Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-jbqgn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-04T16:55:53.562Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Bibliography

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 July 2015

Edited by
Keimpe Algra  and
Katerina Ierodiakonou
Keimpe Algra
Affiliation:
Universiteit Utrecht, The Netherlands
Katerina Ierodiakonou
Affiliation:
University of Athens, Greece
Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Sextus Empiricus and Ancient Physics , pp. 403 - 412
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2015

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adam, C. and Tannery, P. (eds.) (1983) Oeuvres de Descartes. (11 vols.). Paris.Google Scholar
Algra, K. (1995) Concepts of Space in Greek Thought. Leiden, New York and Cologne.Google Scholar
Algra, K. (2003) ‘Zeno of Citium and Stoic cosmology: some notes and two case studies’, Elenchos 24: 9–32.Google Scholar
Algra, K. (2014) ‘Aristotle's conception of place and its reception in the Hellenistic period’, in Ranocchia, G., Helmig, C. and Horn, C. (eds.), Space in Hellenistic Philosophy. Berlin: 11–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Algra, K., Barnes, J., Mansfeld, J. and Schofield, M. (eds.) (1999) The Cambridge History of Hellenistic Philosophy. Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allen, J. (2001) Inference from Signs. Ancient Debates about the Nature of Evidence. Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Annas, J. (1992) ‘Sextus Empiricus and the Peripatetics’, Elenchos 13: 203–31.Google Scholar
Annas, J. (2011) ‘Ancient scepticism and ancient religion’, in Morison, B. and Ierodiakonou, K. (eds.), Episteme, etc. Essays in Honour of Jonathan Barnes. Oxford: 75–90.Google Scholar
Annas, J. and Barnes, J. (1994) Sextus Empiricus, Outlines of Scepticism. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Armstrong, A. H. (trans.) (1984) Plotinus, Ennead IV. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Bailey, A. (2002) Sextus Empiricus and Pyrrhonean Scepticism. Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baltzly, D. (1998) ‘Who are the mysterious dogmatists of Adversus Mathematicus ix 352?’, Ancient Philosophy 18: 145–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barnes, J. (1979) The Presocratic Philosophers (2 vols.). London.Google Scholar
Barnes, J. (1980) ‘Proof destroyed’, in Schofield et al. (1980) 161–81.Google Scholar
Barnes, J. (1982a) ‘The beliefs of a Pyrrhonist’, Proceedings of the Cambridge Philological Society N.S. 28: 1–29, reprinted in Burnyeat and Frede (1997) 58–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barnes, J. (1982b) ‘Medicine, experience and logic’, in Barnes et al. (1982) 24–68.Google Scholar
Barnes, J. (1983) ‘Ancient skepticism and causation’, in Burnyeat (1983) 149–203.Google Scholar
Barnes, J. (1988) ‘Bits and pieces’, in Barnes and Mignucci (1988) 225–94.Google Scholar
Barnes, J. (1990a) The Toils of Scepticism. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Barnes, J. (1990b) ‘Pyrrhonism, belief and causation: observations on the scepticism of Sextus Empiricus’, ANRW II.36.4: 2608–95.Google Scholar
Barnes, J. (1992) ‘Diogenes Laertius IX 61–116: the philosophy of Pyrrhonism’, ANRW II.36.6: 4241–301.Google Scholar
Barnes, J. (2007) ‘Sextan scepticism’, in Scott, D. (ed.), Maieusis: Essays in Ancient Philosophy in Honour of Myles Burnyeat. Oxford: 322–34.Google Scholar
Barnes, J., Brunschwig, J., Burnyeat, M. and Schofield, M. (eds.) (1982) Science and Speculation. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Barnes, J. and Mignucci, M. (eds.) (1988) Matter and Metaphysics. Naples.Google Scholar
Barnes, J., Schofield, M. and Sorabji, R. (eds.) (1979) Articles on Aristotle, vol. iii: Metaphysics. London.Google Scholar
Betegh, G. (2006a) ‘Epicurus’ argument for atomism’, Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 30: 261–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Betegh, G. (2006b) ‘Greek philosophy and religion’, in Gill and Pellegrin (2006) 625–39.Google Scholar
Bett, R. (1996) ‘Hellenistic essays translated’, Apeiron 29: 75–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bett, R. (1997) Sextus Empiricus, Against the Ethicists. Oxford.Google Scholar
