Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Notes on contributors
- Preface and acknowledgments
- Part I Framing the problem: Multi-disciplinary approaches
- Part II Europe
- Part III Africa
- 6 Silences on state violence during the Algerian War of Independence: France and Algeria, 1962–2007
- 7 African silences: Negotiating the story of France's colonial soldiers, 1914–2009
- 8 Now that all is said and done: Reflections on the Truth and Reconciliation Commission in South Africa
- Part IV The Middle East
- Index
- References
8 - Now that all is said and done: Reflections on the Truth and Reconciliation Commission in South Africa
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 04 May 2010
Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Notes on contributors
- Preface and acknowledgments
- Part I Framing the problem: Multi-disciplinary approaches
- Part II Europe
- Part III Africa
- 6 Silences on state violence during the Algerian War of Independence: France and Algeria, 1962–2007
- 7 African silences: Negotiating the story of France's colonial soldiers, 1914–2009
- 8 Now that all is said and done: Reflections on the Truth and Reconciliation Commission in South Africa
- Part IV The Middle East
- Index
- References
Summary
The witness: speaking out
In 1998, four years after the transition to democracy in South Africa, a five-volume Report answerable to the formal mandate of South Africa's Truth and Reconciliation Commission (TRC) was tabled on the public agenda there. The Commission, a crucial dimension of South Africa's negotiated settlement, was empowered to grant amnesty to politically motivated perpetrators of all affiliations in return for the full disclosure of their offences. But the Commission's power to confer amnesty did not exhaust its role. No less significantly, the Truth and Reconciliation Commission was instituted in order to “[afford] victims an opportunity to relate the violations they suffered” and was required to “[report] to the Nation about such violations and victims.”
Through the workings of its various committees, the TRC called forth individual and collective acts of testimony on an unprecedented scale. The narratives of approximately 22,000 victims were elicited and processed. Roughly ten percent of these were heard in the public hearings across South Africa which became the hallmark of the TRC. Such acts of breaking silence were integral to the “restorative justice” that the Commission sought to implement. In the words of its Report, “People came to the Commission to tell their stories in an attempt to facilitate not only their individual healing process, but also a healing process for the entire nation.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Shadows of WarA Social History of Silence in the Twentieth Century, pp. 153 - 170Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2010
References
, and , The Theatre of Violence: Narratives of Protagonists in the South African Conflict (Pretoria: Institute for Justice and Reconciliation, HSRC Press, James Currey, 2005), p. 22Google Scholar
, J. M. Coetzee: South Africa and the Politics of Writing (Berkeley, Los Angeles, Oxford: University of California Press; Cape Town, Johannesburg: David Philip, 1993), pp. 10–17Google Scholar
, Mapmakers: Writing in a State of Siege (London and Boston: Faber and Faber, 1983), p. 152Google Scholar
, “Memory Theaters, Virtual Witnessing, and the Trauma-Aesthetic,” Biography XXVII, 1 (2004), p. 172.Google Scholar
: “Truth and Testimony: The Process and the Struggle,” in (ed.), Trauma: Explorations in Memory (Baltimore and London: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1995), pp. 69–70Google Scholar
, The Politics of Truth and Reconciliation in South Africa: Legitimising the Post-Apartheid State (Cambridge University Press, 2001), pp. 16–17Google Scholar
, “The TRC Report: What Kind of History? What Kind of Truth?,” in and (eds.), Commissioning the Past: Understanding South Africa's Truth and Reconciliation Commission (Johannesburg: Witwatersrand University Press, 2002), p. 165Google Scholar
, Dis-placing Race: The South African Truth and Reconciliation Commission (TRC) and Interpretations of Violence (Braamfontein: Centre for the Study of Violence and Reconciliation, 2004Google Scholar
, “Reconciliation without Justice,” South African Review of Books XLVI (1996), pp. 3–5Google Scholar
, “A Diminished Truth,” in and (eds.), After the TRC: Reflections on Truth and Reconciliation in South Africa (Athens, OH: Ohio University Press; Cape Town: David Philip, 2000), pp. 58–61Google Scholar
, “Amnesty or Impunity: A Preliminary Critique of the Report of the Truth and Reconciliation Commission of South Africa (TRC),” diacritics XXXII, 3–4 (2002), pp. 33–4Google Scholar
, “Nationalism as Such: Violence during South Africa's Political Transition,” Public Culture XVI, 2 (2004), pp. 315–35Google Scholar
, “Re-Placing Pasts, Forgetting Presents: Narrative, Place and Memory in the Time of the Truth and Reconciliation Commission,” Research in African Literatures XXXII, 3 (2001), pp. 198– 212Google Scholar
, Bearing Witness: Women and the Truth and Reconciliation Commission in South Africa (London, Sterling, Virginia: Pluto Press, 2003), pp. 51–9Google Scholar
, cited in , Truth & Lies: Stories from the Truth and Reconciliation Commission in South Africa, with an introduction by Michael Ignatieff and an essay by Pumla Gobodo-Madikizela (New York: The New Press, 2002 [2001]), p. 88Google Scholar
, “Freedom from Speech (Or the Silent Demand),” diacritics XXXI, 2, p. 72
, “Confession and Double Thoughts: Tolstoy, Rousseau, Dostoevsky,” in (ed.), Doubling the Point: Essays and Interviews (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1992 [1985]), p. 253, emphasis in originalGoogle Scholar
, “Very Morbid Phenomena: “Liberal Funk,” the “Lucy-syndrome,” and J. M. Coetzee's Disgrace,” Scrutiny2: Issues in English Studies in Southern Africa IV, 1 (2001), pp. 32–8Google Scholar
, “Aneconomy in an Economy of Melancholy: Embodiment and Gendered Identity in J. M. Coetzee's Disgrace,” African Identities I, 2 (2003), pp. 167–85Google Scholar
, “Compulsory Heterosexuality and Lesbian Existence,” in and (eds.), Women: Sex and Sexuality (University of Chicago Press, 1980), pp. 62–91Google Scholar
, Skin Tight: Apartheid Literary Culture and its Aftermath (Pretoria, Leiden: Unisa Press, Brill, 2006), pp. 77–91.Google Scholar
, Bodies that Matter: On the Discursive Limits of “Sex” (New York and London: Routledge, 1993), p. 30Google Scholar
, “How Can I Deny that these Hands and this Body are mine,” in , , , and (eds.), Material Events: Paul de Man and the Afterlife of Theory (Minneapolis and London: University of Minnesota Press, 2001), pp. 256, 257Google Scholar
, “Violence and Vision: The Prosthetics and Aesthetics of Terror,” Public Culture X, 1 (1997), p. 30Google Scholar
and , Between Anger and Hope: South Africa's Youth and the Truth and Reconciliation Commission (Johannesburg: Witwatersrand University Press, 2001Google Scholar
, , and (eds.), Deep hiStories: Gender and Colonialism in Southern Africa (Amsterdam and New York: Rodopi, 2003)Google Scholar
, Precarious Life: The Powers of Mourning and Violence (London and New York: Verso, 2004), p. 20.Google Scholar
, Fables of Responsibility: Aberrations and Predicaments in Ethics and Politics (Stanford University Press, 1997Google Scholar
, “The Burdens of Truth: An Evaluation of the Psychological Support Services and Initiatives Undertaken by the South African Truth and Reconciliation Commission,” American Imago LV, 1 (1998), p. 20Google Scholar
, “Foreword: The Tiger on the Paper Mat,” in , The Resistance to Theory, foreword by W. Godzich (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1986), pp. ix–xviii, p. xivGoogle Scholar