Book contents
- Social Rights Judgments and the Politics of Compliance
- Social Rights Judgments and the Politics of Compliance
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures and Tables
- Contributors
- Preface
- Part I Overview
- 1 Introduction: From Jurisprudence to Compliance
- 2 Explaining Compliance: Lessons Learnt from Civil and Political Rights
- 3 Beyond Enforcement: Assessing and Enhancing Judicial Impact
- Part II Case Studies
- Part III Concluding Perspectives
- Case Index
- Thematic Index
- References
2 - Explaining Compliance: Lessons Learnt from Civil and Political Rights
from Part I - Overview
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 16 March 2017
Book contents
- Social Rights Judgments and the Politics of Compliance
- Social Rights Judgments and the Politics of Compliance
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures and Tables
- Contributors
- Preface
- Part I Overview
- 1 Introduction: From Jurisprudence to Compliance
- 2 Explaining Compliance: Lessons Learnt from Civil and Political Rights
- 3 Beyond Enforcement: Assessing and Enhancing Judicial Impact
- Part II Case Studies
- Part III Concluding Perspectives
- Case Index
- Thematic Index
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Social Rights Judgments and the Politics of ComplianceMaking it Stick, pp. 43 - 74Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2017
References
Alston, Philip (1982), ‘A Third Generation of Solidarity Rights: Progressive Development or Obfuscation of International Human Rights Law?’, Netherlands International Law Review, 29(3), 307–322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alston, Philip and Quinn, Gerard (1987), ‘The Nature and Scope of States Parties’ Obligations under the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights’, Human Rights Quarterly, 9(2), 156–229.Google Scholar
Anagnostou, Dia (2010), ‘Does European Human Rights Law Matter? Implementation and Domestic Impact of Strasbourg Court Judgments on Minority-Related Policies’, International Journal of Human Rights, 14(5), 721–743.Google Scholar
Baluarte, David and De Vos, Christian (2010), From Judgment to Justice: Implementing International and Regional Human Rights Decisions (New York: Open Society Foundations).Google Scholar
Basch, Fernando Felipe (2007), ‘The Doctrine of the Inter-American Court of Human Rights Regarding States’ Duty to Punish Human Rights Violations and Its Dangers’, American University International Law Review, 23(1), 195–230.Google Scholar
Benvenisti, Eyal, and Downs, George W. (2009), ‘National courts, domestic democracy, and the evolution of international law’, European Journal of International Law 20(1), 59–72.Google Scholar
Berman, Sheri (1998), The Social Democratic Moment: Ideas and Politics in the Making in Interwar Europe (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beyers, Jan (2005), ‘Multiple Embeddedness and Socialization in Europe: The Case of Council Officials’, International Organisation, 59(4), 899–936.Google Scholar
Çalı, Başak (2010), ‘The Logics of Supranational Human Rights Litigation, Official Acknowledgment, and Human Rights Reform: The Southeast Turkey Cases before the European Court of Human Rights, 1996–2006’, Law and Social Inquiry, 35(2), 311–337.Google Scholar
Çalı, Başak, Koch, Anne and Bruch, Nicola (2013), ‘The Legitimacy of Human Rights Courts: A Grounded Interpretivist Analysis of the European Court of Human Rights’, Human Rights Quarterly 35(4), 955–984.Google Scholar
Çalı, Başak and Koch, Anne (2014), ‘Foxes Guarding the Foxes? Peer Review of Human Rights Judgments by the Committee of Ministers of the Council of Europe’, Human Rights Law Review, 14 (2), 301–325.Google Scholar
Cardenas, Sonia (2007), Conflict and Compliance: State Responses to International Human Rights Pressure (Philadelphia, PA: Pennsylvania University Press).Google Scholar
Carozza, Paolo G. (2003), ‘Subsidiarity as a Structural Principle of International Human Rights Law’, American Journal of International Law, 97, 38–79.Google Scholar
Cavallaro, James and Brewer, Stephanie Erin (2008), ‘Re-evaluating Regional Human Rights Litigation in the Twenty First Century: The Case of the Inter American Court’, American Journal of International Law, 102, 768–827.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chayes, Abram, and Chayes, Antonia Handler (1993), ‘On compliance’, International organization 47(2), 175–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Council of Europe Committee of Ministers (2009), Supervision of the Execution of Judgments of the European Court of Human Rights: 3rd Annual Report (Strasbourg: Directorate General of Human Rights and Legal Affairs).Google Scholar
Council of Europe Committee of Ministers (2015), Supervision of the Execution of Judgments of the European Court of Human Rights: 9th Annual Report (Strasbourg: Directorate General of Human Rights and Legal Affairs).Google Scholar
Crawford, James (2002), The International Law Commission’s Articles on State Sovereignty (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Dai, Xinjuan (2005), ‘Why Comply? The Domestic Constituency Mechanism’, International Organization, 59(2), 363–398.Google Scholar
Dai, Xinjuan (2007), International Institutions and National Processes (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Dembour, Marie-Benedicte (2003), ‘Human Rights Law and National Sovereignty in Collusion: The Plight of Quasi-Nationals at Strasbourg’, Netherlands Quarterly of Human Rights, 21(1), 63–98.Google Scholar