Bett, R. (2000) Pyrrho, his Antecedents and his Legacy. Oxford.Google Scholar
Bett, R. (2002) ‘Is there a Sophistic ethics?’, Ancient Philosophy 22: 235–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bett, R. (2005) Sextus Empiricus, Against the Logicians. Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bett, R. (2009) ‘Sextus Empiricus’, in Oppy, G. and Trakakis, N. (eds.), The History of Western Philosophy of Religion, vol. i: Ancient Philosophy of Religion. Durham.Google Scholar
Bett, R. (ed.) (2010) The Cambridge Companion to Ancient Scepticism. Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bett, R. (2011) ‘How ethical can an ancient skeptic be?’, in Machuga, D. E. (ed.), Pyrrhonism in Ancient, Modern and Contemporary Philosophy. Berlin: 3–19.Google Scholar
Bett, R. (2012) Sextus Empiricus, Against the Physicists. Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blank, D. (1998) Sextus Empiricus, Against the Grammarians. Oxford.Google Scholar
Blomqvist, J. (1974) ‘Die Skeptika des Sextus Empiricus’, Grazer Beiträge 2: 7–14.Google Scholar
Bobzien, S. (1999) ‘Stoic logic’, in Algra et al. (1999) 92–157.Google Scholar
Brennan, T. (2000) ‘Criterion and appearance in Sextus Empiricus’, in Sihvola (2000) 63–92.Google Scholar
Brisson, L. (2006) ‘Contre les arithméticiens (Pros arithmētikous) ou contre ceux qui enseignent que les nombres sont des principes’, in Delattre, J. (ed.), Sur le Contre les professeurs de Sextus Empiricus. Lille: 67–77.Google Scholar
Brittain, C. (2005) ‘Common sense. Concepts, definition and meaning in and out of the Stoa’, in Frede, D. and Inwood, B. (eds.), Language and Learning. Cambridge: 165–209.Google Scholar
Brittain, C. (trans.) (2006) Cicero, On Academic Scepticism. Indianapolis.Google Scholar
Brochard, V. (1923) Les Sceptiques grecs, 2nd edn.Paris.Google Scholar
Brouwer, R. (2008) ‘Hellenistic philosophers on Phaedrus 229b–30a’, The Cambridge Classical Journal 54: 30–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brunschwig, J. (1980) ‘Proof defined’, in Schofield et al. (1980) 124–60.Google Scholar
Brunschwig, J. (1988a) ‘La formule hoson epi tōi logōi chez Sextus Empiricus’, in Voelke, A.-J. (ed.), Le scepticisme antique: perspectives historiques et systématiques. Geneva: 107–22.Google Scholar
Brunschwig, J. (1988b) ‘Sextus Empiricus on the Kriterion: the skeptic as conceptual legatee’, in Dillon, J. and Long, A. A. (eds.), The Question of Eclecticism, Berkeley, 145–75, reprinted in his Papers in Hellenistic Philosophy. Cambridge: 224–43.Google Scholar
Brunschwig, J. (1994) ‘Did Diogenes of Babylon invent the ontological argument?’, in his Papers in Hellenistic Philosophy. Cambridge: 170–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brunschwig, J. (2002) ‘Democritus and Xeniades’, in Caston, V. and Graham, D. (eds.), Presocratic Philosophy: Essays in Honour of Alexander Mourelatos. Aldershot: 159–67.Google Scholar
Brunschwig, J. (2003) ‘Stoic metaphysics’, in Inwood (2003) 206–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burkert, W. (1972) Lore and Science in Ancient Pythagoreanism (trans. Minar, E.). Cambridge, Mass. (1st German edn. 1962).Google Scholar
Burnyeat, M. F. (1980a) ‘Aristotle on understanding knowledge’, in Berti, E. (ed.), Aristotle on Science: The Posterior Analytics. Padua and New York: 97–139.Google Scholar
Burnyeat, M. F. (1980b) ‘Can the sceptic live his scepticism?’, in Schofield et al. (1980) 20–53, reprinted in Burnyeat (1983) 117–48, and in Burnyeat and Frede (1997) 25–57.Google Scholar
Burnyeat, M. F. (1982) ‘Gods and heaps’, in Schofield, M. and Nussbaum, M. (eds.), Language and Logos: Studies in Ancient Greek Philosophy Presented to G. E. L. Owen. Cambridge: 315–38.Google Scholar
Burnyeat, M. F. (ed.) (1983) The Skeptical Tradition. Berkeley, Los Angeles and London.Google Scholar
Burnyeat, M. F. (1984) ‘The sceptic in his place and time’, in Rorty, R., Schneewind, J. B. and Skinner, Q. (eds.), Philosophy in History: Essays on the Historiography of Philosophy. Cambridge: 225–54, reprinted in Burnyeat and Frede (1997) 92–126.Google Scholar
Burnyeat, M. F. (1997) ‘The impiety of Socrates’, Ancient Philosophy 17: 1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burnyeat, M. and Frede, M. (eds.) (1997) The Original Sceptics: a Controversy. Indianapolis.Google Scholar
