Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-75dct Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-01T04:27:09.923Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chapter 7 - Recruitment to QAnon

Ordinary Persuasion and Human Agency or “Brainwashing”?

from Part II - Recruiting and Maintaining Followers

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 September 2023

Monica K. Miller
Affiliation:
University of Nevada, Reno
Get access

Summary

This chapter examines research about recruitment to political and new religious movements from the 1960s, 70s, and 80s, contrasting those results with the meager research base on participants in QAnon, noting similarities and differences. The major finding from the earlier research was that young people participated of their own volition as an expression of their human agency. They were not “brainwashed”. This key finding is generally applicable to QAnon participants, although QAnon devotees are typically older and often were recruited through social media and the internet. Social psychological theories such as “foot-in-the-door” and what happens when prophecies fail are applied to QAnon recruitment as well. The chapter ends with suggestions for research needed to fully understand QAnon recruitment.

Type
Chapter
Information
The Social Science of QAnon
A New Social and Political Phenomenon
, pp. 104 - 120
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2023

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Amarasingam, A., & Argentino, M. A. (2020a, October 28). QAnon’s predictions haven’t come true; so how does the movement survive the failure of prophecy? Religion Dispatches. https://religiondispatches.org/qanons-predictions-havent-come-true-so-how-does-the-movement-survive-the-failure-of-prophecy/Google Scholar
Amarasingam, A., & Argentino, M. A. (2020b). The QAnon conspiracy theory: A security threat in the making? CTC Sentinel, 13(7). www.ctc.usma.edu/the-qanon-conspiracy-theory-a-security-threat-in-the-making/Google Scholar
Anthony, D. (1990). Religious movements and brainwashing litigation: Evaluating key testimony. In Robbins, T. & Anthony, D. (Eds.), In gods we trust (pp. 295344). Transaction Publishers.Google Scholar
Anthony, D., & Robbins, T. (2004). Pseudoscience and minority religions: In Richardson, J. T. (Ed.), Regulating religion: Case studies from around the globe (pp. 127149). Kluwer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Argentino, M. A. (2020, May 18). The church of QAnon: Will conspiracy theories form the basis of a new religious movement? The Conversation. https://theconversation.com/the-church-of-qanon-will-conspiracy-theories-form-the-basis-of-a-new-religious-movement-137859Google Scholar
Balch, R., & Taylor, D. (1978). Seekers and saucers: The role of the cultic milieu in joining an UFO cult. In Richardson, J. T. (Ed.), Conversion careers: In and out of the new religions (pp. 95116). Sage.Google Scholar
Barker, E. (1984). The making of a Moonie: Brainwashing or choice? Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Beaty, K. (2020, August 17). QAnon: The alternative religion that’s coming to your church. Religion News Service. https://religionnews.com/2020/08/17/qanon-the-alternative-religion-thats-coming-to-your-church/Google Scholar
Beckford, J. (1978). Through the looking glass and out the other side: Withdrawal from Rev. Moon’s Unification Church. Archives des Science Sociales des Religious, 45, 95116.Google Scholar
Berkowitz, R. (2021, May 11). QAnon resembles the games I design. But for believers, there is no winning. Washington Post. www.washingtonpost.com/outlook/qanon-game-plays-believers/2021/05/10/31d8ea46-928b-11eb-a74e-1f4cf89fd948_story.htmlGoogle Scholar
Beverly, J. (2020). The QAnon deception: Everything you need to know about the world’s most dangerous conspiracy theory. EqualTime Books.Google Scholar
Bird, F., & Reimer, B. (1982). Participation rates in new religious movements and para-religious movements. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 21, 114.Google Scholar
Brasher, B. (2001). Give me that online religion. Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
Bromley, D., & Breschel, E. (1992). General population and institutional elite support for control of new religious movements: Evidence from national survey data. Behavioral Science and the Law, 10, 3952.Google Scholar
Bromley, D., & Richardson, J. T. (1983). The brainwashing/deprogramming controversy. Edwin Mellen Press.Google Scholar
Cheruvallil-Contractor, S., & Shakkour, S. (2016). Digital methodologies in the sociology of religion. Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Cowan, D. (2005). Cyberhenge: Modern pagans on the internet. Routledge.Google Scholar
Dawson, L. (1999). When prophecy fails and faith persists: A theoretical overview. Nova Religio, 3(1), 6082.Google Scholar
