Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-q6k6v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-10T17:34:10.966Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

10 - ‘Shane, don't film this bit’: Comedy and Performance in Le Donk and Scor-zay-zee

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 October 2013

Brett Mills
Affiliation:
University of East Anglia
Martin Fradley
Affiliation:
Freelance film scholar
Get access

Summary

Le Donk and Scor-zay-zee is a significant film within Meadows' work because it is, as its DVD blurb attests, a ‘comedy’. This places it at odds with the dominant assumptions related to Meadows, which, while acknowledging comic moments are common in his films, categorise him primarily not as a comedic director. This means that reviews and previews for Le Donk often note that while the film has clear similarities to others directed by Meadows, it is of a different sort from what is normally expected of him. For example, in The Observer Sean O'Hagan notes how Paddy Considine's performance, in other films thought of as having a ‘dark intensity’, ‘is here reined in’ (2009: 4); the implication is that not all of Considine's acting muscles are stretched in Le Donk, even though many reviews acknowledge the extent that the film draws on his improvisational skills for much of its content. Marc Lee, in The Telegraph, questions the cinematic nature of Le Donk, suggesting that it is more akin to television, because ‘it isn't begging for the big-screen treatment’ (2009: 11); it therefore fails to adhere to the notions of ‘art cinema’ (2009) that David Forrest sees as emblematic of the majority of Meadows' work. And Ben Hopkins, in the online magazine Clash Music, enjoys the film, but calls it ‘rather lightweight’ and a ‘stopgap’ (2009), arguing in a manner similar to many other reviewers that Le Donk is an interesting experiment on the part of Meadows and Considine, but that we need to look elsewhere if we want to encounter their more substantial work.

Type
Chapter
Information
Shane Meadows
Critical Essays
, pp. 142 - 154
Publisher: Edinburgh University Press
Print publication year: 2013

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×