twenty-first century. Mortality, 13(2), 99104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foltyn, J. L. (2008b). Dead famous and dead sexy: Popular culture, forensics, and the rise of the corpse. Mortality, 13(2), 153173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foltyn, J. L. (2011). Corpse chic: Dead models and living corpses in fashion photography. In Fashion Forward, ed. de Witt-Paul, A. and Crouch, M.. Oxford: Inter-Disciplinary Press, pp. 379392.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foster, E. A., Jobling, M. A., Taylor, P. G., et al. (1998). Jefferson fathered slave’s last child. Nature, 396(6706), 2728.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foucault, M. (2003). Abnormal: Lectures at the College de France, 1974–1975. New York: Picador.Google Scholar
Fowler, C. (2004). The Archaeology of Personhood: An Anthropological Approach. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gell, A. (1998). Art and Agency: An Anthropological Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gillespie, S. D. (2001). Personhood, agency, and mortuary ritual: A case study from the ancient Maya. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology, 20(1), 73112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ginzburg, C. (1980). The Cheese and the Worms: The Cosmos of a Sixteenth-Century Miller. Middlesex: Harmondsworth.Google Scholar
Ginzburg, C. (2012). Our words and theirs: A reflection on the historian’s craft today. In Historical Knowledge: In Quest of Theory, Method and Evidence, eds. Fellman, S. and Rahikainen, M.. Cambridge: Cambridge Scholars Publishing, pp. 97114.Google Scholar
Ginzburg, C. (2013). Clues, Myths, and the Historical Method. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glaister, J., Ruxton, B., and Brash, J. C. (1937). Medico-Legal Aspects of the Ruxton Case. Edinburgh: E. & S. Livingstone.Google Scholar
Gorer, G. (1955). The pornography of death. Encounter, 5(4), 4952.Google Scholar
Hallam, E. (2010). Articulating bones: An epilogue. Journal of Material Culture, 15(4), 465492.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Handler, S. D., Miller, L., Richmond, K. H., and Baranak, C. C. (1986). Post-tonsillectomy hemorrhage: Incidence, prevention and management. The Laryngoscope, 96(11), 12431247.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Harper, S. (2010). The social agency of dead bodies. Mortality, 15(4), 308322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Höss, M., Jaruga, P., Zastawny, T. H., Dizdaroglu, M., and Pääbo, S. (1996). DNA damage and DNA sequence retrieval from ancient tissues. Nucleic Acids Research, 24(7), 13041307.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hughes, M. (2013). US soldier undergoes successful double arm transplant. The Telegraph, January 29.Google Scholar
Institute of Medicine. (2016). Mitochondrial Replacement Techniques: Ethical, Social, and Policy Considerations. Washington, DC: National Academies of Sciences.Google Scholar
Johannsen, N. (2012). Archaeology and the inanimate agency proposition: A critique and a suggestion. In Excavating the Mind: Cross-sections through Culture, Cognition and Materiality, eds. Johannsen, N., Jessen, M. D., and Jensen, H. Juel. Aarhus: Aarhus University Press, pp. 305347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Joralemon, D. (1995). Organ wars: The battle for body parts. Medical Anthropology Quarterly, 9(3), 335356.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Joyce, R. A. (1998). Performing the body in pre-Hispanic Central America. RES: Anthropology and Aesthetics, 33, 147165.Google Scholar
Joyce, R. A. (2001). Burying the dead at Tlatilco: Social memory and social identities. Archeological Papers of the American Anthropological Association, 10(1), 1226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Joyce, R. A. (2005). Archaeology of the body. Annual Reviews of Anthropology, 34, 139158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Joyce, R. A. (2015a). Grave responsibilities: Encountering human remains. In Disturbing Bodies: Perspectives on Forensic Anthropology, eds. Crossland, Z. and Joyce, R. A.. Santa Fe, NM: School for Advanced Research Press, 167184.Google Scholar