Bury, J. B. (1933) Sextus Empiricus, vol. i: Outlines of Pyrrhonism. Loeb Classical Library. Cambridge, Mass.Google Scholar
Bury, J. B. (1935) Sextus Empiricus, vol. ii: Against the Logicians. Loeb Classical Library. Cambridge, Mass.Google Scholar
Bury, J. B. (1936) Sextus Empiricus, vol. iii: Against the Physicists, Against the Ethicists. Loeb Classical Library. Cambridge, Mass.Google Scholar
Bydén, B. (2002) ‘“To every argument there is a counter-argument”: Theodore Metochites' defence of scepticism (Semeiosis 61)’, in Ierodiakonou, K. (ed.), Byzantine Philosophy and its Ancient Sources. Oxford: 183–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cherniss, H. (1976) Plutarch, Moralia. Vol. XIII Part II. Loeb Classical Library. Cambridge, Mass.Google Scholar
Clarke, T. (1972) ‘The legacy of skepticism’, Journal of Philosophy 69: 754–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coope, U. (2005) Aristotle on Time. Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cottingham, J., Stoothoff, R. and Murdoch, D. (trans.) (1988) The Philosophical Writings of Descartes (3 vols.; vol. iii including Kenny, A.). Cambridge.Google Scholar
Cuomo, S. (2001) Ancient Mathematics. London.Google Scholar
Decleva Caizzi, F. (1992) ‘Sesto e gli scettici’, Elenchos 13: 277–327.Google Scholar
De Haas, F. A. J. (1997) John Philoponus' New Definition of Prime Matter. Leiden.Google Scholar
Delattre, D. (2006) ‘Présence de l'Épicurisme dans le Contre les grammairiens et le Contre les musiciens de Sextus Empiricus’, in Delattre, J. (ed.), Sur le Contre les Professeurs de Sextus Empiricus. Lille: 47–65.Google Scholar
Dennett, D. (2006) Breaking the Spell: Religion as a Natural Phenomenon. New York.Google Scholar
Denyer, N. (1981) ‘The atomism of Diodorus Cronus’, Prudentia 13: 33–45.Google Scholar
Diels, H. (1870) De Galeni historia philosophica. Diss. Bonn.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Diels, H. (1879) Doxographi Graeci. Berlin.Google Scholar
Diels, H. (1903) Die Fragmente der Vorsokratiker (vols. i–iii). Berlin.Google Scholar
Dillon, J. (1993) Alcinous, The Handbook of Platonism, Oxford.Google Scholar
Di Marco, M. (1989) Timone di Fliunte, Silli. Rome.Google Scholar
Dorandi, T. (1991) ‘Den Autoren über die Schulter geschaut’, Zeitschrift für Papyrologie und Epigraphik, 87: 11–33.Google Scholar
Döring, J. (1972) Die Megariker: Kommentierte Sammlung der Testimonien, Studien zur Antiken Philosophie, vol. ii. Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Dover, K. (ed.) (1970) Aristophanes, Clouds. Oxford.Google Scholar
Dye, G. and Vitrac, B. (2009) ‘Le Contre les géomètres de Sextus Empiricus: sources, cible, structure’, Phronesis 54: 155–203.Google Scholar
Falcon, A. (2005) Aristotle and the Science of Nature. Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Farquharson, A. S. L. (1944) The Meditations of the Emperor Marcus Aurelius, vol. i. Oxford.Google Scholar
Floridi, L. (1998) ‘Mathematical skepticism: a sketch with historian in foreground’, in van der Zande, J. and Popkin, R. H. (eds.), The Skeptical Tradition around 1800. Dordrecht: 41–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Floridi, L. (2002) Sextus Empiricus. The Transmission and Recovery of Pyrrhonism. Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Floridi, L. (2004) ‘Mathematical skepticism: the debate between Hobbes and Wallis’, in Neto, J. R. M. and Popkin, R. H. (eds.), Skepticism in Renaissance and Post-Renaissance Thought: New Interpretations. Amherst, NY: 143–84.Google Scholar
Floridi, L. (2010) ‘The rediscovery and posthumous influence of scepticism’, in Bett (2010) 267–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frede, M. (1979) ‘Des Skeptikers Meinungen’, Neue Hefte für Philosophie 15/16: 102–29; Eng. trans. as ‘The sceptic's beliefs’, in his Essays in Ancient Philosophy. Oxford and Minnesota 1987: 179–200, reprinted in Burnyeat and Frede (1997) 1–24.Google Scholar
Frede, M. (1980) ‘On the original notion of cause’, in Schofield et al. (1980) 217–49.Google Scholar
Frede, M. (1993) ‘The Stoic doctrine of the tenses of the verb’, in Döring, K. and Ebert, T. (eds.), Dialektiker und Stoiker. Zur Logik der Stoa und ihrer Vorläufer. Stuttgart: 141–54.Google Scholar
