Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-7c8c6479df-5xszh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-03-28T10:02:41.561Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

3 - The Breaking of the Premodern Islamic State

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2014

Frederick F. Anscombe
Affiliation:
Birkbeck, University of London
Get access

Summary

Historians commonly treat the reigns of Selim III and Mahmud II as a practically seamless whole, but despite some continuities, Mahmud ruled essentially in opposition to what he had seen of Selim’s practice. Where Selim’s attempts at state strengthening stirred resistance from the established Ottoman military, Mahmud’s disdain for the limits on sultanic action that Selim had accepted spread disaffection and rebellion to a much wider population. Unlike Selim’s, Mahmud’s method of rule was to break extant systems, or at least to cripple them to ensure their subservience; his efforts to topple any power not obviously dependent upon his court created turmoil in both center and provinces, where his actions otherwise had small effect beyond his clients’ seizing a greater part of the wealth of provincial notables while leaving to them, or their families, much of their local influence. In the manner and methods of provincial administration, he changed little on a systematic basis, and his rule brought the empire to the point of collapse. Mahmud felt bound to observe few rules in his campaign to remake the empire into an entity better able to defend itself against its external enemies; in so doing, he alienated subjects who still held to the ideology legitimating Ottoman rule and did not share his conviction that he need not dispense, but rather could dispense with, justice. His decisions also accentuated Muslim ethnic identity by closing to Albanians, Bosnians, Kurds, and Arabs the ranks of the army he founded to replace the janissaries, a move that gave a lasting “Turkish” flavor to the empire. In another move that would prove more clearly damaging in future, he also surrendered much of Istanbul’s long-treasured authority over commerce by concluding an ill-considered trade convention with Britain in 1838. Selim III’s overthrow may have marked one of the low points in Ottoman imperial politics, but Mahmud’s survival on the throne for thirty-one years did not mark an upturn in the empire’s fortunes: at his death, he faced dethronement not by rioters but by a better-organized and cleverer underling, Mehmed (Muhammad) Ali, governor of Egypt. His successor, Abdülmecid I, had to issue a proclamation of intent not to rule as Mahmud had done in order to reconsolidate support for the throne among Muslim and non-Muslim subjects alike. Unlike the Deed of Agreement, this proclamation turned out to be lastingly significant.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2014

