Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-6d856f89d9-5pczc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-16T08:18:32.740Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chapter 6 - The Do-Not-Intubate Order

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 May 2021

Matthew N. Jaffa
Affiliation:
Hartford Hospital, Connecticut
David Y. Hwang
Affiliation:
Yale University, Connecticut
Get access

Summary

Mrs. Williams is an 82-year-old woman with severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), hypertension, and diastolic heart failure who is admitted to the medical intensive care unit (ICU) with acute hypercapnic/hypoxemic respiratory failure necessitating rescue noninvasive bilevel positive airway pressure. She seems to be fatigued and volume overloaded on physical examination, with coarse breath sounds bilaterally. You have started diuretics and empiric treatment for a COPD exacerbation, but you worry that she may not be responding adequately to noninvasive ventilation. This is her third admission in the last 6 months. She has never required intubation, and from a brief chart review, it does not seem that intubation has been previously discussed in detail.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2021

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Smith, G., Nielsen, M.. Criteria for admission. BMJ, 1999; 318(7197): 1544–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stefan, M.S., Shieh, M.S., Pekow, P.S., et al. Epidemiology and outcomes of acute respiratory failure in the United States, 2001 to 2009: a national survey. Journal of Hospital Medicine, 2013; 8(2): 7682.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Flaatten, H., Gjerde, S., Guttormsen, A.B., et al. Outcome after acute respiratory failure is more dependent on dysfunction in other vital organs than on the severity of the respiratory failure. Critical Care, 2003; 7(4): R72–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Abram, M.B., Ballantine, H.T., G.R., et al. The President’s Commission for the Study of Ethical Problems in Medicine and Biomedical and Behavioural Research. Deciding to Forego Life-Sustaining Treatment: a report on the ethical, medical, and legal issues in treatment decisions. Washington, D.C.; President’s Commission for the Study of Ethical Problems in Medicine and Biomedical and Behavioural Research; 1983.Google Scholar
Meisel, A., Cerminara, K.L., Pope, T.M.. The right to die: the law of end-of-life decisionmaking. 3rd ed. New York: Aspen Publishers; 2004.Google Scholar
Tulsky, J.A., Chesney, M.A., Lo, B.. How do medical residents discuss resuscitation with patients? Journal of General Internal Medicine, 1995; 10(8): 436–42.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fischer, G.S., Tulsky, J.A., Rose, M.R., Siminoff, L.A., Arnold, R.M.. Patient knowledge and physician predictions of treatment preferences after discussion of advance directives. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 1998; 13(7): 447–54.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mehta, N., Roche, S., Wong, E., Noor, A., DeCarli, K.. Balancing patient autonomy, surrogate decision making, and physician non-maleficence when considering do-not-resuscitate orders: an ethics case analysis. Rhode Island Medical Journal, 2017; 100(10): 32–4.Google ScholarPubMed
Auriemma, C.L., Nguyen, C.A., Bronheim, R., et al. Stability of end-of-life preferences: a systematic review of the evidence. JAMA Internal Medicine, 2014; 174(7): 1085–92.Google Scholar
Jesus, J.E., Allen, M.B., Michael, G.E., et al. Preferences for resuscitation and intubation among patients with do-not-resuscitate/do-not-intubate orders. Mayo Clinic Proceedings, 2013; 88(7): 658–65.Google Scholar
Breu, A.C., Herzig, S.J.. Differentiating DNI from DNR: combating code status conflation. Journal of Hospital Medicine, 2014; 9(10): 669–70.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vasilyev, S., Schaap, R.N., Mortensen, J.D.. Hospital survival rates of patients with acute respiratory failure in modern respiratory intensive care units: an international, multicenter, prospective survey. Chest, 1995; 107(4): 1083–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Esteban, A., Anzueto, A., Frutos, F., et al. Characteristics and outcomes in adult patients receiving mechanical ventilation: a 28-day international study. JAMA, 2002; 287(3): 345–55.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mehta, A.B., Syeda, S.N., Wiener, R.S., Walkey, A.J.. Epidemiological trends in invasive mechanical ventilation in the United States: a population-based study. Journal of Critical Care, 2015; 30(6): 1217–21.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Behrendt, C.E.. Acute respiratory failure in the United States: incidence and 31-day survival. Chest, 2000; 118(4): 1100–5.Google Scholar
