Lynch, MA. Child abuse before Kempe: An historical literature review. Child Abuse and Neglect. 1985;9(1):7–15.Google Scholar

Roche, AJ, Fortin, G, Labbé, J, Brown, J, Chadwick, D. The work of Ambroise Tardieu: The first definitive description of child abuse. Child Abuse and Neglect. 2005;29(4):325–34.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Ingalls, TH. The role of scurvy in the etiology of chronic subdural hematoma. New England Journal of Medicine. 1936;215(27):1279–81.Google Scholar

Ingraham, FD, Matson, DD. Subdural hematoma in infancy. Journal of Pediatrics. 1944;24(1):1–37.Google Scholar

Caffey, J. Multiple fractures in the long bones of infants suffering from chronic subdural hematoma. American Journal of Roentgenology Radium Therapy and Nuclear Medicine. 1946;56(2):163–73.Google Scholar

Woolley, PV, Evans, WA. Significance of skeletal lesions in infants resembling those of traumatic origin. JAMA. 1955;158(7):539–43.Google Scholar

Astley, R. Multiple metaphyseal fractures in small children (metaphyseal fragility of bone). British Journal of Radiology. 1953;26(311):577–83.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Kempe, CH, Silverman, FN, Steele, BF, Droegemueller, W, Silver, HK. The battered child syndrome. JAMA. 1962;181(1):17–24.Google Scholar

Guthkelch, AN. Infantile subdural haematoma and its relationship to whiplash injuries. British Medical Journal. 1971;2(5759):430–1.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Caffey, J. On the theory and practice of shaking infants: Its potential residual effects of permanent brain damage and mental retardation. American Journal of Diseases of Children. 1972;124(2):161–9.Google Scholar

Caffey, J. The whiplash shaken infant syndrome: Manual shaking by the extremities with whiplash-induced intracranial and intraocular bleedings, linked with residual permanent brain damage and mental retardation. Pediatrics. 1974;54(4):396–403.Google Scholar

Kelly, P, Farrant, B. Shaken baby syndrome in New Zealand, 2000–2002. Journal of Paediatrics and Child Health. 2008;44(3):99–107.Google Scholar

Christian, CW, Block, R. Abusive head trauma in infants and children. Pediatrics. 2009;123(5):1409–11.Google Scholar

Elinder, G, Eriksson, A, Hallberg, B et al. Traumatic shaking: The role of the triad in medical investigations of suspected traumatic shaking. Acta Paediatrica. 2018;107:3–23.Google Scholar

Squier, W. The triad of retinal haemorrhage, subdural haemorrhage and encephalopathy in an infant unassociated with evidence of physical injury is not the result of shaking, but is most likely to have been caused by a natural disease: Yes. Journal of Primary Health Care. 2011;3(2):159–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

US Congress. Child Abuse Prevention and Treatment Act (CAPTA). PL 93-247, 1974.Google Scholar

UK Government. The Children Act 1989. House of Commons Vol. C41. London, 1989.Google Scholar

World Health Organization. Preventing child maltreatment: A guide to taking action and generating evidence. World Health Organization, 2006.Google Scholar

Price-Robertson, R, Bromfield, L, Lamont, A. International approaches to child protection: What can Australia learn? CFCA paper. Australian Institute of Family Studies. 2014;23:1–11.Google Scholar

Besharov, DJ. Responding to child sexual abuse: The need for a balanced approach. Future Child. 1994;4(2):135–55.Google Scholar

Turney, K, Wildeman, C. Mental and physical health of children in foster care. Pediatrics. 2016;138(5):1–11.Google Scholar

Cantwell, HB. Vaginal inspection as it relates to child sexual abuse in girls under thirteen. Child Abuse and Neglect. 1983;7(2):171–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Hobbs, C, Wynne, J. Buggery in childhood: A common syndrome of child abuse. Lancet. 1986;2:792–6.Google Scholar

Goodyear-Smith, F. What is the evidence for non-sexual transmission of gonorrhoea in children after the neonatal period? A systematic review. Journal of Forensic and Legal Medicine. 2007;14(8):489–502.Google Scholar

United Nations International Children’s Emergency Fund (UNICEF). A league table of child maltreatment deaths in rich countries. Innocenti Research Centre, 2003.Google Scholar

Child and Youth Mortality Review Committee. 15th data report Te pūrongo raraunga 15 2015–19. Wellington Health Quality & Safety Commission, 2021.Google Scholar

SM. Influential Auckland pediatrician recognised with ONZM. Stuff. 2016, 5 June.Google Scholar

Ministry of Health. Family violence questions and answers: Is it mandatory to report abuse? www.health.govt.nz/our-work/preventative-health-wellness/family-violence/family-violence-questions-and-answers.Google Scholar

Clinical Network for Child Protection. Schedule 1: Children admitted to hospital with suspected or confirmed abuse or neglect. Clinical Network for Child Protection, 2011.Google Scholar

Kelly, P, Hayes, I. Infantile subdural haematoma in Auckland, New Zealand: 1988–1998. New Zealand Medical Journal. 2004;117(1201):U1047.Google Scholar

Kelly, P, John, S, Vincent, AL, Reed, P. Abusive head trauma and accidental head injury: A 20-year comparative study of referrals to a hospital child protection team. Archives of Disease in Childhood. 2015;100(12):1123–30.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Frasier, LD, Kelly, P, al-Eissa, M, Otterman, GJ. International issues in abusive head trauma. Pediatric Radiology. 2014;44(Suppl 4):S647–53.Google Scholar

KidsHealth. What is shaken baby syndrome? www.kidshealth.org.nz/never-ever-shake-baby.Google Scholar

