Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-lvtdw Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-16T21:56:30.805Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

7 - Post-Ottoman Turkey

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2014

Frederick F. Anscombe
Affiliation:
Birkbeck, University of London
Get access

Summary

Viewed from today, Turkey’s construction from the rubble of the Ottoman empire appears to have been a natural step, given Istanbul’s loss of its remaining “non-Turkish” provinces in Europe (Albania, Macedonia, and western Thrace), Asia (the Dodecanese islands, Iraq, eastern and western Arabia, Transjordan, Palestine, and Lebanon), and Africa (Libya, Egypt, and Sudan) between 1911 and 1918. The twelfth of Woodrow Wilson’s famous fourteen points that provided an ostensible blueprint for reshaping the world after the Entente’s victory in 1918 called for secure sovereignty for Turkish Muslim parts of the Ottoman empire. Turkey seems the natural embodiment of this point, but its construction featured arguably the most traumatic direct transition of any part of the empire to nation-state. Unlike in most of the Balkans except Albania, there was serious conflict between native aspirants to political power and between adherents of competing visions of the future. Unlike in Albania, where King Zog gained critical financial and material assistance from Italy, none of the Entente states supported the efforts of any party to restore stability to Anatolia, and indeed some, notably Greece and Britain, showed fierce hostility. The one state to render assistance was another outcast of Europe, Bolshevik Russia, leading to the seemingly odd fact that the eventually strongly anticommunist republic signed its first treaty of friendship with the Soviet Union. Turkey also had advantages compared with Albania and other Balkan post-Ottoman countries, however, that helped it to achieve stable statehood after independence, because Turkey’s founders inherited established political and administrative traditions that were not only recognized but welcomed by a population traumatized by a decade of war, and because the victorious struggle against various hostile powers gave key figures, notably Mustafa Kemal (Atatürk), a degree of legitimacy that no other leader of a country emerging from the Ottoman empire enjoyed. These assets served Atatürk well in his postindependence campaign to make Turkish politics and society into seamless wholes that would be under the full control of a powerful state.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2014

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Wasti, Syed Tanvir, “Feylosof Riza,” MES 38 (2002), 83–100Google Scholar
Dumont, Paul, “La Revolution Impossible: Les Courants d’Opposition en Anatolie 1920–1921,” Cahiers du Monde Russe et Soviétique 19 (1978), 145–6Google Scholar
Mardin, Şerif, “Ideology and Religion in the Turkish Revolution,” IJMES 2 (1971), 198–9Google Scholar
Zürcher, Erik, “The Ottoman Legacy of the Turkish Republic: An Attempt at a New Periodization,” Die Welt des Islams 32 (1992), 244–6Google Scholar
Fischer, Bernd (ed.), Balkan Strongmen: Dictators and Authoritarian Rulers of Southeastern Europe (London: Hurst, 2007)
Dodd, C. H., “The Development of Turkish Democracy,” BriJMES 19 (1992), 16–30Google Scholar
Tachau, Frank, “Language and Politics: Turkish Language Reform,” Review of Politics 26 (1964), 191–204CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brockett, Gavin, “Collective Action and the Turkish Revolution: Towards a Framework for the Social History of the Atatürk Era, 1923–38,” MES 34 (1998), 44–66Google Scholar
Itzkowitz, Norman and Volkan, Vamik, The Immortal Atatürk: A Psychobiography (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1984), 290–1Google Scholar
Poulton, Hugh, Top Hat, Grey Wolf and Crescent: Turkish Nationalism and the Turkish Republic (London: Hurst, 1997), 117–19Google Scholar
Öztürkmen, Arzu, “Folklore on Trial: Pertev Naili Boratav and the Denationalization of Turkish Folklore,” Journal of Folklore Research 42 (2005), 185–216CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Post-Ottoman Turkey
  • Frederick F. Anscombe, Birkbeck, University of London
  • Book: State, Faith, and Nation in Ottoman and Post-Ottoman Lands
  • Online publication: 05 June 2014
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107323926.011
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Post-Ottoman Turkey
  • Frederick F. Anscombe, Birkbeck, University of London
  • Book: State, Faith, and Nation in Ottoman and Post-Ottoman Lands
  • Online publication: 05 June 2014
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107323926.011
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Post-Ottoman Turkey
  • Frederick F. Anscombe, Birkbeck, University of London
  • Book: State, Faith, and Nation in Ottoman and Post-Ottoman Lands
  • Online publication: 05 June 2014
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107323926.011
Available formats
×