Akkerman, Fokke. 1985. “Le caractère rhétorique du Traitè théologico-politique,” Les cahiers de Fontenay, 36–8: 381–90.Google Scholar

Alberti, Leon Battista. 1969. The Family in Renaissance Florence. Translated by Renée Neu Watkins. Columbia: University of South Carolina.Google Scholar

Alberti, Leon Battista. 1987. Dinner Pieces. Translated by David Marsh. Binghamton, NY: Medieval and Renaissance Texts.Google Scholar

Allais, Lucy. 2016. “Kant's Racism,” Philosophical Papers 1–2: 1–36.Google Scholar

Allison, Henry. 1975. Benedict de Spinoza. Boston, MA: Twayne.Google Scholar

Ambedkar, B. R. 1988. “What Path to Salvation?” Speech delivered to the Bombay Presidency Mahar Conference, 31 May 1936, Bombay. Translated by Vasant W. Moon. Edited by Frances W. Pritchett. Available at: www.columbia.edu/itc/mealac/pritchett/00ambedkar/txt_ambedkar_salvation.html (Accessed on February 13, 2018).Google Scholar

Anderson, Elizabeth. 2006. “The Epistemology of Democracy,” Episteme 3: 9–23.Google Scholar

Anderson, Elisabeth. 2010. The Imperative of Integration. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Appiah, Kwame Anthony. 1996. “Race, Culture, and Identity: Misunderstood Connections,” in Color Conscious: The Political Morality of Race, Appiah, Kwame Anthony and Gutmann, Amy (eds.). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Aquinas, Thomas. 2008. Political Writings. Edited and translated by Dyson, R. W.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Armstrong, Aurelia. 2009a. “Natural and Unnatural Communities: Spinoza Beyond Hobbes,” British Journal for the History of Philosophy 17(2): 279–305.Google Scholar

Armstrong, Aurelia. 2009b. “Autonomy and the Relational Individual: Spinoza and Feminism,” in Rereading in the Canon: Feminist Interpretations of Benedict de Spinoza, Gatens, Moira (ed.). University Park, PA: The Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar

Austin, J. L. 1975. How to Do Things with Words. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Balibar, Étienne. 1989. “Spinoza: The Anti-Orwell: The Fear of the Masses.” Rethinking Marxism: A Journal of Economics, Culture, and Society 2(3): 104–39.Google Scholar

Balibar, Étienne. 1997. From Individuality to Transindividuality. Delft: Eburon.Google Scholar

Balibar, Étienne. 1998. Spinoza and Politics. Translated by Snowdon, Peter. London: Verso.Google Scholar

Balibar, Étienne. 2014. “Preface,” in Louis Althusser, On the Reproduction of Capitalism. London: Verso.Google Scholar

Barbone, Steven and Lee, Rice. 2000. “Introduction and Notes to Spinoza's Political Treatise.” Translated by Shirley, Samuel. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett.Google Scholar

Barry, Brian. 1965. Political Argument. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Belaief, Gail. 1971. Spinoza's Philosophy of Law. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar

Ben Ze'ev, Aaron. 1999. “Emotions and Change: A Spinozistic Account,” in Desire and Affect: Spinoza as Psychologist, Yovel, Yirmiyahu (ed.). New York: Little Room Press, 139–54.Google Scholar

Bennett, Jonathan. 1984. A Study of Spinoza's Ethics. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett.Google Scholar

Berlin, Isaiah. 1993. “A Reply to David West,” Political Studies 41: 297–8.Google Scholar

Blits, Jan. 1989. “Hobbesian Fear,” Political Theory 17(3): 417–31.Google Scholar

Blom, Hans. 1993. “The Moral and Political Philosophy of Spinoza,” in The Renaissance and Seventeenth Century Rationalism, Parkinson, G. H. R. (ed.). London and New York: Routledge, 313–48.Google Scholar

Blom, Hans. 1995. Causality and Morality in Politics: The Rise of Naturalism in Dutch Seventeenth-Century Political Thought. Utrecht: Universiteit Utrecht.Google Scholar

Blom, Hans and Winkel, Lauren (eds.). 2004. Grotius and the Stoa. Assen: Royal Van Gorcum.Google Scholar

Bonadeo, Alfredo. 1969. “The Role of the ‘Grandi’ in the Political World of Machiavelli,” Studies in the Renaissance 16: 9–30.Google Scholar

Brennan, Geoffrey and Pettit, Philip. 2005. “The Feasibility Issue,” in The Oxford Handbook of Contemporary Philosophy, Jackson, Frank and Smith, Michael (eds.). Oxford: Oxford University Press, 258–79.Google Scholar

Brooke, Christopher. 2012. Philosophical Pride. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Butterfield, Herbert. 1962. The Statecraft of Machiavelli. New York: Collier Books.Google Scholar

Cameron, Evan. 2010. Enchanted Europe: Superstition, Reason and Religion, 1250–1750. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Carriero, John. 2005. “Spinoza on Final Causality,” Oxford Studies in Early Modern Philosophy 2: 105–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Carruthers, Mary. 2008. The Book of Memory: A Study of Memory in Medieval Culture, 2nd Edition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cassirer, Ernst. 1963. The Individual and the Cosmos in Renaissance Philosophy. Translated by Mario Domandi. New York: Harper Torchbooks.Google Scholar

Charron, Pierre. 1971. Of Wisdom [De la Sagesse]. Amsterdam: Da Capo Press.Google Scholar