John, SM, Kelly, P, Vincent, A. Patterns of structural head injury in children younger than 3 years: A ten-year review of 519 patients. Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery. 2013;74(1):276–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Vincent, AL, Kelly, P. Retinal haemorrhages in inflicted traumatic brain injury: The ophthalmologist in court. Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology. 2010;38(5):521–32.Google Scholar

John, SM, Jones, P, Kelly, P, Vincent, A. Fatal pediatric head injuries: A 20-year review of cases through the Auckland coroner’s office. American Journal of Forensic Medicine and Pathology. 2013;34(3):277–82.Google Scholar

Kelly, P, MacCormick, J, Strange, R. Non-accidental head injury in New Zealand: The outcome of referral to statutory authorities. Child Abuse and Neglect. 2009;33(6):393–401.Google Scholar

Pence, DM, Wilson, CA. Reporting and investigating child sexual abuse. Future Child. 1994;4(2):70–83.Google Scholar

Oz, S, Balshan, D. Mandatory reporting of childhood sexual abuse in Israel: What happens after the report? International research. Journal of Child Sex Abuse. 2007;16(4):1–22.Google Scholar

Morad, Y, Avni, I, Capra, L et al. Shaken baby syndrome without intracranial hemorrhage on initial computed tomography. Journal of Pediatric Ophthalmology and Strabismus. 2004;8(6):521–7.Google Scholar

Parton, N, Berridge, D. Child protection in England. In Child protection systems: International trends and orientations. Gilbert, N, Parton, N, Skivenes, M, eds. Oxford University Press, 2011, pp. 60–85.Google Scholar

Bilson, A, Martin, KEC. Referrals and child protection in England: One in five children referred to children’s services and one in nineteen investigated before the age of five. British Journal of Social Work. 2016;47(3):793–811.Google Scholar

Bywaters, P, Brady, G, Sparks, T, Bos, E. Inequalities in child welfare intervention rates: The intersection of deprivation and identity. Child and Family Social Work. 2016;21(4):452–63.Google Scholar

Hooper, C, Gorin, S, Cabral, C, Dyson, C. Living with hardship 24/7: The diverse experiences of families in poverty in England. Frank Buttle Trust, 2007.Google Scholar

Tufford, L. Child abuse and neglect in Canada: A guide for mandatory reporters. Oxford University Press, 2019.Google Scholar

Trocmé, NM, Tourigny, M, MacLaurin, B, Fallon, B. Major findings from the Canadian incidence study of reported child abuse and neglect. Child Abuse and Neglect. 2003;27(12):1427–39.Google Scholar

Swift, K. Canadian child welfare. In Child protection systems: International trends and orientations. Gilbert, N, Parton, N, Skivenes, M, eds. Oxford University Press, 2011, pp. 36–59.Google Scholar

Bird, S. Child abuse: Mandatory reporting requirements. Australian Family Physician. 2011;40(11):921–6.Google Scholar

Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. Child protection Australia 2019–20. Australian Institute of Health and Welfare, 2021.Google Scholar

Liley, W, Stephens, A, Kaltner, M et al. Infant abusive head trauma incidence, outcomes and awareness. Australian Family Physician. 2012;41(10):823–6.Google Scholar

Ministry of Health Brazil. Annex 1 Ordinance No 104 Federative Republic of Brazil. Brasilia, 2011.Google Scholar

Cardia, N, Lagatta, P, Affonso, C. Assessment of child maltreatment prevention readiness: Country report. University of São Paulo, 2012.Google Scholar

Republic of Korea. Child Welfare Act. In Welfare PS. 12361. Seoul 2014.Google Scholar

Ministry of Health and Welfare. The protection of children and youths welfare and rights act. Republic of China, 2003.Google Scholar

Supreme People’s Procuratorate, National Supervision Commission, Ministry of Education et al. Opinions on establishing a mandatory reporting system for cases of violations against juveniles (provisional) in procuratorate SPs. Supreme People’s Procuratorate, 2020.Google Scholar

Wiklund, S. Signs of child maltreatment. The extent and nature of referrals to Swedish child welfare agencies Barnavårdsanmälningar i Sverige: omfattning, källor och problembilder. European Journal of Social Work. 2006;9(1):39–58.Google Scholar

Ångman, I, Gustafsson, M. Combating child abuse and neglect in Sweden. 2011.Google Scholar

Pösö, T. Combatting child abuse in Finland. In Child protection systems: International trends and orientations. Gilbert, N, Parton, N, Skivenes, M, eds. Oxford University Press, 2011, pp. 112–30.Google Scholar

Knijn, T, Van Nijnatten, C. Child welfare in the Netherlands. In Child protection systems: International trends and orientations. Gilbert, N, Parton, N, Skivenes, M, eds. Oxford University Press, 2011, pp. 223–40.Google Scholar

Desair, K, Adriaenssens, P. Policy toward child abuse and neglect in Belgium. In Child protection systems: International trends and orientations. Gilbert, N, Parton, N, Skivenes, M, eds. Oxford University Press, 2011, pp. 204–22.Google Scholar

Narang, SK, Melville, JD, Greeley, CS et al. A Daubert analysis of abusive head trauma/shaken baby syndrome. Part II: An examination of the differential diagnosis. Journal of Health Law and Policy. 2013;203–327.Google Scholar

Christian, CW. Committee on Child Abuse and Neglect clinical report: The evaluation of suspected child physical abuse. Pediatrics. 2015;135(5):e1337–e1354.Google Scholar

Berger, MA. The admissibility of expert testimony, the federal judicial center and National Research Council. In Reference manual on scientific evidence. 3rd ed. Committee on the Development of the Third Edition of the Reference Manual on Scientific Evidence, ed. National Academies Press, 2011, p. 12.Google Scholar

