Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-25wd4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-27T05:06:05.988Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

8 - Analysis of Comparative Opinions

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2015

Bing Liu
Affiliation:
University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign
Get access

Summary

Apart from directly expressing positive or negative opinions about an entity and/or its aspects, one can also express opinions by comparing similar entities. Such opinions are called comparative opinions (Jindal and Liu, 2006a, 2006b). Comparative opinions have different semantic meanings than regular opinions and also different syntactic forms. For example, a typical regular opinion sentence is “The voice quality of this phone is amazing,” and a typical comparative opinion sentence is “The voice quality of Moto X is better than that of iPhone 5.” This comparative sentence does not say that any phone's voice quality is good or bad, but simply states a relative ordering in terms of voice quality of the two smart phones. Like regular sentences, comparative sentences can be opinionated or not-opinionated. The above comparative sentence is clearly opinionated because it explicitly expresses a comparative sentiment, while the sentence “Samsung Galaxy 4 is larger than iPhone 5” expresses no sentiment, at least not explicitly. In this chapter, we first define the problem of comparative opinion mining and then present some existing methods for solving the problem. We will study superlative opinions as well because their semantic meanings and handling methods are similar.

Problem Definition

A comparative sentence usually expresses a relation based on the similarities or differences of more than one entity. Linguists have studied comparatives in the English language for a long time. Lerner and Pinkal (1992) defined comparatives as universal quantifiers over degrees. For example, in the sentence “John is taller than he was,” the degree d is John's height and John is tall to degree d. In other words, comparatives are used to express explicit orderings between objects with respect to the degree or amount to which they possess some gradable property (Kennedy, 2005). Two broad types of comparatives are as follows:

  1. Metalinguistic comparatives. Compare the extent to which an entity has one property to a greater or lesser extent than another property, for example, “Ronaldo is angrier than upset.”

  2. […]

Type
Chapter
Information
Sentiment Analysis
Mining Opinions, Sentiments, and Emotions
, pp. 202 - 217
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2015

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Analysis of Comparative Opinions
  • Bing Liu, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign
  • Book: Sentiment Analysis
  • Online publication: 05 June 2015
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139084789.009
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Analysis of Comparative Opinions
  • Bing Liu, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign
  • Book: Sentiment Analysis
  • Online publication: 05 June 2015
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139084789.009
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Analysis of Comparative Opinions
  • Bing Liu, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign
  • Book: Sentiment Analysis
  • Online publication: 05 June 2015
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139084789.009
Available formats
×