Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-x4r87 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T11:39:45.610Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

References

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2014

Hans Joas
Affiliation:
Universitat Erfurt, Germany
Wolfgang Knöbl
Affiliation:
Georg-August-Universität, Göttingen, Germany
Get access
Type
Chapter
Information
Social Theory
Twenty Introductory Lectures
, pp. 561 - 591
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abbott, Andrew (1988), The System ofProfessions:An Essay on the Division of Expert Labor. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Adler, Patricia, Peter, Adler and Andrea, Fontana (1987), ‘Everyday Life in Sociology’, Annual Review of Sociology 13: 217–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adorno, Theodor W. (1976 [1969]), The Positivist Dispute in German Sociology [Der Positivismusstreit in der deutschen Soziologie]. London: Heinemann.Google Scholar
Adorno, Theodor W. and Max, Horkheimer (1979 [1944]), Dialectic of Enlightenment [Dialektik der Aufklärung. Philosophische Fragmente]. London: Verso.Google Scholar
Adorno, Theodor W., Else Frenkel, Brunswick, Daniel Jacob, Levinson and Robert Nevitt, Sanford (1950), The Authoritarian Personality. New York: Harper.Google Scholar
Alexander, Jeffrey C. (1982), Theoretical Logic in Sociology. Volume I: Positivism, Presuppositions, and Current Controversies. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Alexander, Jeffrey C. (1982), Theoretical Logic in Sociology. Volume II: The Antinomies of Classical Thought: Marx and Durkheim. Berkeley and Los Angeles. University of California Press.Google Scholar
Alexander, Jeffrey C. (1983), Theoretical Logic in Sociology. Volume III: The Classical Attempt at Theoretical Synthesis: Max Weber. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Alexander, Jeffrey C. (1983), Theoretical Logic in Sociology. Volume IV: The Modern Reconstruction of Classical Thought: Talcott Parsons. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Alexander, Jeffrey C. (1985), ‘Introduction’, in Jeffrey C., Alexander (ed.), Neofunctionalism. London: Sage, pp. 7–18.Google Scholar
Alexander, Jeffrey C. (1987), Twenty Lectures: Sociological Theory since World War II. London: Hutchinson.Google Scholar
Alexander, Jeffrey C. (1988), ‘Culture and Political Crisis: “Watergate” and Durkheimian Sociology’, in Jeffrey C., Alexander, Durkheimian Sociology: Cultural Studies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 187–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alexander, Jeffrey C. (1994), ‘Modern, Anti, Post, and Neo: How Social Theories Have Tried to Understand the “New World” of “Our Time”’, Zeitschrift für Soziologie 23, 3: 165–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alexander, Jeffrey C. (1996), ‘Critical Reflections on “Reflexive Modernization”’, Theory, Culture & Society 13, 4: 133–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alexander, Jeffrey C. (1998), ‘Citizen and Enemy as Symbolic Classification: On the Polarizing Discourse of Civil Society’, in Jeffrey C., Alexander (ed.), Real Civil Societies: Dilemmas of Institutionalization. London: Sage, pp. 96–114.Google Scholar
Alexander, Jeffrey C. (1998), Neofunctionalism and After. Malden, MA and Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Alexander, Jeffrey C. and Paul, Colomy (1985), ‘Toward Neo-Functionalism’, Sociological Theory 3, 2: 11-23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Almond, Gabriel and Sidney, Verba (1989 [1963]), The Civic Culture: Political Attitudes and Democracy in Five Nations. Newbury Park, London and New Delhi: Sage.Google Scholar
Arendt, Hannah (1958), The Human Condition. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Arendt, Hannah (1958 [1951]), The Origins of Totalitarianism. New York: Meridian Books.Google Scholar
Arendt, Hannah (1964 [1963]), Eichmann in Jerusalem: A Report on the Banality of Evil. New York: Viking Press.Google Scholar
Arendt, Hannah (1970), On Violence. London: Allen Lane.Google Scholar
Arnason, Johann P. (1988), Praxis und Interpretation. Sozialphilosophische Studien. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
Arnason, Johann P. (1993), The Future that Failed: Origins and Destinies of the Soviet Model. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Arendt, Hannah (1996), ‘Totalitarismus und Modernisierung’, in Lars, Clausen (ed.), Gesellschaften im Umbruch. Frankfurt am Main: Campus, pp. 154–63Google Scholar
Arendt, Hannah (1997), Social Theory and Japanese Experience: The Dual Civilization. London and New York: Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Arendt, Hannah (2002), The Peripheral Centre: Essays on Japanese History and Civilization. Melbourne: Transpacific Press.Google Scholar
Arendt, Hannah (2003), Civilizations in Dispute: Historical Questions and Theoretical Traditions. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Barber, Bernard (1992), ‘Neofunctionalism and the Theory of the Social System’, in Paul, Colomy (ed.), The Dynamics of Social Systems. London: Sage, pp. 36–55.Google Scholar
Barthes, Roland (1972 [1957]), Mythologies [Mythologies]. London: Jonathan Cape.Google Scholar
Baudrillard, Jean (1978), Agonie des Realen. Berlin: Merve.Google Scholar
Baudrillard, Jean (1988 [1986]), America [Amérique]. London: Verso.Google Scholar
Baudrillard, Jean (1993 [1976]), Symbolic Exchange and Death [L'échange symbolique et la mort]. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Bauman, Zygmunt (1989), Modernity and the Holocaust. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Bauman, Zygmunt (1991), Modernity and Ambivalence. Oxford: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Bauman, Zygmunt (1993), Postmodern Ethics. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Bauman, Zygmunt (1997), Postmodernity and its Discontents. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Bauman, Zygmunt (1999), In Search of Politics. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Beck, Ulrich (1986), Risikogesellschaft. Auf dem Weg in eine andere Moderne. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
Beck, Ulrich (1992 [1986]), Risk Society: Towards a New Modernity [Risikogesellschaft. Auf dem Weg in eine andere Moderne]. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Beck, Ulrich (1995 [1988]), Ecological Politics in an Age of Risk [Gegengifte. Die organisierte Unverantwortlichkeit]. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Beck, Ulrich (1997 [1993]), The Reinvention of Politics [Die Erfindung des Politischen]. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Beck, Ulrich (2000 [1997]), What is Globalization? [Was ist Globalisierung?]. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Becker, Gary S. (1981), A Treatise on the Family. Cambridge, MA and London: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Becker, Howard S. (1963), Outsiders:Studies in the Sociology of Deviance. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Becker-Schmidt, Regina and Gudrun-Axeli, Knapp (2001), Feministische Theorien zur Einführung. Hamburg: Junius.Google Scholar
Beckert, Jens (2002 [1997]), Beyond the Market: The Social Foundations of Economic Efficiency [Grenzen des Marktes. Die sozialen Grundlagen wirtschaftlicher Effizienz]. Princeton and Oxford: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Bell, Daniel (1973), The Coming of Post-Industrial Society: A Venture in Social Forecasting. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Bellah, Robert (1985 [1957]), Tokugawa Religion: The Cultural Roots of Modern Japan. New York and London: Anchor Books.Google Scholar
Bellah, Robert (1991 [1970]), Beyond Belief: Essays on Religion in a Post-Traditional World. Berkeley, Los Angeles and London: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Bellah, Robert, Richard, Madsen, William M., Sullivan, Ann, Swidler and Steven M., Tipton (1985), Habits of the Heart: Individualism and Commitment in American Life. Berkeley and London: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Bellah, Robert, Richard, Madsen, William M., Sullivan, Ann, Swidler and Steven M., Tipton (1991), The Good Society. New York: Knopf.Google Scholar
Bellow, Saul (2000), Ravelstein. London: Viking.Google Scholar
Bendix, Reinhard (1963 [1952]), ‘Social Stratification and Political Power’, in Reinhard, Bendix and Seymour Martin, Lipset (eds.), Class, Status and Power: A Reader in Social Stratification. Glencoe: Free Press, pp. 596–609.Google Scholar
Bendix, Reinhard (1966 [1960]), Max Weber: An Intellectual Portrait. London: Methuen.Google Scholar
Bendix, Reinhard (1974 [1956]), Work and Authority in Industry: Ideologies of Management in the Course of Industrialization. Berkeley, Los Angeles and London: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Bendix, Reinhard (1986), From Berlin to Berkeley: German Jewish Identities. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Books.Google Scholar
Benhabib, Seyla (1984), ‘Epistemologies of Postmodernism: A Rejoinder to Jean-François Lyotard’, New German Critique 33: 103–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benhabib, Seyla (1992), Situating the Self: Gender, Community and Postmodernism in Contemporary Ethics. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Berger, Peter L. and Thomas, Luckmann (1971 [1966]), The Social Construction of Reality. Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
Bergson, Henri (1912 [1889]), Time and Free Will: An Essay on the Immediate Data of Consciousness [Essai sur les données immédiates de la conscience]. London: George Allen.Google Scholar
Bernstein, Richard (1971), Praxis and Action: Contemporary Philosophies of Human Activity. Philadelphia. University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Bernstein, Richard (1976), The Restructuring of Social and Political Theory. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Bernstein, Richard (1992), The New Constellation: The Ethical-Political Horizons of Modernity/Postmodernity. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Bernstein, Richard (2002), ‘Putnams Stellung in der pragmatistischen Tradition’, in Marie-Luise, Raters and Marcus, Willaschek (eds.), Hilary Putnam und die Tradition des Pragmatismus. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, pp. 33–48.Google Scholar
Bittner, Egon (1967), ‘Police Discretion in Emergency Apprehension of Mentally Ill Persons’, Social Problems 14, 3: 278–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blau, Peter M. (1964), Exchange and Power in Social Life. New York, London and Sidney: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Blumer, Herbert (1969), ‘The Methodological Position of Symbolic Interactionism’, in Herbert, Blumer, Symbolic Interactionism: Perspective and Method. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, pp. 1–60.Google Scholar
Blumer, Herbert (1969), Symbolic Interactionism: Perspective and Method. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Blumer, Herbert (1975), ‘Comment on Turner, “Parsons as a Symbolic Interactionist”’, Sociological Inquiry 45, 1: 59-62.Google Scholar
Blumer, Herbert (1981), ‘George Herbert Mead’, in B., Rhea (ed.), The Future of the Sociological Classics. London: Allen & Unwin, pp. 136–69.Google Scholar
Blumer, Herbert (1990), Industrialization as an Agent of Social Change: A Critical Analysis. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Bolt, Christine (1993), The Women's Movements in the United States and Britain from the 1790s to the 1920s. Amherst: University of Massachusetts Press.Google Scholar
Boltanski, Luc (1987 [1982]), The Making of a Class: Cadres in French Society [Les cadres. Laformation d'un groupe social]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Boltanski, Luc and Eve, Chiapello (2001), ‘Die Rolle der Kritik in der Dynamik des Kapitalismus und der normative Wandel’, Berliner Journal für Soziologie 11, 4: 459–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boltanski, Luc and Eve, Chiapello (2005 [1999]), The New Spirit of Capitalism [Le nouvel esprit du capitalisme]. London: Verso.Google Scholar
Boltanski, Luc and Laurent, Thévenot (2006 [1991]), On Justification: Economies of Worth [De la justification. Les économies de la grandeur]. Princeton and Oxford: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Bosshart, David (1992), Politische Intellektualität und totalitäre Erfahrung. Hauptströmungen der französischen Totalitarismuskritik. Berlin: Duncker & Humblot.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boudon, Raymond (1982), The Unintended Consequences of Social Action. New York: St. Martin's Press.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, Pierre (1970), Zur Soziologie der symbolischen Formen. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, Pierre (1977 [1972]), Outline of a Theory of Practice [Esquisse d'une théorie de la pratique, précédé de trois études d'ethnologie kabyle]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, Pierre (1982), Leçon sur la leçon. Paris: Les Editions de Minuit (reprinted as the closing chapter of In Other Words; see below).Google Scholar