Daubert v Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 509 U.S. 579 (1993).Google Scholar

Evid, Fed. R.. 401.Google Scholar

Kumho Tire Co., Ltd. v Carmichael, 526 U.S. 137 (1999).Google Scholar

Findley, KA, Strang, DA. Ending manner-of-death testimony and other opinion determinations of crime. Duquesne Law Review. 2022;60:302–38.Google Scholar

Frye v United States, 293 F. 1013(D.C. Cir. 1923).Google Scholar

Wong, JB, Gostin, LO, Cabrera, OA. Reference guide on medical testimony: The Federal Judicial Center and National Research Council. In Reference manual on scientific evidence. 3rd ed. National Academies Press, 2011, p. 690.Google Scholar

Lynøe, N, Eriksson, A. A diagnostic test can prove anything if you use incorrect assumptions and circular reasoning. Acta Paediatrica. 2018;107:2051–3.Google Scholar

Bowers v Norfolk S. Corp., 537 F. Supp. 2d 1343, 1360-61 (M.D. Ga. 2007), aff’d, 300 F. App’x 700 (11th Cir. 2008).Google Scholar

C.W. ex rel. Wood v Textron, Inc., 807 F.3d 827 (7th Cir. 2015).Google Scholar

Tamraz v Lincoln Elec. Co., 620 F.3d 665, 673 (6th Cir. 2010).Google Scholar

Findley, KA, Risinger, DM, Barnes, PD et al. Feigned consensus: Usurping the law in shaken baby syndrome/abusive head trauma prosecutions. Wisconsin Law Review. 2019:1211–67.Google Scholar

Findley, KA, Barnes, PD, Moran, DA, Sperling, C. Examining SBS convictions in light of new medical scientific research. Oklahoma City University Law Review. 2012;37:219–50.Google Scholar

Smith, DW. The death of negative corpus. Proceedings of the 5th International Symposium on Fire Investigation Science and Technology. National Association of Fire Investigators International, 2012.Google Scholar

Goudge Report, P. 520 Inquiry into Pediatric Forensic Pathology in Ontario. Volume 3. www.fixcas.com/news/2008/Vol_3_Eng.pdf.Google Scholar

Ervin v Johnson & Johnson, Inc., 492 F.3d 901 (7th Cir. 2007).Google Scholar

Hendrix v Evenflo Co., Inc., 609 F.3d 1183 (11th Cir. 2010).Google Scholar

Hall v Baxter Healthcare Corp., 947. F.Supp. 1387 (D. Oregon 1996).Google Scholar

In re Bausch & Lomb Inc. Contact lens Solution Products Liability Litigation, 2010 WL 1627807 (D.S.C., 2010).Google Scholar

In re Breast Implant Litigation 11 F.Supp.2d 1217 (D. Colorado 1998).Google Scholar

Wynacht v Beckman Instruments, Inc., 113 F.Supp.2d 1205, 1209 (E.D. Tenn. 2000).Google Scholar

Sanders, J, Faigman, DL, Imrey, PB, Dawid, P. Differential etiology: Inferring specific causation in the law from group data in science. Arizona Law Review. 2021;63:851–921.Google Scholar

McClain v Metabolife Int’l, Inc., 401 F3d 1233, 1253 (11th Cir. 2005).Google Scholar

Brief for the American Association for the Advancement of Science and the National Academy of Sciences as Amici Curiae, Daubert v Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 509 U.S. 579 (1993).Google Scholar

Calvo, F, Karras, BT, Phillips, R et al. Diagnoses, syndromes, and diseases: A knowledge representation problem. In AMIA 2003 annual symposium proceedings, vol. 2003. American Medical Informatics Association, 2003, p. 802.Google Scholar

Wulff, HR. Rational diagnosis and treatment: An introduction to clinical decision-making. 2nd ed. Blackwell Scientific, 1981. Diagnosis As a Matter of Opinion, p. 109.Google Scholar

Brooks, W, Weathers, L. Overview of shaken baby syndrome. In The shaken baby syndrome: A multidisciplinary approach. Lazoritz, S, Palusci, VJ, eds. Haworth Press, 2001.Google Scholar

Caffey, J. On the theory and practice of shaking infants. American Journal of Diseases of Children. 1972;124:161–9.Google Scholar

Caffey, J. The whiplash shaken infant syndrome. Pediatrics. 1974;54(4):396–403.Google Scholar

Dykes, LJ. The whiplash shaken infant syndrome: What has been learned? Child Abuse and Neglect. 1986;10:211–21.Google Scholar

Ludwig, S, Warman, M. SBS: A review of 20 cases. Annals of Emergency Medicine. 1984;13(2):104–7.Google Scholar

Billmire, E, Myers, P. Serious head injury in infants: Accident or abuse? Pediatrics. 1985;75(2):340–2.Google Scholar

American Academy of Pediatrics Committee on Child Abuse and Neglect. Shaken baby syndrome: Inflicted cerebral trauma. Pediatrics. 1993;92(6):872–5.Google Scholar

Chadwick, DL, Kirschner, RH, Reece, RM et al. Shaken baby syndrome: A forensic pediatric response. Pediatrics. 1998;101:321–3.Google Scholar

Ommaya, AK, Goldsmith, W, Thibault, L. Biomechanics and neuropathology of adult and paediatric head injury. British Journal of Neurosurgery. 2002;16(3):220–42.Google Scholar

Reece, RM, Nicholson, CE, eds. Inflicted childhood neurotrauma: Proceedings of a conference sponsored by Department of Health and Human Services, National Institutes of Health, National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, Office of Rare Diseases, National Center for Medical Rehabilitation Research. American Academy of Pediatrics, 2002.Google Scholar

