Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-vvkck Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T13:34:35.918Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

3 - On the Hinges of History: For a Relational Legal Historiography

from Part I - Histories of the Legal Contemporary

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 December 2017

By
Maks Del Mar
Edited by
Justin Desautels-Stein  and
Christopher Tomlins
Justin Desautels-Stein
Affiliation:
University of Colorado School of Law
Christopher Tomlins
Affiliation:
University of California, Berkeley School of Law
Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Searching for Contemporary Legal Thought , pp. 61 - 79
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2017

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Works Cited – Chapter 3

Ahdieh, Robert 2004. “Between dialogue and decree: international review of national courts,” New York University Law Review 79: 2029–163.Google Scholar
Bell, Christine 2008. On the Law of Peace. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Berman, Paul Schiff 2012. Global Legal Pluralism: A Jurisprudence of Law beyond Borders. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berman, Paul Schiff 2014. “Ruth Bader Ginsburg and the interaction of legal systems,” in Dodson, (ed.), pp. 151–71.Google Scholar
Boele-Woelki, Katharina and Grosheide, Willem (eds.) 2007. The Future of European Contract Law: Essays in Honour of Ewoud Hondius. Alphen aan den Rijn: Wolters Kluwer.Google Scholar
Born, Georgina 2010. “On Tardean relations: temporality and ethnography,” in Candea, (ed.), pp. 232–49.Google Scholar
Candea, Matei (ed.) 2010. The Social after Gabriel Tarde. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cotterrell, Roger and Del Mar, Maksymilian (eds.) 2016. Authority in Transnational Legal Theory. Edward Elgar.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cover, Robert and Aleinikoff, T. Alexander 1977. “Dialectical federalism: habeas corpus and the court,” Yale Law Journal 86: 1035–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Darwall, Stephen 2006. The Second-Person Standpoint. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Del Mar, Maksymilian 2015. “Legal fictions and legal change in the common law tradition,” in Del Mar, and Twining, (eds.), pp. 225–54.Google Scholar
Del Mar, Maksymilian 2016. “Imaginaries of authority: towards an archaeology of disagreement,” in Cotterrell, and Del Mar, (eds.), pp. 220–50.Google Scholar
Del Mar, Maksymilian, and Lobban, Michael (eds.) 2016. Law in Theory and History: New Essays on a Neglected Dialogue. Oxford: Hart Publishing.Google Scholar
Del Mar, Maksymilian and Twining, William (eds.) 2015. Legal Fictions in Theory and Practice. Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
Delmas-Marty, Mireille 2002. Towards a Truly Common Law: Europe as a Laboratory for Legal Pluralism. Norberg, N. (transl.) Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Dodson, Scott (ed.) 2014. The Legacy of Ruth Bader Ginsburg. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Eisenberg, Mervin 1988. The Nature of the Common Law. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Fleming, John (ed.) 2014. Nomos LV: Federalism and Subsidiarity. New York University Press.Google Scholar
Glenn, Patrick 1987. “Persuasive authority,” McGill Law Journal 31: 261–99.Google Scholar
Glenn, Patrick 2005. On Common Laws. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Glenn, Patrick 2007. “Multivalent logic and the Rome Convention,” in Boele-Woelki and Grosheide (eds.), pp. 283–290.Google Scholar
Glenn, Patrick 2013. The Cosmopolitan State. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Glenn, Patrick 2014. “Transnational legal thought: Plato, Europe and beyond,” in Maduro, , Tuori, , and Sankari, (eds.), pp. 61–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gurevitch, Zali 1988. “The other side of dialogue: on making the other strange and the experience of otherness,” American Journal of Sociology 93: 1179–99.Google Scholar
Hogan, Patrick Colm 2014. “Intertextuality and allusion,” in Stockwell, and Whiteley, (eds.), pp. 117–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krisch, Nico 2010. Beyond Constitutionalism: The Pluralist Structure of Postnational Law. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
MacCormick, Neil 2005. Rhetoric and the Rule of Law. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Maduro, Miguel, Tuori, Kaarlo, and Sankari, Suvi (eds.) 2014. Transnational Law: Rethinking European Law and Legal Thinking. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Priest, Graham 2006. In Contradiction. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Resnik, Judith 2014. “Federalism(s)'s forms and norms: contesting rights, de-essentializing jurisdictional divides, and temporizing accommodations,” in Fleming, (ed.), pp. 363–436.Google Scholar
Stockwell, Peter and Whiteley, Sara (eds.) 2014. The Cambridge Handbook of Stylistics. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Strathern, Margaret 2005. Kinship, Law, and the Unexpected: Relatives Are Always a Surprise. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tomlins, Christopher 2016. “Historicism and materiality in legal theory,” in Del Mar, and Lobban, (eds.), pp. 57–83.Google Scholar
Toulmin, Stephen 2003. The Uses of Argument. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walker, Neil 2015. Intimations of Global Law. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Cases Cited – Chapter 3

Barker v Corus UK Ltd [2006]2 AC 572.Google Scholar
Durham v BAI (Run-Off) Ltd [“The Trigger Litigation”] [2012]1 WLR 867.Google Scholar
Fairchild v Glenhaven Funeral Services Ltd and Others [2002]3 WLR 89.Google Scholar
McGhee v National Coal Board [1972]3 All ER 1008.Google Scholar
Sienkiewicz v Grief (UK) Ltd [2011]UKSC 10.Google Scholar
White & Carter v McGregor [1961]3 All ER 1178.Google Scholar
Zurich Insurance PLC UK Branch v International Energy Group Limited [2015] UKSC 33.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×