Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-75dct Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-06T19:23:37.548Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

9 - Social interactions, social relationships and the social system of spider monkeys

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 May 2010

Filippo Aureli
Affiliation:
School of Biological and Earth Science, Liverpool John Moores University, Liverpool
Colleen M. Schaffner
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, Chester Centre for Stress Research, University of Chester, Chester CH
Christina J. Campbell
Affiliation:
California State University, Northridge
Get access

Summary

Introduction

Primates live in a variety of social systems that differ in terms of spacing, grouping and mating patterns as well as the quality of social relationships between individual members (Crook and Gartland, 1966; Clutton-Brock, 1974; van Schaik and van Hooff, 1983; Wrangham, 1987; Dunbar, 1988; Strier, 1994; Janson, 2000; Isbell and Young, 2002; Fuentes, 2007). Three important components of a social system are social organization, social structure and mating system (Kappeler and van Schaik, 2002). In this chapter we focus on the social structure of spider monkeys and its components; social interactions and social relationships. First we start with fission–fusion dynamics, an aspect of social organization that is critical for the understanding of the spider monkeys' social system.

Fission–fusion dynamics

According to Kappeler and van Schaik (2002), social organization describes the size, sexual composition and spatiotemporal cohesion of a social system. The aspect of spatiotemporal cohesion is typically not emphasized in group-living primates because groups are usually viewed as cohesive units. Although variation in spatiotemporal cohesion also occurs in “cohesive” groups, it has mainly been used to characterize species living in so-called “fission–fusion societies.”

The term “fission–fusion” was introduced by Hans Kummer (1971) to describe a social system in which group size can be temporarily adjusted to the availability and distribution of resources by means of the fission and fusion of subunits called parties or subgroups.

Type
Chapter
Information
Spider Monkeys
The Biology, Behavior and Ecology of the Genus Ateles
, pp. 236 - 265
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ahumada, J. A. (1992). Grooming behavior of spider monkeys (Ateles geoffroyi) on Barro Colarado Island, Panama. Int. J. Primatol., 13, 33–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anaya-Huertas, C. and Mondragón-Ceballos, R. (1998). Social behavior of black-handed spider monkeys (Ateles geoffroyi) reared as home pets. Int. J. Primatol., 19, 767–784.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Asensio, N., Korstjens, A. H., Schaffner, C. M. and Aureli, F. (in press). Intragroup aggression, fission–fusion dynamics and feeding competition in spider monkeys. Behaviour.Google Scholar
Aureli, F. and Schaffner, C. M. (2002). Relationship assessment through emotional mediation. Behaviour, 139, 393–420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aureli, F. and Schaffner, C. M. (2005). Fission–fusion dynamics complicate the regulation of social relationships. Primate Eye, 86, 6.Google Scholar
Aureli, F. and Schaffner, C. M. (2007). Aggression and conflict management at fusion in spider monkeys. Biol. Lett., 3, 147–149.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Aureli, F., Das, M. and Veenema, H. C. (1997). Differential kinship effect on reconciliation in three species of macaques (Macaca fascicularis, M. fuscata, and M. sylvanus). J. Comp. Psychol., 111, 91–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aureli, F., Schaffner, C. M., Boesch, C.et al. (in press). Fission–fusion dynamics: new research frameworks. Curr. Anthropol.Google Scholar
Aureli, F., Schaffner, C. M., Verpooten, J., Slater, K. Y. and Ramos-Fernández, G. (2006). Raiding parties of male spider monkeys: insights into human warfare?Am. J. Phys. Anthropol., 131, 486–497.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Barrett, L. and Henzi, S. P. (2002). Constraints on relationship formation among female primates. Behaviour, 139, 263–289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barrett, L., Henzi, P. and Dunbar, R. (2003). Primate cognition: from ‘what now?’ to ‘what if?’. Trends Cogn. Sci., 7, 494–497.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barton, R. A., Byrne, R. W. and Whitten, A. (1996). Ecology, feeding competition and social structure in baboons. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol., 38, 321–329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bearder, S. K. (1987). Lorises, bushbabies, and tarsiers: diverse societies in solitary foragers. In Primate Societies, ed. Smuts, B. B., Cheney, D. L., Seyfarth, R. M., Wrangham, R. W. and Struhsaker, T. T., Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp. 11–24.Google Scholar
Boesch, C. and Boesch-Achermann, H. (2000). The Chimpanzees of the Taï Forest. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Boinski, S., Kauffman, L., Ehmke, E., Schet, S. and Vreedzaam, A. (2005). Dispersal patterns among three species of squirrel monkeys (Saimiri oerstedii, S. boliviensis and S. sciureus). I. Divergent costs and benefits. Behaviour, 142, 525–632.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boinski, S., Sughrue, K., Selvaggi, L.et al. (2002). An expanded test of the ecological model of primate social evolution: competitive regimes and female bonding in three species of squirrel monkeys (Saimiri oerstedii, S. boliviensis, and S. sciureus). Behaviour, 139, 227–261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campbell, C. J. (2003). Female-directed aggression in free-rangingAteles geoffroyi. Int. J. Primatol., 24, 223–237.Google Scholar
Campbell, C. J. (2006a). Lethal intragroup aggression by adult male spider monkeys (Ateles geoffroyi). Am. J. Primatol., 68, 1197–1201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campbell, C. J. (2006b). Copulation in free-ranging black-handed spider monkeys (Ateles geoffroyi). Am. J. Primatol., 68, 507–511.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chapais, B. (1988). Experimental matrilineal inheritance of rank in female Japanese macaques. Anim. Behav., 36, 1025–1037.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chapman, C. A. (1990). Association patterns of spider monkeys: the influence of ecology and sex on social organization. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol., 26, 409–414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chapman, C. A., Fedigan, L. M., Fedigan, L. and Chapman, L. J. (1989). Post-weaning resource competition and sex ratios in spider monkeys. Oikos, 54, 315–319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chapman, C. A., Wrangham, R. W. and Chapman, L. J. (1995). Ecological constraints on group size: an analysis of spider monkey and chimpanzee subgroups. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol., 36, 59–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chapman, T., Arnqvist, G., Bangham, J. and Rowe, L. (2003). Sexual conflict. Trends Ecol. Evol., 18, 41–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clutton-Brock, T. H. (1974). Primate social organization and ecology. Nature, 250, 539–542.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clutton-Brock, T. H. and Parker, G. A. (1995). Sexual coercion in animal societies. Anim. Behav., 49, 1345–1365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Connor, R. C., Wells, R., Mann, J. and Read, A. (2000). The bottlenose dolphin, Tursiops spp.: social relationships in a fission–fusion society. In Cetacean Societies: Field Studies of Whales and Dolphins, ed. Mann, J., Connor, R. C., Tyack, P. and Whitehead, H., Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp. 91–126.Google Scholar
Cooper, M. A. and Bernstein, I. S. (2002). Counter aggression and reconciliation in Assamese macaques (Macaca assamensis). Am. J. Primatol., 56, 215–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cords, M. (1997). Friendships, alliances, reciprocity and repair. In Machiavellian Intelligence II, ed. Whiten, A. and Byrne, R. W., Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 24–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crook, J. H. and Gartland, J. S. (1966). Evolution of primate societies. Nature, 210, 1200–1203.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cross, P. C., Lloyd-Smith, J. O. and Getz, W. M. (2005). Disentangling association patterns in fission–fusion societies using African buffalo as an example. Anim. Behav., 69, 499–506.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waal, F. B. M. (1982). Chimpanzee Politics. London: Cape.Google Scholar
Waal, F. B. M. and Luttrell, L. M. (1989). Toward a comparative socioecology of the genus Macaca: different dominance styles in rhesus and stumptail macaques. Am. J. Primatol., 19, 83–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Di Fiore, A. and Campbell, C. J. (2007). The Atelines: variation in ecology, behavior, and social organization. In Primates in Perspective, ed. Campbell, C. J., Fuentes, A., MacKinnon, K. C., Panger, M. and Bearder, S. K., New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 155–185.Google Scholar
Dunbar, R. I. M. (1988). Primate Social System. London: Croom Helm.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dunbar, R. I. M. (2003). Why are apes so smart? In Primate Life Histories and Socioecology, ed. Kappeler, P. M. and Pereira, M. E., Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp. 285–298.Google Scholar
Eisenberg, J. F. and Kuehn, R. (1966). The behavior of Ateles geoffroyi and related species. Smithson. Misc. Coll., 151, 1–63.Google Scholar
Emlen, S. T. and Oring, L. W. (1977). Ecology, sexual selection, and the evolution of mating systems. Science, 197, 215–223.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fedigan, L. M. and Baxter, M. J. (1984). Sex differences and social organization in free-ranging spider monkeys (Ateles geoffroyi). Primates, 25, 279–294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fragaszy, D. M., Visalberghi, E. and Fedigan, L. M. (2004). The Complete Capuchin: The Biology of the Genus Cebus. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Fuentes, A. (2007). Social organization: social systems and the complexities in understanding the evolution of primate behavior. In Primates in Perspective, ed. Campbell, C. J., Fuentes, A., MacKinnon, K. C., Panger, M. and Bearder, S. K., New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 592–608.Google Scholar
Furuichi, T. (1989). Social interactions and the life history of female Pan paniscus in Wanba, Zaire. Int. J. Primatol., 10, 173–197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goodall, J. (1986). The Chimpanzees of Gombe: Patterns of Behavior. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Grüter, C. C. and Zinner, D. (2004). Nested societies: convergent adaptations of baboons and snub-nosed monkeys. Primate Rep., 70, 1–98.Google Scholar
Henzi, S. P. and Barrett, L. (2002). Infants as a commodity in a baboon market. Anim. Behav., 63, 915–921.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henzi, S. P. and Barrett, L. (2003). Evolutionary ecology, sexual conflict, and behavioral differentiation among baboon populations. Evol. Anthropol., 12, 217–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hinde, R. A. (1976). Interactions, relationships and social structure. Man, 11, 1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hinde, R. A. (1979). Towards Understanding Relationships. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Hohmann, G and Fruth, B. (2002). Dynamics in social organization of bonobos (Pan paniscus). In Behavioural Diversity in Chimpanzees and Bonobos, ed. Boesch, C., Hohmann, G. and Marchant, L. F., Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 138–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holekamp, K. E., Cooper, S. M., Katona, C. I., Berry, N. A., Frank, L. G. and Smale, L. (1997). Patterns of association among female spotted hyenas (Crocuta crocuta). J. Mammal., 78, 55–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hunt, K. D. (1989). Positional behavior in Pan troglodytes at the Mahale Mountains and the Gombe Stream National Parks, Tanzania. Unpublished Ph.D. thesis, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI.Google Scholar
Isbell, L. A. and Young, T. P. (2002). Ecological models of female social relationships in primates: similarities, disparities, and some directions for future clarity. Behaviour, 139, 177–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Izawa, K., Kimura, K. and Nieto, A. S. (1979). Grouping of the wild spider monkey. Primates, 20, 503–512.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Janson, C. H. (1992). Evolutionary ecology of primate social structure. In Evolutionary Ecology and Human Behavior, ed. Smith, E. A. and Winterhalden, B., New York: Gruyter, pp. 95–130.Google Scholar
Janson, C. H. (2000). Primate socio-ecology: the end of a golden age. Evol. Anthropol., 9, 73–86.3.0.CO;2-X>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Janson, C. H. and Goldsmith, M. L. (1995). Predicting group size in primates: foraging costs and predation risks. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol., 36, 326–336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Janson, C. H. and Schaik, C. P. (1988). Recognizing the many faces of primate food competition: methods. Behaviour, 105, 165–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kano, T. (1992). The Last Ape: Pygmy Chimpanzee Behavior and Ecology. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Kappeler, P. M. and Schaik, C. P. (2002). Evolution of primate social systems. Int. J. Primatol., 23, 707–740.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kappeler, P. M. and van Schaik, C. P. (2004). Sexual selection in primates: review and selective preview. In Sexual Selection in Primates: New and Comparative Perspectives, ed. Kappeler, P. M. and Schaik, C. P., Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 3–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kerth, G. and Konig, B. (1999). Fission, fusion and nonrandom association in female Bechstein's bats (Myotis bechsteinii). Behaviour, 136, 1187–1202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kinzey, W. G. and Cunningham, E. P. (1994). Variability in platyrrhine social organization. Am. J. Primatol., 34, 185–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klein, L. L. (1971). Observations on copulation and seasonal reproduction of two species of spider monkeys, Ateles belzebuth and A. geoffroyi. Folia Primatol., 15, 233–248.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Klein, L. L. (1974). Agonistic behavior in Neotropical primates. In Primate Aggression, Territoriality and Xenophobia: A Comparative Perspective, ed. Holloway, R. L., New York: Academic Press, pp. 77–122.Google Scholar
Klein, L. L. and Klein, D. J. (1971). Aspects of social behavior in a colony of spider monkeys Ateles geoffroyi. Int. Zoo Yrbk., 11, 175–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klein, L. L. and Klein, D. J. (1977). Feeding behavior of the Colombian spider monkey, Ateles belzebuth. In Primate Ecology: Studies of Feeding and Ranging Behaviour in Lemurs, Monkeys and Apes, ed. Clutton-Brock, T. H., London: Academic Press, pp. 153–181.Google Scholar
Koenig, A. (2000). Competitive regimes in forest-dwelling Hanuman langur females (Semnopithecus entellus). Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol., 48, 93–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koenig, A. (2002). Competition for resources and its behavioral consequences among female primates. Int. J. Primatol., 23, 759–783.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Korstjens, A. H., Verhoeckx, I. L. and Dunbar, R. I. M. (2006). Time as a constraint on group size in spider monkeys. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol., 60, 683–694.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kummer, H. (1967). Tripartite relations in hamadryas baboons. In Social Communication among Primates, ed. Altman, S., Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp. 63–71.Google Scholar
Kummer, H. (1971). Primate Societies: Group Techniques of Ecological Adaptation. Arlington Heights, IL: AHM Publishing Corporation.Google Scholar
Kummer, H. (1978). On the value of social relationships to nonhuman primates: a heuristic scheme. Soc. Sci. Inform., 17, 687–705.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lehmann, J. and Boesch, C. (in press). Sex differences in chimpanzee sociality. Int. J. Primatol.Google Scholar
Lehmann, J., Korstjens, A. H. and Dunbar, R. I. M. (in press). Fission–fusion social systems as a strategy for coping with ecological constraints: a primate case. Evol. Ecol.Google Scholar
Lusseau, D. and Newman, M. E. J. (2004). Identifying the role that animals play in their social networks. Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. B (Suppl.), 271, S477–S481.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Maestripieri, D. (1994). Influence of infants on females social relationships in monkeys. Folia Primatol., 63, 192–202.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Marlowe, F. W. (2005). Hunter-gatherers and human evolution. Evol. Anthropol., 14, 54–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Milton, K. (1984). Habitat, diet, and activity patterns of free-ranging woolly spider monkeys (Brachyteles arachnoides E Geoffroy 1806). Int. J. Primatol., 5, 491–514.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Milton, K. (2000). Quo vadis? Tactics of food search and group movement in primates and other animals. In On the Move: How and Why Animals Travel in Groups, ed. Boinski, S. and Garber, P. A., Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp. 375–417.Google Scholar
Milton, K. and Hopkins, M. E. (2006). Growth of a reintroduced spider monkey (Ateles geoffroyi) population on Barro Colorado Island, Panama. In New Perspectives in the Study of Mesoamerican Primates: Distribution, Ecology, Behavior and Conservation, ed. Estrada, A., Garber, P. A., Pavelka, M. S. M. and Lueke, L., New York: Springer, pp. 417–435.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mitchell, C. L., Boinski, S. and Schaik, C. P. (1991). Competitive regimes and female bonding in two species of squirrel monkeys (Saimiri oerstedi and S. sciurieus). Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol., 28, 55–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Müller, A. E. and Thalmann, U. (2000). Origin and evolution of primate social organisation: a reconstruction. Biol. Rev., 75, 405–435.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Muroyama, Y. (1994). Exchange of grooming for allomothering in female patas monkeys (Erythrocebus patas). Behaviour, 128, 103–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nishida, T. (1983). Alpha status and agonistic alliance in wild chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes schweinfurthii). Primates, 24, 318–336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nishida, T. and Hiraiwa-Hasegawa, M. (1987). Chimpanzees and bonobos: cooperative relationships among males. In Primate Societies, ed. Smuts, B. B., Cheney, D. L., Seyfarth, R. M., Wrangham, R. W. and Struhsaker, T. T., Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp. 165–177.Google Scholar
Noë, R. and Hammerstein, P. (1994). Biological markets: supply and demand determine the effect of partner choice in cooperation, mutualism and mating. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol., 35, 1–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Noë, R., Schaik, C. P. and Hooff, J. A. R. A M. (1991). The market effect: an explanation for pay-off asymmetries among collaborating animals. Ethology, 87, 97–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pastor-Nieto, R. (2001). Grooming, kinship, and co-feeding in captive spider monkeys (Ateles geoffroyi). Zoo Biol., 20, 293–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Preuschoft, S., Paul, A. and Kuester, J. (1998). Dominance styles of female and male Barbary macaques (Macaca sylvanus). Behaviour, 135, 731–755.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ramos-Fernández, G., Boyer, D. and Gómez, V. P. (2006). A complex social structure with fission–fusion properties can emerge from a simple foraging model. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol., 60, 536–549.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robinson, J. G. and Janson, C. H. (1987). Capuchins, squirrel monkeys, and atelines: socioecological convergence with Old World primates. In Primate Societies, ed. Smuts, B. B., Cheney, D. L., Seyfarth, R. M., Wrangham, R. W. and Struhsaker, T. T., Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp. 69–82.Google Scholar
Rodseth, L., Wrangham, R. W., Harrigan, A. M. and Smuts, B. B. (1991). The human community as a primate society. Curr. Anthropol., 32, 221–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rondinelli, R. and Klein, L. L. (1976). Analysis of adult social spacing tendencies and related social interactions in a colony of spider monkeys (Ateles geoffroyi) at San Francisco Zoo. Folia Primatol., 25, 122–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Russo, S. E., Campbell, C. J., Dew, J. L., Stevenson, P. R. and Suarez, S. A. (2005). A multi-forest comparison of dietary preferences and seed dispersal by Ateles spp. Int. J. Primatol., 26, 1017–1037.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schaffner, C. M. and Aureli, F. (2005). Embraces and grooming in captive spider monkeys. Int. J. Primatol., 26, 1093–1106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seyfarth, R. M. (1980). The distribution of grooming and related behaviours among adult female vervet monkeys. Anim. Behav., 28, 798–813.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shimooka, Y. (2003). Seasonal variation in association patterns of wild spider monkeys (Ateles belzebuth belzebuth) at La Macarena, Colombia. Primates, 44, 83–90.Google ScholarPubMed
Shimooka, Y. (2005). Sexual differences in ranging of Ateles belzebuth belzebuth at La Macarena, Colombia. Int. J. Primatol., 26, 385–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shülke, O. and Ostner, J. (2005). Big times for dwarfs: social organization, sexual selection, and cooperation in the Cheirogaleidae. Evol. Anthropol., 14, 170–185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Slater, K. Y., Schaffner, C. M. and Aureli, F. (2005). Female-directed aggression in wild spider monkeys: male display and female mate choice. Primate Rep., 72, 89–90.Google Scholar
Slater, K. Y., Schaffner, C. M. and Aureli, F. (2007). Embraces for infant handling in spider monkeys: evidence for a biological market?Anim. Behav., 74, 455–461.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smuts, B. B. and Smuts, R. W. (1993). Male aggression and sexual coercion of females in nonhuman primates and other mammals: evidence and theoretical implications. Adv. Stud. Behav., 22, 1–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smuts, B. B., Cheney, D. L., Seyfarth, R. M., Wrangham, R. W. and Struhsaker, T. T. (1987). Primate Societies. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Stammbach, E. (1987). Desert, forest, and montane baboons: multilevel societies. In Primate Societies, ed. Smuts, B. B., Cheney, D. L., Seyfarth, R. M., Wrangham, R. W. and Struhsaker, T. T., Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp. 112–120.Google Scholar
Sterck, E. H. M., Watts, D. P. and Schaik, C. P. (1997). The evolution of female social relationships in nonhuman primates. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol., 41, 291–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strier, K. B. (1989). Effects of patch size on feeding associations in muriquis (Brachyteles arachnoids). Folia Primatol., 52, 70–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strier, K. B. (1992). Atelinae adaptations: behavioural strategies and ecological constraints. Am. J. Phys. Anthropol., 88, 515–524.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Strier, K. B. (1994). Myth of the typical primate. Yrbk. Phys. Anthropol., 37, 233–271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strier, K. B. (1999). Why is female kin bonding so rare? Comparative sociality of neotropical primates. In Comparative Primate Socioecology, ed. Lee, P. C., Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 300–319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stumpf, R. (2007). Chimpanzees and bonobos – diversity within and between species. In Primates in Perspective, ed. Campbell, C. J., Fuentes, A., MacKinnon, K. C., Panger, M. and Bearder, S. K., New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 321–344.Google Scholar
Sussman, R. W. and Garber, P. A. (2007). Cooperation and competition in primate social interactions. In Primates in Perspective, ed. Campbell, C. J., Fuentes, A., MacKinnon, K. C., Panger, M. and Bearder, S. K., New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 636–651.Google Scholar
Symington, M. M. (1987). Sex ratio and maternal rank in wild spider monkeys: when daughters disperse. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol., 20, 421–425.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Symington, M. M. (1988). Food competition and foraging party size in the black spider monkey (Ateles paniscus chamek). Behaviour, 105, 117–132.Google Scholar
Symington, M. M. (1990). Fission–fusion social organization in Ateles and Pan. Int.J. Primatol., 11, 47–61.Google Scholar
Thierry, B. (1985). Patterns of agonistic interactions in three species of macaque (Macaca mulatta, M. fascicularis, M. tonkeana). Aggress. Behav., 11, 223–233.3.0.CO;2-A>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thierry, B. (2000). Covariation of conflict management patterns across macaque species. In Natural Conflict Resolution, ed. Aureli, F. and Waal, F. B. M., Berkeley: University of California Press, pp. 106–128.Google Scholar
Thierry, B., Singh, M. and Kaumanns, W. (2004). Macaque Societies: A Model for the Study of Social Organization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Valero, A., Schaffner, C. M., Vick, L. G., Aureli, F. and Ramos-Fernández, G. (2006). Intragroup lethal aggression in wild spider monkeys. Am. J. Primatol., 68, 732–737.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hooff, J. A. R. A. M. and Schaik, C. P. (1994). Male bonds: affiliative relationships among nonhuman primate males. Behaviour, 130, 309–337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van Roosmalen, M. G. M. and Klein, L. L. (1988). The spider monkeys, genus Ateles. In Ecology and Behavior of Neotropical Primates, Vol. 2, ed. Mittermeier, R. A., Coimbra-Filho, A. F. and Fonseca, G. A. B., Washington, DC: World Wildlife Fund, pp. 455–537.Google Scholar
Schaik, C. P. (1983). Why are diurnal primates living in groups?Behaviour, 87, 120–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van Schaik, C. P. (1989). The ecology of social relationships amongst female primates. In Comparative Socioecology: The Behavioural Ecology of Humans and Other Mammals, ed. Standen, V. and Foley, R. A., Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 195–218.Google Scholar
Schaik, C. P. (1999). The socioecology of fission–fusion sociality in orangutans. Primates, 40, 69–86.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
van Schaik, C. P. and Aureli, F. (2000). The natural history of valuable relationships in primates. In Natural Conflict Resolution, ed. Aureli, F. and Waal, F. B. M., Berkeley: University of California Press, pp. 307–333.Google Scholar
Schaik, C. P. and Hoerstermann, M. (1994). Predation risk and the number of adult males in a primate group: a comparative test. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol., 35, 261–272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schaik, C. P. and Kappeler, P. M. (1997). Infanticide risk and the evolution of male-female association in primates. Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. B, 264, 1687–1694.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schaik, C. P. and Hooff, J. A. R. A. M. (1983). On the ultimate causes of primate social systems. Behaviour, 85, 91–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schaik, C. P. and Noordwijk, M. A. (1988). Scramble and contest feeding competition among female long-tailed macaques (Macaca fascicularis). Behaviour, 105, 77–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van Schaik, C. P., Pradhan, G. R. and Noordwijk, M. A. (2004). Mating conflict in primates: infanticide, sexual harassment and female sexuality. In Sexual Selection in Primates: New and Comparative Perspectives, ed. Kappeler, P. M. and Schaik, C. P., Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 131–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wallace, R. B. (2001). Diurnal activity budgets of black spider monkeys, Ateles chamek, in a southern Amazonian tropical forest. Neotrop. Primates, 9, 101–107.Google Scholar
Watts, D. P. (1997). Agonistic interventions in wild mountain gorilla groups. Behaviour, 134, 23–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watts, D. P. (1998). Coalitionary mate guarding by male chimpanzees at Ngogo, Kibale National Park, Uganda. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol., 44, 43–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watts, D. P., Muller, M., Amsler, S. J., Mbabazi, G. and Mitani, J. C. (2006). Lethal intergroup aggression by chimpanzees in the Kibale National Park, Uganda. Am. J. Primatol., 68, 161–180.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Whitehead, H. and Dufault, S. (1999). Techniques for analysing vertebrate social structure using identified individuals: review and recommendations. Adv. Stud. Behav., 28, 33–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, J. M., Oehlert, G. W., Carlis, J. V. and Pusey, A. E. (2004). Why do male chimpanzees defend a group range?Anim. Behav., 68, 523–532.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wittemyer, G., Douglas-Hamilton, I. and Getz, W. M. (2005). The socioecolgy of elephants: analysis of the process creating multitiered social structures. Anim. Behav., 69, 1357–1371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wrangham, R. W. (1980). An ecological model of female bonded primate groups. Behaviour, 75, 262–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wrangham, R. W. (1987). Evolution of social structure. In Primate Societies, ed. Smuts, B. B., Cheney, D. L., Seyfarth, R. M., Wrangham, R. W. and Struhsaker, T. T., Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp. 282–296.Google Scholar
Wrangham, R. W. (2000). Why are male chimpanzees more gregarious than mothers? A scramble competition hypothesis. In Primate Males: Causes and Consequences of Variation in Group Composition, ed. Kappeler, P. M., Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 248–258.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×