Jenny, C. Modes of presentation of inflicted childhood neurotrauma. In Inflicted childhood neurotrauma: Proceedings of a conference sponsored by Department of Health and Human Services, National Institutes of Health, National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, Office of Rare Diseases, National Center for Medical Rehabilitation Research. Reece, RM, Nicholson, CE, eds. American Academy of Pediatrics, 2002, pp. 49–63.Google Scholar

Nelson v Tennessee Gas Pipeline Co., 243 F.3d 244, 254 (6th Cir. 2001).Google Scholar

Young v Burton, 567 F. Supp.2d 121, 137 (D. D.C. 2008).Google Scholar

Mancuso v Consol. Edison Co. of N.Y., 967 F. Supp. 1437, 1450 (S.D.N.Y. 1997).Google Scholar

Durden v Sec’y of Dep’t of Health & Human Servs., No. 05-163V, 2007 WL 4962000, at *13 (Fed. Cl. 26 September 2007).Google Scholar

O’Conner v Commonwealth Edison Co., 807 F. Supp. 1376, 1396 (C.D. Ill. 1992).Google Scholar

Vinchon, M. Reply to Professor Charles Hyman: The scientific controversy over AHT in infants. Child’s Nervous System. 2011;27:203–4.Google Scholar

Rowe, DS, Leonard, MF, Seashore, MR et al. A hospital program for the detection and registration of abused and neglected children. New England Journal of Medicine. 1970;282:950–2.Google Scholar

Besharov, DJ. What physicians should know about child abuse reporting laws. In Child abuse and neglect: A medical reference. Ellersetin, NS, ed. Wiley, 1981, pp. 21–50.Google Scholar

Hansen, P, Ainsworth, F. Examining child protection practice in New South Wales: Non-accidental injury and the principle of strict liability. Children Australia. 2020;45:8–13.Google Scholar

Choudhary, AK, Narang, SK, Moreno, JA et al. A consensus response on the complete picture: Reply to Lynøe and Eriksson. Pediatric Radiology. 2019;49:424–8.Google Scholar

Duhaime, AC, Christian, CW. Abusive head trauma: Evidence, obfuscation, and informed management. Journal of Neurosurgery: Pediatrics. 2019;24:481–8.Google Scholar

Brown, SD. Ethical challenges in child abuse: What is the harm of a misdiagnosis? Pediatric Radiology. 2021;51:1070–5.Google Scholar

Kempe, CH, Silverman, FN, Steele, BF et al. The battered child syndrome. JAMA. 1962;181:17–24. Reprinted in Journal of the American Medical Association. 1984;251(24):3294.Google Scholar

Helfer, RE, Kempe, CH. The child’s need for early recognition, immediate care and protection. In Helping the battered child and family. Kempe, CH, ed. Lippincott, 1972, pp. 69–78.Google Scholar

Report to the President Forensic Science in Criminal Courts. Ensuring Scientific Validity of Feature-Comparison Methods, Executive Office of the President, President’s Council of Advisors on Science and Technology, 2016, pp. 1–160.Google Scholar

Keenan, HT, Campbell, KA, Page, K et al. Perceived social risk in medical decision-making for physical child abuse: A mixed-methods study. BMC Pediatrics. 2017;17(214):1–10.Google Scholar

Rivara, FP, Kamitsuka, MD, Quan, L. Injuries to children younger than 1 year of age. Pediatrics. 1988;81(1):93–7.Google Scholar

Kellogg, ND. Evaluation of suspected child physical abuse. Pediatrics. 2007;119(6):1232–41.Google Scholar

Goldstein, B, Kelly, MM, Bruton, D et al. Inflicted versus accidental head injury in critically injured children. Critical Care Medicine. 1993;21(9):1328–32.Google Scholar

Wester, K, Stridbeck, U, Syse, A, Wikstrom, J. Re-evaluation of medical findings in alleged shaken baby syndrome and abusive head trauma in Norwegian courts fails to support abuse diagnoses. Acta Paediatrica. 2022;111(4):779–92. https://doi.org/10.1111/apa.15956.Google Scholar

Kirschner, RH, Stein, RJ. The mistaken diagnosis of child abuse: A form of medical abuse? American Journal of Diseases of Children. 1985;139:873–5.Google Scholar

Anderst, J, Nielsen-Parker, M, Moffatt, M et al. Using simulation to identify sources of medical diagnostic error in child physical abuse. Child Abuse and Neglect. 2016;52:62–9.Google Scholar

Schiff, GD. Minimizing diagnostic error: The importance of follow-up and feedback. American Journal of Medicine. 2008;121(5A):S38–S42.Google Scholar

American Academy of Pediatrics Committee on Child Abuse and Neglect. Shaken baby syndrome: Rotational cranial injuries. Technical report. Pediatrics. 2001;108(1):206–10.Google Scholar

Guthkelch, AN. Problems of infant retino-dural hemorrhage with minimal external injury. Houston Journal of Health Law and Policy. 2012;12:201–8.Google Scholar

Hobbs, CJ. Skull fracture and the diagnosis of abuse. Archives of Disease in Childhood. 1984;59:246–52.Google Scholar

Lynøe, N, Juth, N, Eriksson, A. From child protection to paradigm protection: The genesis development and defense of a scientific paradigm. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy. 2018:1–13. https://doi.org/10.1093/jmp/jhy015.Google Scholar

Högberg, U, Lampa, E, Högberg, G et al. Infant abuse diagnosis associated with abusive head trauma criteria: Incidence increase due to overdiagnosis? European Journal of Public Health. 2018;28(4):641–6.Google Scholar

Riggs, JE, Hobbs, GR. Infant homicide and accidental death in the United States, 1940–2005: Ethics and epidemiological classification. Journal of Medical Ethics. 2011;37:445–8.Google Scholar

