Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-c4f8m Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-23T16:52:16.695Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chapter 9 - Burning the Bullet: Industrial Demilitarization of Ammunition pages 200 to 217

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2014

Get access

Summary

REGULATIONS, STANDARDS, AND OVERSIGHT

There is currently no common international or European standard, legislation, or compliance mechanism that specifically addresses ammunition demilitarization by commercial contractors.

This may complicate, and in some cases prevent, the development of a systematic, multinational approach to ammunition demilitarization. Within NATO, Standardization Agreement 4518 provides a brief—and outdated—overview of the demilitarization process and available techniques, but it was not written to provide industry standards (NIAG, 2010, p. 171). National legislation usually does not regulate the destruction of military ammunition by civilian industrial contractors. To process military ammunition, industrial contractors must therefore apply a patchwork of civilian explosives industry legislation and for certain activities, such as OB and OD, they may adapt military guidance.

Seemingly unrelated legislation and civilian regulations affect the demilitarization industry indirectly. Changes to regulations in the areas of environment, safety, and staff training requirements can have effects on demilitarization practices. There is also a complex framework of regional, national, and even local rules subjecting demilitarization activities to various local permits and licences. In the United States, for example, the demilitarization of munitions requires compliance with numerous local, state, and federal regulations, most of which require air emissions permits and chemical release reports (Thompson, Kennedy, and Nordquist, 2004).

US and Western European contractors usually know these constraints well because they have a direct impact on their business. However, client governments and national programmers may find this regulatory framework complex and opaque.

Type
Chapter
Information
Small Arms Survey 2013
Everyday Dangers
, pp. 200 - 217
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2013

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×