Bourdieu, Pierre (1984 [1979]), Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste [La distinction. Critique sociale du jugement]. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, Pierre (1985), ‘The Social Space and the Genesis of Groups’, Theory and Society 14, 6: 723–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bourdieu, Pierre (1986 [1983]), ‘The Forms of Capital’, in John, Richardson (ed.), Handbook of Theory and Research for the Sociology of Education. New York: Greenwood Press, pp. 241–58.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, Pierre (1988 [1984], Homo academicus [Homo academicus]. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, Pierre (1990 [1980]), The Logic of Practice [Le sens pratique]. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, Pierre (1990 [1987]), In Other Words: Essays Towards a Reflexive Sociology [Choses dites]. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, Pierre (1993 [1980]), Sociology in Question [Questions de sociologie]. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, Pierre (1996 [1992]), The Rules of Art [Les règles de l'art. Genèse et structure du champ littéraire]. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, Pierre (1998 [1994]), Practical Reason: On the Theory of Action [Raisons pratiques. Sur la théorie de l'action]. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, Pierre (1999 [1993]), The Weight of the World: Social Suffering in Contemporary Society [La misère du monde]. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, Pierre (2000 [1997]), Pascalian Meditations [Méditations pascaliennes]. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, Pierre and Jean-Claude, Passeron (1971), Die Illusion der Chancengleichheit. Untersuchungen zur Soziologie des Bildungswesens am Beispiel Frankreichs. Stuttgart: Ernst Klett Verlag.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, Pierre and Jean-Claude, Passeron (1981), ‘Soziologie und Philosophie in Frankreich seit 1945: Tod und Wiederauferstehung einer Philosophie ohne Subjekt’, in Wolf, Lepenies (ed.), Geschichte der Soziologie. Studien zur kognitiven, sozialen und historischen Identität einer Disziplin. Volume III. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, pp. 496–551.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, Pierre and Loïc J. D., Wacquant (1992), Invitation to Reflexive Sociology [Réponsespour une anthropologie réflexive]. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Browning, Christopher R. (1992), Ordinary Men: Reserve Police Battalion 101 and the Final Solution in Poland. New York: Aaron Asher Books.Google Scholar
Brownmiller, Susan (1975), Against Our Will: Men, Women and Rape. London: Secker & Warburg.Google Scholar
Butler, Judith (1990), Gender Trouble. New York and London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Butler, Judith (1997), Excitable Speech: A Politics of the Performative. New York and London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Browning, Christopher R. (1997), The Psychic Life of Power: Theories in Subjection. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Camic, Charles (1979), ‘The Utilitarians Revisited’, American Journal of Sociology 85, 3: 516–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Camic, Charles (1989), ‘Structure after 50 Years: The Anatomy of a Charter’, American Journal of Sociology 95, 1: 38-107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Camic, Charles (1991), ‘Introduction: Talcott Parsons before The Structure of Social Action’, in Charles, Camic (ed.), Talcott Parsons: The Early Essays. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp. ix–lxix.Google Scholar
Cardoso, Fernando H. and Enzo, Faletto (1979 [1969]), Dependency and Development in Latin America [Dependencia y desarrollo en América Latina. Ensayo de interpretación sociológica]. Berkeley and London: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Castoriadis, Cornelius (1983), ‘Destinies of Totalitarianism’, Salmagundi 60: 107–22.Google Scholar
Castoriadis, Cornelius (1984 [1978]), Crossroads in the Labyrinth [Les carrefours du labyrinthe]. Brighton: Harvester.Google Scholar
Castoriadis, Cornelius (1984/1985), ‘Reflections on “Rationality” and “Development”’, Thesis Eleven 10/11: 18–35.Google Scholar
Castoriadis, Cornelius (1987 [1975]), Thelmaginarylnstitution of Society [L'institution imaginaire de la société]. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Castoriadis, Cornelius (1997), ‘The Greek Polis and the Creation of Democracy’, in David, Curtis (ed.), The Castoriadis Reader. Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 267–89.Google Scholar
Castoriadis, Cornelius (2001), ‘Aeschylean Anthropogony and Sophoclean Self-Creation of Anthropos’, in Johann P., Arnason and Peter, Murphy (eds.), Agon, Logos, Polis: The Greek Achievement and its Aftermath. Stuttgart: Franz Steiner, pp. 138–54.Google Scholar
Caws, Peter (1988), Structuralism: The Art of the Intelligible. Atlantic Highlands, NJ: Humanities Press.Google Scholar
Chalmers, A. F. (1986), What is this Thing Called Science? Second Edition. Milton Keynes and Philadelphia: Open University Press.Google Scholar
Charle, Christophe (1997), Vordenker der Moderne. Die Intellektuellen im 19. Jahrhundert. Frankfurt am Main: Fischer.Google Scholar
Chazel, François (1994), ‘Away from Structuralism and the Return of the Actor: Paradigmatic and Theoretical Orientations in Contemporary French Sociology’, in Piotr, Sztompka (ed.), Agency and Structure: Reorienting Social Theory. Yverdon, Switzerland and Langhorn, PA: Gordon and Breach, pp. 143–63.Google Scholar
Chodorow, Nancy (1978), The Reproduction of Mothering: Psychoanalysis and the Sociology of Gender. Berkeley and London: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Cicourel, Aaron V. (1964), Method and Measurement in Sociology. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Charle, Christophe (1981), ‘Basic and Normative Rules in the Negotiation of Status and Role’, in David, Sudnow (ed.), Studies in Social Interaction. New York: Free Press, pp. 229–58.Google Scholar
Cohen, Jean and Andrew, Arato (1992), Civil Society and Political Theory. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Cohen-Solal, Annie (1987 [1985]), Sartre: A Life [Sartre. 1905–1980]. New York: Pantheon Books.Google Scholar
Coleman, James (1982), The Asymmetric Society. Syracuse, NY: Syracuse University Press.Google Scholar
Coleman, James (1990), Foundations of Social Theory. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Collins, Randall (1971), ‘Functional and Conflict Theories of Educational Stratification’, American Sociological Review 36, 6: 1002–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Collins, Randall (1975), Conflict Sociology: Toward an Explanatory Science. New York, San Francisco and London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Collins, Randall (1979), The Credential Society: An Historical Sociology of Education and Stratification. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Collins, Randall (1985), Three Sociological Traditions. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Collins, Randall (1986), Weberian Sociological Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Collins, Randall (1998), The Sociology of Philosophies: A Global Theory of Intellectual Change. Cambridge, MA and London: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Collins, Randall (2008), Violence: A Micro-Sociological Theory. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Collins, Randall, Janet Saltzman, Chafetz, Lesser Rae, Blumberg, Scott, Coltrane, Jonathan H., Turner (1993), ‘Toward an Integrated Theory of Gender Stratification’, Sociological Perspectives 36, 3: 185-216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Colomy, Paul B. (1986), ‘Recent Developments in the Functionalist Approach to Change’, Sociological Focus 19, 2: 139–58.Google Scholar
Colomy, Paul B. and David J., Brown (1995), ‘Elaboration, Revision, Polemic, and Progress in the Second Chicago School’, in Gary Alan, Fine (ed.), A Second Chicago School? The Development of a Postwar American Sociology. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press, pp. 17–81.Google Scholar
Coser, Lewis A. (1956), The Functions of Social Conflict. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Coser, Lewis A. (1967), Continuities in the Study of Social Conflict. New York and London: Free Press.Google Scholar
Dahrendorf, Ralf (1958), ‘Out of Utopia: Toward a Reorientation of Sociological Analysis’, American Journal of Sociology 64, 2: 115–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dahrendorf, Ralf (1972 [1957]), Class and Class Conflict in Industrial Society [Soziale Klassen und Klassenkonflikt in der industriellen Gesellschaft]. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Dahrendorf, Ralf (1972), Konflikt und Freiheit. Auf dem Weg zur Dienstklassengesellschaft. Munich: Piper.Google Scholar
Dahrendorf, Ralf (1986 [1955]), ‘Struktur und Funktion. Talcott Parsons und die Entwicklung der soziologischen Theorie’, in Ralf, Dahrendorf, Pfade aus Utopia. Zur Theorie und Methode der Soziologie. Munich and Zurich: Piper, pp. 213–42.Google Scholar
Dahrendorf, Ralf (1988), The Modern Social Conflict: An Essay on the Politics ofLiberty. London: Weidenfeld & Nicolson.Google Scholar
Dahrendorf, Ralf (2002), Über Grenzen. Lebenserinnerungen. Munich: C. H. Beck.Google Scholar
Denzin, Norman K. (1977), ‘Notes on the Criminogenic Hypothesis: A Case Study of the American Liquor Industry’, American Sociological Review 42, 6: 905–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Denzin, Norman K. (1984), On Understanding Emotion. San Francisco, Washington and London: Jossey-Bass Publishers.Google Scholar
Denzin, Norman K. (1991), Images of Postmodern Society: Social Theory and Contemporary Cinema. London, Newbury Park and New Delhi: Sage.Google Scholar
Derrida, Jacques (1978 [1967]), Writing and Difference [L'écriture et la différence]. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Dewey, John (1925), Experience and Nature. London: George Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
Dewey, John (1930 [1929]), The Questfor Certainty. London: George Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
DiMaggio, Paul J. (1998), ‘The New Institutionalisms: Avenues of Collaboration’, Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics 154: 696–705.Google Scholar
DiMaggio, Paul J. and Walter W., Powell (1991), ‘Introduction’, in Walter W., Powell and Paul J., DiMaggio (eds.), The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press, pp. 1–38.Google Scholar
Dosse, François (1997 [1991f.]), History of Structuralism. 2 vols. [Histoire du structuralisme]. Minneapolis and London: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Dosse, François (1998 [1997]), The Empire of Meaning: The Humanization of the Social Sciences [L'empire du sens. L'humanisation de sciences humaines]. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Dosse, François (2000), Paul Ricoeur. Les sens d'une vie. Paris: La Découverte.Google Scholar
Douglas, Jack D. (1967), The Social Meanings of Suicide. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Dreyfus, Hubert L. and Paul, Rabinow (1982), Michel Foucault: Beyond Structuralism and Hermeneutics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Dubet, François (1987), La galère. Jeunes en survie. Paris: Fayard.Google Scholar
Dubet, François (1994), Sociologie de l'expérience. Paris: Éditions du Seuil.Google Scholar
Dubet, François (2002), Le déclin de l'institution. Paris: Éditions du Seuil.Google Scholar
Dubet, François and Didier, Lapeyronnie (1992), Les quartiers d'exil. Paris: Éditions du Seuil.Google Scholar
Durkheim, Emile (1982 [1895]), The Rules of Sociological Method. London: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eder, Klaus (1989), ‘Klassentheorie als Gesellschaftstheorie. Bourdieus dreifache kulturtheoretische Brechung der traditionellen Klassentheorie’, in Klaus, Eder (ed.), Klassenlage, Lebensstil und kulturelle Praxis. Theoretische und empirische Beiträge zur Auseinandersetzung mit Pierre Bourdieus Klassentheorie. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, pp. 15–43.Google Scholar
Eder, Klaus (ed.) (1989), Klassenlage, Lebensstil und kulturelle Praxis. Theoretische und empirische Beiträge zur Auseinandersetzung mit Pierre Bourdieus Klassentheorie. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.