Case, ME, Graham, MA, Handy, TC et al. Position paper on fatal abusive head injuries in infants and young children. American Journal of Forensic Medicine and Pathology. 2001;22(2):112–22.Google Scholar

Tuerkheimer, D. Science-dependent prosecution and the problem of epistemic contingency: A study of shaken baby syndrome. Alabama Law Review. 2011;62:513–69.Google Scholar

Narang, SK. A Daubert analysis of abusive head trauma/shaken baby syndrome. Houston Journal of Health Law and Policy. 2011;11:505–635.Google Scholar

Hymel, KP, Jenny, C, Block, RW. Intracranial hemorrhage and rebleeding in suspected victims of abusive head trauma: Addressing the forensic controversies. Child Maltreatment. 2002;7(4):329–48.Google Scholar

Matschke, J, Voss, J, Obi, N et al. Nonaccidental head injury is the most common cause of subdural bleeding in infants < 1 year of age. Pediatrics. 2009;124(6):1587–94.Google Scholar

Scheimberg, I, Cohen, MC, Zapata, RE et al. Nontraumatic intradural and subdural hemorrhage and hypoxic ischemic encephalopathy in fetuses, infants, and children up to three years of age: Analysis of two audits of 636 cases from two referral centers in the United Kingdom. Pediatric and Developmental Pathology. 2013;16:149–59.Google Scholar

Hogberg, G, Colville-Ebeling, B, Hogberg, U et al. Circularity bias in abusive head trauma studies could be diminished with a new ranking scale. Egyptian Journal of Forensic Sciences. 2016;6:6–10.Google Scholar

Blumbergs, P, Reilly, P, Vink, R. Trauma. In Greenfield’s neuropathology: Volume I. 8th ed. Love, S, Louis, DN, Ellison, DW, eds. Edward Arnold, 2008, pp. 733–831.Google Scholar

Geddes, JF, Hacksaw, AK, Vowels, GH et al. Neuropathology of inflicted head injury in children I. Patterns of brain damage. Brain. 2001;124:1290–8.Google Scholar

Geddes, JF, Vowels, GH, Hacksaw, AK et al. Neuropathology of inflicted head injury in children II. Microscopic brain injury in infants. Brain. 2001;124:1299–1306.Google Scholar

Oehmichen, M, Schleiss, D, Pedal, I. Shaken baby syndrome: Re-examination of diffuse axonal injury as cause of death. Acta Neuropathologica. 2008;116:317–29.Google Scholar

Matschke, J, Buttner, A, Bergman, M et al. Encephalopathy and death in infants with abusive head trauma is due to hypoxic-ischemic injury following local brain trauma to vital brainstem centers. International Journal of Legal Medicine. 2015;129:105–14.Google Scholar

Geddes, JF, Tasker, RC, Hacksaw, AK et al. Dural haemorrhage in non-traumatic infant deaths: Does it explain the bleeding in ‘shaken baby syndrome’? Neuropathology and Applied Neurobiology. 2003;29:14–22.Google Scholar

Geddes, JF. Nonaccidental trauma: Clinical aspects and epidemiology of child abuse. Pediatric Radiology. 2009;39(7):759–61.Google Scholar

Lantz, PE, Stanton, CA. Postmortem detection & evaluation of retinal hemorrhages. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2006;271:12 (retinal haemorrhages present at autopsy in infants who died from meningitis, asphyxia/suffocation, prematurity/congenital conditions, heart disease, in utero haemorrhage, blunt force trauma, sudden infant death syndrome/resuscitation, apnoea/gastro-oesophageal reflux, and birth-related causes).Google Scholar

Thiblin, I, Andersson, J, Wester, K et al. Retinal hemorrhage in infants investigated for suspected maltreatment is strongly correlated with intracranial pathology. Acta Pediatrica. 2021;00:1–9.Google Scholar

Christian, CW, Levin, AV. The eye examination in the evaluation of child abuse. Pediatrics. 2018;142(2):1–8.Google Scholar

Mattheij, M, Venstermans, C, de Veuster, I et al. Retinal haemorrhages in a university hospital: Not always abusive head injury. Acta Neurologica Belgica. 2017;117:515–22.Google Scholar

Duhaime, AC, Alario, AJ, Lewander, WJ. Head injury in very young children: Mechanisms, injuries, and ophthalmologic findings in 100 hospitalized patients younger than 2 years of age. Pediatrics. 1992;90(2):179–85.Google Scholar

Emerson, MV, Jacobs, E, Green, WR. Ocular autopsy and histopathologic features of child abuse. Ophthalmology. 2007;114:1384–94.Google Scholar

Del Prete v Thompson, 10 F.Supp.3d 907, 931-2 (N.D.Ill. 2014).Google Scholar

Callaway, NF, Ludwig, CA, Blumenkranz, MS et al. Retinal and optic nerve hemorrhages in the newborn infant: One-year results of the Newborn Eye Screen Test (NEST) study. Ophthalmology. 2016;123(5):1043–52.Google Scholar

Mena, OJ, Paul, I, Reichard, RR. Ocular findings in raised intracranial pressure. American Journal of Forensic Medicine and Pathology. 2011;32:55–7.Google Scholar

Bhardwaj, G, Jacobs, MB, Moran, KT et al. Terson syndrome with ipsilateral severe hemorrhagic retinopathy in a 7-month-old child. Journal of the American Association for Pediatric Ophthalmology and Strabismus. 2010;14:5;441–3.Google Scholar

Agrawal, S, Peters, MJ, Adams, GW et al. Prevalence of retinal hemorrhages in critically ill children. Pediatrics. 2012;129(6):e1388–e1396.Google Scholar