Freytag, W. (1995) Mathematische Grundbegriffe bei Sextus Empiricus. Hildesheim.Google Scholar
Friedländer, M. (1904) Maimonides: Guide for the Perplexed, 2nd edn. London.Google Scholar
Furley, D. J. (1967) Two Studies in the Greek Atomists. Princeton.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Furley, D. J. (1978) ‘Self-movers’, in Lloyd, G. E. R. and Owen, G. E. L. (eds.), Aristotle on the Mind and the Senses. Cambridge: 165–79, reprinted in Furley (1989) 121–31, and Gill and Lennox (1994) 3–14.Google Scholar
Furley, D. J. (1982) ‘The Greek commentators' treatment of Aristotle's theory of the continuous’, in Kretzmann, N. (ed.), Infinity and Continuity in Ancient and Medieval Thought. Ithaca, NY: 17–36.Google Scholar
Furley, D. J. (1989) Cosmic Problems. Princeton.Google Scholar
Furley, D. J. and Allen, R. E. (eds.) (1975) Studies in Presocratic Philosophy (2 vols.). London.Google Scholar
Gill, M. L. (1994) ‘Aristotle on self-motion’, in Gill and Lennox (1994) 15–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gill, M. L. and Lennox, J. G. (eds.) (1994) Self-Motion. Princeton.Google Scholar
Gill, M. L. and Pellegrin, P. (eds.) (2006) A Companion to Ancient Philosophy. Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Göransson, T. (1995) Albinus, Alcinous, Arius Didymus. Gothenburg.Google Scholar
Gottschalk, H. B. (1964) ‘Strato of Lampsakos: some texts’, Proceedings of the Leeds Philosophical and Literary Society 11: 97–182.Google Scholar
Gottschalk, H. B. (1987) ‘Aristotelian philosophy in the Roman World’, ANRW II.36.2: 1079–174.Google Scholar
Gottschalk, H. B. (2002) ‘Eudemus and the Peripatos’, in Bodnár, I. and Fortenbaugh, W. W. (eds.), Eudemus of Rhodes. New Brunswick: 25–37.Google Scholar
Graeser, A. (1978) ‘The Stoic categories’, in Brunschwig, J. (ed.), Les Stoiciens et leur logique. Paris: 199–222.Google Scholar
Grünbaum, A. (1968) Modern Science and Zeno's Paradoxes. London.Google Scholar
Guthrie, W. K. C. (1965) A History of Greek Philosophy, vol. ii: The Presocratic Tradition from Parmenides to Democritus. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Hahm, D. (1972) ‘Chrysippus' solution to the Democritean dilemma of the cone’, Isis 63: 205–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hankinson, R. J. (1995) The Sceptics. London.Google Scholar
Hankinson, R. J. (1998) Cause and Explanation in Ancient Greek Thought. Oxford.Google Scholar
Hankinson, R. J. (2010) ‘Aenesidemus and the rebirth of Pyrrhonism’, in Bett (2010) 105–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heintz, W. (1932) Studien zu Sextus Empiricus. Halle.Google Scholar
Hiller, E. (ed.) (1878) Theonis Smyrnaei philosophi Platonii expositio rerum mathematicarum ad legendum Platonem utilium. Leipzig.Google Scholar
Hossenfelder, M. (1985) Sextus Empirikus: Grundriß der pyrrhonischen Skepsis. Frankfurt.Google Scholar
House, D. K. (1980) ‘The life of Sextus Empiricus’, The Classical Quarterly 30: 227–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huffman, C. A. (2005) Archytas of Tarentum: Pythagorean, Philosopher and Mathematician King. Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hume, D. (1978) A Treatise of Human Nature, ed. Nidditch, P., 2nd edn.Oxford.Google Scholar
Humphreys, P. (1997) ‘How properties emerge’, Philosophy of Science 64: 1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hussey, E. (1983) Aristotle, Physics Books III and IV. Oxford.Google Scholar
Ierodiakonou, K. (2007) ‘The Stoics and the Skeptics on memory’, in Sassi, M. M. (ed.), Tracce nella mente. Teorie della memoria da Platone ai moderni. Pisa: 47–65.Google Scholar
Inwood, B. (1981) ‘The origin of Epicurus' concept of void’, Classical Philology 76: 80–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Inwood, B. (ed.) (2003) The Cambridge Companion to the Stoics. Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ioppolo, A. M. (1995) ‘Socrate nelle tradizioni accademico-scettica e pirroniana’, in Giannantoni, G., Gigante, M., Martens, E. and Ioppolo, A. M. (eds.), La Tradizione Socratica. Naples: 89–124.Google Scholar
Ioppolo, A. M. and Sedley, D. N. (eds.) (2007) Pyrrhonists, Patricians, Platonizers: Hellenistic Philosophy in the Period 155–86 BC. Naples.Google Scholar
