Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-wq484 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T19:04:07.663Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

12 - The value of status in management and organization research

A theoretical integration

from Part VI - Developing status and management knowledge

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2012

Jone L. Pearce
Affiliation:
University of California, Irvine
Get access

Summary

Status does matter. All the authors in this volume have demonstrated its value in advancing our understanding of current problems in management and organizational scholarship, and in furthering our understanding of how status affects workplace, organizational, and marketplace actions. In this concluding chapter I highlight a few of the contributions their work on status makes to their fields, address their contributions to our understanding of status more generally, and highlight a few practical implications of their work.

Strategy scholarship

All of the authors help to illuminate the developing consensus that the absence of attention to status can lead to impoverished theories. For example, these authors note that an overemphasis on individual firms as isolated utility maximizers in markets has led to incomplete understandings and possibly misleading theory. This point certainly has been made before. However, most of those making it have sought to emphasize pro-social, cooperative motives in interaction. Scholars of status enrich strategy theory by emphasizing that the social environments of firms are as much arenas of competition as they are for cooperation.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Baugh, S. G.Graen, G. B. 1997 Effects of team gender and racial composition on perceptions of team performance in cross-functional teamsGroup and Organization Management 22 366CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blau, P. M. 1977 Inequality and HeterogeneityNew YorkThe Free PressGoogle Scholar
Blau, P. M. 1994 Structural contexts of opportunitiesUniversity of Chicago PressGoogle Scholar
Brief, A. P. 2008 Diversity at WorkCambridge University PressCrossRef
Byrne, D. 1971 The Attraction ParadigmNew YorkAcademic PressGoogle Scholar
Chatman, J. A.Polzer, J. T.Barsade, S. G.Neale, M. A. 1998 Being different yet feeling similar: The influence of demographic composition and organizational culture on work processes and outcomesAdministrative Science Quarterly 43 749CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chattopadhyay, P. 1999 Beyond direct and symmetrical effects: The influence of demographic dissimilarity on organizational citizenship behaviorAcademy of Management Journal 42 273Google Scholar
Gibson, C. B.Gibbs, J. L. 2006 Unpacking the concept of virtualityAdministrative Science Quarterly 51 451CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pearce, J. L.Xu, Q. J. 2010 Rating performance or contesting status: A test of a Social Dominance Theory of supervisor demographic skew in performance ratingsMerage School Working PaperUniversity of California, IrvineGoogle Scholar
Podolny, J. M. 1993 A status-based model of market competitionAmerican Journal of Sociology 98 829CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ridgeway, C. L.Boyle, E. H.Kuipers, K. J.Robinson, D. T. 1998 How do status beliefs develop? The role of resources and interactional experienceAmerican Sociological Review 63 331CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Riordan, C.Shore, L. 1997 Demographic diversity and employee attitudes: Examination of relational demography within work unitsJournal of Applied Psychology 82 342CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tsui, A. S.Egan, T. D.O’Reilly, C. A. 1992 Being different: Relational demography and organizational attachmentAdministrative Science Quarterly 37 549CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tsui, A. S.Gutek, B. A. 1999 Demographic Differences in Organizations: Current Research and Future DirectionsLanham, MDLexington BooksGoogle Scholar
Umphress, E. E.Smith-Crowe, K.Brief, A. P.Dietz, J.Watkins, M. B. 2007 When birds of a feather flock together and when they do not: Status composition, social dominance orientation, and organizational attractivenessJournal of Applied Psychology 92 396CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, K. Y.O’Reilly, C. A. 1998 Staw, B. M.Sutton, R. I.Research in Organizational BehaviorGreenwich, CT:JAI PressGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×