Cicero, . 1942. De Oratore, vol. I. Translated by Sutton, E. W. and Rackham, H.. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Cicero, . 1991. On Duties. Translated by Griffin, M. T. and Atkins, E. M.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Cohen, Joshua. 1986. “An Epistemic Conception of Democracy,” Ethics 97: 26–38.Google Scholar

Cohen, Joshua. 1989. “Deliberation and Democratic Legitimacy,” in The Good Polity, Hamline, A. and Pettit, P. (eds.). Oxford: Blackwell, 17–34.Google Scholar

Collins, Jeffrey. 2005. The Allegiance of Thomas Hobbes. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Coogan, Robert. 1969. “Petrarch and More's Concept of Fortune,” Italica 46(2): 167–75.Google Scholar

Cooper, Julie. 2013. Secular Powers. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Cooper, Julie. 2017. “Reevaluating Spinoza's Legacy for Jewish Political Thought,” The Journal of Politics 79(2): 473–84.Google Scholar

Copenhaver, Brian P. and Schmitt, Charles B.. 1992. A History of Western Philosophy, Vol. 3: Renaissance Philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Corneau, Sorana. 2011. Regimens of the Mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Cox, Virginia. 2010. “Rhetoric and Ethics in Machiavelli,” in The Cambridge Companion to Machiavelli, Najemy, John M. (ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 173–89.Google Scholar

Crick, Bernard. 2003. “Introduction” to Machiavelli, The Discourses. London: Penguin.Google Scholar

Curley, Edwin. 1990a. “Homo Audax. Leibniz, Oldenburg and the TTP,” Studia Leibnitiana 27: 277–312.Google Scholar

Curley, Edwin. 1990b. “Notes on a Neglected Masterpiece [II]: Spinoza's Theological–Political Treatise as a Prolegomenon to the Ethics,” in Central Themes in Early Modern Philosophy, Cover, J. A. and Kulstad, M. (eds.). Indianapolis, IN: Hackett.Google Scholar

Curley, Edwin. 1991. “The State of Nature and Its Law in Hobbes and Spinoza,” Philosophical Topics 19(1): 97–117.Google Scholar

Curley, Edwin. 1992. “‘I Durst Not Write So Boldly’ or, How to Read Hobbes’ Theological–Political Treatise,” in Hobbes e Spinoza, Bostrenghi, Daniela (ed.). Napoli: Bibliopolis, 497–593.Google Scholar

Curley, Edwin. 1995. “Samuel Pufendorf (1632–1694) as a Critic of Spinoza,” in L'hérésie Spinoziste. La discussion sur le Tractatus Theologico-Politicus, 1670–1677, et la réception immédiate du Spinozisme, Cristofolini, P. (ed.). Amsterdam: APA-Holland University Press, 89–96.Google Scholar

Curley, Edwin. 1996. “Kissinger, Spinoza, and Genghis Khan,” in Cambridge Companion to Spinoza, Garrett, Don (ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 315–42.Google Scholar

Darwall, Stephen. 2012. “Grotius at the Creation of Modern Moral Philosophy,” Archiv Für Geschichte Der Philosophie 94(3): 296–325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Davidson, Donald. 1980. “How is Weakness of Will Possible?” in Essays on Actions and Events. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

De Dijn, Herman. 2004. “Ethics IV: The Ladder, Not the Top,” in Spinoza on Reason and the Free Man, Yovel, Yirmiyahu and Segal, Gideon (eds.). New York: Little Room Press, 37–53.Google Scholar

De la Boétie, Étienne. 1942. The Discourse of Voluntary Servitude. Translated by Harry Kurz. Indianapolis, IN. http://oll.libertyfund.org/titles/boetie-the-discourse-of-voluntary-servitude. Available at: http://oll.libertyfund.org/titles/2250#Boetie_Discourse1520_9 (Accessed on February 13, 2018).Google Scholar

Debrabander, Firmin. 2007. Spinoza and the Stoics: Power, Politics and the Passions. London: Continuum.Google Scholar

Del Lucchese, Filippo. 2009. Conflict, Power, and Multitude in Machiavelli and Spinoza: Tumult and Indignation. London and New York: Continuum.Google Scholar

Della Rocca, Michael. 1996a. Representation and the Mind–Body Problem in Spinoza. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Della Rocca, Michael. 1996b. “Spinoza's Metaphysical Psychology,” in The Cambridge Companion to Spinoza, Garrett, Don (ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 192–266.Google Scholar

Della Rocca, Michael. 1998. (with Robert Sleigh and Vere Chappel). “Determinism and Human Freedom,” in The Cambridge History of Seventeenth-Century Philosophy, Ayers, Michael and Garber, Daniel (eds.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1195–270.Google Scholar

Della Rocca, Michael. 2008a. Spinoza. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Della Rocca, Michael. 2008b. “Rationalism Run Amok,” in Interpreting Spinoza: Critical Essays, Huenemann, C. (ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008.Google Scholar

Den Uyl, Douglas. 1983. Power, State and Freedom: An Interpretation of Spinoza's Political Philosophy. Assen, The Netherlands: Van Gorcum and Company.Google Scholar

Douglas, Alexander X. 2015. Spinoza and Dutch Cartesianism: Philosophy and Theology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Du Vair, Guillaume. 1990. “The Moral Philosophy of the Stoics,” in Schneewind, J. B. (ed.), Moral Philosophy from Montaigne to Kant. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Dunn, John. 1968. “The Identity of the History of Ideas,” The Journal of the Royal Institute of Philosophy 43: 85–104.Google Scholar