Isnardi Parente, M. (1982) Senocrate–Ermodoro: Frammenti. Naples.Google Scholar
Isnardi Parente, M. (1992) ‘Sesto, Platone, l'Accademia antica e I Pitagorici’, Elenchos 13: 120–68.Google Scholar
Janáček, K. (1948) Prolegomena to Sextus Empiricus. Acta Universitatis Palackianae Olmucencis. Olomouc.Google Scholar
Janáček, K. (1963) ‘Die Hauptschrift des Sextus Empiricus als Torso erhalten?’, Philologus 107: 271–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Janáček, K. (1972) Sextus Empiricus' Skeptical Methods. Prague.Google Scholar
Janáček, K. (2008) Studien zu Sextus Empiricus, Diogenes Laertius und zur Pyrrhonischen Skepsis, ed. Janda, J. and Karfik, F.. Berlin and New York.Google Scholar
Janda, J. (2006) ‘Karel Janáček, Sextus Empiricus und der Neupyrrhonische Skeptizismus’. Acta Universitatis Carolinae Philologica 1 (Graecolatina Pragensia XXI): 29–49.Google Scholar
Janko, R. (2006) ‘Socrates the Freethinker’, in Rappe, S. Ahbel and Kamtekar, R. (eds.), A Companion to Socrates. Oxford: 48–62.Google Scholar
Kahn, C. H. (2001) Pythagoras and the Pythagoreans: a Brief History. Indianapolis and Cambridge.Google Scholar
Kidd, I. G. (1988) Posidonius, vol. ii: The Commentary. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Kirk, G. S., Raven, J. E. and Schofield, M. (1983) The Presocratic Philosophers. Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klibansky, R. and Labowsky, C. (eds.) (1953) Procli Commentarium in Platonis Parmenidem. London.Google Scholar
Knuuttilla, S. and Sihvola, J. (2000) ‘Ancient scepticism and philosophy of religion’, in Sihvola (2000) 125–44.Google Scholar
Konstan, D. (1979) ‘Problems in Epicurean physics’, Isis 70: 394–418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Konstan, D. (1982) ‘Ancient atomism and its heritage: minimal parts’, Ancient Philosophy 2: 60–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Konstan, D. (1987) ‘Points, lines and infinity: Aristotle's Physics Zeta and Hellenistic philosophy’, in Cleary, J. (ed.), Proceedings of the Boston Area Colloquium in Ancient Philosophy, vol. iii. Boston: 1–32.Google Scholar
Krämer, H.-J. (1971) Platonismus und hellenistische Philosophie. Berlin and New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lagerlund, H. (ed.) (2010) Rethinking the History of Skepticism: the Missing Medieval Background. Leiden.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
La Sala, R. (2005) Die Züge des Skeptikers. Der dialektische Charakter von Sextus Empiricus' Werk. Hypomnemata 160. Göttingen.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lear, J. (1981) ‘A note on Zeno's arrow’, Phronesis 26: 91–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Le Poidevin, R. (2002) ‘Zeno's arrow and the significance of the present’ in Callender, C. (ed.), Time, Reality and Experience. Cambridge: 57–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Locke, J. (1975) An Essay Concerning the Human Understanding, ed. Nidditch, P.. Oxford.Google Scholar
Long, A. A. (1990) ‘Scepticism about gods in Hellenistic philosophy’, in Griffith, M. and Mastronarde, D. (eds.), Cabinet of the Muses: Essays on Classical and Comparative Literature in Honor of Thomas G. Rosenmeyer. Atlanta: 279–91.Google Scholar
Long, A. A. (2006) ‘Timon of Phlius: Pyrrhonist and satirist’, in his From Epicurus to Epictetus: Studies in Hellenistic and Roman Philosophy. Oxford: 70–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Long, A. A. and Sedley, D. N. (eds.) (1987) The Hellenistic Philosophers (2 vols.). Cambridge.Google Scholar
Machamer, P. K. and Turnbull, R. G. (eds.) (1976) Motion and Time, Space and Matter: Interrelations in the History and Philosophy of Science. Columbus, OH.Google Scholar
Machuca, D. E. (ed.) (2012) Pyrrhonism in Ancient, Modern, and Contemporary Philosophy. Dordrecht.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mackie, J. L. (1974) The Cement of the Universe: a Study of Causation. Oxford.Google Scholar
Mansfeld, J. (1998) Prolegomena Mathematica. Leiden.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mansfeld, J. (1999) ‘Theology’, in Algra et al. (1999) 452–78.Google Scholar