Eisenstadt, Shmuel N. (1963), The Political Systems of Empires. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Eisenstadt, Shmuel N. (1973), Tradition, Change and Modernity. New York: Wiley-Interscience.Google Scholar
Eisenstadt, Shmuel N. (1978), Revolution and the Transformation of Societies: A Comparative Study of Civilizations. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Eisenstadt, Shmuel N. (1981), ‘Cultural Traditions and Political Dynamics: The Origins and Modes of Ideological Politics’ (Hobhouse Memorial Lecture). British Journal of Sociology 32, 2: 155–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eisenstadt, Shmuel N. (1985), ‘This Worldly Transcendentalism and the Structuring of the World: Weber's “Religion of China” and the Format of Chinese History and Civilization’, Journal of Developing Societies 1, 2: 168–86.Google Scholar
Eisenstadt, Shmuel N. (1989), ‘Cultural Premises and the Limits of Convergence in Modern Societies: An Examination of Some Aspects of Japanese Society’, Diogenes 37: 125–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eisenstadt, Shmuel N. (1992), ‘Frameworks of the Great Revolutions: Culture, Social Structure, History and Human Agency’, International Social Science Journal 133: 385–401.Google Scholar
Eisenstadt, Shmuel N. (1995), ‘Introduction’, in Shmuel N., Eisenstadt, Power, Trust and Meaning: Essays in Sociological Theory and Analysis. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp. 1–40.Google Scholar
Eisenstadt, Shmuel N. (1995), ‘Social Change, Differentiation, and Evolution’, in Shmuel N., Eisenstadt, Power, Trust and Meaning: Essays in Sociological Theory and Analysis. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp. 106–22.Google Scholar
Eisenstadt, Shmuel N. (1996), Japanese Civilization: A Comparative View. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Eisenstadt, Shmuel N. (2000), Die Vielfalt der Moderne. Weilerswist: Velbrück.Google Scholar
Elias, Norbert (1982 [1937]), The Civilizing Process. 2 vols. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Elster, Jon (1979), ‘Imperfect Rationality: Ulysses and the Sirens’, in Jon, Elster, Ulysses and the Sirens: Studies in Rationality and Irrationality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 36–111.Google Scholar
Elster, Jon (1983), Sour Grapes: Studies in the Subversion of Rationality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elster, Jon (1999), Alchemies of the Mind: Rationality and the Emotions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Emerson, Richard M. (1962), ‘Power-Dependence Relations’, American Journal of Sociology 27, 1: 31–41.Google Scholar
Epstein, Cynthia Fuchs (1988), Deceptive Distinctions: Sex, Gender, and the Social Order. New Haven and London: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Eribon, Didier (1991 [1989]), Michel Foucault [Michel Foucault (1926–1984)]. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Erikson, Kai (1966), Wayward Puritans: A Study in the Sociology of Deviance. New York: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Esser, Hartmut (1993), Soziologie. Allgemeine Grundlagen. Frankfurt am Main and New York: Campus.Google Scholar
Esser, Hartmut (19992000), Soziologie. Spezielle Grundlagen. 6 vols. Frankfurt am Main and New York: Campus.Google Scholar
Etzioni, Amitai (1968), The Active Society: A Theory of Societal and Political Processes. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Etzioni, Amitai (1988), The Moral Dimension: Towards a New Economics. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Etzioni, Amitai (1993), The Spirit of Community: The Reinvention of American Society. New York: Crown.Google Scholar
Etzioni, Amitai (2001), The Monochrome Society. Princeton and Oxford: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Etzioni, Amitai (2003), My Brother's Keeper: A Memoir and a Message. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
Ferry, Luc and Alain, Renaut (1990 [1985]), ‘French Marxism (Bourdieu)’ in Luc, Ferry and Alain, Renaut, French Philosophy of the Sixties: An Essay on Anti-Humanism [La pensée 68. Essai sur l'antihumanisme contemporain]. Amherst and London: University of Massachusetts Press, pp. 153–84.Google Scholar
Feyerabend, Paul (1982), Science in a Free Society. London: Verso.Google Scholar
Firestone, Shulamith (1971), The Dialectic of Sex: The Case for Feminist Revolution. London: Jonathan Cape.Google Scholar
Flax, Jane (1990), ‘Postmodernism and Gender Relations in Feminist Theory’, in Linda J., Nicholson (ed.), Feminism/Postmodernism. New York and London: Routledge, pp. 39–62.Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel (1977 [1975]), Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison [Surveiller et punir. Naissance de la prison]. London: Allen Lane.Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel (1979 [1976]), The History of Sexuality. Volume I: The Will to Knowledge [Histoire de la sexualité. La volonté de savoir]. London: Allen Lane.Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel (1986 [1984]), The History of Sexuality. Volume III: The Care of the Self [Histoire de la sexualité. Le souci de soi]. London: Pantheon.Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel (1987 [1984]), The History of Sexuality. Volume II: The Use of Pleasure [Histoire de la sexualité. L'usage des plaisirs]. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel (1988 [1961]), Madness and Civilization: A History of Insanity in the Age of Reason [Histoire de la folie]. New York: Vintage.Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel (2001 [1966]), The Order ofThings: An Archaeology of the Human Sciences [Les mots et les choses]. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel (2002 [1996]), Society Must be Defended: Lectures at the Collège de France, 1975–1976 [Il faut défendre la société]. New York: Picador.Google Scholar
Frank, Manfred (1989 [1984]), What is Neostructuralism? [Was ist Neostrukturalismus?]. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Fraser, Nancy (1989), Unruly Practices: Power, Discourse and Gender in Contemporary Social Theory. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Fraser, Nancy and Axel, Honneth (2003), Redistribution or Recognition? A Political-Philosophical Exchange. London: Verso.Google Scholar
Fraser, Nancy and Linda J., Nicholson (1990), ‘Social Criticism without Philosophy: An Encounter between Feminism and Postmodernism’, in Linda J., Nicholson (ed.), Feminism/Postmodernism. New York and London: Routledge, pp. 19–38.Google Scholar
Freidson, Eliot (1970), Profession of Medicine: A Study of the Sociology of Applied Knowledge. New York: Dodd, Mead & Co.Google Scholar
Friedman, Debra and Michael, Hechter (1988), ‘The Contribution of Rational Choice Theory to Macrosociological Research’, Sociological Theory 6, 2: 201–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fühmann, Franz (1978), ‘Drei nackte Männer’, in Franz, Fühmann, Bagatelle, rundum positiv. Erzählungen. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, pp. 7–22.Google Scholar
Gardner, Howard (1976), The Quest for Mind: Piaget, Lévi-Strauss and the Structuralist Movement. London: Quartet Books.Google Scholar
Garfinkel, Harold (1959), ‘Aspects of the Problem of Common-Sense Knowledge of Social Structres’, in Transactions of the Fourth World Congress of Sociology. Volume IV: The Sociology of Knowledge, pp. 51–66.Google Scholar
Garfinkel, Harold (1963), ‘A Conception of, and Experiments with, “Trust” as a Condition of Stable Concerted Actions’, in O. J., Harvey (ed.), Motivation and Social Interaction. New York: Ronald Press, pp. 187–238.Google Scholar
Garfinkel, Harold (1967), Studies in Ethnomethodology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Garfinkel, Harold (1991), ‘Respecification: Evidence for Locally Produced, Naturally Accountable Phenomena of Order, Logic, Reason, Meaning, Method, etc. in and as of the Essential Haecceity of Immortal Ordinary Society, (I) – an Announcement of Studies’, in Graham, Button (ed.), Ethnomethodology and the Human Sciences. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 10–19.Google Scholar
Garfinkel, Harold and Harvey, Sacks (1970), ‘On Formal Structures of Practical Actions’, in Edward, Tiryakian and John, MacKinney (eds.), Theoretical Sociology: Perspectives and Developments. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts' pp. 337–66.Google Scholar
Gauchet, Marcel (1997 [1985]), The Disenchantment of the World: A Political History of Religion [Le désenchantement du monde]. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Gehlen, Arnold (1956), Urmensch und Spätkultur. Bonn: Athenäum.Google Scholar
Gehlen, Arnold (1968 [1940]), ‘Mensch und Institutionen’, in Arnold, Gehlen, Anthropologische Forschung. Zur Selbstbegegnung und Selbstentdeckung des Menschen. Reinbek: Rowohlt, pp. 69–77.Google Scholar
Gehlen, Arnold (1988 [1940]), Man: His Nature and Place in the World [Der Mensch. Seine Natur und Stellung in der Welt]. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Gerhard, Ute (1992), Unerhört. Die Geschichte der deutschen Frauenbewegung. Reinbek: Rowohlt.Google Scholar
Gerhardt, Uta (ed.) (1993), Talcott Parsons on National Socialism. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.