Elster, Jon. 1997. “The Market and the Forum: Three Varieties of Political Theory,” in Deliberative Democracy: Essays on Reason and Politics, Bohman, James and Rehg, William (eds.). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar

Estlund, David. 1997. “Beyond Fairness and Deliberation: The Epistemic Dimension of Democratic Authority,” in Deliberative Democracy: Essays on Reason and Politics, Bohman, James and Rehg, William (eds.). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar

Feuer, Lewis. 1958. Spinoza and the Rise of Liberalism. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.Google Scholar

Flanagan, Owen. 1993. Varieties of Moral Personality. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Fontana, Biancamaria. 2008. Montaigne's Politics: Authority and Governance in the Essais. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Frankena, William K. 1963. Ethics. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar

Frankfurt, Harry. 1998. “Coercion and Moral Responsibility,” in Frankfurt, The Importance of What We Care About. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Franklin, Julian. 1991. “Sovereignty and the Mixed Constitution: Bodin and His Critics,” in The Cambridge History of Political Thought 1450–1700, Burns, J. H. (ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 298–328.Google Scholar

Freudenthal, Jakob. 1899. Die Lebensgeschichte Spinoza's in Quellenschriften, Urkunden and Nichtamtlichen Nachrichten. Leipzig: Verlag Von Veit.Google Scholar

Fricker, Miranda. 2014. “What's the Point of Blame? A Paradigm Based Explanation,” Nous 50(1): 165–83.Google Scholar

Frijda, Nico. 1999. “Spinoza and Current Theory of Emotion,” in Desire and Affect: Spinoza as Psychologist, Yovel, Yirmiyahu (ed.). New York: Little Room Press, 235–61.Google Scholar

Gabbey, Alan. 2008. “Spinoza, Infinite Modes, and the Infinite Mood,” Studia Spinozana 16: 41–65.Google Scholar

Garber, Daniel. 2005. “‘A Free Man Thinks of Nothing Less Than Death’: Spinoza on the Eternity of the Mind,” in Early Modern Philosophy: Mind, Matter and Metaphysics, Mercer, Christia and O'Neill, Eileen (eds.). New York: Oxford University Press, 103–18.Google Scholar

Garrett, Aaron. 2003. “Was Spinoza a Natural Lawyer?” Cardozo Law Review 25(2): 627–41.Google Scholar

Garrett, Aaron. 2012. “Knowing the Essence of the State in Spinoza's Tractatus Theologico-Politicus,” European Journal of Philosophy 20(1): 50–73.Google Scholar

Garrett, Don. 1994. “Spinoza's Theory of Metaphysical Individuation,” in Individuation in Early Modern Philosophy, Barber, Kenneth F. and Gracia, Jorge J. E. (eds.). Albany, NY: State University of New York Press, 73–101.Google Scholar

Garrett, Don. 1996. “Spinoza's Ethical Theory,” in Cambridge Companion to Spinoza, Garrett, Don (ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 267–314.Google Scholar

Garrett, Don. 2002. “Spinoza's Conatus Argument,” in Spinoza's Metaphysics: Central Themes, Biro, John I. and Koistinen, Olli (eds.). Oxford: Oxford University Press, 127–58.Google Scholar

Garrett, Don. 2009. “Spinoza on the Essence of the Human Body and the Part of the Mind That Is Eternal,” in The Cambridge Companion to Spinoza's Ethics, Koistinen, Olli (ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 284–302.Google Scholar

Garrett, Don. 2017. “Representation and Misrepresentation in Spinoza's Philosophy of Mind,” in The Oxford Handbook of Spinoza, Rocca, Michael Della (ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press, 190–203.Google Scholar

Garver, Eugene. 1987. Machiavelli and the History of Prudence. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar

Gatens, Moira. 1995. Imaginary Bodies: Ethics, Power, and Corporeality. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Gatens, Moira and Lloyd, Genevieve. 1999. Collective Imaginations. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Gauthier, David. 1986. Morals by Agreement. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Gauthier, David. 2001. “Hobbes: The Laws of Nature,” Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 82(3–4): 258–84.Google Scholar

Geuss, Raymond. 2008. Philosophy and Real Politics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Grey, John. 2014. “Spinoza on Composition, Causation, and the Mind's Eternity,” British Journal for the History of Philosophy 22(3): 446–67.Google Scholar

Groenhuis, Gerrit. 1981. “Calvinism and National Consciousness: The Dutch Republic as the New Israel,” in Britain and the Netherlands, Vol. 7, Church and State Since the Reformation, Duke, A. C. and Tamse, C. A. (eds.). The Hague: Nijhoff, 118–33.Google Scholar

Grofman, Bernard and Feld, Scott. 1988. “Rousseau's General Will: A Condorcetian Perspective,” American Political Science Review 82(2): 567–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Guicciardini, Francesco. 1965. Ricordi [Maxims and Reflections], Series C. Translated by Mario Domandi. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar

Haakonssen, Knud. “Divine/natural Law Theories in Ethics,” in The Cambridge History of Seventeenth-Century Philosophy, Ayers, Michael and Garber, Daniel (eds.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1317–57.Google Scholar

Habermas, Jurgen. 1996. Between Facts and Norms: Contributions to a Discourse Theory of Law and Democracy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Haitsma Mulier, Eco. 1980. The Myth of Venice and Dutch Republican Thought in the Seventeenth Century. Translated by Moran, Gerard T.. Assen: Van Gorcum.Google Scholar