Minns, RA, Jones, PA, Tandon, A et al. Raised intracranial pressure and retinal haemorrhages in childhood encephalopathies. Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology. 2017;59:597–604.Google Scholar

Gardner, HB. Letter to editor. Archives of Pediatrics. (16 April 2012).Google Scholar

Galaznik, J. Response to ‘Retinal Hemorrhages in Children’ by Ms Shiau and Dr. Levin. (16 April 2012).Google Scholar

Vinchon, M, Delestret, I, Defoort-Dhellemmes, S et al. Subdural hematoma in infants: Can it occur spontaneously? Data from a prospective series and critical review of the literature. Child’s Nervous System. 2010;26:119501205.Google Scholar

Shuman, MJ, Hutchins, KD. Severe retinal hemorrhages with retinoschisis in infants are not pathognomonic for abusive head trauma. Journal of Forensic Science. 2017;62(3):807–11.Google Scholar

Coats, B, Binenbaum, G, Smith, C et al. Cyclic head rotations produce modest brain injury in infant piglets. Journal of Neurotrauma. 2016;33:1–13.Google Scholar

Thiblin, I, Anderson, J, Wester, K et al. Medical findings and symptoms in infants exposed to witnessed or admitted abusive shaking: A nationwide registry study. PLoS One. 2020;15(10):1–14. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0240182.Google Scholar

Levin, AV. Retinal hemorrhages of crush head injury: Learning from outliers. Archives of Ophthalmology. 2006;124:1773–4.Google Scholar

Levin, AV. Ophthalmic manifestations of inflicted childhood neurotrauma. In Inflicted childhood neurotrauma: Proceedings of a conference sponsored by Department of Health and Human Services, National Institutes of Health, National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, Office of Rare Diseases, National Center for Medical Rehabilitation Research. Reece, RM, Nicholson, CE, eds. American Academy of Pediatrics, 2002, pp. 127–64.Google Scholar

Togioka, BM, Arnold, MA, Bathurst, MA et al. Retinal hemorrhages and shaken baby syndrome: An evidence-based review. Journal of Emergency Medicine. 2009;37(1):98–106.Google Scholar

Levin, AV, Christian, CW, Committee on Child Abuse and Neglect, Section on Ophthalmology. The eye examination in the evaluation of child abuse. Pediatrics. 2010;126;376.Google Scholar

Kahneman, D. Thinking fast and slow. Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 2011, p. 62.Google Scholar

Kaye, DH, Freedman, DA . Reference guide on statistics. In Reference manual on scientific evidence. 3rd ed. National Academies Press, 2011, pp. 218–19.Google Scholar

Meister v Medical Engineering Corp., 267 F.3d 1123, 1129, 347 U.S.App.D.C. 361, 367 (C.A.D.C.,2001).Google Scholar

Black v Food Lion, Inc., 171 F.3d 308, 314 (5th Cir.1999).Google Scholar

Levinson, JD, Pasquale, MA, Lambert, SR. Diffuse bilateral retinal hemorrhages in an infant with a coagulopathy and prolonged cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Journal of the American Association for Pediatric Ophthalmology and Strabismus. 2016;20(2):166–8.Google Scholar

Risinger, DM. Defining the task at hand: Non-science forensic science after Kumho Tire Co. v Carmichael. Washington and Lee Law Review. 2000;57:767, 776–7.Google Scholar

Duhaime, AC, Gennarelli, RA, Thibault, LE et al. The shaken baby syndrome: A clinical, pathological, and biomechanical study. Journal of Neurosurgery. 1987;66:409–15.Google Scholar

Matshes, EW. Retinal and optic nerve sheath hemorrhages are not pathognomonic of abusive head injury. Proceedings of the American Academy of Forensic Sciences. 2010. www.aafs.org/sites/default/files/media/documents/AAFS-2010-G1.pdf.Google Scholar

Narang, SK, Estrada, C, Greenberg, S et al. Acceptance of shaken baby syndrome and abusive head trauma as medical diagnoses. Journal of Pediatrics. 2016;177:273–8.Google Scholar

Donohoe, M. Evidence-based medicine and shaken baby syndrome. Part I: Literature review, 1966–1998. American Journal of Forensic and Medical Pathology. 2003;24:239–42.Google Scholar

DiMaio, VJ, DiMaio, D. Forensic pathology. CRC Press, 2001, p. 362.Google Scholar

Dias, MS. The case for shaking. In Child abuse and neglect. Jenny, C., ed. Saunders, 2011, pp. 364–72.Google Scholar

SBU Assessment Report 255E/2016 Traumatic Shaking. The role of the triad in medical investigations of suspected traumatic shaking: A systematic review. Swedish Agency for Health Technology Assessment and Assessment of Social Services.Google Scholar

Lynøe, N, Elinder, G, Hallberg, B et al. Insufficient evidence for ‘shaken baby syndrome’: A systematic review. Acta Paediatrica. 2017;106:1021–7.Google Scholar

101 General Elec. Co. v Joiner, 522 R.C. U.S. 136 (1997).Google Scholar

Findley, KA, Risinger, DM, Barnes, PD et al. Feigned consensus: Usurping the law in shaken baby syndrome/abusive head trauma prosecutions. Wisconsin Law Review. 2019;1211:1238–45.Google Scholar

Choudhary, AK, Servaes, S, Slovis, T et al. Consensus statement on abusive head trauma in infants and young children. Pediatric Radiology. 2018;48(8):1048–65.Google Scholar

Findley, KA, Barnes, PD, Moran, DA, Squier, W. Shaken baby syndrome, abusive head trauma, and actual innocence: Getting it right. Houston Journal of Health Law and Policy. 2012;12:209–312.Google Scholar