Giddens, Anthony (1971), Capitalism and Modern Social Theory. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Giddens, Anthony (1973), The Class Structure of the Advanced Societies. London: Hutchinson.Google Scholar
Giddens, Anthony (1976), ‘Classical Social Theory and the Origins of Modern Sociology’, American Journal of Sociology 81, 4: 703–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Giddens, Anthony (1976), New Rules of Sociological Method. London: Hutchinson.Google Scholar
Giddens, Anthony (1979), Central Problems in Social Theory: Action, Structure and Contradiction in Social Analysis. Basingstoke: Macmillan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Giddens, Anthony (1981), A Contemporary Critique of Historical Materialism. Volume I: Power, Property and the State. Basingstoke: Macmillan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Giddens, Anthony (1982), ‘Commentary on the Debate’, Theory and Society 11, 4: 527–39.Google Scholar
Giddens, Anthony (1984), The Constitution of Society: Outline of the Theory of Structuration. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Giddens, Anthony (1985), TheNation-State and Violence. Volume Two of A Contemporary Critique of Historical Materialism. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Giddens, Anthony (1987), ‘Structuralism, Post-structuralism and the Production of Culture’, in Anthony, Giddens, Social Theory and Modern Sociology. Cambridge: Polity Press, pp. 73–108.Google Scholar
Giddens, Anthony (1989), Sociology. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Giddens, Anthony (1990), The Consequences of Modernity. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Giddens, Anthony (1991), Modernity and Self-Identity: Selfand Society in the Late Modern Age. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Giddens, Anthony (1992), Transformation of Intimacy. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Giddens, Anthony (1994), Beyond Left and Right: The Future of Radical Politics. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Giddens, Anthony (1998), The Third Way: The Renewal of Social Democracy. Malden, MA and Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Giele, Janet Zollinger (1995), Two Paths to Women's Equality: Temperance, Suffrage, and the Origins of Modern Feminism. New York: Twayne Publishers.Google Scholar
Gilcher-Holtey, Ingrid (1995), Die ‘Phantasie an die Macht’. Mai 68 in Frankreich. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
Gildemeister, Regine and Angelika, Wetterer (1992), ‘Wie Geschlechter gemacht werden. Die soziale Konstruktion der Zweigeschlechtlichkeit und ihre Reifizierung in der Frauenforschung’, in Gudrun-Axeli, Knapp and Angelika, Wetterer (eds.), Traditionen Brüche. Entwicklungen feministischer Theorie. Freiburg: Kore, pp. 201–54.Google Scholar
Gilligan, Carol (1982), In a Different Voice: Psychological Theory and Women's Development. Cambridge, MA and London: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Glaser, Barney G. and Anselm L., Strauss (1966 [1965]), Awareness of Dying. London: Weidenfeld & Nicolson.Google Scholar
Glaser, Barney G. and Anselm L., Strauss (1967), The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Godbout, Jacques and Alain, Caillé (1998 [1992]), The World of the Gift [L'esprit de don]. Montreal and London: McGill-Queen's University Press.Google Scholar
Goffman, Erving (1956), The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Goffman, Erving (1961), Asylums: Essays on the Social Situation of Mental Patients and Other Inmates. Garden City, NY: Doubleday & Co.Google Scholar
Goffman, Erving (1963), Stigma: Notes on the Management of Spoiled Identity. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Goffman, Erving (1972 [1971]), Interaction Ritual: Essays on Face-to-Face Behaviour. Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
Goffman, Erving (1975 [1974]), Frame Analysis: An Essay on the Organization of Experience. Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
Goldhagen, Daniel J. (1996), Hitler's Willing Executioners: Ordinary Germans and the Holocaust. London: Little, Brown.Google Scholar
Goldstone, Jack A. (1994), ‘Is Revolution Individually Rational? Groups and Individuals in Revolutionary Collective Action’, Rationality and Society 6, 1: 139–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gottschall, Karin (1997), ‘Sozialkonstruktivistische Perspektiven für die Analyse von sozialer Ungleichheit und Geschlecht’, in Stefan, Hradil (ed.), Differenz und Integration. Die Zukunft moderner Gesellschaften. Verhandlungen des 28. Kongresses der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Soziologie in Dresden 1996. Frankfurt am Main and New York: Campus, pp. 479–96.Google Scholar
Habermas, Jürgen (1963), ‘Literaturbericht zur philosophischen Diskussion um Marx und den Marxismus’, in Jürgen, Habermas, Theorie und Praxis. Sozialphilosophische Studien. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, pp. 387–463.Google Scholar
Habermas, Jürgen (1969), Technik und Wissenschaft als ‘Ideologie’. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
Habermas, Jürgen (1971), Toward a Rational Society: Student Protest, Science and Politics. London: Heinemann.Google Scholar
Habermas, Jürgen (1973 [1963]), ‘Between Philosophy and Science: Marxism as Critique’ [‘Zwischen Philosophie und Wissenschaft. Marxismus als Kritik’], in Jürgen, Habermas, Theory and Practice. Cambridge: Polity Press in association with Basil Blackwell, pp. 195–252.Google Scholar
Habermas, Jürgen (1973 [1967]), ‘Labour and Interaction: Remarks on Hegel's “Jena Philosophy of Mind’” [‘Arbeit und Interaktion. Bemerkungen zu Hegels “Jenenser Philosophie des Geistes’”], in Jürgen, Habermas, Theory and Practice. Cambridge: Polity Press in association with Basil Blackwell, pp. 142–69.Google Scholar
Habermas, Jürgen (1976 [1973]), Legitimation Crisis [Legitimationsprobleme im Spätkapitalismus]. London: Heinemann.Google Scholar
Habermas, Jürgen (1978 [1968]), Knowledge and Human Interests [Erkenntnis und Interesse]. London: Heinemann.Google Scholar
Habermas, Jürgen (1983 [1971]), Philosophical-Political Profiles [Philosophisch-Politische Profile]. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Habermas, Jürgen (19841987 [1981]), The Theory of Communicative Action [Theorie deskommunikativen Handelns]. London: Heinemann.Google Scholar
Habermas, Jürgen (1987 [1981]), ‘The Paradigm Shift in Mead and Durkheim: From Purposive Activity to Communicative Action’, in Jürgen, Habermas, The Theory of Communicative Action, Volume II [Theorie des kommunikativen Handelns]. Cambridge: Polity Press, pp. 1–92.Google Scholar
Habermas, Jürgen (1989 [1962]), The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere: An Inquiry into a Category of Bourgeois Society [Strukturwandel der Öffentlichkeit. Untersuchungen zu einer Kategorie der bürgerlichen Gesellschaft]. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Habermas, Jürgen (1990[l983]), Moral Consciousness and Communicative Action [Moralbewußtsein und kommunikatives Handeln]. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Habermas, Jürgen (1991 [1976]), ‘Toward a Reconstruction of Historical Materialism’ [‘Zur Rekonstruktion des Historischen Materialismus’], in Jürgen, Habermas, Communication and the Evolution of Society. Cambridge: Polity Press, pp. 130–77.Google Scholar
Habermas, Jürgen (1992), Postmetaphysical Thinking: Philosophical Essays. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Habermas, Jürgen (1996 [1992]), Between Facts and Norms: Contributions to a Discourse Theory of Law and Democracy [Faktizität und Geltung. Beiträge zur Diskurstheorie des Rechts und des demokratischen Rechtsstaats]. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Habermas, Jürgen (1998 [1996]), The Inclusion of the Other: Studies in Political Theory [Die Einbeziehung des Anderen. Studien zur politischen Theorie]. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Habermas, Jürgen (2003), Truth and Justification. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Habermas, Jürgen and Niklas, Luhmann (1971), Theorie der Gesellschaft oder Sozialtechnologie – Was leistet die Systemforschung?Frankfurt am Main. Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
Haferkamp, Heinrich and Wolfgang, Knöbl (2001), ‘Die Logistik der Macht. Michael Manns Historische Soziologie als Gesellschaftstheorie’, in Michael, Mann (ed.), Geschichte der Macht. Die Entstehung von Klassen und Nationalstaaten. Band 3, Teil II. Frankfurt am Main and New York. Campus, pp. 303–49.Google Scholar
Hagemann-White, Carol (1988), ‘Wir werden nicht zweigeschlechtlich geboren …’, in Carol, Hagemann-White and Maria S., Rerrich (eds.), FrauenMännerBilder. Männer und Männlichkeit in der feministischen Diskussion. Bielefeld: AJZ Verlag, pp. 224–35.Google Scholar
Hall, John A. (1985), Powers and Liberties: The Causes and Consequences of the Rise of the West. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Hall, John A. (1994), Coercion and Consent: Studies in the Modern State. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Hall, Peter A. and Rosemary C.R., Taylor (1996), ‘Political Science and the Three New Institutionalisms’, Political Studies 44, 5: 936–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, Peter M. (1972), ‘A Symbolic Interactionist Analysis of PoliticsSociological Inquiry 42, 3/4:35–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, Peter M. (1987), ‘Presidential Address: Interactionism and the Study of Social Organization’, The Sociological Quarterly 28, 1: 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, Peter M. and Dee Ann, Spencer-Hall (1982), ‘The Social Conditions of the Negotiated Order’, Urban Life 11, 3: 328–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harding, Sandra (1990), ‘Feminism, Science, and the Anti-Enlightenment Critiques’, in Linda J., Nicholson (ed.), Feminism/Postmodernism. New York and London: Routledge, pp. 83–106.Google Scholar
Hartsock, Nancy (1990), ‘Foucault on Power: A Theory for Women?’, in Linda J., Nicholson (ed.), Feminism/Postmodernism. New York and London: Routledge, pp. 157–75.Google Scholar
Harvey, David (1989), The Condition of Postmodernity: An Enquiry into the Origins of Cultural Change. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Haskell, Thomas (1998), Objectivity is Not Neutrality: Explanatory Schemes in History. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Hechter, Michael (1987), Principles of Group Solidarity. Berkeley, Los Angeles and London: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Heilbron, Johan (1995), The Rise of Social Theory. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Heintz, Bettina and Eva, Nadai (1998), ‘Geschlecht und Kontext. De-Institutionalisierungsprozesse und geschlechtliche Differenzierung’, Zeitschrift für Soziologie 27, 2: 75–93.Google Scholar
Hénaff, Marcel (2002), Le prix de la vérité: Le don, l'argent, la philosophie. Paris: Éditions du Seuil.Google Scholar
Heritage, John (1984), Garfinkel and Ethnomethodology. Cambridge and New York: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Hettlage, Robert and Karl, Lenz (eds.) (1991), Erving Goffman – ein soziologischer Klassiker der zweiten Generation. Stuttgart: UTB.
Hirschauer, Stefan (1994), ‘Die soziale Fortpflanzung der Zweigeschlechtlichkeit’, Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie 46, 4: 668–92.Google Scholar
Hirschman, Albert (1977), The Passions and the Interests: Political Arguments for Capitalism Before its Triumph. Princeton and Guildford: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Hobbes, Thomas (1914 [1651]), Leviathan. London: J. M. Dent & Sons.Google Scholar
Hochschild, Arlie (1979), ‘Emotion Work, Feeling Rules, and Social Structure’, American Journal of Sociology 85, 3: 551–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hochschild, Arlie (1983), The Managed Heart. Berkeley and London: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Höffe, Otfried (1985), Strategien der Humanität. Zur Ethik öffentlicher Entscheidungsprozesse. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
Homans, George C. (1950), The Human Group. New York: Harcourt, Brace & World.Google Scholar
Homans, George C. (1958), ‘Social Behavior as Exchange’, American Journal of Sociology 63, 6: 597–606.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Homans, George C. (1961), Social Behavior: Its Elementary Forms. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Homans, George C. (1964), ‘Bringing Men Back In’, American Sociological Review 29, 5: 809–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Honneth, Axel (1989), ‘Moralische Entwicklung und sozialer Kampf. Sozialphilosophische Lehren aus dem Frühwerk Hegels’, in Axel, Honneth, Thomas, McCarthy, Claus, Offe and Albrecht, Wellmer (eds.), Zwischenbetrachtungen im Prozeß der Aufklärung. Jürgen Habermas zum 60. Geburtstag. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, pp. 549–73.Google Scholar
Honneth, Axel (1990), ‘A Structuralist Rousseau: On the Anthropology of Claude Lévi-Strauss’, Philosophy and Social Criticism 16, 2: 143–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Honneth, Axel (1991 [1986]), The Critique of Power: Reflective Stages in a Critical Social Theory [Kritik der Macht. Reflexionsstufen einer kritischen Gesellschaftstheorie]. Cambridge, MA and London: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Honneth, Axel (1994), Desintegration. Bruchstücke einer soziologischen Zeitdiagnose. Frankfurt am Main: Fischer.Google Scholar
Honneth, Axel (1995 [1990]), ‘The Fragmented World of Symbolic Forms: Reflections on Pierre Bourdieu's Sociology of Culture’, in Axel, Honneth and Charles W., Wright (eds.), The Fragmented World of the Social: Essays in Social and Political Philosophy [Die zerrissene Welt des Sozialen. Sozialphilosophische Aufsätze]. Albany: State University of New York Press, pp. 184–201.Google Scholar
Honneth, Axel (1995 [1992]), The Struggle for Recognition: The Moral Grammar of Social Conflicts [Kampf um Anerkennung. Zur moralischen Grammatik sozialer Konflikte]. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Honneth, Axel (2000), Das Andere der Gerechtigkeit. Aufsätze zur praktischen Philosophie. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
Honneth, Axel (2001), ‘Die Zukunft des Instituts für Sozialforschung’, Mitteilungen des Instituts für Sozialforschung 12: 54–63.Google Scholar
Honneth, Axel (2007) Disrespect: The Normative Foundations of Critical Theory. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Honneth, Axel and Hans, Joas (1988 [1980]), Social Action and Human Nature [Soziales Handeln und menschliche Natur. Anthropologische Grundlagen der Sozialwissenschaften]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Honneth, Axel and Hans, Joas (2002), Kommunikatives Handeln. Beiträge zu Jürgen Habermas' ‘Theorie des kommunikativen Handelns’. Erweiterte und aktualisierte Ausgabe. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