Hanasz, Waldemar. 2010. “Machiavelli's Method Revisited: The Art and Science of Modeling,” Review Journal of Political Philosophy 8(1): 1–32.Google Scholar

Harris, Errol. 1984. “Spinoza's Treatment of Natural Law,” in Spinoza's Political and Theological Thought, Deugd, Cornelis de (ed.). Amsterdam: North-Holland Publishing, 63–72.Google Scholar

Haserot, Francis. 1973. “Spinoza and the Status of Universals,” in Studies in Spinoza: Critical and Interpretive Essays, Kashap, S. Paul (ed.). Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 43–67.Google Scholar

Hübner, Karolina. 2014. “Spinoza on Being Human and Human Perfection,” in The Ethics of Spinoza's Ethics, Kisner, Matthew and Youpa, Andrew (eds.). Oxford: Oxford University Press, 124–42.Google Scholar

Hübner, Karolina. 2015. “Spinoza on Negation, Mind-dependence and the Reality of the Finite,” in The Young Spinoza: A Metaphysician in the Making, Melamed, Yitzhak (ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press, 221–37.Google Scholar

Hübner, Karolina. 2016. “Spinoza on Essences, Universals, and Beings of Reason,” Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 97: 58–88.Google Scholar

Huebner, Bryce. 2009. “Troubles with Stereotypes for Spinozan Minds,” Philosophy of the Social Sciences 39(1): 63–92.Google Scholar

Hume, David. 1975. An Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding in Enquiries Concerning Human Understanding and Concerning the Principles of Morals, Selby-Bigge, L. A. (ed.), 3rd Edition. Revised by Nidditch, P. H.. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Irwin, Terence. 2009. Development of Ethics: A Historical and Critical Study, vol. 2. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Israel, Jonathan I. 1995a. The Dutch Republic: Its Rise, Greatness, and Fall, 1477–1806. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Israel, Jonathan I. 1995b. “The Banning of Spinoza's Works in the Dutch Republic 1670–1678,” in Disguised and Overt Spinozism Around 1700, Bunge, Wiep van and Klever, Wim (eds.). Leiden: Brill, 1–4.Google Scholar

Israel, Jonathan I. 2001. Radical Enlightenment: Philosophy and the Making of Modernity 1650–1750. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Israel, Jonathan I. 2002. “Religious Toleration and Radical Philosophy in the Later Dutch Golden Age (1668–1710),” in Calvinism and Religious Toleration in the Dutch Golden Age, Hsia, R. Po-Chia and Nierop, H. F. K. Van (eds.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 148–58.Google Scholar

Israel, Jonathan I. 2010a. A Revolution of Mind: Radical Enlightenment and the Intellectual Origins of Modern Democracy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Israel, Jonathan I. 2010b. “The Early Dutch and German Reaction to the Tractatus Theologico-Politicus: Foreshadowing the Enlightenment's More General Spinoza Reception,” in Spinoza's Theological–Political Treatise: A Critical Guide, Melamed, Yitzhak Y. and Rosenthal, Michael (eds.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 72–100.Google Scholar

Israel, Jonathan I. 2011. Democratic Enlightenment: Philosophy, Revolution, and Human Rights. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

James, Susan. 1996. “Power and Difference: Spinoza's Conception of Freedom,” The Journal of Political Philosophy 4(3): 207–28.Google Scholar

James, Susan. 2009. “Shakespeare and the Politics of Superstition,” in Shakespeare and Early Modern Political Thought, Armitage, David, Condren, Conal, and Fitzmaurice, Andrew (eds.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 80–98.Google Scholar

James, Susan. 2010. “Narrative as the Means to Freedom,” in Spinoza's Theological–Political Treatise: A Critical Guide, Melamed, Yitzhak Y. and Rosenthal, Michael (eds.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 250–67.Google Scholar

James, Susan. 2011. “Creating Rational Understanding: Spinoza as a Social Epistemologist,” The Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 85: 181–99.Google Scholar

James, Susan. 2012. Spinoza on Philosophy, Religion, and Politics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Kahn, Victoria. 2014. The Future of Illusion. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Kingston, Rebecca. 2008. “The Political Relevance of the Emotions from Descartes to Smith,” in Bringing the Passions Back In, Kingston, Rebecca and Ferry, Leonard (eds.). Vancouver: UBC Press, 108–25.Google Scholar

Kisner, Matthew. 2010. “Perfection and Desire: Spinoza on the Good,” Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 91(1): 97–117.Google Scholar

Kisner, Matthew. 2011. Spinoza on Human Freedom. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Klein, Julie. 2014. “‘Something of it Remains’: Spinoza and Gersonides on Intellectual Eternity,” in Spinoza and Jewish Philosophy, Nadler, Steven M. (ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 177–203.Google Scholar

Kneale, Martha. 1969. “Eternity and Sempiternity,” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 69: 223–38.Google Scholar

Kossmann, E. H. 1987. “The Singularity of Absolutism,” in Kossmann, E. H., Politieke theorie en geschiedenis. Verspreide opstellen en voordrachten. Amsterdam: U.B. Bakker.Google Scholar

Kossmann, E. H. 2000. Political Thought in the Dutch Republic. Three Studies. Amsterdam: Koninklijke Nederlandse Akademie van Wetenschappen.Google Scholar

Kramer, Matthew. 2003. The Quality of Freedom. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Lærke, Mogens. 2010. “G.W. Leibniz's two readings of the Tractatus Theologico-Politicus,” in Spinoza's Theological–Political Treatise: A Critical Guide, Melamed, Yitzhak Y. and Rosenthal, Michael (eds.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 101–27.Google Scholar