Huaringa, A.J., Francis, W.H.. Outcome of invasive mechanical ventilation in cancer patients: intubate or not to intubate a patient with cancer. Journal of Critical Care, 2019; 50: 8791.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ehlenbach, W.J., Cooke, C.R.. Making ICU prognostication patient centered: is there a role for dynamic information? Critical Care Medicine, 2013; 41(4): 1136–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dinglas, V.D., Faraone, L.N., Needham, D.M.. Understanding patient-important outcomes after critical illness: a synthesis of recent qualitative, empirical, and consensus-related studies. Current Opinion in Critical Care, 2018; 24: 401–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Auriemma, C.L., Harhay, M.O., Haines, K.J., et al. What matters to patients and their families during and after critical illness: a qualitative study. American Journal of Critical Care, 2021; 30(1): 1120.Google Scholar
Detsky, M.E., Harhay, M.O., Bayard, D.F., et al. Discriminative accuracy of physician and nurse predictions for survival and functional outcomes 6 months after an ICU admission. JAMA, 2017; 317(21): 21872195.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Haines, K.J., Hibbert, E., McPeake, J., et al. Prediction models for physical, cognitive, and mental health impairments after critical illness: a systematic review and critical appraisal. Critical Care Medicine, 2020; 48(12): 18711889.Google Scholar
Anderson, W.G., Chase, R., Pantilat, S.Z., Tulsky, J.A., Auerbach, A.D.. Code status discussions between attending hospitalist physicians and medical patients at hospital admission. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 2011; 26(4): 359–66.Google Scholar
Kon, A.A., Davidson, J.E., Morrison, W.; American College of Critical Care Medicine, et al. Shared decision making in ICUs: an American College of Critical Care Medicine and American Thoracic Society Policy Statement. Critical Care Medicine, 2016; 44(1): 188201.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lakin, J.R., Koritsanszky, L.A., Cunningham, R., et al. A systematic intervention to improve serious Illness communication in primary care. Health Affairs, 2017; 36(7): 1258–64.Google Scholar
Bernacki, R., Paladino, J., Neville, B.A., et al. Effect of the serious illness care program in outpatient oncology: a cluster randomized clinical trial. JAMA Internal Medicine, 2019; p. 751–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gries, C.J., Engelberg, R.A., Kross, E.K., et al. Predictors of symptoms of posttraumatic stress and depression in family members after patient death in the ICU. Chest, 2010; 137(2): 280–7.Google Scholar
Scheunemann, L.P., Cunningham, T.V., Arnold, R.M., Buddadhumaruk, P., White, D.B.. How clinicians discuss critically ill patients’ preferences and values with surrogates: an empirical analysis. Critical Care Medicine, 2015; 43(4): 757–64.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Scheunemann, L.P., Ernecoff, N.C., Buddadhumaruk, P., et al. Clinician-family communication about patients’ values and preferences in intensive care units. JAMA Internal Medicine, 2019; 179(5): 676–84.Google Scholar
Curtis, J.R., White, D.B.. Practical guidance for evidence-based ICU family conferences. Chest, 2008; 134(4): 835–43.Google Scholar
Stacey, D., Légaré, F., Col, N., et al. Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 2014; 1: CD0.Google Scholar
Rubin, E.B., Buehler, A.E., Cooney, E., Gabler, N.B., Mante, A.A., Halpern, S.D.. Intuitive vs deliberative approaches to making decisions about life support: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Network Open, 2019; 2(1): e187851.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cox, C.E., White, D.B., Hough, C.L., et al. Effects of a personalized web-based decision aid for surrogate decision makers of patients with prolonged mechanical ventilation. A randomized clinical trial. Annals of Internal Medicine, 2019; 170(5): 285–97.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×