Horster, Detlef (1997), Niklas Luhmann. Munich: Beck.Google Scholar
Hughes, Everett C. (1994), ‘Professions’, in Everett C., Hughes, On Work, Race, and the Sociological Imagination, ed. and intro. Lewis A., Coser. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press, pp. 37–49.Google Scholar
Husserl, Edmund (1970 [1936]), The Crisis of European Sciences and Transcendental Phenomenology [Die Krisis der europäischen Wissenschaften und die transzendentale Phänomenologie]. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
Irrgang, Bernhard (1993), Lehrbuch der evolutionären Erkenntnistheorie. Munich and Basel: Ernst Reinhardt.Google Scholar
Jaggar, Alison M. (1993), ‘Feministische Ethik. Ein Forschungsprogramm für die Zukunft’, in H., Nagl-Docekal and H., Pauer-Studer (eds.), Jenseits der Geschlechtermoral. Beiträge zur feministischen Ethik. Frankfurt am Main: Fischer, pp. 195–218.Google Scholar
James, William (1978 [1907]), Pragmatism: A New Name for Some Old Ways of Thinking. Cambridge, MA and London: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Jameson, Fredric (1991), Postmodernism, or, The Cultural Logic of Late Capitalism. London and New York: Verso.Google Scholar
Jaspers, Karl (1953 [1949]), The Origin and Goal of History [Vom Ursprung und Ziel der Geschichte]. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Joas, Hans (1993 [1986]), ‘The Unhappy Marriage of Hermeneutics and Functi onalism: Jürgen Habermas' Theory of Communicative Action’, in Hans, Joas, Pragmatism and Social Theory [Pragmatismus und Gesellschaftstheorie]. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press, pp. 125–53.Google Scholar
Joas, Hans (1993 [1992]), ‘Pragmatism in American Sociology’, in Hans, Joas, Pragmatism and Social Theory [Pragmatismus und Gesellschaftstheorie]. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press, pp. 14–54.Google Scholar
Joas, Hans (1993 [1992]), ‘A Sociological Transformation of the Philosophy of Praxis: Anthony Giddens's Theory of Structuration’, in Hans, Joas, Pragmatism and Social Theory [Pragmatismus und Gesellschaftstheorie]. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press, pp. 172–87.Google Scholar
Joas, Hans (1996 [1992]), The Creativity of Action [Die Kreativität des Handelns]. Oxford: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Joas, Hans (1997 [1980]), G. H. Mead: A Contemporary Re-examination of His Thought [Praktische Intersubjektivität. Die Entwicklung des Werkes von G. H. Mead]. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Joas, Hans (1998), ‘The Autonomy of the Self: The Meadian Heritage and its Postmodern Challenge’, European Journal of Social Theory 1: 7–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Joas, Hans (1998/1999), ‘Macroscopic Action – On Amitai Etzioni's Contribution to Social Theory’, The Responsive Community 9: 23-31.Google Scholar
Joas, Hans (2000 [1997]), The Genesis of Values [Die Entstehung der Werte]. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Joas, Hans (2001), ‘The Gift of Life: Parsons' Late Sociology of Religion’, Journal of Classical Sociology 1, 1: 127–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Joas, Hans (2002), ‘Values versus Norms: A Pragmatist Account of Moral Objectivity’, The Hedgehog Review 3, 1: 42-56.Google Scholar
Joas, Hans (2002 [2000]), War and Modernity [Kriege und Werte. Studien zur Gewaltgeschichte des 20. Jahrhunderts]. Oxford: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Joas, Hans (2003), ‘Gott in Frankreich. Paul Ricoeur als Denker der Vermittlung’, Merkur 57: 242–6.Google Scholar
Joas, Hans (2003), ‘Max Weber und die Entstehung der Menschenrechte. Eine Studie über kulturelle Innovation’, in Gert, Albert, Agathe, Bienfait, Steffen, Siegmund and Claus, Wendt (eds.), Das Weber-Paradigma. Studien zur Weiterentwicklung von Max Webers Forschungsprogramm. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, pp. 252–70.Google Scholar
Joas, Hans (2007 [2004]), Do We Need Religion? On the Experience of Self-Transcendence [Braucht der Mensch Religion? Über Erfahrungen der Selbsttranszendenz]. Boulder: Paradigm Publishers.Google Scholar
Joas, Hans and Frank, Adloff (2002), ‘Milieuwandel und Gemeinsinn’, in Herfried, Münkler and Harald, Bluhm (eds.), Gemeinwohl und Gemeinsinn. Volume IV: Zwischen Normativität und Faktizität. Berlin: Akademie Verlag, pp. 153–85.Google Scholar
Joas, Hans and Jens, Beckert (2001), ‘Action Theory’, in Jonathan H., Turner (ed.), Handbook of Sociological Theory. New York: Kluwer Academic, pp. 269–85.Google Scholar
Kalyvas, Andreas (2001), ‘The Politics of Autonomy and the Challenge of Deliberation: Castoriadis Contra Habermas’, Thesis Eleven 64: 1–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kessler, Suzanne J. and Wendy, McKenna (1978), Gender: An Ethnomethodological Approach. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Kippenberg, Hans G. and Brigitte, Luchesi (eds.) (1978), Magie. Die Sozialwissenschaftliche Kontroverse über das Verstehen fremden Denkens. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.
Kitsuse, John I. (1962), ‘Societal Reaction to Deviant Behavior: Problems of Theory and Method’, Social Problems 9, 3: 247–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knapp, Gudrun-Axeli (1992), ‘Macht und Geschlecht. Neuere Entwicklungen in der feministischen Macht- und Herrschaftsdiskussion’, in Gudrun-Axeli, Knapp and Angelika, Wetterer (eds.), Traditionen Brüche. Entwicklungen feministischer Theorie. Freiburg: Kore, pp. 287–325.Google Scholar
Knapp, Gudrun-Axeli (1997), ‘Differenz und Dekonstruktion. Anmerkungen zum “Paradigmenwechsel” in der Frauenforschung’, in Gudrun-Axeli, Knapp, Differenz und Integration. Die Zukunft moderner Gesellschaften. Verhandlungen des 28. Kongresses der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Soziologie in Dresden 1996. Frankfurt am Main and New York: Campus, pp. 497–513.Google Scholar
Kneer, Georg and Armin, Nassehi, Niklas Luhmanns Theorie sozialer Systeme. Munich: Wilhelm Fink.
Knöbl, Wolfgang (2001), Spielräume der Modernisierung. Das Ende der Eindeutigkeit. Weilerswist: Velbrück.Google Scholar
Knöbl, Wolfgang (2007), Die Kontingenz der Moderne. Wege in Europa, Asien und Amerika. Frankfurt am Main and New York: Campus.Google Scholar
Knorr-Cetina, Karin (1981), The Manufacture of Knowledge: An Essay on the Constructivist and Contextual Nature of Science. Oxford: Pergamon.Google Scholar
Kohlberg, Lawrence (1996), ‘Moral Stages and Moralization’, in Lawrence, Kohlberg, The Psychology of Moral Development. San Francisco and London: Harper & Row, pp. 170–206.Google Scholar
Kuhn, Thomas S. (1962), The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Kurzweil, Edith (1980), The Age of Structuralism: Lévi-Strauss to Foucault. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Kymlicka, Will (1990), Contemporary Political Philosophy: An Introduction. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Lamont, Michèle (1992), Money, Morals, and Manners: The Culture of the French and the American Upper-Middle Class. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Landweer, Hilge (1994), ‘Generativität und Geschlecht. Ein blinder Fleck in der sex/gender-Debatte’, in Theresa, Wobbe and Gesa, Lindemann (eds.), Denkachsen. Zur theoretischen und institutionellen Rede vom Geschlecht. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, pp. 147–76.Google Scholar
Larson, Magali Sarfatti (1977), The Rise of Professionalism: A Sociological Analysis. Berkeley, Los Angeles and London: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Latour, Bruno (1993 [1991]), We Have Never Been Modern [Nous n'avons jamais été modernes. Essai d'anthropologie symétrique]. New York and London: Harvester Wheatsheaf.Google Scholar
Leach, Edmund (1989), Claude Lévi-Strauss. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Lefort, Claude (1988), ‘Interpreting Revolution within the French Revolution’, in Claude, Lefort, Democracy and Political Theory. Oxford: Polity Press, pp. 89–114.Google Scholar
Lemert, Edwin M. (1975), ‘Das Konzept der sekundären Abweichung’, in Friedrich W., Stallberg (ed.), Abweichung und Kriminalität. Konzeptionen, Kritik, Analysen. Hamburg: Hoffmann und Campe, pp. 33–46.Google Scholar
Lenski, Gerhard (1966), Power and Privilege: A Theory of Social Stratification. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Lerner, Daniel (1965 [1958]), The Passing of Traditional Society: Modernizing the Middle East. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Lévi-Strauss, Claude (1966 [1962]), The Savage Mind [Lapensée sauvage]. London: Weidenfeld & Nicolson.Google Scholar
Lévi-Strauss, Claude (1968 [1958]), Structural Anthropology [Anthropologie structurale]. London: Allen Lane.Google Scholar
Lévi-Strauss, Claude (1973 [1955]), Tristes Tropiques [Tristes Tropiques]. London: Jonathan Cape.Google Scholar
Lévi-Strauss, Claude (1977 [1949]), The Elementary Structures of Kinship [Les structures élémentaires de la parenté]. Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
Lidz, Victor (2000), ‘Talcott Parsons’, in George, Ritzer (ed.), Blackwell Companion to Major Social Theorists. Oxford: Basil Blackwell, pp. 388–431.Google Scholar
Lipset, Seymour Martin (1988 [1959]), Political Man: The Social Bases of Politics. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Lockwood, David (1956), ‘Some Remarks on The Social System’, British Journal of Sociology 7: 134–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lockwood, David (1964), ‘Social Integration and System Integration’, in George, Zollschan and Walter, Hirsch (eds.), Explorations in Social Change. London: Routledge, pp. 244–57.Google Scholar
Lockwood, David (1992), Solidarity and Schism: ‘The Problem of Disorder’ in Durkheimian and Marxist Sociology. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Lorber, Judith (1994), Paradoxes of Gender. New Haven and London: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Luhmann, Niklas (1964), Funktionen und Folgen formaler Organisation. Berlin: Duncker & Humblot.Google Scholar
Luhmann, Niklas (1970), ‘Funktionale Methode und Systemtheorie’, in Niklas, Luhmann, Soziologische Aufklärung 1. Aufsätze zur Theorie sozialer Systeme. Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag, pp. 31–53.Google Scholar
Luhmann, Niklas (1970), ‘Funktionen und Kausalität’, in Niklas, Luhmann, Soziologische Aufklärung 1. Aufsätze zur Theorie sozialer Systeme. Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag, pp. 9–30.Google Scholar
Luhmann, Niklas (1970), ‘Soziologie als Theorie sozialer Systeme’, in Niklas, Luhmann, Soziologische Aufklärung 1. Aufsätze zur Theorie sozialer Systeme. Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag, pp. 113–36.Google Scholar
Luhmann, Niklas (1970), ‘Soziologische Aufklärung’, in Niklas, Luhmann, Soziologische Aufklärung 1. Aufsätze zur Theorie sozialer Systeme. Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag, pp. 66–91.Google Scholar
Luhmann, Niklas (1972 [1968]), Zweckbegriff und Systemrationalität. Über die Funktion von Zwecken in sozialen Systemen. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
Luhmann, Niklas (1979 [1968]), Trustand Power [originally published in German as two separate volumes, Vertrauen and Macht]. Chichester: Wiley.Google Scholar
Luhmann, Niklas (1980), Gesellschaftsstruktur und Semantik. Studien zur Wissenssoziologie der modernen Gesellschaft. 4 vols. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
Luhmann, Niklas (1983 [1969]), Legitimation durch Verfahren. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
Luhmann, Niklas (1986 [1982]), Love as Passion: The Codification of Intimacy [Liebe als Passion. Zur Codierung von Intimität]. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Luhmann, Niklas (1989 [1986]), Ecological Communication [Ökologische Kommunikation. Kann die moderne Gesellschaft sich auf ökologische Gefährdungen einstellen?]. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Luhmann, Niklas (1989), ‘Politische Steuerung. Ein Diskussionsbeitrag’, Politische Vierteljahresschrift 31, 1: 4–9.Google Scholar
Luhmann, Niklas (1990 [1981]), Political Theory in the Welfare State [Politische Theorie im Wohlfahrtsstaat]. Berlin: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Luhmann, Niklas (1995 [1984]), Social Systems [Soziale Systeme. Grundriß einer allgemeinen Theorie]. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Luhmann, Niklas (1997), ‘Biographie im Interview’, in Detlef, Horster, Niklas Luhmann. Munich: Beck, pp. 25–45.Google Scholar
Luhmann, Niklas (1997), Die Gesellschaft der Gesellschaft. 2 vols. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
Luhmann, Niklas (2000), Die Politik der Gesellschaft. ed. André, Kieserling. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
Lukács, Georg (1971 [1923]), History and Class Consciousness: Studies in Marxist Dialectics [Geschichte und Klassenbewußtsein]. London: Merlin Press.Google Scholar
Lynch, Michael, Eric, Livingston and Harold, Garfinkel (1983), ‘Temporal Order in Laboratory Work’, in Karin, Knorr-Cetina and Michael, Muller (eds.), Science Observed: Perspectives on the Social Study of Science. Beverly Hills and London: Sage, pp. 205–38.Google Scholar
Lyotard, Jean-François (1984 [1979]), The Postmodern Condition: A Report on Knowledge [La condition postmoderne]. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
MacKinnon, Catharine A. (1989), Toward a Feminist Theory of the State. Cambridge, MA and London: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Maines, David R. (1977), ‘Social Organization and Social Structure in Symbolic Interactionist Thought’, Annual Review of Sociology 3: 235–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maines, David R. (1982), ‘In Search of Mesostructure: Studies in the Negotiated Order’, Urban Life 11, 3: 267–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maines, David R. (2001), The Faultline of Consciousness: A View of Interactionism in Sociology. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Mann, Michael (1986), The Sources of Social Power. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marwell, Gerald and Ruth E., Ames (1981), ‘Economists Free Ride, Does Anyone Else? Experiments on the Provision of Public Goods, IV’, Journal of Public Economics 15: 295–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marx, Karl (1970 [1919]), A Contribution to the Critique of Political Economy. London: Lawrence & Wishart.Google Scholar
Marx, Werner (1987), Die Phänomenologie Edmund Husserls. Eine Einführung. Munich: Fink.Google Scholar
Maurer, Andrea and Michael, Schmid (eds.) (2002), Neuer Institutionalismus. Zur soziologischen Erklärung von Organisation, Moral und Vertrauen. Frankfurt am Main and New York: Campus.
