Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-25wd4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T09:17:39.128Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

9 - Plant mechanics and primate dental adaptations: an overview

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 August 2009

Peter W. Lucas
Affiliation:
Department of Anatomy, University of Hong Kong, 21 Sassoon Road, Hong Kong
Fred Anapol
Affiliation:
University of Wisconsin, Milwaukee
Rebecca Z. German
Affiliation:
University of Cincinnati
Nina G. Jablonski
Affiliation:
California Academy of Sciences, San Francisco
Get access

Summary

Introduction

Most mammals chew their food, a process generally involving the fracture and fragmentation of food particles. The efficiency of this process can be measured by the rate at which food particle size is reduced per chew and depends on the match of postcanine tooth shape to the mechanical properties of the food. The dentition of a mammal is presumably adapted to its diet so as to produce a rate of processing in the mouth sufficient for the gut to service its metabolic rate. Previously, I have offered very generalized models for the differentiation of molar shape in relation to food type (Lucas, 1979). The aim of this chapter is to suggest gains in understanding of tooth form that follow from more detailed analysis of food properties. The arguments presented here are snippets of those to be published in a forthcoming book (Lucas, in press).

For the dentition of a primate to be optimally adapted to its diet, the animal must either feed on a very restricted range of foods, with consequently limited variation in mechanical texture, or else actively select foods on a textural basis. It is difficult, at first glance, to imagine that primates employ the texture of plant parts as a primary criterion for food selection. Species that forage widely, eating many plant species, are more likely to use long-range senses like color and smell as primary sensory cues to draw them towards potential foods, or else they would waste much time in moving around to sample food texture with their forelimbs or mouth.

Type
Chapter
Information
Shaping Primate Evolution
Form, Function, and Behavior
, pp. 193 - 205
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2004

