Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-fv566 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-23T22:20:22.369Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

1 - English Rights in an Atlantic World

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2012

Craig Yirush
Affiliation:
University of California, Los Angeles
Get access

Summary

In Philadelphia in 1687, William Penn printed a small pamphlet entitled The Excellent Priviledge of Liberty and Property Being the Birth-Right of the Free-born Subjects of England. The Excellent Priviledge was an abridgement of a longer tract called English Liberties: Or, the Free-Born Subject's Inheritance published by the radical Whig Henry Care in 1682. Care wanted to provide religious dissenters, then facing the full force of the Test and Corporation Acts, with an accessible guide to English law should they be hauled into court. But Care's primer outlived its dissenting roots to become a publishing phenomenon, with successive editions circulating around the Atlantic world in the eighteenth century, its small size – it could literally fit into a pocket – enabling knowledge of English rights to reach the peripheries of the empire.

Penn had a similar aim for his abridgment of English Liberties, hoping it would aid the settlers in his new colony to understand the laws that were “their native Right and Inheritance.” Penn thought his version would be particularly valuable for those “who may not have leisure from their Plantations to read large Volumes.” The centerpiece of Penn's compendium was “Magna Charta,” “the Store-house of all our Liberties,” to which Penn appended a lengthy comment, drawn largely from the writings of the great seventeenth-century jurist Edward Coke.

