Skip to main content Accessibility help
  • Get access
    Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
  • Cited by 7
  • Print publication year: 2014
  • Online publication date: June 2014

3 - Status Considerations in International Politics and the Rise of Regional Powers


The salience of major powers and the status they are attributed in international politics have been of central concern to both scholars and practitioners. The focus on major powers is at least as old as Thucydides, who noted in the Melian debate the unique advantages these states possessed in structuring relations between states. More recently, realists, neorealists, long-cycle theorists, hierarchical theorists, power transition theorists, and liberal institutionalists have all focused on major powers as critical to ordering interstate relations, as well as attempts to change those orders.

One aspect of being a major power is the status one receives from the policy makers of other states. The attribution of status to major powers – separate from their capabilities – has stubbornly persisted in significance across empirical conflict models, appearing as a predictor of conflict initiation, alliance formation and membership, involvement in militarized interstate disputes (MIDs) and crises, and multilateralism. Such status attribution, as both international relations (IR) scholars and historians have long recognized, is not a mirror reflection of the capabilities of these powers. Italy and Austria-Hungary are two clear historical cases of states that continued to receive high status attribution long after they no longer had the capacity or the willingness to act as major powers.

Thucydides, Complete Writings: The Peloponnesian Wars, trans. Crawley, Richard, adapted by Bald, Suresh (New York: Modern Library, 1951), 331
Kennedy, Paul, The Rise and Fall of the Great Powers (New York: Vintage Books, 1987), 206
Morgenthau, Hans J., Politics Among Nations, sixth edn. (New York: McGraw-Hill: 1985)
Galtung, Johann, “A Structural Theory of Aggression.”Journal of Peace Research 1, no. 2 (1964), 95–119
East, Maurice A., “Status Discrepancy and Violence in the International System: An Empirical Analysis,” in The Analysis of International Politics: Essays in Honor of Harold and Margaret Sprout, eds. Rosenau, James N., Davis, Vincent, and East, Maurice A. (New York: The Free Press, 1972), 299–319
Gilpin, Robert, War and Change in World Politics (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1981)
Midlarsky, Manus, On War: Political Violence in the International System (New York: Free Press, 1975)
Wallace, Michael D., “Power, Status, and International War,”Journal of Peace Research 8, no. 1 (1971), 23–35
Wallace, Michael D., “Status, Formal Organization and Arms Levels as Factors Leading to the Onset of War, 1820–1964,” in Peace, War, and Numbers, ed. Russett, Bruce M. (Beverly Hills, CA: Sage, 1973), 49–69
Deng, Yong, China’s Struggle for Status: The Realignment of International Relations (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008)
Larson, Deborah Welch and Shevchenko, Alexei, “Shortcut to Greatness: The New Thinking and the Revolution in Soviet Foreign Policy,”International Organization 57, no. 1 (Winter 2003), 77–109
Status Seekers: Chinese and Russian Responses to U.S. Primacy,” International Security 34, no. 4 (Spring 2010), 63–95
Mercer, Jonathan, “Anarchy and Identity,”International Organization 49, no. 2 (Spring 1995), 229–252
Mercer, Jonathan, Reputation and International Politics (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1996)
Nayar, Baldev Raj and Paul, T.V., India in the World Order: Searching for Major-Power Status (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003)
Volgy, Thomas J. and Mayhall, Stacey, “Status Inconsistency and International War: Exploring the Effects of Systemic Change,”International Studies Quarterly 39, no. 1 (March 1995), 67–84
Volgy, Thomas J. et al., eds., Major Powers and the Quest for Status in International Politics: Global and Regional Perspectives (New York: Palgrave MacMillan, 2011)
Wohlforth, William C., “Unipolarity, Status Competition, and Great Power War,”World Politics 61, no. 1 (January 2009), 28–57
Organski, A. F. K. and Kugler, Jacek, The War Ledger (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1980)
Lemke, Douglas, “The Continuation of History: Power Transition Theory and the End of the Cold War.”Journal of Peace Research 34, no. 1 (February 1997), 23–36
Strange, Susan, “Toward a Theory of Transnational Empire,” in Global Change and Theoretical Challenges: Approaches to World Politics for the 1990’s, eds. Czempiel, Ernst-Otto and Rosenau, James N. (Lexington, KY: Lexington Books, 1989), 161–176
Volgy, Thomas J. and Bailin, Alison, International Politics and State Strength (Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner, 2003)
Levy, Jack S., War in the Modern Great Power System (Lexington: University Press of Kentucky, 1983)
Larson, Deborah Welch and Shevchenko, Alexei, “Status Seekers: Chinese and Russian Responses to U.S. Primacy,International Security 34, no. 4 (Spring 2010), 63–95
Azar, Edward E., “The Conflict and Peace Data Bank (COPDAB) Project,”Journal of Conflict Resolution 24, no. 1 (March 1980), 143–152)
Goldstein, Joshua, “A Conflict-Cooperation Scale for WEIS Events Data,”Journal of Conflict Resolution 36, no. 2 (June 1992), 369–385)
Bond, Doug et al., “Integrated Data for Events Analysis [IDEA]: An Event Typology for Automated Events Data Development,”Journal of Peace Research 40, no. 6 (November 2003), 733–745)
King, Gary and Lowe, Will, “An Automated Information Extraction Tool for International Conflict Data with Performance as Good as Human Coders: A Rare Events Evaluation Design,”International Organization 57, no. 3 (Summer 2003), 617–42)
Wasserman, Stanley and Faust, Katherine, Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994)
David Singer, J., “Reconstructing the Correlates of War Dataset on Material Capabilities of States, 1816–1985,”International Interactions 14, no. 2 (April 1988), 115–132
Ghosn, Faten, Palmer, Glenn, and Bremer, Stuart A., “The MID3 Data Set, 1993–2001: Procedures, Coding Rules, and Description,”Conflict Management and Peace Science 21, no. 2 (April 2004), 133–154
Volgy, Thomas J. et al., Mapping the New World Order (Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell, 2009)
Kugler, Jacek and Lemke, Douglas, “The Power Transition Research Program: Assessing Theoretical and Empirical Advances,” in Handbook of War Studies II, ed. Midlarsky, Manus (Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 2000), 129–163
Control, United States Arms and Agency, Disarmament, World Military Expenditures and Arms Transfers, 1991–1992 (Washington, D.C.: United States Arms Control and Disarmament Agency, 1994)
Maddison, Angus, The World Economy: A Millennial Perspective (Paris: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, 2001)
Arbetman, Marina and Kugler, Jacek, “The Politics of Inflation: An Empirical Assessment of the Emerging Market Economies,” in Establishing Monetary Stability in Emerging Market Economies, eds. Willett, Thomas D. et al. (Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 1995), 81–100
Stockholm International Peace Research Institute, SIPRI Yearbook 2011: Armaments, Disarmament, and International Security (New York: Oxford University Press, 2011).