Mansfeld, J. (2002) ‘Plato, Pythagoras, Aristotle, the Peripatetics, the Stoics and Thales and his followers on causes’, in Mansfeld and Runia (2009) 375–413.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mansfeld, J. (2008) ‘Doxography of ancient philosophy’, The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall 2008 edition), Zalta, Edward N. (ed.), URL = <http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2008/entries/doxography-ancient/>.Google Scholar
Mansfeld, J. and Runia, D. T. (1997) Aëtiana. The Method and Intellectual Context of a Doxographer, vol. i: The Sources. Leiden.Google Scholar
Mansfeld, J. and Runia, D. T. (2009) Aëtiana. The Method and Intellectual Context of a Doxographer, vol. iii: Studies in the Doxographical Traditions of Greek Philosophy. Leiden.Google Scholar
Mates, B. (1996) The Skeptic Way: Sextus Empiricus's Outlines of Pyrrhonism. Oxford.Google Scholar
Mau, J. (1973) ‘Was there a special Epicurean mathematics?’, in Lee, E. N., Mourelatos, A. P. D. and Rorty, R. M. (eds.), Exegesis and Argument: Studies in Greek Philosophy Presented to Gregory Vlastos. Phronesis Supp. Vol. i. Assen: 421–30.Google Scholar
Mejer, J. (2006) ‘Ancient philosophy and the doxographic tradition’, in Gill and Pellegrin (2006) 20–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Menn, S. (1999) ‘The Stoic theory of categories’, Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 17: 215–47.Google Scholar
Mignucci, M. (1988) ‘The Stoic notion of relatives’, in Barnes and Mignucci (1988) 129–217.Google Scholar
Monet, A. (1996) ‘[Philodème, Sur les sensations] PHerc. 19/698’, Cronache Ercolanesi 26: 27–127.Google Scholar
Moraux, P. (1984) Der Aristotelismus bei den Griechen von Andronikos bis Alexander von Aphrodisias, vol. ii. Berlin and New York.Google Scholar
Morison, B. (2002) On Location. Aristotle's Concept of Place. Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mueller, I. (1982) ‘Geometry and scepticism’, in Barnes et al. (1982) 69–95.Google Scholar
Mugler, C. (1958) Dictionnaire historique de la terminologie géométrique des Grecs. Paris.Google Scholar
Mutschmann, H. (ed.) (1914) Sextus Empiricus, vol. ii. Leipzig.Google Scholar
Mutschmann, H. and Mau, J. (eds.) (1958) Sextus Empiricus, vol. i. Leipzig.Google Scholar
Mutschmann, H., Mau, J., and Janáček, K. (eds.) (1954) Sextus Empiricus, vol. iii. Leipzig.Google Scholar
Newton-Smith, W. H. (1980) The Structure of Time. London.Google Scholar
Obbink, D. (1989) ‘The atheism of Epicurus’, Greek, Roman and Byzantine Studies 30: 187–223.Google Scholar
Obbink, D. (1996) Philodemus, On Piety, Part I: Critical Text with Commentary. Oxford.Google Scholar
Owen, G. E. L. (1958) ‘Zeno and the mathematicians’, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 58: 199–222, reprinted in Furley and Allen (1975) 143–65, and in Owen (1986) 45–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Owen, G. E. L. (1986) Logic, Science and Dialectic. Ithaca, NY.Google Scholar
Pellegrin, P. (2010) ‘Sextus Empiricus’, in Bett, R. (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Ancient Scepticism. Cambridge: 120–43.Google Scholar
Penelhum, T. (1983) ‘Skepticism and fideism’, in Burnyeat (1983) 287–318.Google Scholar
Perin, C. (2010) ‘Scepticism and belief’, in Bett (2010) 145–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Polito, R. (2004) The Sceptical Road: Aenesidemus' Appropriation of Heraclitus. Leiden.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pullman, B. (1998) The Atom in the History of Human Thought. Oxford.Google Scholar
Purinton, J. (2001) ‘Epicurus on the nature of the Gods’, Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 21: 181–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reesor, M. (1954) ‘The Stoic concept of quality’, American Journal of Philology 75: 40–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Repici Cambiano, L. (1980) ‘Sesto Empirico e i Peripatetici’, in Lo scetticismo antico, ed. Giannantoni, G., vol. i, Naples: 689–713.Google Scholar
Ross, W. D. (ed.) (1936) Aristotle, Physics. Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Runia, D. T. (1996a) ‘Additional fragments of Arius Didymus on physics’, in Algra, K. A., van der Horst, P. W. and Runia, D. T. (eds.), Polyhistor: Studies in the History and Historiography of Greek Philosophy Presented to Jaap Mansfeld on his Sixtieth Birthday. Leiden: 363–81, reprinted in Mansfeld and Runia (2009) 313–32.Google Scholar