Dawson, L. (2021, January 21). Keeping faith with Trump: The dangerous causes and consequences. International Centre for Counter-Terrorism. https://icct.nl/publication/keeping-faith-with-trump-the-dangerous-causes-and-the-consequences/Google Scholar
Dawson, L., & Cowan, D. (2004). Religion online: Finding faith on the internet. Routledge.Google Scholar
Festinger, L., Riecken, H., & Schachter, S. (1956). When prophecy fails: A social and psychological study of a group that predicted the destruction of the world. University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Flacks, R. (1967). The liberated generation: An exploration of the roots of student protest. Journal of Social Issues, 23, 5275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flacks, R. (1973). Youth and social change. Markham.Google Scholar
Freedman, J., & Fraser, S. (1966). Compliance without pressure: The foot-in-the-door technique. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 4(2), 195202.Google Scholar
Galanter, M. (1978). The “relief effect”: A sociobiological model of neurotic stress and large group therapy. American Journal of Psychiatry, 135, 588591.Google Scholar
Galanter, M. (1980). Psychological induction into the lager group: Findings from a modern religious sect. American Journal of Psychiatry, 137, 15741578.Google Scholar
Garry, A., Walther, S., Rukaya, R., & Mohammed, A. (2021). QAnon conspiracy theory: Examining its evolution and mechanisms of radicalization. Journal of Deradicalization, 26, 152216.Google Scholar
Ginsburg, G., & Richardson, J. T. (1998). “Brainwashing” evidence in light of Daubert. In Reece, H. (Ed.), Law and science (pp. 265288). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hadden, J., & Cowan, D. (2000). Religion on the internet: Research prospects and promises. JAI Press.Google Scholar
Jaffe, G., & Del Real, J. (2021, February 23). Life among the ruins: “I want my family back.” Seattle Times. www.seattletimes.com/nation-world/life-amid-the-ruins-of-qanon-i-wanted-my-family-back/Google Scholar
Jenkins, J. (2021, May 27). Survey: White evangelicals, Hispanic Protestants, Mormons most likely to believe in QAnon. Religious News Service. https://religionnews.com/2021/05/27/survey-white-evangelicals-hispanic-protestants-and-mormons-most-likely-believe-in-qanon/Google Scholar
Kilbourne, B., & Richardson, J. T. (1984). Psychotherapy and the new religions in a pluralistic society. American Psychologist, 39, 237251.Google Scholar
Kilbourne, B., & Richardson, J. T. (1988). A social psychological analysis of healing. Journal of Integrative and Eclectic Psychotherapy, 7(1), 2034.Google Scholar
Kilbourne, B., & Richardson, J. T. (1989). Paradigm conflict, types of conversion, and conversion theories. Sociological Analysis, 50(1), 121.Google Scholar
LaFrance, A. (2020, May 13). The prophecies of Q: American conspiracy theories are entering a dangerous new phase. The Atlantic. www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2020/06/qanon-nothing-can-stop-what-is-coming/610567/gGoogle Scholar
Levine, S. (1986). Radical departures: Desperate detours to growing up. Harvest Books.Google Scholar
Levine, J., & Russo, E. (1988). Majority and minority influence. In Hedrick, C. (Ed.), Group processes (pp. 1354). Sage.Google Scholar
Lifton, R. (1961). Thought reform and the psychology of totalism. Victor Gollancz.Google Scholar
Milgram, S., & Toch, H. (1969). Collective behavior: Crowds and social movements. In Lindzey, G. & Aronson, E. (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology. Vol. 4: Group psychology and phenomena of interaction (pp. 507610). Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
Moreland, R., & Levine, J. (1985). Socialization in small groups: Temporal change in individual–group relations. In Berkowitz, L. (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (pp. 143169). Academic Press.Google Scholar
Neumann, E. (2021, February 19). Former DHS official: Right-wing extremists and white supremacists targeting QAnon followers for recruitment [Interview]. 60 Minutes. www.cbsnews.com/news/qanon-conspiracy-capitol-riots-60-minutes-2021-02-19/Google Scholar
Pliner, P., Hart, H., Kohl, J., & Saari, D. (1974). Compliance without pressure: Some further data on the foot-in-the-door technique. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 10, 1724.Google Scholar
Possami-Inesedy, A., & Nixon, A. (2019). The digital social: Religion and belief. De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Rahn, W., & Patterson, D. (2021, March 29). What is the QAnon conspiracy theory? CBS News. www.cbsnews.com/news/what-is-the-qanon-conspiracy-theory/Google Scholar
Richardson, J. T. (1978). Conversion careers: In and out of the new religions. Sage.Google Scholar
Richardson, J. T. (1985). The active versus passive convert: Paradigm conflict in conversion/recruitment research. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 24, 163179.Google Scholar