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ursinus, Michael, “Die osmanische Balkanprovinzen 1830–1840: Steuerreform als Modernisierungsinstrument,” Südost-Forschungen 55 (1996), 129–60Google Scholar
Ismail, F., “The Making of the Treaty of Bucharest, 1811–1812,” MES 15 (1979), 163–92Google Scholar
Uzunçarşılı, İsmail, Meşhur Rumeli Ayanından Tirsinikli İsmail, Yılık Oğlu Suleyman Ağalar ve Alemdar Mustafa Paşa (Istanbul: Maarif Matbaası, 1942), 33–9Google Scholar
Paxton, Roger, “Nationalism and Revolution: A Re-Examination of the Origins of the First Serbian Insurrection 1804–1807,” EEQ 6 (1972), 337–62Google Scholar
Stokes, Gale, “The Absence of Nationalism in Serbian Politics before 1840,” Canadian Review of Studies in Nationalism 4 (1976), 77–90Google Scholar
Börekçi, Mehmet, Osmanlı İmparatorluğu’nda Sırp Meselesi (Istanbul: Kutup Yıldızı, 2001)Google Scholar
Skiotis, Dennis (Dionysios), “The Lion and the Phoenix: Ali Pasha and the Greek Revolution” (PhD diss., Harvard University, 1971); “Mountain Warriors and the Greek Revolution,” in War, Technology and Society in the Middle East, ed. Parry, V. J. and Yapp, M. E. (London: Oxford University Press, 1975), 308–29Google Scholar
“The Greek Revolution: Ali Pasha’s Last Gamble” in Hellenism and the First Greek War of Liberation (1821–1830): Continuity and Change, ed. Diamandouros, Nikiforos et al. (Thessaloniki: Institute for Balkan Studies, 1976), 97–109
Levy, Avigdor, The Jews of the Ottoman Empire (Princeton: Darwin Press, 1994), 95Google Scholar
Castellan, Georges, Histoire des Balkans (XIVe–XXe siècle) (Paris: Fayard, 1991), 264–5Google Scholar
Couderc, Anna, “Religion et identité nationale en Grèce pendant la révolution d’indépendence (1821–1832): Le creuset ottoman et l’influence occidentale,” in La Perception de l’Héritage Ottoman dans les Balkans, ed. Gangloff, Sylvie (Paris: l’Harmattan, 2005), 24Google Scholar
Masters, Bruce, Christians and Jews in the Ottoman Arab World: The Roots of Sectarianism (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004), 106–7Google Scholar
Makdisi, Ussama, Artillery of Heaven: American Missionaries and the Failed Conversion of the Middle East (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 2008), 118Google Scholar
Clogg, Richard, “Aspects of the Movement for Greek Independence,” in The Struggle for Greek Independence: Essays to Mark the 150th Anniversary of the Greek War of Independence, ed. Clogg, Richard (Hamden, CT: Archon, 1973), 23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Philliou, Christine, Biography of an Empire: Practicing Ottoman Governance in the Age of Revolutions (Berkeley: University of California Press, 2011), 67–74Google Scholar
Fahmy, Khaled, All the Pasha’s Men: Mehmed Ali, His Army and the Making of Modern Egypt (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997), 56–7, 285–9Google Scholar
Zürcher, Erik, The Young Turk Legacy and Nation Building: From the Ottoman Empire to Atatürk’s Turkey (London: I. B. Tauris, 2010), 155Google Scholar
Vak‘a-nüvis Es‘ad Efendi Tarihi (Bâhir Efendi’nin Zeyl ve İlaveleriyle) 1237–1241/1821–1826, ed. Yılmazer, Ziya (Istanbul: Osmanlı Araştırmaları Vakfı, 2000), 533–4
Erdem, Hakan, “Recruitment for the ‘Victorious Soldiers of Muhammad’ in the Arab Provinces, 1826–1828,” in Histories of the Modern Middle East: New Directions, ed. Gershoni, Israel et al. (London: Lynne Rienner, 2002), 193–4Google Scholar
Levy, Avigdor, “The Officer Corps in Sultan Mahmud II’s New Ottoman Army, 1826–39,” IJMES 2 (1971), 23Google Scholar
Maglajski Sidžili 1816–1840, ed. Bojanić-Lukač, Dušanka and Katić, Tatjana (Sarajevo: Bošnjački Institut Fondacija Adila Zulfikarpašića, 2005), 529
Rodrigue, Aron, French Jews, Turkish Jews: The Alliance Israélite Universelle and the Politics of Jewish Schooling in Turkey, 1860–1925 (Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1990), 27–8Google Scholar
Erdem, Hakan, “‘Do Not Think of the Greeks as Agricultural Labourers’: Ottoman Responses to the Greek War of Independence,” in Citizenship and the Nation-State in Greece and Turkey, ed. Birtek, Faruk and Dragonas, Thalia (Abingdon: Routledge, 2005), 76–7Google Scholar
Findley, Carter, Bureaucratic Reform in the Ottoman Empire: The Sublime Porte 1789–1922 (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1980), 125–48Google Scholar
Eren, Ahmet, Mahmud II. Zamanında Bosna-Hersek (Istanbul: Nurgök Matbaası, 1965), 48–56Google Scholar
Aksan, Virginia, “Military Recruitment Strategies in the Late Eighteenth Century,” in Arming the State: Military Conscription in the Middle East and Central Asia, 1775–1925, ed. Zürcher, Erik (London: I. B. Tauris, 1999), 33Google Scholar
Erdem, Hakan, “‘Perfidious Albanians’ and ‘Zealous Governors’: Ottomans, Albanians, and Turks in the Greek War of Independence,” in Ottoman Rule in the Balkans, 1760–1850: Conflict, Transformation, Adaptation, ed. Anastasopoulos, Antonis and Kolovos, Elias (Rethymno: University of Crete, 2007), 213–40Google Scholar
Bilge, Mustafa, “Mustafa Pasha, Buşatlı,” İslam Ansiklopedisi (Istanbul: Türkiye Diyanet Vakfı, 2006), xxxi, 345Google Scholar
Heyd, Uriel, “The Ottoman ‘Ulema and Westernization in the Time of Selim III and Mahmud II,” SH 9 (1961), 69–77Google Scholar
Halaçoğlu, Yusuf, “Bağdat – Osmanlı Dönemi,” İslam Ansiklopedisi (Istanbul: Türkiye Diyanet Vakfı, 2006), iv, 435Google Scholar
Rustum, Asad, “Idara al-Sham: Ruhuha wa Haykaluha wa Atharuha,” in Dhikra al-Batal al-Fatih Ibrahim Basha, 1848–1948 (Cairo: Matba‘a Dar al-Kutub al-Misriyya, 1948), 107–10, 126Google Scholar
Meeker, Michael, A Nation of Empire: The Ottoman Legacy of Turkish Modernity (Berkeley: University of California Press, 2002), 241–2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gould, Andrew, “Lords or Bandits? The Derebeys of Cilicia,” IJMES 7 (1976), 488Google Scholar
Gammer, Moshe, “The Imam and the Pasha: A Note on Shamil and Muhammad Ali,” MES 32 (1996), 339Google Scholar
Poroy, Ibrahim, “Expansion of Opium Production in Turkey and the State Monopoly of 1828–1839,” IJMES 13 (1981), 191–211Google Scholar
Hurewitz, J. C. (ed.), Diplomacy in the Near and Middle East: A Documentary Record, 1535–1914 (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1956), 110–11

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×