Greenhalgh, T. How to read a paper: The basics of evidence-based medicine and healthcare. 6th ed. Wiley Blackwell, 2019.Google Scholar

Bhardwaj, G, Chowdhury, V, Jacobs, MB et al. A systematic review of the Diagnostic Accuracy of Ocular Signs in Pediatric Abusive Head Trauma. Ophthalmology. 2010;117:983–92.Google Scholar

Maguire, S, Pickerd, N, Farewell, D et al. Which clinical features distinguish inflicted from non-inflicted brain injury? A systematic review. Archives of Disease in Childhood. 2009:94:860–7.Google Scholar

Maguire, SA, Kemp, AM, Lumb, RC et al. Estimating the probability of abusive head trauma: A pooled analysis. Pediatrics. 2011;128;e550.Google Scholar

Piteau, SJ, Ward, MGK, Barrowman, NJ et al. Clinical and radiographic characteristics associated with abusive and nonabusive head trauma: A systematic review Pediatrics. 2012;130(2):315–23.Google Scholar

Kemp, AM, Jaspan, T, Griffiths, J et al. Neuroimaging: What neuroradiological features distinguish abusive from non-abusive head trauma? A systematic review. Archives of Disease in Childhood. 2011;96(12):1103–12. https://doi.org/10.1136/archdischild-2011-300630.Google Scholar

Vinchon, M, Deefoort-Dhellemmes, S, Desuromont, M et al. Accidental and nonaccidental head injuries in infants: A prospective study. Journal of Neurosurgery (Pediatrics 4). 2005;102 :380–4.Google Scholar

Greeley, C. Justice for Rehma. Science under attack: ‘I can say with 100% medical certainty that abusive head trauma is what a child has and then I stop[.]’ https://edition.cnn.com/interactive/2021/12/health/shaken-baby-syhndrome-legal-battle/chapter-2.html.Google Scholar

Aspelin, P. Keynote address: Can a sign or occult finding predict a causal relationship? How to reason about possible child abuse. University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform. 2017;50(3):757.Google Scholar

Lynøe, N, Rosen, M, Eriksson, A. Questions about isolated traumatic shaking and confessions. Child’s Nervous System. 2017;33:731–2.Google Scholar

Vinchon, M. Response to Lynøe: Questions about isolated trauma shaking and confessions. Child’s Nervous System. 2017;33(9):1423–4.Google Scholar

Lynøe, N, Rosen, M, Eriksson, A. Vinchon’s responses raise additional questions about the shaken baby-study. Child’s Nervous System. 2018;34 :11–13.Google Scholar

Damon-Moore, SL. Trial judges and the forensic science problem. New York University Law Review. 2017;92:1532–70.Google Scholar

State v Jacoby, 2018 WL 5098763(N.J.Super.L.)(Trial Order).Google Scholar

State v Darryl Nieves, Decision issued 7 January 2022 (Indictment No. 17- 06-00785)(N.J.Super.Court).Google Scholar

Guthkelch, AN. Infantile subdural haematoma and its relationship to whiplash injuries. British Medical Journal. 1971;2:430–1.Google Scholar

Shapiro, M, Walker, M, Carroll, KT et al. Neuroanatomy of cranial dural vessels: Implications for subdural hematoma embolization. Journal of Neurointerventional Surgery. 2021;13:471–7.Google Scholar

Gilliland, MGF. Interval duration between injury and severe symptoms in non-accidental head trauma in infants and young children. Journal of Forensic Science. 1998;43:723–5.Google Scholar

Tuerkheimer, D. The next innocence project: Shaken baby syndrome and the criminal courts. Washington University Law Review. 2011;87:1–58.Google Scholar

Tuerkheimer, D. Science-dependent prosecution and the problem of epistemic contingency: A study of shaken baby syndrome. Alabama Law Review. 2011;62:513–69.Google Scholar

Tuerkheimer, D. Flawed convictions: Shaken baby syndrome and the inertia of injustice. Oxford University Press, 2014.Google Scholar

Laurin, JE. Criminal law’s science lag: How criminal justice meets changed scientific understanding. Texas Law Review. 2015;93:1751–82.Google Scholar

Daubert v Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 509 U.S. 579 (1993).Google Scholar

Findley, KA, Risinger, DM. The science and law underlying post-conviction challenges to shaken baby syndrome convictions: A response to Professor Imwinkelried. Seton Hall Law Review. 2018;48:1209–27.Google Scholar

Hack, P. The roads less traveled: Post conviction relief alternatives and the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996. American Journal of Criminal Law. 2003;30:171–223.Google Scholar

Medwed, DS. Up the river without a procedure: Innocent prisoners and newly discovered non-DNA evidence. Arizona Law Review. 2005;47:655–718.Google Scholar

State v Edmunds, 746 N.W.2d 590 (Wis. App. 2008).Google Scholar

Del Prete v Thompson, 10 F.Supp.3d 907 (N.D. Ill. 2014).Google Scholar

Findley, KA. Innocence protection in the appellate process. Marquette Law Review. 2009;93:591–638.Google Scholar

Garrett, B. Convicting the innocent: Where criminal prosecutions go wrong. Harvard University Press, 2011.Google Scholar

Flango, VE. Habeas corpus in state and federal court. State Justice Institute, 1994.Google Scholar

Debelbot v State, 826 S.E.2d 129 (Ga. 2019).Google Scholar

People v Bailey, 47 Misc. 3d 355, 370 (N.Y. Co. Ct. 2014), affirmed, 144 A.D.3d 1562 (N.Y. App. Div. 2016).Google Scholar