Mauss, Marcel (1990 [1923/24]), The Gift: The Form and Reasonfor Exchange in Archaic Societies [Essai sur le don]. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Mayer, Hans (1982), Ein Deutscher auf Widerruf. Erinnerungen. Volume I. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
McCarthy, John and Mayer, Zald (1977), ‘Resource Mobilization and Social Movements: A Partial Theory’, American Journal of Sociology 82, 6: 1212–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCarthy, Thomas (1978), The Critical Theory of Jürgen Habermas. London: Hutchinson.Google Scholar
McCarthy, Thomas (1991), Ideals and Illusions: On Reconstruction and Deconstruction in Contemporary Critical Theory. Cambridge, MA and London: MIT Press.Google Scholar
McClelland, David (1961), The Achieving Society. New York and London: Free Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mehan, Hugh and Houston, Wood (1976), ‘Five Features of Reality’, in Jodi, O'Brien (ed.), The Production of Reality. Thousand Oaks and London: Pine Forge Press, pp. 365–80.Google Scholar
Meitzer, Bernard N., John W., Petras and Larry T., Reynolds (1975), Symbolic Interactionism: Genesis, Varieties and Criticism. London and Boston: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Merleau-Ponty, Maurice (1962 [1945]), Phenomenology of Perception [Phénoménologie de la perception]. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Merton, Robert K. (1957), ‘Continuities in the Theory of Reference Groups and Social Structure’, in Robert K., Merton, Social Theory and Social Structure. Revised and enlarged edition. Glencoe, IL and New York: Free Press, pp. 281–386.Google Scholar
Meyer, John W. (1977), ‘Institutionalized Organizations: Formal Structure as Myth and Ceremony’, American Journal of Sociology 83, 2: 340–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meyer, John W., John, Boli, George M., Thomas and Francisco O., Ramirez (1997), ‘World Society and the Nation-State’, American Journal of Sociology 103, 1: 144–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mill, John Stuart (1992 [1863]), ‘Utilitarianism’, in John Stuart, Mill, On Liberty and Utilitarianism. New York: Alfred A. Knopf, pp. 113–72.Google Scholar
Miller, James (1993), The Passion of Michel Foucault. New York: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
Mills, C. Wright (1956), The Power Elite. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Mills, C. Wright (1959), The Sociological Imagination. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Mills, C. Wright (1964), Sociology and Pragmatism: The Higher Learning in America. New York: Paine-Whitman Publishers.Google Scholar
Müller, Hans-Peter (1992), Sozialstruktur und Lebensstile. Der neuere theoretische Diskurs über soziale Ungleichheit. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
Mullins, Nicolas C. and Carolyn J., Mullins (1973), ‘Symbolic Interactionism: The Loyal Opposition’, in Nicolas C., Mullins, Theories and Theory Groups in Contemporary American Sociology. New York: Harper & Row, pp. 75–104.Google Scholar
Münch, Richard (1984), Die Struktur der Moderne. Grundmuster und differentielle Gestaltung des institutionellen Aufbaus der modernen Gesellschaften. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
Münch, Richard (1986), Die Kultur der Moderne. 2 vols. Frankfurtam Main: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
Münch, Richard (1987 [1982]), Theory of Action: Towards a New Synthesis Going Beyond Parsons [translation of part of Theorie des Handelns. Zur Rekonstruktion der Beiträge von Talcott Parsons, Emile Durkheim und Max Weber]. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Münch, Richard (1988 [1982]), Understanding Modernity: Toward a New Perspective Going beyond Durkheim and Weber [translation of part of Theorie des Handelns. Zur Rekonstruktion der Beiträge von Talcott Parsons, Emile Durkheim und Max Weber]. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Münch, Richard (2002), ‘Die Zweite Moderne: Realität oder Fiktion? Kritische Fragen an die “Theorie reflexiver Modernisierung”’, Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie 54, 3: 417–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nagl, Ludwig (1992), Charles Sanders Peirce. Frankfurt am Main and New York: Campus.Google Scholar
Nagl-Docekal, Herta (2000), Feministische Philosophie. Ergebnisse, Probleme, Perspektiven. Frankfurt am Main: Fischer.Google Scholar
Nipperdey, Thomas (1996 [1983]), Germany from Napoleon to Bismarck 1800–1866 [Deutsche Geschichte. 1800–1866. Bürgerwelt und starker Staat]. Dublin: Gill & Macmillan.Google Scholar
North, Douglass C. (1990), Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nunner-Winkler, Gertrud (1991), ‘Gibt es eine weibliche Moral?’, in Gertrud, Nunner-Winkler (ed.), Weibliche Moral. Die Kontroverse um eine geschlechtsspezifische Ethik. Frankfurt am Main and New York: Campus. pp. 147–61.Google Scholar
Nussbaum, Martha C. (1995), ‘Emotions and Women's Capabilities’, in Martha C., Nussbaum and Jonathan, Glover (eds.), Women, Culture and Development. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 360–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nussbaum, Martha C. (1999), ‘The Professor of Parody: The Hip Defeatism of Judith Butler’, New Republic, 22 February: 37-45.Google Scholar
Offe, Claus and Helmut, Wiesenthal (1980), ‘Two Logics of Collective Action: Theoretical Notes on Social Class and Organizational Form’, Political Power and Social Theory 1: 67–115.Google Scholar
Oliver, Pamela E. and Gerald, Marwell (1988), ‘The Paradox of Group Size in Collective Action: A Theory of the Critical Mass. II’, American Sociological Review 53, 1: 1–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oliver, Pamela E. and Gerald, Marwell (2001), ‘Whatever Happened to Critical Mass Theory? A Retrospective and Assessment’, Sociological Theory 19, 3: 292–311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Olson, Mancur Jr. (1965), The Logic of Collective Action. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Opp, Karl-Dieter (1994), ‘Der “Rational Choice”-Ansatz und die Soziologie sozialer Bewegungen’, Forschungsjournal NSB 2: 11–26.Google Scholar
Opp, Karl-Dieter (1994), ‘Repression and Revolutionary Action’, Rationality and Society 6, 1: 101–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parsons, Talcott (1939), ‘Actor, Situation and Normative Patterns: An Essay in the Theory of Social Action’ (unpublished manuscript).Google Scholar
Parsons, Talcott (1964 [1951]), The Social System. New Yorkand London: Free Press.Google Scholar
Parsons, Talcott (1964), ‘Democracy and Social Structure in Pre-Nazi Germany’, in Talcott, Parsons, Essays in Sociological Theory. New York: Free Press, pp. 104–23.Google Scholar
Parsons, Talcott (1964), ‘The Motivation of Economic Activities’, in Talcott, Parsons, Essays in Sociological Theory. New York: Free Press, pp. 50–68.Google Scholar
Parsons, Talcott (1964), ‘The Professions and Social Structure’, in Talcott, Parsons, Essays in Sociological Theory. New York: Free Press, pp. 34–49.Google Scholar
Parsons, Talcott (1966), Societies: Evolutionary and Comparative Perspectives. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Parsons, Talcott (1967), ‘Full Citizenship for the Negro American?’, in Talcott, Parsons, Sociological Theory and Modern Sociology. New York: Free Press, pp. 422–65.Google Scholar
Parsons, Talcott (1967), ‘On the Concept of Political Power’, in Talcott, Parsons, Sociological Theory and Modern Society. New York: Free Press, pp. 297–354.Google Scholar
Parsons, Talcott (1968 [1937]), The Structure of Social Action: A Study in Social Theory with Special Reference to a Group of Recent European Writers. 2 vols. New York and London: Free Press.Google Scholar
Parsons, Talcott (1969), ‘On the Concept of Influence’, in Talcott, Parsons, Politics and Social Structure. New York and London: Free Press, pp. 405–38.Google Scholar
Parsons, Talcott (1969), ‘On the Concept of Value-Commitments’, in Talcott, Parsons, Politics and Social Structure. New York and London: Free Press, pp. 439–72.Google Scholar
Parsons, Talcott (1971), The System of Modern Societies. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Parsons, Talcott (1974), ‘Comment on Turner, “Parsons as a Symbolic Interactionist”’, Sociological Inquiry 45, 1: 62–5.Google Scholar
Parsons, Talcott (1978), Action Theory and the Human Condition. New York and London: Free Press.Google Scholar
Parsons, Talcott and Edward A., Shils (1951), Toward a General Theory of Action. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parsons, Talcott and Neil, Smelser (1956), Economy and Society: A Study in the Integration of Economic and Social Theory. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Parsons, Talcott, Robert F., Bales and Edward A., Shils (1953), Working Papers in the Theory of Action. New York and London: Free Press.Google Scholar
Pauer-Studer, Herlinde (1993), ‘Moraltheorie und Geschlechterdifferenz. Feministische Ethik im Kontext aktueller Fragestellungen’, in H., Nagl-Docekal and H., Pauer-Studer (eds.), Jenseits der Geschlechtermoral. Beiträge zur feministischen Ethik. Frankfurt am Main: Fischer, pp. 33–68.Google Scholar
Peirce, Charles S. (1934), ‘The Fixation of Belief’, in Charles, Hartshorne and Paul, Weiss (eds.), Collected Papers of Charles Sanders Peirce. Volume V: Pragmatism and Pragmaticism. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, pp. 358–87.Google Scholar
Peirce, Charles S. (1934), ‘Some Consequences of Four Incapacities’, in Charles, Hartshorne and Paul, Weiss (eds.), Collected Papers of Charles Sanders Peirce. Volume V: Pragmatism and Pragmaticism. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, pp. 156–89.Google Scholar
Plummer, Ken (1991), ‘Introduction: The Foundations of Interactionist Sociologies’, in Ken, Plummer (ed.), Symbolic Interactionism. Volume I: Foundations and History. Aldershot and Brookfield: Edward Elgar Publishing, pp. x–xx.Google Scholar
Pope, Whitney, Jere, Cohen and Lawrence E., Hazelrigg (1975), ‘On the Divergence of Weber and Durkheim: A Critique of Parsons' Convergence Thesis’, American Sociological Review 40, 4: 417–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Popper, Karl Raimund (1989), Logik der Forschung. Ninth edition. Tübingen: Mohr.Google Scholar
Popper, Karl Raimund (1992 [1934]), The Logic of Scientific Discovery [Logik der Forschung]. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Psathas, George (1976), ‘Die Untersuchung von Alltagsstrukturen und das ethnomethodologische Paradigma’, in Richard, Grathoff and Walter, Sprondel (eds.), Alfred Schütz und die Idee des Alltags in den Sozialwissenschaften. Stuttgart: Enke, pp. 178–95.Google Scholar
Putnam, Hilary (1981), Reason, Truth and History. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Putnam, Hilary (1988), Representation and Reality. Cambridge, MA and London: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Putnam, Hilary (1992), Renewing Philosophy. Cambridge, MA and London: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Putnam, Hilary (1995), Pragmatism: An Open Question. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Raters, Marie-Luise and Marcus, Willaschek (2002), ‘Hilary Putnam und die Tradition des Pragmatismus’, in Marie-Luise, Raters and Marcus, Willaschek (eds.), Hilary Putnam und die Tradition des Pragmatismus. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, pp. 9–29.Google Scholar
Rawls, John (1972 [1971]), A Theory of Justice. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Rex, John (1970 [1961]), Key Problems of Sociological Theory. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Reynolds, Larry T. and Nancy J., Herman-Kinney (eds.) (2003), Handbook of Symbolic Interactionism. Walnut Creek, CA: Alta Mira Press.