Runia, D. T. (1996b) ‘Atheists in Aëtius: text, translation and comments on De Placitis 1 7 1–10’, Mnemosyne 49: 542–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Runia, D. T. (2002) ‘The beginnings of the end: Philo of Alexandria and Hellenistic theology’, in Frede, D. and Laks, A. (eds.), Traditions of Theology: Studies in Hellenistic Theology, its Background and Aftermath. Leiden: 281–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Russell, B. (1903) The Principles of Mathematics. London.Google Scholar
Russell, B. (1981) ‘On the notion of cause’, reprinted in Mysticism and Logic and Other Essays, reprint edn. Totowa, NJ: 132–51.Google Scholar
Salmon, W. C. (ed.) (1970) Zeno's Paradoxes. Indianapolis.Google Scholar
Sambursky, S. (1959) Physics of the Stoics. London.Google Scholar
Sambursky, S. (1962) The Physical World of Late Antiquity. London.Google Scholar
Sauvé Meyer, S. (1994) ‘Self movement and external causation’, in Gill and Lennox (1994) 65–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scade, P. (2013) ‘Plato and the Stoics on limits, parts and wholes’, in Long, A. G. (ed.), Plato and the Stoics. Cambridge: 80–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmitt, C. B. (1983) ‘The rediscovery of ancient skepticism’, in Burnyeat, M. (ed.), The Skeptical Tradition. Berkeley, Los Angeles and London: 225–53.Google Scholar
Schofield, M. (1983) ‘The syllogisms of Zeno of Citium’, Phronesis 28: 31–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schofield, M. (1988) ‘The retrenchable present’, in Barnes and Mignucci (1988) 329–70.Google Scholar
Schofield, M. (2007) ‘Aenesidemus: Pyrrhonist and “Heraclitean”’, in Ioppolo and Sedley (2007) 271–338.Google Scholar
Schofield, M., Burnyeat, M. F. and Barnes, J. (eds.) (1980) Doubt and Dogmatism. Studies in Hellenistic Epistemology. Oxford.Google Scholar
Sedley, D. N. (1976) ‘Epicurus and the mathematicians of Cyzicus’, Cronache Ercolanesi 6: 23–54.Google Scholar
Sedley, D. N. (1977) ‘Diodorus Cronus and Hellenistic philosophy’, Proceedings of the Cambridge Philological Society N.S. 23: 74–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sedley, D. N. (1989) ‘Epicurus on the common sensibles’, in Huby, P. M. and Neal, G. C. (eds.), The Criterion of Truth. Essays in Honour of George Kerferd. Liverpool: 123–36.Google Scholar
Sedley, D. N. (2002) ‘Aristotelian relativities’, in Canto-Sperber, M. and Pellegrin, P. (eds.), Le style de la pensée. Recueil de textes en hommage à Jacques Brunschwig. Paris: 324–52.Google Scholar
Sedley, D. N. (2004) ‘On Generation and Corruption I.2’, in de Haas, F. and Mansfeld, J. (eds.), Aristotle's On Generation and Corruption I. Oxford: 65–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sedley, D. N. (2005) ‘Les origines des preuves stoïciennes de l'existence de dieu’, Revue de Métaphysique et de Morale 4: 461–87.Google Scholar
Sharples, R. W. (2011) ‘Strato of Lampsacus: the sources, texts and translations’, in Desclos, M.-L. and Fortenbaugh, W. W. (eds.), Strato of Lampsacus: Text, Translation and Discussion. New Brunswick and London: 5–230.Google Scholar
Shields, C. (1994) ‘Mind and motion in Aristotle’, in Gill and Lennox (1994) 117–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sihvola, J. (ed.) (2000) Ancient Scepticism and the Sceptical Tradition. Acta Philosophica Fennica 66. Helsinki.Google Scholar
Sihvola, J. (2006) ‘The autonomy of religion in ancient philosophy’, in Hirvonen, V., Holopainen, T. and Tuominen, M. (eds.), Mind and Modality: Studies in the History of Philosophy in Honour of Simo Knuuttila. Leiden: 87–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sorabji, R. (1976) ‘Aristotle on the instant of change’, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society Supp. Vol. 50: 69–87, reprinted in Barnes, Schofield and Sorabji (1979) 159–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sorabji, R. (1982) Time, Creation and the Continuum. London.Google Scholar
Sorabji, R. (1988) Matter, Space and Motion. London.Google Scholar
Spinelli, E. (2000) Sesto Empirico, Contro gli Astrologi. Naples.Google Scholar
Spinelli, E. (2005) Questioni scettiche: Letture introduttive al pirronismo antico. Rome.Google Scholar