Lærke, Mogens 2014. “Spinoza's Language.” Journal of the History of Philosophy 52(3): 519–47.Google Scholar

Laursen, John Christian. 1992. The Politics of Skepticism in the Ancients, Montaigne, Hume, and Kant. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar

Laursen, John Christian. 1996. “Spinoza on Toleration: Arming the State and Reining in the Magistrate,” in Difference and Dissent: Theories of Toleration in Medieval and Early Modern Europe, Nederman, Cary J. and Laursen, John Christian (eds.). Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield, 185–204.Google Scholar

LeBuffe, Michael. 2009. “The Anatomy of the Passions,” in The Cambridge Companion to Spinoza's Ethics, Koistinen, Olli (ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 188–222.Google Scholar

LeBuffe, Michael. 2010a. From Bondage to Freedom: Spinoza on Human Excellence. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

LeBuffe, Michael. 2010b. “Change and the Eternal Part of the Mind in Spinoza,” Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 91(3): 369–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lesser, Alexander. 1931. “Superstition,” Journal of Philosophy 28: 617–28.Google Scholar

Lin, Martin. 2006a. “Teleology and Human Action in Spinoza,” Philosophical Review 115(3): 317–54.Google Scholar

Lin, Martin. 2006b. “Spinoza's Account of Akrasia,” Journal of the History of Philosophy 44(3): 395–414.Google Scholar

Lipsius, Justus. 1970. Sixe Bookes of Politickes or Civil Doctrine. Translated by Jones, William. New York: Da Capo Press.Google Scholar

Lipsius, Justus. 2006. Of Constancy. Translated by Stradling, Sir John. Edited by Sellars, John, Exeter: Bristol Phoenix Press.Google Scholar

Lloyd, Genevieve. 1986. “Spinoza's Version of the Eternity of Mind,” Spinoza and the Sciences 91: 211–33Google Scholar

Lord, Beth. 2011. “Between Imagination and Reason: Kant and Spinoza on Fictions,” in Inventions of the Imagination: Romanticism and Beyond, Gray, Richard T., Halmi, Nicholas, Handwerk, Gary J., Rosenthal, Michael A., and Vieweg, Klaus (eds.). Seattle: University of Washington Press, 36–53.Google Scholar

Lord, Beth. 2014. “Spinoza, Equality, and Hierarchy,” History of Philosophy Quarterly 31(1): 59–77.Google Scholar

Lord, Beth. 2016. “The Concept of Equality in Spinoza's Theological–Political Treatise,” Epoche: A Journal for the History of Philosophy 20(2): 367–86.Google Scholar

Lordon, Frédéric. 2014. Willing Slaves of Capital: Spinoza and Marx on Desire. Translated by Ash, Gabriel. London: Verso.Google Scholar

Lucretius, . 2006. De Rerum Natura. Translated by Rouse, W. H. D.. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Malebranche, Nicolas. 1997. The Search After Truth. Edited and translated by Lennon, Thomas M. and Olscamp, Paul J.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Marshall, Eugene. 2008. “Adequacy and Innateness in Spinoza,” Oxford Studies in Early Modern Philosophy 4: 51–88.Google Scholar

Marshall, Eugene. 2013. The Spiritual Automaton: Spinoza's Science of the Mind. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Matheron, Alexandre. 1969. Individu et Communauté chez Spinoza. Paris: Les Editions de Minuit.Google Scholar

Matheron, Alexandre. 1986. “Spinoza et la décomposition de la politique Thomiste: Machiavélisme et utopie,” in Alexandre Matheron, Anthropologie et Politique au XVIIe Siècle: Études sur Spinoza, Paris: J. Vrin, 49–79.Google Scholar

Matheron, Alexandre. 1990. “Le Problème de L’évolution de Spinoza Du Traité Théologico-Politique au Traité Politique,” in Spinoza: Issues and Directions, Curley, E. and Moreau, P. F. (eds.). Leiden: Brill, 258–70.Google Scholar

Matheron, Alexandre. 2011. “L'indignation et le conatus de l’État spinoziste,” in Études sur Spinoza et les philosophies de l’âge classique, Matheron, Alexandre (ed.). Lyon: ENS, 219–229.Google Scholar

McGrade, A. S. 1982. “Rights, Natural Rights, and the Philosophy of Law,” in The Cambridge History of Later Medieval Philosophy, Kretzmann, Norman, Kenny, Anthony, and Pinborg, Jan (eds.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 738–56.Google Scholar

McShea, Robert. 1968. The Political Philosophy of Spinoza. New York: Columbia University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McShea, Robert. 1969. “Spinoza on Power,” Inquiry 12: 133–43.Google Scholar

Melamed, Yitzhak. 2010. “Spinoza's Anti-Humanism: an Outline,” in The Rationalists: Between Tradition and Innovation, Fraenkel, Carlos, Perinetti, Dario, and Smith, Justin E. H. (eds.). Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar

Melamed, Yitzhak. 2013a. Spinoza's Metaphysics: Substance and Thought. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Melamed, Yitzhak. 2013b. “Charitable Interpretations and the Political Domestication of Spinoza, or, Benedict in the Land of the Secular Imagination” in The Methodology of the History of Philosophy, Lærke, Mogens, Smith, Justin E. H., and Schliesser, Eric (eds.). Oxford: Oxford University Press, 258–77.Google Scholar