Castillo, A. https://bit.ly/3hl6iMc.Google Scholar

State v Cicogni, 2020 WL 5290709 (Ariz. Super. 2020).Google Scholar

Commonwealth v Epps, 553 N.E.2d 1247 (Mass. 2016).Google Scholar

In re Personal Restraint of Fero, 367 P.3d 588 (Wash. App. 2016).Google Scholar

State v Hansen, 805 N.W.2d 915 (Minn. 2011).Google Scholar

Henderson, Ex Parte, 384 S.W.3d 833 (Tex. 2012).Google Scholar

Hoover-Moore, K. National Registry of Exonerations. https://bit.ly/3UlGIVs.Google Scholar

Johnson, Z. National Registry of Exonerations. https://bit.ly/3t5mOlQ.Google Scholar

Jones, C , III. National Registry of Exonerations. https://bit.ly/3UjlWWu.Google Scholar

State v Quentin Louis, 2011 WL 867677 (Wis. Ct. App. 2011).Google Scholar

Marsh, K. https://bit.ly/3fCUcNT.Google Scholar

Gerber, M. Judge orders release of woman who served 11 years behind bars in grandson’s death. Los Angeles Times. 2018. https://lat.ms/3T75zv3.Google Scholar

People v Miller, 2021 WL 1326733 (Mich. Ct. App. 2021).Google Scholar

Maryland appellate court cites subsequent scientific and medical literature in granting relief to a man convicted in 1999 of the shaken baby syndrome death of his infant son. https://bit.ly/3NHc1Ib.Google Scholar

State v Witt, 2012 WL 5991566 (Ariz. 2012).Google Scholar

People v Ackley, 870 N.W.2d 858 (Mich. 2015).Google Scholar

People v Baumer, 781 N.W.2d 309 (Mich. 2010).Google Scholar

Payne, S. Woman sentenced to life after stepson’s death released, may see new trial. Tulsa World. 2019. https://bit.ly/3UteKaq.Google Scholar

Briggs, Ex Parte, 187 S.W.3d 458 (Tex. Cr. App. 2005).Google Scholar

People v Brown, 2019 WL 3386459 (Mich Ct, App. 2019).Google Scholar

Ceasor v Ocwieja, 655 Fed. Appx. 263 (6th Cir. 2016), and People v Ceasor, 954 N.W.2d 830 (Mich. 2021).Google Scholar

People v Di Mambro, 897 N.W.2d 233 (Mich. 2016).Google Scholar

Cenziper, D. Shaken science: A disputed diagnosis imprisons parents. Washington Post. 2015. https://wapo.st/3zJPTHp.Google Scholar

State v Hales, 152 P.3d 321 (Utah 2007).Google Scholar

State v Jones, Superior Court of Arizona, Maricopa County, CR2004-036702–001, order entered 22 June 2020.Google Scholar

Commonwealth v Millien, 50 N.E.2d 808 (Mass. 2016).Google Scholar

WVU College of Law client freed from prison. 2016. https://bit.ly/3UcYM4l.Google Scholar

Newbold, N. https://bit.ly/3E5Krkx.Google Scholar

State v Pheils, 2015 WL 5306548 (Ct. App. Ohio 2015).Google Scholar

People v Roberts, 892 N.W.2d 353 (Mich. 2017).Google Scholar

State v Schoonmaker, 176 P.3d 1105 (N. Mex. 2008).Google Scholar

Spurgeon v State, 298 So.3d 726 (Dist. Ct. App. Fla. 2020).Google Scholar

Voss, K. National Registry of Exonerations. https://bit.ly/3TbzYZ9.Google Scholar

State v Ware, 679 S.E.2d 797 (Ga. 2009).Google Scholar

Brown v State, 152 So.3d 1146 (Miss. 2014).Google Scholar

Isham v State, 161 So.3d 1076 (Miss. 2015).Google Scholar

State v Gallaway, 2105 WL 4460992 (Del. Sup. Ct. 2015).Google Scholar

Brady v Maryland, 373 U.S. 83 (1963).Google Scholar

American Academy of Pediatrics Committee on Child Abuse and Neglect. Shaken baby syndrome: Inflicted cerebral trauma. Pediatrics. 1993;92:872–5.Google Scholar

American Academy of Pediatrics Committee on Child Abuse and Neglect. Shaken baby syndrome: Rotational cranial injuries. Technical report. Pediatrics. 2001;108:206–10.Google Scholar

Christian, CW, Block, R, Committee on Child Abuse and Neglect. Abusive head trauma in infants and children. Pediatrics. 2009;123:1409–11.Google Scholar

Narang, S, Fingarson, A, Lukefar, J, Council on Child Abuse and Neglect. Abusive head trauma in infants and children. Pediatrics. 2020;145:1–7.Google Scholar

Choudhary, K, Servaes, S, Slovis, TL et al. Consensus statement on abusive head trauma in infants and young children. Pediatric Radiology. 2018;48:1048–65.Google Scholar

Findley, KA, Risinger, DM, Barnes, PD et al. Feigned consensus: Usurping the law in shaken baby syndrome/abusive head trauma prosecutions. Wisconsin Law Review. 2019:1211–67.Google Scholar

Narang, SK, Sachdev, KK, Bertocci, K et al. Overturned abusive head trauma and shaken baby syndrome convictions in the United States: Prevalence, legal basis, and medical evidence. Child Abuse and Neglect. 2021;122:105380. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chiabu.2021.105380.Google Scholar

National Registry of Exonerations. https://bit.ly/3UqiKZ4.Google Scholar

Findley, KA, Angulo Amaya, MC, Hatch, G, Smith, JP. Plea bargaining in the shadow of a retrial: Bargaining away innocence. Wisconsin Law Review. 2022:533–618. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3944845.Google Scholar

Statement of the Innocence Network on Shaken Baby Syndrome/Abusive Head Trauma. https://bit.ly/3t6eUIU.Google Scholar