Spinelli, E. (2010) ‘Pyrrhonism and the specialized sciences’, in Bett (2010) 249–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stocks, J. L. (trans.) (1922) Aristotle, On the Heavens. Oxford.Google Scholar
Tannery, P. (1887) Pour l'histoire de la science hellène. Paris.Google Scholar
Theiler, W. (1930) Die Vorbereitung des Neuplatonismus. Berlin.Google Scholar
Turetzky, P. (1998) Time. Oxford.Google Scholar
Van Evra, J. (1971) ‘On death as a limit’, Analysis 31: 170–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vlastos, G. (1965) ‘Minimal parts in Epicurean atomism’, Isis 56: 121–47, reprinted in Vlastos (1995), vol. ii: 285–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vlastos, G. (1966a) ‘A note on Zeno's arrow’, Phronesis 11: 3–18, reprinted in Vlastos (1995), vol. i: 205–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vlastos, G. (1966b) ‘Zeno of Sidon as a critic of Euclid’, in Wallach, L. (ed.), The Classical Tradition: Literary and Historical Studies in Honor of Harry Caplan. Ithaca, NY: 148–59, reprinted in Vlastos (1995), vol. ii: 315–24.Google Scholar
Vlastos, G. (1966c) ‘Zeno's race course’, Journal of the History of Philosophy 4: 96–108, reprinted in Furley and Allen (1975) 201–20, and in Vlastos (1995), vol. i: 189–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vlastos, G. (1995) Studies in Greek Philosophy (2 vols.). Princeton.Google Scholar
Volkmann, R. (1973) ‘Observationes miscellae XXXV–LX’, Städt. Evang. Gymn. Jauer Progr. Ostern: 1–20.Google Scholar
Von Arnim, H. (1903–5) Stoicorum veterum fragmenta (vols. i–iii). Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Von Staden, H. (1989) Herophilus of Alexandria. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Warren, J. (2003) ‘Sextus Empiricus and the tripartition of time’, Phronesis 48: 313–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Warren, J. (2004) Facing Death: Epicurus and his Critics. Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wedin, M. (1994) ‘Aristotle on the mind's self-motion’, in Gill and Lennox (1994) 81–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
White, M. J. (1982) ‘Zeno's arrow, divisible infinitesimals, and Chrysippus’, Phronesis 27: 239–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
White, M. J. (1985) Agency and Integrality: Philosophical Themes in the Ancient Discussions of Determinism and Responsibility. Dordrecht.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
White, M. J. (1992) The Continuous and the Discrete: Ancient Physical Theories from a Contemporary Perspective. Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
White, M. J. (2003) ‘Stoic natural philosophy (physics and cosmology)’, in Inwood (2003) 124–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, C. J. F. (1982) Aristotle's De generatione et corruptione. Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wlodarczyk, M. A. (2000) Pyrrhonian Enquiry. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Woodruff, P. (1988) ‘Aporetic Pyrrhonism’, Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 6: 139–68.Google Scholar
Yonge, C. D. (1854–90) The Works of Philo Judaeus. London.Google Scholar
Zeller, E. (1876–1909) Die Philosophie der Griechen in ihrer geschichtlichen Entwicklung (3 vols.). Leipzig.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Bibliography
  • Edited by Keimpe Algra, Universiteit Utrecht, The Netherlands, Katerina Ierodiakonou, University of Athens, Greece
  • Book: Sextus Empiricus and Ancient Physics
  • Online publication: 05 July 2015
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107706590.012
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Bibliography
  • Edited by Keimpe Algra, Universiteit Utrecht, The Netherlands, Katerina Ierodiakonou, University of Athens, Greece
  • Book: Sextus Empiricus and Ancient Physics
  • Online publication: 05 July 2015
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107706590.012
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Bibliography
  • Edited by Keimpe Algra, Universiteit Utrecht, The Netherlands, Katerina Ierodiakonou, University of Athens, Greece
  • Book: Sextus Empiricus and Ancient Physics
  • Online publication: 05 July 2015
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107706590.012
Available formats
×