Mendelssohn, Moses. 2012. Morning Hours in Last Works. Translated by Rosenstock, Bruce. Champaign, IL: University of Illinois.Google Scholar

Miller, Jon. 2003. “Spinoza and the Concept of a Law of Nature,” History of Philosophy Quarterly 20(3): 257–76.Google Scholar

Miller, Jon. 2012. “Spinoza and Natural Law,” in Reason, Religion, and Natural Law: From Plato to Spinoza, Jacobs, Jonathan A. (eds.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Miller, Jon. 2015. Spinoza and the Stoics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Mills, Charles. 2005. “‘Ideal Theory’ as Ideology,” Hypatia 20(3): 165–83.Google Scholar

Milton, J. R. 1998. “Laws of Nature,” in The Cambridge History of Seventeenth-Century Philosophy, Ayers, Michael and Garber, Daniel (eds.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 680–701.Google Scholar

Montaigne, Michel de. 1958. The Complete Essays. Translated and edited by Frame, Donald. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar

More, Sir Thomas. 1997. Utopia. Mineola: Dover.Google Scholar

Moreau, Pierre-François. 1994. Spinoza, l'expérience et l’éternité. Paris: Presses universitaires de France.Google Scholar

Mout, M. E. H. N. 1997. “Limits and Debates: A Comparative View of Dutch Toleration in the Sixteenth and Early Seventeenth Centuries,” in The Emergence of Tolerance in the Dutch Republic, Berkvens-Stevelinck, C. et al. (eds.). Leiden: Brill, 37–47.Google Scholar

Mueller, Carol. 2004. “Ella Baker and the Origins of ‘Participatory Democracy,’” in The Black Studies Reader, Bobo, Jacqueline, Hudley, Cynthia, and Michel, Claudine (eds.). New York: Routledge, 79–90.Google Scholar

Nadler, Steven. 1999. Spinoza: A Life. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Nadler, Steven. 2002a. Spinoza's Heresy: Immortality and the Jewish Mind. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Nadler, Steven. 2002b. “Eternity and Immortality in Spinoza's Ethics,” Midwest Studies in Philosophy, 26: 224–44.Google Scholar

Nadler, Steven. 2005. “Hope, Fear, and the Politics of Immortality,” in Analytic Philosophy and History of Philosophy, Sorell, Tom and Rogers, G. A. J. (eds.). Oxford: Oxford University Press, 201–17.Google Scholar

Nadler, Steven. 2011. A Book Forged in Hell: Spinoza's Scandalous Treatise and the Birth of the Secular Age. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Nadler, Steven. 2013. “Scripture and Truth: A Problem in Spinoza's Tractatus Theologico-Politicus,” Journal of the History of Ideas 74(4): 623–42.Google Scholar

Nadler, Steven. 2014. “Virtue, Reason and Moral Luck: Maimonides, Gersonides, and Spinoza,” in Spinoza and Medieval Jewish Philosophy, Nadler, Steven (ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 152–76.Google Scholar

Negri, Antonio. 1991. The Savage Anomaly. Translated by Hardt, Michael. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar

Negri, Antonio. 1997. “Reliqua Desiderantur: A Conjecture for a Definition of the Concept of Democracy in the Final Spinoza,” in The New Spinoza, Montag, Warren and Stolze, Ted (eds.). Minneapolis, MN: Minnesota University Press, 219–46.Google Scholar

Nelson, Eric. 2007. “The Problem of the Prince,” in The Cambridge Companion to Renaissance Philosophy, Hankins, James (ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 319–37.Google Scholar

Newlands, Samuel. 2015. “Spinoza's Early Anti-Abstractionism,” in The Young Spinoza: A Metaphysician in the Making, Melamed, Yitzhak Y. (ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 255–71.Google Scholar

Noreña, Carlos G. 1989. Juan Luis Vives and the Emotions. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.Google Scholar

Nussbaum, Martha. 2001. Upheavals of Thought: The Intelligence of Emotions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Parchment, Steven. 2000. “The Mind's Eternity in Spinoza's Ethics,” Journal of the History of Philosophy 38(3): 349–83.Google Scholar

Pender, Stephen. 2005. “Between Medicine and Rhetoric,” Early Science and Medicine 10(1): 36–64.Google Scholar

Petrarch, . 1991. Remedies for Fortune Fair and Foul. Translated by Rawski, Conrad. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar

Pitkin, Hanna. 1984. Fortune Is a Woman: Gender and Politics in the Thought of Niccolò Machiavelli. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Plotinus, . 1964. The Essential Plotinus. Translated and edited by O'Brien, Elmer. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett.Google Scholar

Pocock, J. G. A. 1975. The Machiavellian Moment: Florentine Political Thought and the Atlantic Republican Tradition. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Pocock, J. G. A. 1987. “Spinoza and Harrington: An Exercise in Comparison,” Bijdragen en Mededelingen betreffende de Geschiedenis der Nederlanden 102: 435–49.Google Scholar

Poppi, Antonio. 1988. “Fate, Fortune, Providence and Human Freedom,” in The Cambridge History of Renaissance Philosophy, Schmitt, Charles B. and Skinner, Quentin (eds.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 641–67.Google Scholar

Preus, J. Samuel. 2001. Spinoza and the Irrelevance of Biblical Authority. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Prokhovnik, Raia. 1997. “From Democracy to Aristocracy: Spinoza, Reason and Politics,” History of European Ideas 23(2–4): 105–15.Google Scholar

Prokhovnik, Raia. 2004. Spinoza and Republicanism. London and New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar

Price, H. H. 1964. “Half-Belief,” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, Supplementary Volumes 38: 149–62.Google Scholar

Raphael, D. D. (ed.). 1991. British Moralists 1650–1800, Vol. I. Hobbes–Gay. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett.Google Scholar

Rawls, John. 1971. A Theory of Justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Revault d'Allonnes, Myriam. 1999. “Affect of the Body and Socialization,” in Desire and Affect: Spinoza as Psychologist, Yovel, Yirmiyahu (ed.). New York: Little Room Press, 183–90.Google Scholar

Rosenthal, Michael. 1997. “Why Spinoza Chose the Hebrews: The Exemplary Function of Prophecy in the Theological–Political Treatise,” History of Political Thought 18(2): 207–41.Google Scholar

Rosenthal, Michael. 2001. “Tolerance as a Virtue in Spinoza's Ethics,” Journal of the History of Philosophy 39(4): 535–57.Google Scholar

Rosenthal, Michael. 2003a. “Spinoza's Republican Argument for Toleration,” The Journal of Political Philosophy 11(3): 320–37.Google Scholar

Rosenthal, Michael. 2003b. “Persuasive Passions: Rhetoric and the Interpretation of Spinoza's Theological–Political Treatise,” Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 85(3): 249–68.Google Scholar

Ross, W. D. 1988. The Right and the Good (Reprint). Indianapolis, IN: Hackett.Google Scholar

Russell, Bertrand. 2009. The Basic Writings of Bertrand Russell. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Russell, Paul. 2010. The Riddle of Hume's Treatise: Skepticism, Naturalism, and Irreligion. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Rutherford, Donald “Spinoza's Conception of Law: Metaphysics and Ethics,” in Spinoza's Theological–Political Treatise: A Critical Guide, Melamed, Yitzhak Y. and Rosenthal, Michael (eds.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 143–67.Google Scholar

Santos Campos, Andre. 2012. Spinoza's Revolutions in Natural Law. London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar

Schama, Simon. 1987. The Embarrassment of Riches. New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 231–4.Google Scholar

Scott, Jonathan. 2002. “Classical Republicanism in Seventeenth Century England and the Netherlands,” in Republicanism: A Shared European Heritage (2 vols.), Gelderen, Martin Van and Skinner, Quentin (eds.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Seigel, Jerrold. 1966. “‘Civic Humanism’ or Ciceronian Rhetoric? The Culture of Petrarch and Bruni,” Past and Present 34: 3–48.Google Scholar

Seneca, Lucius Annaeus. 1917. Ad Lucilium Epistulae Morales [Epistles], vol. 1. Translated by Gummere, Richard M.. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Seneca, Lucius Annaeus. 1920. Ad Lucilium Epistulae Morales [Epistles], vol. 2. Translated by Gummere, Richard. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Shapiro, Lisa (ed. and trans.). 2007. The Correspondence Between Princess Elisabeth and René Descartes. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Sharp, Hasana. 2005. “Why Spinoza Today? Or, a Strategy of Anti-Fear,” Rethinking Marxism: A Journal of Economics, Culture, and Society 17(4): 591–608.Google Scholar

Sharp, Hasana. 2011. Spinoza and the Politics of Renaturalization. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Sharp, Hasana. 2012. “Eve's Perfection: Spinoza on Sexual (In)Equality,” Journal of the History of Philosophy 50(4): 559–80.Google Scholar

Sharp, Hasana. 2013. “Violenta Imperia Nemo Continuit Diu,” Graduate Faculty Philosophy Journal 34(1): 133–48.Google Scholar

Sidgwick, Henry. 1962. The Method of Ethics. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar

Skinner, Quentin. 1978. The Foundations of Modern Political Thought, vol. 1. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Skinner, Quentin. 1984. “The Idea of Negative Liberty: Philosophical and Historical Perspectives,” in Philosophy in History, Rorty, Richard, Schneewind, J. B., and Skinner, Quentin (eds.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Skinner, Quentin. 1996. Reason and Rhetoric in the Philosophy of Hobbes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Skinner, Quentin. 1998. Liberty Before Liberalism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Skinner, Quentin. 2000. Machiavelli: A Very Short Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Slomp, Gabriella. 2000. Thomas Hobbes and the Political Philosophy of Glory. New York: St. Martin's Press.Google Scholar

Smith, Steven B. 1997. Spinoza, Liberalism, and the Question of Jewish Identity. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Smith, Steven B. 2003. Spinoza's Book of Life: Freedom and Redemption in the Ethics. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Sommerville, J. P. 1991. “Absolutism and Royalism,” in The Cambridge History of Political Thought 1450–1700, Burns, J. H. (ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 347–73.Google Scholar

Soyarslan, S. Forthcoming. “Spinoza's Critique of Humility in the Ethics,” The Southern Journal of Philosophy.Google Scholar

Steinberg, Diane. 2005. “Belief, Affirmation, and the Doctrine of Conatus in Spinoza,” The Southern Journal of Philosophy 43: 147–58.Google Scholar

Steinberg, Justin. 2008. “On Being Sui Iuris: Spinoza and the Republican Idea of Liberty,” History of European Ideas 34(3): 239–49.Google Scholar

Steinberg, Justin. 2009. “Spinoza on Civil Liberation,” Journal of the History of Philosophy 47(1): 35–58.Google Scholar

Steinberg, Justin. 2010a. “Benedict Spinoza: Epistemic Democrat,” History of Philosophy Quarterly 27(2): 145–64.Google Scholar