Ricoeur, Paul (1970 [1965]), Freud and Philosophy: An Essay on Interpretation [De l'interpretation. Essai sur Freud]. New Haven and London: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Ricoeur, Paul (1984f. [1983f.]), Time and Narrative. 3 vols. [Temps et récit]. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Ricoeur, Paul (1992 [1990]), Oneself as Another [Soi-même comme un autre]. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Rock, Paul (1991), ‘Symbolic Interaction and Labelling Theory’, in Ken, Plummer (ed.), Symbolic Interactionism. Volume I: Foundations and History. Aldershot and Brookfield: Edward Elgar Publishing, pp. 227–43.Google Scholar
Rödel, Ulrich (ed.) (1990), Autonome Gesellschaft und libertäre Demokratie. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.
Rorty, Richard (1980), Philosophy and the Mirror of Nature. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Rorty, Richard (1989), Contingency, Irony, and Solidarity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rorty, Richard (1991), ‘Solidarity or Objectivity?’, in Richard, Rorty, Objectivity, Relativism and Truth. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Rorty, Richard (1998), Achieving Our Country: Leftist Thought in Twentieth-Century America. Cambridge, MA and London: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Rorty, Richard (1998), Truth andProgress. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Rorty, Richard (1999), ‘Trotsky and the Wild Orchids’, in Richard, Rorty, Philosophy and Social Hope. London: Penguin, pp. 3–20.Google Scholar
Rorty, Richard (2000), ‘Is it Desirable to Love Truth?’, in Richard, Rorty, Truth, Politics and ‘Postmodernism’. Assen: Van Gorcum, pp. 1–22.Google Scholar
Rostow, Walt W. (1971 [1960]), The Stages of Economic Growth: A Non-Communist Manifesto. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Rubin, Gayle (1975), ‘The Traffic in Women: Notes on the “Political Economy” of Sex’, in Rayna R., Reiter (ed.), Toward an Anthropology of Women. New York and London: Monthly Review Press, pp. 157–210.Google Scholar
Ryan, Alan (1991), ‘When It's Rational to be Irrational’, The New York Review of Books, 10 October: 19-22.Google Scholar
Sacks, Harvey (1972), ‘Notes on Police Assessment of Moral Character’, in David, Sudnow (ed.), Studies in Social Interaction. Glencoe: Free Press, pp. 280–93.Google Scholar
Sandel, Michael J. (1982), Liberalism and the Limits of Justice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sandel, Michael J. (1993), ‘The Procedural Republic and the Unencumbered Self’, in Colin, Farrelly (ed.), Contemporary Political Theory: A Reader. London: Sage, pp. 113–25.Google Scholar
Sartre, Jean-Paul (2003 [1943]), Being and Nothingness: An Essay on Phenomenological Ontology [L'être et le néant. Essai d'ontologie phénoménologique]. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Saussure, Ferdinand de (1983 [1915]), Course in General Linguistics [Cours de linguistique genérale]. London: Duckworth.Google Scholar
Scharpf, Fritz W. (1989), ‘Politische Steuerung und Politische Institutionen’, Politische Vierteljahresschrift 31, 1: 10–21.Google Scholar
Scharpf, Fritz W. (2000), Interaktionsformen. Akteurzentrierter Institutionalismus in der Politikforschung. Opladen: Leske & Budrich.Google Scholar
Schegloff, Emanuel A. (2001), ‘Accounts of Conduct in Interaction: Interruption, Overlap, and Turn-Taking’, in Jonathan H., Turner (ed.), Handbook of Sociological Theory. New York: Kluwer Academic, pp. 287–321.Google Scholar
Sendling, Thomas C. (1960), The Strategy of Conflict. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Sendling, Thomas C. (1978), Micromotives and Macrobehavior. New York and London: W. W. Norton & Co.Google Scholar
Schelsky, Helmut (1977 [1975]), Die Arbeit tun die anderen. Klassenkampfund Priesterherrschaft der Intellektuellen. Munich: dtv.Google Scholar
Schelsky, Helmut (1984 [1957]), Die skeptische Generation. Eine Soziologie der deutschen Jugend. Frankfurt am Main, Berlin and Vienna: Ullstein.Google Scholar
Schimank, Uwe (1996), Theorien gesellschaftlicher Differenzierung. Opladen: Leske & Budrich.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schiwy, Günther (1978), Der französische Strukturalismus. Reinbek: Rowohlt.Google Scholar
Schluchter, Wolfgang (1981 [1979]), The Rise of Western Rationalism: Max Weber's Developmental History [Die Entwicklung des okzidentalen Rationalismus. Eine Analyse von Max Webers Gesellschaftsgeschichte]. Berkeley and London: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Schluchter, Wolfgang (1998), Die Entstehung des modernen Rationalismus. Eine Analyse von Max Webers Entwicklungsgeschichte des Okzidents. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
Schluchter, Wolfgang (ed.) (1981), Max Webers Studie über das antike Judentum. Interpretation und Kritik. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.
Schluchter, Wolfgang (ed.) (1983), Max Webers Studie über Konfuzianismus und Taoismus. Interpretation und Kritik. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.
Schluchter, Wolfgang (ed.) (1984), Max Webers Studie über Hinduismus und Buddhismus. Interpretation und Kritik. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.
Schluchter, Wolfgang (ed.) (1985), Max Webers Sicht des antiken Christentums. Interpretation und Kritik. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.
Schluchter, Wolfgang (ed.) (1988), Max Webers Sicht des okzidentalen Christentums. Interpretation und Kritik. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.
Schluchter, Wolfgang (ed.) (1999 [1987]), Max Weber and Islam. Interpretations and Critiques [Max Webers Sicht des Islams. Interpretation und Kritik]. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.
