Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-8kt4b Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-15T19:24:56.356Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

5 - WHY DO SO MANY STATES STAY INTACT?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 September 2012

Joel S. Migdal
Affiliation:
University of Washington
Get access

Summary

On the face of it, it is puzzling that more states do not simply fall apart. Why do their components not fly off in a thousand different directions? It has happened to some in recent years: Lebanon, Yugoslavia, Somalia, Liberia, Zaire, even the vaunted Soviet Union. Why not to others? What can account for the staying power of so many state organizations, most with tens of thousands of workers toiling in hundreds of different agencies with countless sets of varying procedures, goals, interests, pressures, and incentives? All these are scattered across variegated territories with diverse populations. The potential for interagency turmoil, mad grabs for scarce resources, forces pulling in different directions, contestation of internalized global forces, and conflicting priorities seems endless – and all that in an organization harboring the feasibility for inflicting tremendous violence.

Surveying European expansion across five centuries, David Strang found remarkable ability of non-European polities – at least those that were recognized as sovereign – to survive. He found only eleven that went from sovereign to dependent status between 1415 and 1987, and fifteen non-European polities that merged or underwent dissolution. What was striking about the last half of the twentieth century was how many states were created – unprecedented numbers in the annals of world history – and how few disappeared, dissolved, or imploded.

In fact, during the years of the Cold War, one is hard pressed to point to more than a handful of cases in which states vanish or fall apart – perhaps Pakistan and Nigeria for a spell, certainly Lebanon, and then some odd instances such as Egypt, Syria, and the United Arab Republic.

Type
Chapter
Information
State in Society
Studying How States and Societies Transform and Constitute One Another
, pp. 135 - 170
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2001

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×