Steinberg, Justin. 2010b. “Spinoza's Curious Defense of Toleration,” in Spinoza's Theological–Political Treatise: A Critical Guide, Melamed, Yitzhak Y. and Rosenthal, Michael (eds.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 210–30.Google Scholar

Steinberg, Justin. 2013. “Imitation, Representation, and Humanity in Spinoza's Ethics,” Journal of the History of Philosophy 51(3): 383–407.Google Scholar

Steinberg, Justin. 2014. “Following a Recta Ratio Vivendi: The Practical Utility of Spinoza's Dictates of Reason,” in The Ethics of Spinoza's Ethics, Kisner, Matthew and Youpa, Andrew (eds.). Oxford: Oxford University Press, 178–96.Google Scholar

Steinberg, Justin. 2016. “Affect, Desire, and Judgement in Spinoza's Account of Motivation,” British Journal for the History of Philosophy 24(1): 67–87.Google Scholar

Steinberg, Justin. 2018a. “Two Puzzles Concerning Spinoza's Conception of Belief,” European Journal of Philosophy 26(1): 261–82.Google Scholar

Steinberg, Justin. 2018b. “Spinoza and Political Absolutism,” in Spinoza's Political Treatise: New Assessments, Sharp, Hasana and Melamed, Yitzhak (eds.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Steinberg, Justin. Forthcoming. “Spinoza on Bodies Politic and Civil Agreement,” in Spinoza and Relational Autonomy: Being with Others, Armstrong, Aurelia, Green, Keith, and Sangiacomo, Andrea (eds.). Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar

Strauss, Leo. 1965. Spinoza's Critique of Religion. Translated by Sinclair, E. M.. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Strauss, Leo. 1988. Persecution and the Art of Writing. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Strauss, Leo. 2003. Why Societies Need Dissent. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Sunstein, Cass. 2002. “The Law of Group Polarization,” The Journal of Political Philosophy 10(2): 175–95.Google Scholar

Sunstein, Cass, Schkade, David, and Hastie, Reid. 2007. “What Happened on Deliberation Day?” California Law Review 95: 915–40.Google Scholar

Tuck, Richard. 1987. “The ‘Modern’ Theory of Natural Law,” in The Languages of Political Theory in Early–Modern Europe, Pagden, Anthony (ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 99–119.Google Scholar

Van Bunge, Wiep. 2001. From Stevin to Spinoza: An Essay on Philosophy in the Seventeenth-Century Dutch Republic. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar

Van Gelderen, Martin. 1992. The Political Thought of the Dutch Revolt 1555–1590. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Van Gelderen, Martin. 1993. “The Machiavellian Moment and the Dutch Revolt: The Rise of Neostoicism and Dutch Republicanism,” in Machiavelli and Republicanism, Bock, Gisela, Skinner, Quentin, and Viroli, Maurizio (eds.). New York: Cambridge University Press, 205–23.Google Scholar

Velema, Wyger. 2002. “‘That a Republic is Better than a Monarchy’: Anti-Monarchism in Early Modern Dutch Political Thought,” in Republicanism: A Shared European Heritage (2 vols.), Gelderen, Martin Van and Skinner, Quentin (eds.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 9–25.Google Scholar

Verbeek, Theo. 2003. Spinoza's Theologico-Political Treatise: Exploring ‘The Will of God.’ Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar

Viljanen, Valtteri. 2011. Spinoza's Geometry of Power. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Viroli, Maurizio. 2002. Niccolò's Smile. New York: Hill and Wang.Google Scholar

Walker, Leslie. 1950. “Introduction” to The Discourses of Niccolò Machiavelli. Translated and edited by Walker, Leslie. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Warrender, Howard. 2000. The Political Philosophy of Hobbes. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Wernham, A. G. 1958. “Notes and Introduction,” in Spinoza: The Political Works Wernham, A. G. (ed.). Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Williams, Bernard. 1995. “Internal Reasons and The Obscurity of Blame,” in Making Sense of Humanity and Other Philosophical Papers, Williams, Bernard (ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 35–45.Google Scholar

Wilson, Catherine. 2008a. Epicureanism at the Origins of Modernity. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Wilson, Catherine. 2008b. “From Limits to Laws: The Construction of the Nomological Image of Nature in Early Modern Philosophy,” in Natural Law and Laws of Nature in Early Modern Europe: Jurisprudence, Theology, Moral and Natural Philosophy, Daston, Lorraine and Stolleis, Michael (eds.). Farnham: Ashgate: 13–26.Google Scholar

Wilson, Margaret. 1999. “Spinoza's Causal Axiom,” in Wilson, Margaret, Ideas and Mechanism. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 141–65.Google Scholar

Wirszubski, Chaim. 1950. Libertas as a Political Idea in Rome during the Late Republic and Early Principate. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Wright, Richard. 1966. Native Son. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar

Yates, Francis. 1966. The Art of Memory. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Youpa, Andrew. 2007. “Spinoza's Theory of Motivation,” Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 88(3): 375–90.Google Scholar

Youpa, Andrew. 2010. “Spinoza's Theories of Value,” British Journal for the History of Philosophy 18(2): 209–29.Google Scholar

Yovel, Yirmiyahu. 2004. “Incomplete Rationality,” in Spinoza on Reason and the Free Man, Yovel, Yirmiyahu and Segal, Gideon (eds.). New York: Little Room Press, 15–35.Google Scholar

Youpa, Andrew. 1989. Spinoza and Other Heretics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar