Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-vfjqv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T03:31:36.739Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

20 - Staying Private

from Lowering Barriers to Policy Making

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 May 2015

George C. Edwards
Affiliation:
Texas A&M University
Nathaniel Persily
Affiliation:
Stanford Law School
Get access

Summary

The challenges of governing have rarely been greater. The distance between the parties in Congress and between identifiers with the parties among the public is the greatest in a century. The public accords Congress the lowest approval ratings in modern history, but activists allow its members little leeway to compromise. The inability of Congress and the president to resolve critical problems results in constant crises in financing the government; endless debate over immigration, health care, environmental protection, and other crucial issues; and a failure to plan effectively for the future.

GOING PUBLIC

Modern presidents invest heavily in leading the public in the hope of leveraging public support to win backing in Congress (Edwards 1983, 2004; Kernell 2007). They adopt this strategy for governing at least partly in an attempt to create political capital to overcome the impediments to achieving their policy goals. Highly polarized politics only increases the difficulty of hurdling those obstacles. Nevertheless, there is overwhelming evidence that presidents, even “great communicators,” rarely move the public in their direction. Indeed, the public often moves against the position the president favors (Edwards 2004, 2007, 2009, 2012).

Presidents not only fail to create opportunities for change by going public but their efforts at persuading the public also may increase public polarization and thus decrease their chances of success in governing. When political leaders take their cases directly to the public, they have to accommodate the limited attention spans of the public and the availability of space on television. Cable television does not offer the president more opportunities to speak directly to the nation. Cable stations are no more eager than the traditional networks to give up to the White House expensive time slots for which they receive no compensation. Moreover, the audiences for cable news programs are small. The internet does offer the president the opportunity to stream videos to viewers, but true believers, those already supporting the president, make up most of the audience for those videos.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2015

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abramowitz, Alan I. 2010. The Disappearing Center. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Brady, David, and Fiorina, Morris. 2000. “Congress in the Era of the Permanent Campaign.” In The Permanent Campaign and Its Future, eds. Ornstein, Norman and Mann, Thomas. Washington, DC: American Enterprise Institute and Brookings Institution: 134–161.Google Scholar
Bullock, John G. 2011. “Elite Influence on Public Opinion in an Informed Electorate.” American Political Science Review 105(3): 496–515.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dancey, Logan, and Goren, Paul. 2010. “Party Identification, Issue Attitudes, and the Dynamics of Political Debate.” American Journal of Political Science 54(3): 686–699.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Druckman, James N., and Bolsen, Toby. 2011. “Framing, Motivated Reasoning, and Opinions about Emergent Technologies.” Journal of Communication 61(4): 659–668.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Druckman, James N., Peterson, Erik, and Slothuus, Rune. 2013. “How Elite Partisan Polarization Affects Public Opinion Formation.” American Political Science Review 107 (February 2013): 57–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edwards III, George C. 1983. The Public Presidency. New York: St. Martin's.Google Scholar
Edwards III, George C. 2004. On Deaf Ears: The Limits of the Bully Pulpit. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Edwards III, George C. 2007. Governing by Campaigning: The Politics of the Bush Presidency. 2nd edition. New York: Longman.Google Scholar
Edwards III, George C. 2009. The Strategic President: Persuasion and Opportunity in Presidential Leadership. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Edwards III, George C. 2012. Overreach: Leadership in the Obama Presidency. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Edwards III, George C. 2013. “Persuasion Is Not Power.” Presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, Chicago.
Farrand, Max, ed. 1966. “CCCLXVII, Jared Sparks: Journal, April 19, 1830.” In The Records of the Federal Convention of 1787, vol. III, rev. ed. Haven, New: Yale University Press: 578–579.Google Scholar
Fiorina, Morris P., with Abrams, Samuel J. and Pope, Jeremy C.. 2011. Culture Wars? The Myth of Polarized America. 3rd edition. New York: Pearson Longman.Google Scholar
Green, Donald P., Palmquist, Bradley, and Schickler, Eric. 2002. Partisan Hearts and Minds. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Heclo, Hugh. 2000. “Campaigning and Governing: A Conspectus.” In The Permanent Campaign and Its Future, eds. Ornstein, Norman and Mann, Thomas. Washington, DC: American Enterprise Institute and Brookings Institution: 1–37.Google Scholar
Jacobs, Lawrence R., and Mettler, Suzanne. 2011. “Why Public Opinion Changes: The Implications for Health and Health Policy.” Journal of Health Policy, Politics and Law 36(6): 917–933.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jacobs, Lawrence R., and Shapiro, Robert Y.. 2000. Politicians Don't Pander: Political Manipulation and the Loss of Democratic Responsiveness. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Jacobs, Lawrence R., and Skocpol, Theda. 2012. Health Care Reform and American Politics, rev. ed. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Jacobson, Gary C. 2013. “Partisan Polarization in American Politics: A Background Paper.” Presidential Studies Quarterly 43(4): 688–708.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kernell, Samuel. 2007. Going Public: New Strategies of Presidential Leadership. 4th edition. Washington, DC: CQ Press.Google Scholar
Lee, Frances E. 2009. Beyond Ideology: Politics, Principles, and Partisanship in the U.S. Senate. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, Francis E. 2013. “Presidents and Party Teams: The Politics of Debt Limits and Executive Oversight, 2001–2013.” Presidential Studies Quarterly 43(4): 775–791.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lizza, Ryan. 2013. “Getting to Maybe: Inside the Gang of Eight's Immigration Deal.” New Yorker, June 24.Google Scholar
Mann, Thomas E., and Ornstein, Norman J.. 2012. It's Even Worse than It Looks. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
News Conference by the President. 2013. White House, April 30. Retrieved from www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2013/04/30/news-conference-president.
Nicholson, Stephen P. 2012. “Polarizing Cues.” American Journal of Political Science 56(4): 52–66.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ornstein, Norman J., and Mann, Thomas E.. 2000. “Conclusion: The Permanent Campaign and the Future of American Democracy.” In The Permanent Campaign and Its Future, eds. Ornstein, Norman and Mann, Thomas. Washington, DC: American Enterprise Institute and Brookings Institution: 291–334.Google Scholar
Rapoport, Ronald B., Dost, Meredith, Lovell, Ani-Rae, and Stone, Walter J.. 2013. “Republican Factionalism and Tea Party Activists.” Presented at the Annual Meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association, Chicago.
Shear, Michael D. 2013. “Difficult Spot for Obama on Immigration Push.” New York Times, July 11.
Smith, Joanne R., Terry, Deborah J., Crosier, Timothy R., and Duck, Julie M.. 2005. “The Importance of the Relevance of the Issue to the Group in Voting Intentions.” Basic and Applied Social Psychology 27(2): 163–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, Mark. 2000. American Business and Political Power: Public Opinion, Elections, and Democracy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strickland, April A., Taber, Charles S., and Lodge, Milton. 2011. “Motivated Reasoning and Public Opinion.” Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law 36(6): 935–944.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Theriault, Sean M. 2008. Party Polarization in Congress. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Theriault, Sean M. 2013. The Gingrich Senators: The Roots of Partisan Warfare in Congress. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Visser, Penny S., Bizer, George Y., and Krosnick, Jon A.. 2006. “Exploring the Latent Structure of Strength-Related Attitude Attributes.” In Advances in Experimental Social Psychology 38, ed. Zanna, Mark P.. San Diego: Academic Press: 1–67.Google Scholar
West, Darrel, and Loomis, Burdett. 1999. The Sound of Money: How Political Interests Get What They Want. New York: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar
Wilson, Scott, and Goldfarb, Zachary A.. 2013. “With Domestic Legacy in Lawmakers' Hands, Obama Considers His Options.” New York Times, April 13.Google Scholar
Woodward, Bob. 2012. The Price of Politics. New York: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×