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Agrawal, K. R., Lucas, P. W., Prinz, J. F., and Bruce, I. C. (1997). Mechanical properties of foods responsible for resisting food breakdown in the human mouth. Arch. Oral Biol., 42, 1–9CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Agrawal, K. R., Lucas, P. W., Bruce, I. C., and Prinz, J. F. (1998). Food properties that influence neuromuscular activity during human mastication. J. Dent. Res., 77, 1931–1938CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Agrawal, K. R., Lucas, P. W., and Bruce, I. C. (2000). The effect of food fragmentation index on mandibular closing angle in human mastication. Arch. Oral Biol., 45, 577–584CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ashby, M. F. (1999). Materials Selection in Mechanical Design. 2nd Edn. Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann
Ashby, M. F. and Jones, D. R. H. (1980). Engineering Materials 1. Oxford: Pergamon Press
Ashby, M. F. and Jones, D. R. H. (1986). Engineering Materials 2. Oxford: Pergamon Press
Ashby, M. F., Easterling, K. E., Harryson, R., and Maiti, S. K. (1985). The fracture and toughness of woods. Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. A, 398, 261–280CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Atkins, A. G. and Mai, Y.-W. (1985). Elastic and Plastic Fracture. Chichester: Ellis Horwood
Choong, M. F. (1996). What makes a leaf tough and how this affects the pattern of Castanopsis fissa leaf consumption by caterpillars. Funct. Ecol., 10, 668–674CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Choong, M. F., Lucas, P. W., Ong, J. Y. S., Pereira, B. P., Tan, H. T. W., and Turner, I. M. (1992). Leaf fracture toughness and sclerophylly: their correlations and ecological implications. New Phytol., 121, 597–610CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dominy, N. J. and Lucas, P. W. (2001). The ecological value of trichromatic vision to primates. Nature, 410, 383–386CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ganzhorn, J. U. (1992). Leaf chemistry and the biomass of folivorous primates in tropical forests. Oecol., 91, 540–547CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gibson, L. J., Ashby, M. F., and Easterling, K. E. (1988). Structure and mechanics of the iris leaf. J. Mater. Sci., 23, 3041–3048CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gordon, J. E. and Jeronimidis, G. (1980). Composites with high work of fracture. Philos. Trans. Roy. Soc. Lond. A, 294, 545–550CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hiller, S., Bruce, D. M., and Jeronimidis, G. (1996). A micropenetration technique for mechanical testing of plant cell walls. J. Text. Stud., 27, 559–587CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Janson, C. H. (1983). Adaptation of fruit morphology to dispersal agents in a neotropical rain forest. Sci., 299, 187–189CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Janson, C. H. and Chapman, C. A. (1999). Resources and primate community structure. In: Primate Communities, ed. J. G. Fleagle, C. H. Janson, and K. E. Reed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. pp. 237–267CrossRef
Janzen, D. H. and Martin, P. S. (1982). Neotropical anachronisms: the fruits the gomphotheres ate. Sci., 215, 19–27CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lawn, B. (1993). Fracture of Brittle Solids. 2nd Edn. Cambridge: Cambridge University PressCrossRef
Leigh, E. G., Jr. (1999). Tropical Forest Ecology: a View from Barro Colorado Island. New York, NY: Oxford University Press
Lucas, P. W. (1979). The dental–dietary adaptations of mammals. Neues Jahrb. Geol. Palaeontol., 8, 486–512Google Scholar
Lucas, P. W. (in press). Dental Function Morphology: How Teeth Work. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Lucas, P. W. and Luke, D. A. (1984). Chewing it over – basic principles of food breakdown. In: Food Acquisition and Processing in Primates, ed. D. J. Chivers, B. A. Wood, and A. Bilsborough. New York, NY: Plenum Press. pp. 283–302CrossRef
Lucas, P. W. and Peters, C. R. (2000). Function of postcanine tooth shape in mammals. In: Development, Function and Evolution of Teeth, ed. M. F. Teaford, M. M. Smith, and M. Ferguson. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. pp. 482–289CrossRef
Lucas, P. W., Darvell, B. W., Lee, P. K. D., Yuen, T. D. B., and Choong, M. F. (1995). The toughness of plant cell walls. Philos. Trans. Roy. Soc. Lond. B, 348, 363–372CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lucas, P. W., Tan, H. T. W., and Cheng, P. Y. (1997a). The toughness of secondary cell wall and woody tissue. Philos. Trans. Roy. Soc. Lond. B, 352, 341–352CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lucas, P. W., Cheng, P. Y., Choong, M. F., et al. (1997b). The toughness of plant tissues. In: Proceedings of Plant Biomechanics 9, ed. G. Jeronimidis and J. F. V. Vincent. Reading: Centre for Biomimetics, University of Reading. pp. 109–114
Lucas, P. W., Turner, I. M., Dominy, N. J., and Yamashita, N. (2000). Mechanical defenses to herbivory. Ann. Bot., 86, 913–920CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lucas, P. W., Prinz, J. F.Agrawal, K. R., and Bruce, I. M. (2002). Food physics and oral physiology. Food Qual. Pref., 13, 203–213CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Page, D. H., El-Hosseiny, F., and Winkler, K. (1971). Behaviour of single wood fibres under axial tensile strain. Nature, 229, 252–253CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pereira, B. P., Lucas, P. W., and Toh, S. H. (1997). Ranking the fracture toughness of mammalian soft tissues using the scissors cutting test. J. Biomech., 30, 911–94CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Purslow, P. P. (1983). Measurement of the fracture toughness of extensible connective tissue. J. Mater. Sci., 18, 3591–3598CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rogers, M. E., Maisels, F., Williamson, E. A., Fernandez, M., and Tutin, C. E. G. (1990). Gorilla diet in the Lopé Reserve, Gabon: a nutritional analysis. Oecol., 84, 326–339CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vincent, J. F. V. (1990). Fracture in plants. Adv. Bot. Res., 17, 235–287CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vincent, J. F. V. (1992). Biomaterials: a practical approach. Oxford: IRL Press
Waterman, P. G., Ross, J. A. M., Bennett, E. L., and Davies, A. G. (1988). A comparison of the floristics and leaf chemistry of the tree flora in two Malaysian rain forests and the influence of leaf chemistry in populations of colobine monkeys in the Old World. Biol. J. Linn. Soc., 34, 1–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williamson, L., and Lucas, P. W. (1995). The effect of moisture content on the mechanical properties of a seed shell. J. Mater. Sci., 30, 162–166CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×