Joyce, R. A. (2015b). History and materiality. Emerging Trends in the Social and Behavioral Sciences: An Interdisciplinary, Searchable, and Linkable Resource, 1–16. doi: 10.1002/9781118900772.etrds0163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Komar, D. A. and Buikstra, J. E. (2008). Forensic Anthropology: Contemporary Theory and Practice. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kugelberg, C. F. (1992). Third molar surgery. Current Opinion in Dentistry, 2, 916.Google ScholarPubMed
Kymionis, G. D., Kankariya, V. P., and Kontadakis, G. A. (2012). Combined treatment with flap amputation, phototherapeutic keratectomy, and collagen crosslinking in severe intractable post-LASIK atypical mycobacterial infection with corneal melt. Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery, 38(4), 713715.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lambert, H. and McDonald, M. (2009). Introduction. In Social Bodies, eds. Lambert, H. and McDonald, M.. New York: Berghahn Books, pp. 115.Google Scholar
Lewis, R. (2006). Judgments of value, judgments of fact: The ethical dimension of biohistorical research. The Public Historian, 28(1), 9399.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lincoln Biohistory Study Group. (2011). Notes on file, Chicago Historical Museum.Google Scholar
Lock, M. (2002). Twice Dead: Organ Transplants and the Reinvention of Death. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Lock, M. (2003). On making up the good-as-dead in a utilitarian world. In Remaking Life & Death, eds. Franklin, S. and Lock, M.. Santa Fe, NM: School for Advanced Research Press, pp. 165192.Google Scholar
Magnússon, S. G. and Szijártó, I. M. (2013). What is Microhistory? Theory and Practice. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Masterton, M. (2010). Duties to Past Persons: Moral Standing and Posthumous Interests of Old Human Remains. PhD dissertation, Acta Universitatis Upsaliensis.Google Scholar
McKusick, V. A. (1991). The defect in Marfan syndrome. Nature, 352(6333): 279281.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McSherry, J. P. (2015). The Víctor Jara case and the long struggle against impunity in Chile. Social Justice, 41(3), 5268.Google Scholar
Meskell, L. (1996). The somatization of archaeology: Institutions, discourses, corporeality. Norwegian Archaeological Review, 29(1), 116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meskell, L. (1999). Archaeologies of life and death. American Journal of Archaeology, 103(2), 181199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meskell, L. (2000). Writing the body in archaeology. In Reading the Body: Representations and Remains in the Archaeological Record, ed. Rautman, A. E.. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press, pp. 1324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miyajima, N., Yamakawa, T., Varma, A., et al. (1995). Experience with laparoscopic double gallbladder removal. Surgical Endoscopy, 9(1), 6366.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mularski, J. (2013). Unearthing the past. ReVista, 13(1), 7982.Google Scholar
Novak, S. A. and Kopp, D. (2003). To feed a tree in Zion: Osteological analysis of the 1857 Mountain Meadows massacre. Historical Archaeology, 37(2), 85108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pääbo, S., Poinar, H., Serre, D., et al. (2004). Genetic analyses from ancient DNA. Annual Review of Genetics, 38, 645679.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Paradise, J. and Andrews, L. (2007). Tales from the crypt: Scientific, ethical, and legal considerations for biohistorical analysis of deceased historical figures. Temple Journal of Science, Technology & Environmental Law, 26, 223299.Google Scholar
Penfold-Mounce, R. (2010). Consuming criminal corpses: Fascination with the dead criminal body. Mortality, 15(3), 250265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Penny, D., Haak, W., Balanovsky, O., et al. (2010). Ancient DNA from European early Neolithic farmers reveals their Near Eastern affinities. PLoS Biology, 8(11), e1000536. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1000536.Google Scholar
Pessemier, E. A., Bemmaor, A. C., and Hanssens, D. M. (1977). Willingness to supply human body parts: Some empirical results. Journal of Consumer Research, 4(3), 131140.Google ScholarPubMed
Postel, M. and Kerboull, M. (1970). Total prosthetic replacement in rapidly destructive arthrosis of the hip joint. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, 72, 138144.Google ScholarPubMed
