Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-sv6ng Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-10T03:30:34.182Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

7 - “They're Just Mentally and Physically Unfit”: Discrimination in Education and Health Care

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2012

Jim Sidanius
Affiliation:
University of California, Los Angeles
Felicia Pratto
Affiliation:
University of Connecticut
Get access

Summary

Despite the fact that a very large proportion of both dominants and subordinates are convinced that both groups are treated equally within the domains of education and health care, the evidence we review next shows these beliefs to be significantly out of touch with reality.

Discrimination in Education

Confucius (551–479 B.C.), a sage and high-level bureaucrat, was one of the earliest documented examples of a poor person rising to fame and prominence by virtue of fortuitous access to higher education. In many hierarchical societies, education has been a key element in social mobility. Because of their power and value as scarce resources, education and literacy have tended to be reserved exclusively for ruling elites and their agents for most of human history. For example, many slave states in the United States made it illegal to teach slaves to read.

Mass literacy did not begin to emerge until around A.D. 1000 in Europe, and even then wa6s largely restricted to the ruling elites out of a fear of what impact it might have on the general social order. To the extent that subordinates were given literacy instruction at all, this instruction stressed rote memorization, rather than the ability to process information critically. It was not until the Industrial Revolution of the nineteenth century that basic literacy was extended to broad sections of the population. Though the twentieth century has seen an even further extension of literacy, this training still tends to be rather rudimentary and to stress rote learning rather than critical reasoning abilities.

Type
Chapter
Information
Social Dominance
An Intergroup Theory of Social Hierarchy and Oppression
, pp. 178 - 201
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 1999

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×