Dixon, Rosalind (2007), ‘Creating Dialogue about Socioeconomic Rights: Strong-Form versus Weak-Form Judicial Review Revisited’, International Journal of Constitutional Law, 5(3), 391–418.Google Scholar
Dorf, Michael C. and Sabel, Charles F. (1998), ‘A Constitution of Democratic Experimentalism’, Columbia Law Review, 98(2), 267–473.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Downs, George W. and Jones, Michael A. (2002), ‘Reputation, Compliance and International Law’, Journal of Legal Studies, 31(1), 595–115.Google Scholar
Fearon, James D. (1994), ‘Domestic Political Audiences and the Escalation of International Disputes’, American Political Science Review, 88(3), 577–592.Google Scholar
Gardbaum, Stephen (2001), ‘The New Commonwealth Model of Constitutionalism’, American Journal of Comparative Law, 49, 707–760.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gaubatz, Kurt Taylor (1996), ‘Democratic States and Commitment in International Relations’, International Organization, 50(1), 109–139.Google Scholar
Gauri, Varun and Brinks, Daniel (eds.) (2008), Courting Social Justice. Judicial Enforcement of Social and Economic Rights in the Developing World (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Gloppen, Siri (2009), ‘Legal Enforcement of Social Rights: Enabling Conditions and Impact Assessment’, Erasmus Law Review, 2(4), 465–480.Google Scholar
Goodman, Ryan and Jinks, Derek (2008), ‘Incomplete Internationalization and Compliance with International Law’, European Journal of International Law, 19(4), 725–748.Google Scholar
Guzman, Andrew (2009), How International Law Works: A Rational Choice Theory (Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
Hillebrecht, Courtney (2014), Domestic Politics and International Human Rights Tribunals: The Problem of Compliance (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Hopf, Ted (2010), ‘The logic of habit in international relations’, European Journal of International Relations 16(4), 539–561.Google Scholar
Langford, Malcolm (ed.) (2008), Social Rights Jurisprudence. Emerging Trends in International and Comparative Law (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Leach, Philip (2001), Taking a Case to the European Court of Human Rights (London: Blackstone Press).Google Scholar
Merali, Isfahan and Oosterveldeds, Valerie (2001), Giving Meaning to Economic, Social, and Cultural Rights (Philadelphia: University of Philadelphia Press).Google Scholar
Meron, Theodor (1986), ‘On a Hierarchy of International Human Rights’, American Journal of International Law, 80, 1–23.Google Scholar
Mowbray, Alastair (2004), The Development of Positive Obligations under the European Convention on Human Rights by the European Court of Human Rights (Oxford: Hart Publishing).Google Scholar
Murray, Rachael and Debra, Long (2015), The Implementation of the Findings of the African Commission on Human and Peoples Rights (Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Musila, M. Godfrey (2006), ‘The Right to an Effective Remedy under the African Charter on Uman and Peoples’ Rights’, African Human Rights Law Journal, 6(2), 442–464.Google Scholar
Mutua, Makau (1999), ‘The African Human Rights Court: A Two-Legged Stool?’, Human Rights Quarterly, 21(2), 342–363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Palmer, Elizabeth (2009), ‘Protecting Socio-Economic Rights through the European Convention on Human Rights: Trends and Developments at the European Court of Human Rights’, Erasmus Law Review, 2(4), 397–425.Google Scholar
Raustiala, Kal and Slaughter, Anne-Marie (2002), ‘International Law, International Relations and Compliance’, in Carlsnaes, Walter, Risse, Thomas and Simmons, Beth A. (eds.), Handbook of International Relations (London: Sage Publications), 538–558.Google Scholar
Roach, Kent (2008), ‘The challenges of crafting remedies for violations of socio-economic rights’ in Langford, Malcolm (ed.) Social Rights Jurisprudence: Emerging Trends in International and Comparative Law (New York: Cambridge University Press), 46–58.Google Scholar
Rodríguez-Garavito, César (2011), ‘Beyond the Courtroom: The Impact of Judicial Activism on Socioeconomic Rights in Latin America’, Texas Law Review, 89(7), 2011.Google Scholar
Saito, Natsu Taylor (1996), ‘Beyond Civil Rights: Considering “Third Generation” International Human Rights Law in the United States’, The University of Miami Inter-American Law Review, 28(2), 387–412.Google Scholar
Simmons, Beth (2009), Mobilising Human Rights: International Law in Domestic Politics (New York: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
Tallberg, Jonas (2002), ‘Paths to Compliance: Enforcement, Management and the European Union’, International Organisation, 56(3), 609–643.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tushnet, Mark (2003a), ‘Forms of Judicial Review as Expressions of Constitutional Patriotism’, Law and Philosophy, 22(3/4), 353–379.Google Scholar
Tushnet, Mark (2003b), ‘Social Welfare Rights and the Forms of Judicial Review’, Texas Law Review, 82, 1895–1919.Google Scholar
Tushnet, Mark (2003c), ‘New Forms of Judicial Review and the Persistence of Rights- and Democracy-Based Worries’, Wake Forest Law Review, 38, 813–838.Google Scholar
Tushnet, Mark (2008), Weak Courts, Strong Rights: Judicial Review and Social Welfare Rights in Comparative Constitutional Law (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press).Google Scholar
Wiener, Antje (2004), ‘Contested Compliance: Interventions on the Normative Structure of World Politics’, European Journal of International Relations, 1(2), 189–234.Google Scholar
- 2
- Cited by