Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
  • Get access
    Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
  • Cited by 1
  • Print publication year: 2007
  • Online publication date: August 2009

3 - Countertransference: recent developments and technical implications for the treatment of patients with severe personality disorders

Summary

What follows is an overview of the clinical experiences regarding countertransference that we have gathered over 25 years in the treatment of severe personality disorders at the Personality Disorders Institute of the Weill Cornell Medical College and the Westchester Division of the New York Hospital. Earlier experiences of the author in his work with the psychotherapy research project of the Menninger Foundation provided the conceptual and clinical background that influenced the development of new technical approaches and the reshaping of the relevant concepts.

The contemporary concept of countertransference

At this time, the “totalistic” or “global” concept of countertransference clearly has replaced the classical concept as originally defined by Freud (1910). The classical concept defined countertransference as the analyst's transferences toward the patient, or the analyst's unconscious reactions to the patient's transference; the accent was on the unconscious aspect of the analyst's reaction, with the implication that only further analytic work by the analyst on himself would help him to “overcome” the countertransference, as Freud recommended. The contemporary “totalistic” or “global” concept, in contrast, defines countertransference as the therapist's total emotional reaction to the patient at any particular point in time (Kernberg, 1975). The implication of this modern, contemporary concept is that the therapist needs to monitor his/her countertransference consistently to deepen the understanding of the patient by relating it to the developments in the transference.

Related content

Powered by UNSILO
REFERENCES
Adler, G. (1985). Devaluation and countertransference. In Borderline Psychopathology and its Treatment, Vol. 10. New York: Jason Aronson, pp. 171–188.
Baranger, M. and Baranger, W. (1961–62). La situación analítica como campo dinámico. Rev Uruguaya Psicoan IV (1): 3–54.
Baranger, M. and Baranger, W. (1969). Problemas del Campo Psicoanalitico. Buenos Aires: Kargieman.
Baranger, M., Baranger, W. and Mom, J. (1982). Proceso y no proceso en el trabajo analítico. Rev Psicoan 39: 527–549. English translation in Int J Psychoanal 1983; 64: 1–15.
Bion, W. R. (1967). On arrogance. In Second Thoughts: Selected Papers on Psychoanalysis. New York: Basic Books, pp. 86–92.
Clarkin, J. F., Yeomans, F. and Kernberg, O. F. (1999). Treatment of Borderline Personality. New York: Wiley.
Mijolla, A. and Mijolla, M. S. (1996). Psychanalyse. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.
Freud, A. (1936). The Ego and the Mechanisms of Defense. The Writings of Anna Freud, Vol. 2. New York: International Universities Press, 1993.
Freud, S. (1910). The Future Prospects of Psycho-Analytic Therapy: Standard Edition, Vol. 11, pp. 139–151. London: Hogarth Press, 1957.
Green, A. (1993). On Private Madness. Madison, CN: International Universities Press.
Grinberg, L. (1956). Sobre algunos problemas de técnica psicoanalìtica determinados por la identificación y contraidentificación proyectivas. Rev Psicoan 13: 507–511.
Grinberg, L. (1979). Projective counteridentification and countertransference. In Epstein, L. and Feiner, A.. (eds.) Countertransference. New York: Jason Aronson, pp. 169–192.
Heimann, P. (1950). On countertransference. Int J Psychoanal 31: 81–84.
Kernberg, O. (1975). Borderline Conditions and Pathological Narcissism. New Jersey: Jason Aronson.
Kernberg, O. (1976). Object Relations Theory and Clinical Psycho-Analysis. New York: Jason Aronson.
Kernberg, O. (1984). Severe Personality Disorders. New Haven: Yale University Press, pp. 197–209.
Kernberg, O. (1999). Psychoanalysis, psychoanalytic psychotherapy, and supportive psychotherapy: contemporary controversies. Int J Psychoanal 80(6): 1075–1091.
Kernberg, O. (2004a). Aggressivity, Narcissism, and Self-Destructiveness in the Psychotherapeutic Relationship. New Haven: Yale University Press, pp. 167–183.
Kernberg, O. (2004b). Contemporary Controversies in Psychoanalytic Theory, Techniques, and Their Applications. New Haven: Yale University Press, pp. 285–304.
Racker, H. (1957). The meaning and uses of countertransference. Psychoanal Q 26: 303–357.
Sandler, J. (1976). Countertransference and role-responsiveness. Int Rev Psychoanal 3: 43–47.
Searles, H. F. (1979). Countertransference and theoretical model. In Countertransference and Related Subjects: Selected Papers, Vol. 18. New York: International Universities Press, pp. 373–379.
Ticho, E. (1972). The effects of the psychoanalyst's personality on the treatment. In Lindon, J. A. (ed.) Psychoanalytic Forum, Vol. 4. New York: International Universities Press, pp. 137–151.
Tower, L. E. (1956). Countertransference. J Am Psychoanal Assoc 4: 224–255.