Quigley, C. (1996). The Corpse: A History. London: McFarland and Co.Google Scholar
Relman, D. A. (1993). The identification of uncultured microbial pathogens. The Journal of Infectious Diseases, 168(1), 18.Google ScholarPubMed
Richardson, R. (2000). Death, Dissection and the Destitute. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Robb, J. (2008). Tradition and agency: Human body representations in later prehistoric Europe. World Archaeology, 40(3), 332353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robb, J. (2011). Towards a critical Ötziography: Inventing prehistoric bodies. In Social Bodies, eds. Lambert, H. and McDonald, M.. New York: Berghahn, pp. 100128.Google Scholar
Schwartz, H. (1964). Abraham Lincoln and the Marfan syndrome. Journal of the American Medical Association, 187(7), 473479.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Seltzer, M. (1998). Serial Killers: Death and Life in America’s Wound Culture. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Semm, K. (1983). Endoscopic appendectomy. Endoscopy, 15(2), 5964.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shufeldt, R. W. (1891). Mortuary customs of the Navajo Indians. The American Naturalist, 25(292), 303306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skloot, R. (2010). The Immortal Life of Henrietta Lacks. New York: Crown Publishers.Google Scholar
Sledge, M. (2005). Soldier Dead: How We Recover, Identify, Bury, and Honor our Military Fallen. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Smolensky, K. R. (2009). Rights of the dead. Arizona Legal Studies Discussion Paper 06-27, 763–803.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sotos, J. G. (2008a). The Physical Lincoln, Version 1.1. Mt. Vernon, VA: Mt. Vernon Book Systems.Google Scholar
Sotos, J. G. (2008b) The Physical Lincoln Sourcebook, Version 1.1. Mt. Vernon, VA: Mt. Vernon Book Systems.Google Scholar
Sotos, J. G. (2009). Abraham Lincoln did not have type 5 spinocerebellar ataxia. Historical Neurology, 73(16), 13281332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sotos, J. G. (2010). Reply by the author. Neurology, 74(22), 18371838.Google Scholar
Stodder, A. L. W. and Palkovich, A. M. (eds.) (2012). The Bioarchaeology of Individuals. Gainesville, FL: University Press of Florida.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stone, A. C., Wilbur, A. K., Buikstra, J. E., and Roberts, C. A. (2009). Tuberculosis and leprosy in perspective. Yearbook of Physical Anthropology, 52(549), 6694.Google Scholar
Strathern, A. (1996). Body Thoughts. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strathern, M. (2009). Using bodies to communicate. In Social Bodies, eds. Lambert, H. and McDonald, M.. New York: Berghahn, pp. 148169.Google Scholar
Troyer, J. (2007). Embalmed vision. Mortality, 12(1), 2247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Troyer, J. (2008). Abuse of a corpse: A brief history and re-theorization of necrophilia laws in the USA. Mortality, 13(2), 132152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
United Nations (1950). Yearbook of the United Nations 1948–1949. New York: United Nations.Google Scholar
Vilaça, A. (2009). Bodies in perspective: A critique of the embodiment paradigm from the point of view of Amazonian ethnography. In Social Bodies, eds. Lambert, H. and McDonald, M.. New York: Berghahn Books, pp. 129147.Google Scholar
Wagner, S. (2013). The making and unmaking of an unknown soldier. Social Studies of Science, 43(5), 631656.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Werner, H. M. (2015). Molecular Identification of Mycobacterium Tuberculosis in the Milwaukee County Institution Grounds Cemetery. MS thesis, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee.Google Scholar
Wyndham, M. and Read, P. (2010). From state terrorism to state errorism: Post-Pinochet Chile’s long search for truth and justice. The Public Historian, 32(1), 3144.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zvelebil, M. and Pettitt, P. (2013). Biosocial archaeology of the Early Neolithic: Synthetic analyses of a human skeletal population from the LBK cemetery of Vedrovice, Czech Republic. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology, 32(3), 313329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×