Book contents
- Half title page
- Title page
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Contributors
- Book part
- Glossary
- Table of cases
- Table of statutes
- Introduction
- Part I The social dimensions of privacy
- Part II Privacy: practical controversies
- 5 The feminist critique of privacy: past arguments and new social understandings
- 6 Privacy in the family
- 7 How to do things with personal big biodata
- 8 Should personal data be a tradable good? On the moral limits of markets in privacy
- 9 Privacy, democracy and freedom of expression
- 10 How much privacy for public officials?
- 11 Privacy, surveillance, and the democratic potential of the social Web
- Part III Issues in privacy regulation
- Index
- References
10 - How much privacy for public officials?
from Part II - Privacy: practical controversies
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 July 2015
Book contents
- Half title page
- Title page
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Contributors
- Book part
- Glossary
- Table of cases
- Table of statutes
- Introduction
- Part I The social dimensions of privacy
- Part II Privacy: practical controversies
- 5 The feminist critique of privacy: past arguments and new social understandings
- 6 Privacy in the family
- 7 How to do things with personal big biodata
- 8 Should personal data be a tradable good? On the moral limits of markets in privacy
- 9 Privacy, democracy and freedom of expression
- 10 How much privacy for public officials?
- 11 Privacy, surveillance, and the democratic potential of the social Web
- Part III Issues in privacy regulation
- Index
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Social Dimensions of PrivacyInterdisciplinary Perspectives, pp. 181 - 201Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2015
References
Brettschneider, C. 2007. Democratic Rights: The Substance of Self-Government. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Chambers, S. 2010. “Theories of political justification,” Philosophy Compass 5: 893–903.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dobel, P. 1998. “Judging the private lives of public officials,” Administration and Society 30: 115–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fraser, N. 1992. “Sex, lies, and the public sphere: some reflections on the confirmation of Clarence Thomas,” Critical Inquiry 18: 595–612.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garthoff, J. 2012. “The idea of an overlapping consensus revisited,” Journal of Value Inquiry 46: 183–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gaus, G. 1996. Justificatory Liberalism: An Essay on Epistemology and Political Theory. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gaus, G. 2003. Contemporary Theories of Liberalism: Public Reason as a Post-Enlightenment Project. London: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hartley, Ch. and Watson, L. 2010. “Is feminist political liberalism possible?” Journal of Ethics & Social Philosophy 5: 1–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keating, J. 2014. “The Problem with the Right to be Forgotten.” Accessed September 23, 2014 from www.slate.com/blogs/the_world_/2014/05/13/the_eu_s_misguided_push_for_a_right_to_be_forgotten_on_the_internet.html.Google Scholar
Kelly, K. and McPherson, L. 2001. “On tolerating the unreasonable,” Journal of Political Philosophy 9: 38–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lafont, C. 2008. “Religious citizens & public reasons.” The Immanent Frame. Accessed September 5, 2014 from http://blogs.ssrc.org/tif/2008/02/08/religious-citizens-public-reasons/.Google Scholar
Lafont, C. 2009. “Religion and the public sphere,” Philosophy and Social Criticism 35: 127–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Larmore, C. 1999. “The Moral Basis of Political Liberalism,” Journal of Philosophy 96: 599–625.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Larmore, C. 2003. “Public Reason,” in Freeman, S (ed.) The Cambridge Companion to Rawls. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lever, A. 2015. “Privacy and democracy: what the secret ballot reveals,” Law, Culture and the Humanities (forthcoming).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lukes, S. 1978. “Power and Authority,” in Bottomore, T. B. and Nisbet, R. (eds.) A History of Sociological Analysis. London: Basic Books, pp. 633–76.Google Scholar
Macedo, S. 1991. Liberal Virtues: Citizenship, Virtue, and Community in Liberal Constitutionalism. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
MacKinnon, C. 1989. Toward a Feminist Theory of the State. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Mendus, S. 2008. “Private Faces in Public Faces,” in Kramer, M. H., Grant, C. and Hatzistavrou, A. (eds.) The Legacy of H.L.A. Hart’s Legal, Political, and Moral Philosophy. Oxford University Press, pp. 299–315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Merry, M. 2007. Culture, Identity and Islamic Schooling: A Philosophical Approach. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mokrosinska, D. 2014. “Privacy and the integrity of liberal politics: the case of governmental internet searches,” Journal of Social Philosophy 45: 369–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moore, A. 2000. “Employee monitoring and computer technology: evaluative surveillance v. privacy,” Business Ethics Quarterly 10: 697–707.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pateman, C. 1989. “Feminist Critiques of the Public/Private Dichotomy,” in Pateman, C.The Disorder of Women: Democracy, Feminism, and Political Theory. Stanford University Press, pp. 118–40.Google Scholar
Quong, J. 2013. “Public Reason,” in Zalta, E. N. (ed.) The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Accessed September 2014 from http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2013/entries/public-reason.Google Scholar
Rawls, J. 1996. Political Liberalism. Second revised edition (with a new introduction and the "Reply to Habermas"). New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Russon, M. 2014. “Google’s Right to be Forgotten: 70,000 Politicians, Criminals and Individuals want Offending Content Erased.” Accessed September 23, 2014 from www.ibtimes.co.uk/googles-right-be-forgotten-70000-politicians-criminals-individuals-want-offending-content-1456603.Google Scholar
Schauer, F. 2000. “Can public figures have private lives?” Social Philosophy and Policy 17: 293–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thompson, D. 1987. Political Ethics and Public Office. Cambridge, MA.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Thompson, D. 2004. “Public reason and precluded reasons,” Fordham Law Review 73: 2073–88.Google Scholar
Thompson, D. 2005. Restoring Responsibility: Ethics in Government, Business, and Healthcare. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Thompson, D. and Gutmann, A. 1996. Democracy and Disagreement. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press.Google Scholar
Waldron, J. 1993. “Theoretical Foundations of Liberalism,” in Waldron, J.Liberal Rights: Collected Papers 1981–1991. Cambridge University Press, pp. 35–62.Google Scholar
Wall, S. and Klosko, G. 2003. Perfectionism and Neutrality: Essays in Liberal Theory. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
- 5
- Cited by