Richardson, J. T. (1991). Cult/brainwashing cases and the freedom of religion. Journal of Church and State, 33, 5574.Google Scholar
Richardson, J. T. (1992). Mental health of cult consumers. In Schumacher, J. (Ed.), Religion and mental health (pp. 233244). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Richardson, J. T. (1993a). Definitions of cult: From sociological-technical to popular-negative. Review of Religious Research, 34(4), 348356.Google Scholar
Richardson, J. T. (1993b). Religiosity as deviance: Use and misuse of the DMS with participations new religions. Deviant Behavior, 14, 121.Google Scholar
Richardson, J. T. (1993c). A social psychological critique of “brainwashing” claims about recruitment to new religions. In Hadden, J. & Bromley, D. (Eds.), The handbook of sects and cults in America (pp. 7597). JAI Books.Google Scholar
Richardson, J. T. (1995). Clinical and personality assessment of participants in new religions. International Journal of Psychology of Religion, 5(3), 145170.Google Scholar
Richardson, J. T. (2011). Deprogramming: From private self-help to governmental organized repression. Crime, Law, and Social Change, 55, 321336.Google Scholar
Richardson, J. T. (2014a). Brainwashing and forensic evidence. In Morewitz, S. & Goldstein, M. (Eds.), Handbook of forensic sociology (pp. 7785). Springer.Google Scholar
Richardson, J. T. (2014b). “Brainwashing” and mental health. In Friedman, H. (Ed.), Encyclopedia of mental health (2nd ed., pp. 210215). Academic Press.Google Scholar
Richardson, J. T. (2021). The myth of the omnipotent leader: Social construction of a misleading account of leadership in new religious movements. Nova Religio, 24, 1125.Google Scholar
Richardson, J. T., Balch, R., & Melton, G. (1993). Problems of research and data in the study of new religions. In Hadden, J. & Bromley, D. (Eds.), The handbook of sects and cults in America (pp. 213229). JAI Books.Google Scholar
Richardson, J. T., Bromley, D., & Best, J. (1991). The satanism scare. Aldine de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Richardson, J. T., van der Lans, J., & Derks, F. (1986). Leaving and labeling: Voluntary and coerced disaffiliation from religious social movements. In Lang, F., Lang, G., & Kriesberg, L. (Eds.), Research in social movements, conflicts and change (pp. 97126). JAI Books.Google Scholar
Rogers, K. (2020, October 29). QAnon isn’t going to take over Congress in 2020. But it’s found a home in the GOP. FiveThirtyEight. https://fivethirtyeight.com/features/qanon-isnt-going-to-take-over-congress-in-2020-but-its-found-a-home-in-the-gop/Google Scholar
Rogers, K. (2021, March 4). Why QAnon has attracted so many white evangelicals. FiveThirtyEight. https://fivethirtyeight.com/features/why-qanon-has-attracted-so-many-white-evangelicals/Google Scholar
Rosenberg, M. (2020, November 10). Republican voters take a radical conspiracy theory mainstream. New York Times. www.nytimes.com/2020/10/19/us/politics/qanon-trump-republicans.htmlGoogle Scholar
Schein, E. (1961). Coercion persuasion. W.W. Norton.Google Scholar
Schulson, M. (2021, February 24). Can cult studies offer help with QAnon? The science is thin. Undark. https://undark.org/2021/02/24/cult-studies-qanon/Google Scholar
Scott, M., & Lyman, S. (1968). Accounts. American Sociological Review, 33(1), 4662.Google Scholar
Shupe, A., & Bromley, D. (1980). The new vigilantes: Anti-cultists and the new religions. Sage.Google Scholar
Singer, M. (1979). Coming out of the cults. Psychology Today, 12, 7282.Google Scholar
Skolnick, J. (1969). The politics of protest. Ballentine Books.Google Scholar
Stark, R. (1971). Psychopathology and religious commitment. Review of Religious Research, 12, 165176.Google Scholar
Stark, R., & Bainbridge, W. (1980). Networks of faith: Interpersonal bonds and recruitment to cults and sects. American Journal of Sociology, 85, 376395.Google Scholar
Straus, R. (1976). Changing oneself: Seekers and the creative transformation of life experience. In Lofland, J. (Ed.), Doing social life (pp. 252273). John Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar
Straus, R. (1979). Religious conversion as a personal and collective accomplishment. Sociological Analysis, 40, 158165.Google Scholar
Thomas, P. (2021, April 15). “Deprogramming” QAnon followers ignores free will and why they adopted the beliefs in the first place.” The Conversation. https://theconversation.com/deprogramming-qanon-followers-ignores-free-will-and-why-they-adopted-the-beliefs-in-the-first-place-158372Google Scholar
Tumminia, D. (2005). When prophecy never fails: Myth and reality in a flying-saucer group. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Wright, S. (1987). Leaving cults: The dynamics of defection. The Society for the Scientific Study of Religion.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×