Schröter, Susanne (2002), FeMale. Über Grenzverläufe zwischen den Geschlechtern. Frankfurt am Main: Fischer.Google Scholar
Schulze, Gerhard (1992), Die Erlebnisgesellschaft. Kultursoziologie der Gegenwart. Frankfurt am Main and New York: Campus.Google Scholar
Schütz, Alfred (1972 [1932]), The Phenomenology of the Social World [Der sinnhafte Aufbau der sozialen Welt. Eine Einleitung in die verstehende Soziologie]. London: Heinemann.Google Scholar
Schütz, Alfred and Thomas, Luckmann (1974/1989 [1979/1984]), The Structures of the Life-World. 2 vols. London: Heinemann.Google Scholar
Schwingel, Markus (2000), Pierre Bourdieu zur Einführung. Hamburg: Junius.Google Scholar
Scott, Richard W. (1995), Institutions and Organizations. Thousand Oaks, London and New Delhi: Sage.Google Scholar
Sebeok, Thomas A. and Jean, Umiker-Sebeok (1980), You Know My Method': A Juxtaposition of Charles S. Peirce and Sherlock Holmes. Bloomington: Gaslight Publications.Google Scholar
Selznick, Philip (1966 [1949]), TVA and the Grass Roots: A Study in the Sociology of Formal Organization. ‘With a new preface by the author’. New York: Harper.Google Scholar
Selznick, Philip (1992), The Moral Commonwealth: Social Theory and the Promise of Community. Berkeley, Los Angeles and London: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Shibutani, Tamotsu (1988), ‘Herbert Blumer's Contribution to Twentieth-Century Sociology’, Symbolic Interaction 11, 1: 23–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shils, Edward A. (1958), ‘Tradition and Liberty: Antinomy and Interdependence’, Ethics 68, 3: 153–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shils, Edward A. (1966), ‘The Intellectuals in the Political Development of the New States’, in Jason L., Finkle and Richard W., Gable (eds.), Political Developmentand Social Change. New York, London and Sydney: John Wiley & Sons, pp. 338–65.Google Scholar
Shils, Edward A. (1982), ‘Center and Periphery’, in Edward A., Shils, The Constitution of Society. ‘With a new introduction by the author’. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press, pp. 93–109.Google Scholar
Shils, Edward A. (1982), ‘Charisma, Order, and Status’, in Edward A., Shils, The Constitution of Society. ‘With a new introduction by the author’. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press, pp. 119–42.Google Scholar
Shils, Edward A. and Morris, Janowitz (1948), ‘Cohesion and Disintegration in the Wehrmacht in World War II’, The Public Opinion Quarterly 12, 2: 280–315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shils, Edward A. and Michael, Young (1953), ‘The Meaning of the Coronation’, Sociological Review 1, 2: 63–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simmel, Georg (1964 [1908]), Conflict [a translation of chapters from Soziologie. Untersuchungen über die Formen der Vergesellschaftung]. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Simon, Herbert A. (1959), ‘Theories of Decision-Making in Economics and Behavioral Science’, American Economic Review 49, 3: 253–83.Google Scholar
Smelser, Neil J. (1960 [1958]), Social Change in the Industrial Revolution: An Application to the Lancashire Cotton Industry 1770–1840. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Smelser, Neil J. (1962), Theory of Collective Behavior. New York and London: Free Press.Google Scholar
Smelser, Neil J. (1991), Social Paralysis and Social Change. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Smelser, Neil J. (1997), Problematics of Sociology: The GeorgSimmel Lectures, 1995. Berkeley, Los Angeles and London: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Snow, David A. and Phillip W., Davis (1995), ‘The Chicago Approach to Collective Behavior’, in Gary Alan, Fine (ed.), A Second Chicago School? The Development of a Postwar American Sociology. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press, pp. 188–220.Google Scholar
Sofsky, Wolfgang (1997 [1993]), The Order of Terror: The Concentration Camp [Die Ordnung des Terrors. Das Konzentrationslager]. Princeton and Chichester: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Srubar, Ilia (1988), Kosmion. Die Genese derpragmatischen Lebenswelttheorie von Alfred Schütz und ihr anthropologischer Hintergrund. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
Stichweh, Rudolf (1991), Der frühmoderne Staat und die europäische Universität. Zur Interaktion von Politik und Erziehungssystem im Prozeß ihrer Ausdifferenzierung (16.–18. Jahrhundert). Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
Stichweh, Rudolf (1994), Wissenschaft, Universität, Professionen. SoziologischeAnalysen. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
Stichweh, Rudolf (2000), Die Weltgesellschaft. Soziologische Analysen. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
Strauss, Anselm (1977 [1959]), Mirrors andMasks: The Search for Identity. London: Martin Robertson.Google Scholar
Strauss, Anselm (1978), Negotiations: Varieties, Contexts, Processes, and Social Order. San Francisco, Washington and London: Jossey-Bass Publications.Google Scholar
Strauss, Anselm (1982), ‘Interorganizational Negotiation’, Urban Life 11, 3: 349–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strauss, Anselm (1993), Continual Permutations of Action. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Stryker, Sheldon (1987), ‘The Vitalization of Symbolic Interactionism’, Social Psychology Quarterly 50, 1: 83–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, Charles (1975), Hegel. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, Charles (1985), ‘Legitimation Crisis?’ in Charles, Taylor, Philosophy and the Human Sciences: Philosophical Papers 2. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 248–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, Charles (1985), Philosophy and the Human Sciences: Philosophical Papers 2. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, Charles (1989), Sources of the Self: The Makingofthe Modern Identity. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Therborn, Göran (1992), ‘The Right to Vote and the Four World Routes to/through Modernity’, in Rolf, Torstendahl (ed.), State Theory and State History. London, Newbury Park and New Delhi: Sage, pp. 62–92.Google Scholar
Therborn, Göran (1995), European Modernity and Beyond: The Trajectory of European Societies, 1945–2000. London: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomas, George M. and John W., Meyer (1984), ‘The Expansion of the State’, Annual Review of Sociology 10: 461–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thompson, Edward P. (1963), The Making of the English Working Class. London: Victor Gollancz.Google Scholar
Tilly, Charles (2003), The Politics of Collective Violence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tiryakian, Edward A. (1991), ‘Modernization: Exhumetur in Pace (Rethinking Macrosociology in the 1990s)’, International Sociology 6, 2: 165–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tocqueville, Alexis de (2003 [1835/1840]) Democracy in America [De la démocratie en Amérique]. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
Toulmin, Stephen (1990), Cosmopolis: The Hidden Agenda of Modernity. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Touraine, Alain (1965), Sociologie de l'action. Paris: Éditions du Seuil.Google Scholar
Touraine, Alain (1974 [1969]), The Post-Industrial Society [La société post-industrielle]. London: Wildwood House.Google Scholar
Touraine, Alain (1977), The Self-Production of Society. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Touraine, Alain (1981 [1978]), The Voice and the Eye [La voix et le regard]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Touraine, Alain (1992), ‘La théorie sociologique entre l'acteur et les structures’, Schweizerische Zeitschrift für Soziologie/Revue suisse de sociologie 18, 3: 533–5.Google Scholar
Touraine, Alain (1995 [1992]), Critique of Modernity [Critique de la modernité]. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Touraine, Alain (1997 [1994]), What is Democracy? [Qu'est-ce que la démocratie?]. Boulder: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Touraine, Alain (2000 [1997]), Can We Live Together? Equality and Difference [Pourrons-nous vivre ensemble? Égaux et différents]. Oxford: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Tugendhat, Ernst (1982 [1976]), Traditional andAnalyticalPhilosophy: Lectures on the Philosophy of Language [Vorlesungen zur Einführung in die sprachanalytische Philosophie]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Turner, Jonathan H. (1974), ‘Parsons as a Symbolic Interactionist: A Comparison of Action and Interaction Theory’, Sociological Inquiry 44, 4: 283–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Touraine, Alain (1998), The Structure of Sociological Theory. Sixth edition. Belmont: Wadsworth Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Turner, Ralph (1962), ‘Role-Taking: Process versus Conformity’, in A., Rose (ed.), Human Behavior and Social Processes: An Interactionist Approach. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, pp. 20–40.Google Scholar
Turner, Ralph (1970), Family Interaction. New Yorkand London: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Turner, Ralph and Lewis M., Killian (1972), Collective Behavior. Second edition. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Turner, Stephen (1999), ‘The Significance of Shils’, Sociological Theory 17, 2: 125–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Turner, Stephen (2003), ‘The Maturity of Social Theory’, in Charles, Camic and Hans, Joas (eds.), The Dialogical Turn. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield, pp. 141–70.Google Scholar
Van der Linden, Marcel (1997), ‘Socialisme ou Barbarie: A French Revolutionary Group (1949–65)’, Left History 5, 1: 7-37.Google Scholar
Wagner, Helmut R. (1983), Alfred Schütz: An Intellectual Biography. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Wagner, Peter (1993), ‘Die Soziologie der Genese sozialer Institutionen – Theoretische Perspektiven der “neuen Sozialwissenschaften” in Frankreich’, Zeitschrift für Soziologie 22, 6: 464–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wagner, Peter (1994 [1995]), A Sociology of Modernity: Liberty and Discipline [Soziologie der Moderne. Freiheit und Disziplin]. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Wagner, Peter (2001), Theorizing Modernity: Inescapability and Attainability in Social Theory. London, Thousand Oaks and New Delhi: Sage.Google Scholar
Walby, Sylvia (1990), Theorizing Patriarchy. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Wallerstein, Immanuel (1974f.), The Modern World-System. 3 vols. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Wallerstein, Immanuel (1983), Historical Capitalism. London: Verso.Google Scholar
Warner, Stephen R. (1978), ‘Toward a Redefinition of Action Theory: Paying the Cognitive Element Its Due’, American Journal of Sociology 83, 6: 1317–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weber, Max (1975 [1908]), ‘Marginal Utility Theory and the So-called Law of Psychophysics’ [‘Die Grenznutzlehre und das “psychophysische Grundgesetz’”], Social Science Quarterly 56: 21–36.Google Scholar
Weber, Max (1979), Economy and Society: An Outline of lnterpretive Sociology [Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft. Grundriß der verstehenden Soziologie]. Berkeley and London: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Weingarten, Elmar and Fritz, Sack (1976), ‘Ethnomethodologie. Die methodische Konstruktion der Realität’, in Elmar, Weingarten, Fritz, Sack and Jim, Schenkein (eds.), Ethnomethodologie. Beiträge zu einer Soziologie des Alltagshandelns. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, pp. 7–26.Google Scholar
Welsch, Wolfgang (2002), Unsere postmoderne Moderne. Berlin: Akademie Verlag.Google Scholar
Wenzel, Harald (1990), Die Ordnung des Handelns. Talcott Parsons' Theorie des allgemeinen Handlungssystems. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
Wenzel, Harald (1993), ‘Einleitung: Neofunktionalismus und theoretisches Dilemma’, in Jeffrey C., Alexander, Soziale Differenzierung und kultureller Wandel, ed. Harald, Wenzel. Frankfurt am Main and New York: Campus, pp. 7–30.Google Scholar
Wenzel, Harald (2001), Die Abenteuer der Kommunikation. Echtzeitmassenmedien und der Handlungsraum der Hochmoderne. Weilerswist: Velbrück.Google Scholar
West, Candace and Don H., Zimmerman (1987), ‘Doing Gender’, Gender & Society 1, 2: 125–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wieder, D. Lawrence and Don H., Zimmermann (1976), ‘Regeln im Erklärungsprozeß. Wissenschaftliche und ethnowissenschaftliche Soziologie’, in Elmar, Weingarten, Fritz, Sack and Jim, Schenkein (eds.), Ethnomethodologie. Beiträge zu einer Soziologie des Alltagshandelns. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, pp. 105–29.Google Scholar
Wiesenthal, Helmut (1987), ‘Rational Choice. Ein Überblick über Grundlinien, Theoriefelder und neuere Themenakquisition eines sozialwissenschaftlichen Paradigmas’, Zeitschrift für Soziologie 16, 6: 434–49.Google Scholar
Wieviorka, Michel (1993 [1988]), The Making of Terrorism [Sociétés et terrorisme]. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Wieviorka, Michel (2004), La violence. Paris: Ballard.Google Scholar
Wieviorka, Michel (2007), The Lure of Anti-Semitism: Hatred of Jews in Present-Day France. Leiden: Brill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wieviorka, Michel (ed.) (1992), La France raciste. Paris: Editions du Seuil.
Wiggershaus, Rolf (1994 [1988]), The Frankfurt School: Its History, Theories and Political Significance [Die Frankfurter Schule. Geschichte – Theoretische Entwicklung – Politische Bedeutung]. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Willke, Helmut (1987), Systemtheorie. Eine Einführung in die Grundprobleme. Stuttgart and New York: Gustav Fischer Verlag.Google Scholar
Willke, Helmut (1992), Ironie des Staates. Grundlinien einer Staatstheorie polyzentrischer Gesellschaft. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
Willke, Helmut (1995), Systemtheorie III: Steuerungstheorie. Grundzüge einer Theorie der Steuerung komplexer Sozialsysteme. Stuttgart and Jena: Gustav Fischer Verlag.Google Scholar
Willke, Helmut (1997), Supervision des Staates. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
Wilson, R. Jackson (1968), In Quest of Community: Social Philosophy in the United States, 1860–1920. New York, London, Sidney and Toronto: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Wolfe, Alan (1998), ‘The Missing Pragmatist Revival in American Social Science’, in Morris, Dickstein (ed.), The Revival of Pragmatism. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, pp. 199-206Google Scholar
Zald, Mayer N. and John D., McCarthy (1987), Social Movements in an Organizational Society: Collected Essays. New Brunswick, NJ and Oxford: Transaction Books.Google Scholar
Zald, Mayer N. and John D., McCarthy (2002), ‘The Resource Mobilization Research Program: Progress, Challenge, and Transformation’, in Joseph, Berger and Morris, Zelditch Jr. (eds.), New Directions in Contemporary Sociological Theory. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
Zapf, Wolfgang (1996), ‘Die Modernisierungstheorie und unterschiedliche Pfade der gesellschaftlichen Entwicklung’, Leviathan 24, 1: 63–77.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • References
  • Hans Joas, Universitat Erfurt, Germany, Wolfgang Knöbl, Georg-August-Universität, Göttingen, Germany
  • Translated by Alex Skinner
  • Book: Social Theory
  • Online publication: 05 June 2014
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139878432.022
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • References
  • Hans Joas, Universitat Erfurt, Germany, Wolfgang Knöbl, Georg-August-Universität, Göttingen, Germany
  • Translated by Alex Skinner
  • Book: Social Theory
  • Online publication: 05 June 2014
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139878432.022
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • References
  • Hans Joas, Universitat Erfurt, Germany, Wolfgang Knöbl, Georg-August-Universität, Göttingen, Germany
  • Translated by Alex Skinner
  • Book: Social Theory
  • Online publication: 05 June 2014
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139878432.022
Available formats
×