Type
Chapter
Information
Settlers, Liberty, and Empire
The Roots of Early American Political Theory, 1675–1775
, pp. 29 - 50
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Hudson, Winthrop S., “William Penn's English Liberties: Tract for Several Times,” William and Mary Quarterly 26 (1969), 578–585CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schwoerer, Lois, The Ingenious Mr. Care, Restoration Publicist (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2001)Google Scholar
Fortescue, Sir John, On the Laws and Governance of England, ed. Shelley Lockwood (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997)Google Scholar
Baker, J.H., “Personal Liberty under the Common Law of England,” in R.W. Davis, ed., The Origins of Modern Freedom in the West (Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1995), 178–202Google Scholar
White, Stephen D., Sir Edward Coke and the “Grievances of the Commonwealth,” 1621–1628 (Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 1979)Google Scholar
Pocock, J.G.A., The Ancient Constitution and the Feudal Law: A Study of English Historical Thought in the Seventeenth Century (1957; revised edition, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1987)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sommerville, J.P., Royalists and Patriots: Politics and Ideology in England, 1603–1640 (New York: Longman, 1999), 81–104Google Scholar
Cromartie, Alan, The Constitutionalist Revolution: An Essay on the History of England, 1450–1642 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Howard, A.E. Dick, The Road from Runnymede: Magna Carta and Constitutionalism in America (Charlottesville: University Press of Virginia, 1968)Google Scholar
Russell, Conrad, Unrevolutionary England (London: Hambledon Press, 1990)Google Scholar
Cogswell, Thomas, “Coping with Revisionism in Early Stuart History,” Journal of Modern History 62 (1990), 538–551CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burgess, Glenn, “On Revisionism: An Analysis of Early Stuart Historiography in the 1970s and 1980s,” Historical Journal 33 (1990), 609–627CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kenyon, J.P., “Revisionism and Post Revisionism in Early Stuart History,” Journal of Modern History 64 (1992), 686–699CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sommerville, Johann P., “English and European Political Ideas in the Seventeenth-Century: Revisionism and the Case of Absolutism,” Journal of British Studies 35 (1996), 168–194CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kishlansky, Mark, A Monarchy Transformed: Britain 1603–1714 (New York: Penguin, 1996), 113–133Google Scholar
Kenyon, John, The Civil Wars of England (London: Weidenfeld and Nicolson, 1988), 5–47Google Scholar
Marshall, John, “Some Intellectual Consequences of the English Revolution,” European Legacy 5 (2000), 515–530CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wootton, David, ed., From Divine Right to Democracy: An Anthology of Political Writing in Stuart England (New York: Penguin, 1986)Google Scholar
Judson, Margaret, The Crisis of the Constitution: An Essay in Constitutional and Political Thought in England, 1603–1645 (New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press, 1949)Google Scholar
Mendle, Michael, “Parliamentary Sovereignty: A Very English Absolutism,” in Nicholas Phillipson and Quentin Skinner, eds., Political Discourse in Early Modern Britain (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1993), 97–119Google Scholar
Weston, Corinne C. and Greenberg, Janelle R., Subjects and Sovereigns: The Grand Controversy over Legal Sovereignty in Stuart England (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1981)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weston, Corrine C., “Co-ordination – a Radicalising Principle in Stuart Politics,” in Margaret Jacob and James Jacob, eds., The Origins of Anglo-American Radicalism (Boston: George Allen & Unwin, 1984), 85–104Google Scholar
Pocock, J.G.A. and Schochet, Gordon, “Interregnum and Restoration,” in Pocock, J.G.A., Schochet, Gordon J., and Schwoerer, Lois G., eds., The Varieties of British Political Thought (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1993), 146–179Google Scholar
Harris, Tim, “The Leveller Legacy: From the Restoration to the Exclusion Crisis,” in Mendle, Michael, ed., The Putney Debates of 1647: The Army, the Levellers and the English State (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001), 219–240Google Scholar
Smith, Joseph, Appeals to the Privy Council from the American Plantations (New York: Columbia University Press, 1950), 464–522Google Scholar
Holdsworth, Sir William, A History of English Law, Volume IX (London: Methuen, 1926), 74–86Google Scholar
Price, Polly J., “Natural Law and Birthright Citizenship in Calvin's Case,” Yale Journal of Law and Humanities 73 (1997), 73–145Google Scholar
Pawlisch, Hans S., Sir John Davies and the Conquest of Ireland: A Study in Legal Imperialism (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1985)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brady, Ciaran and Ohlmeyer, Jane, eds., British Interventions in Early Modern Ireland (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005), 334–356CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Loughton, , “Calvin's Case and the Origins of the Rule Governing ‘Conquest’ in English Law,” Australian Journal of Legal History 8 (2004), 143–180 (quote at 145)Google Scholar
Madden, A.F., “1066, 1776 and All That: The Relevance of English Medieval Experience of Empire to Later Imperial Constitutional Issues,” in Flint, John E. and Williams, Glyndwr, eds., Perspectives of Empire: Essays Presented to Gerald S. Graham (London: Longman, 1973), 9–26Google Scholar
O'Melinn, Liam S., “The American Revolution and Constitutionalism in the Seventeenth-Century West Indies,” Columbia Law Review 95 (1995), 104–159CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Black, Barbara, “The Constitution of Empire: The Case for the Colonists,” University of Pennsylvania Law Review 124 (1976), 1157–1211CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hulsebosch, Daniel J., “Edward Coke and the Expanding Empire: Sir Edward Coke's British Jurisprudence,” Law and History Review 21 (2003), 439–482CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cromartie, Alan, Sir Mathew Hale, 1609–1676: Law, Religion, and Natural Philosophy (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hale, Mathew, The Prerogatives of the King, ed., D.E.C. Yale (London: Selden Society, 1976), 34–35Google Scholar
Chalmers, George, Opinions of Eminent Lawyers on Various Points of English Jurisprudence (Burlington: C. Goodrich, 1858), 207Google Scholar
Blackstone, William, Commentaries on the Laws of England, Volume I. Katz, Stanley N., ed. (1765; Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1979), 93Google Scholar
Lieberman, David, The Province of Legislation Determined: Legal Theory in Eighteenth-Century Britain (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1989)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tully, James, “Rediscovering America: The Two Treatises and Aboriginal Rights,” in his An Approach to Political Philosophy: Locke in Contexts (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1993), 137–176CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×