Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-t5pn6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-23T20:32:52.011Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

13 - A Cultural Reluctance to Rights

from Part II - Images of the Legal Contemporary?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 December 2017

By
Louis Assier-Andrieu
Edited by
Justin Desautels-Stein  and
Christopher Tomlins
Justin Desautels-Stein
Affiliation:
University of Colorado School of Law
Christopher Tomlins
Affiliation:
University of California, Berkeley School of Law
Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Searching for Contemporary Legal Thought , pp. 256 - 274
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2017

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Works Cited – Chapter 13

Assier-Andrieu, Louis 2015a. “Brève théorie culturelle du droit,” in Dedek, and Van Praagh, (eds.), pp. 83–103.Google Scholar
Assier-Andrieu, Louis (ed.) 2015b. L'Indépendance des Avocats: Le Long Chemin d'une Liberté. Paris: Dalloz.Google Scholar
Baxi, Upendra 2012. The Future of Human Rights, Oxford India Perennials.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, Pierre 1986. “La force du droit. Éléments pour une sociologie du champ juridique,” Actes de la recherche en sciences sociales 4: 3–19.Google Scholar
Cardozo, Benjamin Nathan 1921. The Nature of the Judicial Process. Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Coke, Edward [1628] 1832. The First Part of the Institutes of the Laws of England. London: J. & W.T. Clarke (19th edition).Google Scholar
Cohen, Felix 1935. “Transcendental nonsense and the functional approach,” Columbia Law Review 35: 809–49.Google Scholar
Cowan, Jane K., Dembour, Marie-Bénédicte, and Wilson, Richard A. (eds.) 2001. Culture and Rights: Anthropological Perspectives. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Dedek, Helge 2015. “De iure hominis et homunculi: rights, Tristram Shandy, and the language of isolation,” in Gephart, and Suntrup, (eds.), pp. 59–78.Google Scholar
Dedek, Helge and Van Praagh, Shauna (eds.) 2015. Stateless Law. Evolving Boundaries of a Discipline. Farnham, UK: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Foblets, Marie-Claire and Renteln, Alison Dundes (eds.) Multicultural Jurisprudence: Comparative Perspectives on the Cultural Defense. Oxford: Hart.Google Scholar
Freeman, Michael D. A. (ed.) 2006. Law and Sociology. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Friedman, Lawrence M. 1969. “Legal culture and social development,” Law and Society Review 4: 29–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Friedman, Lawrence M. 2006. “The place of legal culture in the sociology of law,” in Freeman, (ed.), pp. 185–99.Google Scholar
Friedman, Lawrence M. 2011. The Human Rights Culture: A Study in History and Context. New Orleans: Quid Pro Books.Google Scholar
Fuller, Lon L. 1934. “American legal realism,” University of Pennsylvania Law Review 32: 429–62.Google Scholar
Geertz, Clifford 1983. “Fact and law in comparative perspective,” in Geertz, Clifford, Local Knowledge: Further Essays in Interpretive Anthropology. New York: Basic Books, pp. 167–234.Google Scholar
Gephart, Werner and Suntrup, Jan Christoph (eds.) 2015. Rechtanalyse als Kulturforschung II. Frankfurt: Verlag Vittorio Klostermann.Google Scholar
Glenn, H. Patrick 2004. “Legal cultures and legal traditions,” in Van Hoecke, (ed.), pp. 7–20.Google Scholar
Glenn, H. Patrick 2010. Legal Traditions of the World. Sustainable Diversity in Law (4th edition). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Holder, Cindy and Reidy, David (eds.) 2013. Human Rights. The Hard Questions. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holmes, Oliver Wendell 1881. The Common Law. Little, Brown and Co.Google Scholar
Kairys, David (ed.) 1982. The Politics of Law: A Progressive Critique. New York: Pantheon Books.Google Scholar
Kantorowicz, Hermann 1934. “Some rationalism about realism,” Yale Law Journal 43: 1240–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kennedy, Duncan 1982. “Legal education as training for hierarchy,” in Kairys, (ed.), pp. 40–63.Google Scholar
Kennedy, Duncan 2006 [1975]. The Rise and Fall of Classical Legal Thought. Beard Books.Google Scholar
Kennedy, Duncan 2006. “Three globalizations of law and legal thought 1850–2000,” in Trubek, and Santos, (eds.), pp. 19–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kroeber, Alfred L. and Kluckohn, Clyde 1952. Culture: A Critical Review of Concepts and Definitions. Cambridge, MA: Peabody Museum of Archeology and Ethnology Papers, 47, 1.Google Scholar
Leonard, Jerry D. (ed.) 1995. Legal Studies as Cultural Studies: A Reader in (Post) Modern Critical Theory. Albany: The State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Llewellyn, Karl N. 1930–1931. “Some realism about realism – response to Dean Pound,” Harvard Law Review 44: 1222–64.Google Scholar
Llewellyn, Karl N. 1960. The Common Law Tradition – Deciding Appeals. Little, Brown and Co.Google Scholar
Llewellyn, Karl N. and Hoebel, E. Adamson 1941. The Cheyenne Way. Conflict and Case Law in Primitive Jurisprudence. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press.Google Scholar
Marx, Karl 1975. “Proceedings of the third Rhine province assembly: debates on the law of the theft of wood [1842],” in Karl Marx and Frederick Engels Collected Works. New York: International Publishers.Google Scholar
Marx, Karl 1978. “On the Jewish Question” [1843], in Tucker, (ed.), pp. 26–46.Google Scholar
Merry, Sally E. 2001. “Changing Rights, Changing Culture,” in Cowan, , Dembour, , and Wilson, (eds.), pp. 31–55.Google Scholar
Mohawk, John 2010. Thinking in Indian: A John Mohawk Reader. Golden, CO: Fulcrum Publishing.Google Scholar
Moyn, Samuel 2010. The Last Utopia. Human Rights in History. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Moyn, Samuel 2014. Human Rights and the Uses of History. New York: Verso.Google Scholar
O'Cinneide, Colm 2009. “‘A million mutinies now’: why claims of cultural uniqueness cannot be used to justify violation of basic human rights,” in Oliver, (ed.), pp. 131–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oliver, Dawn (ed.) 2009. Justice, Legality and the Rule of Law. Lessons from the Pitcairn Prosecutions. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Renteln, Alison Dundes 2009. “The use and abuse of cultural defense,” in Foblets, and Renteln, (eds.), pp. 61–82.Google Scholar
Renteln, Alison Dundes 2013. “The significance of cultural differences for human rights,” in Holder, and Reidy, (eds.), pp. 79–99.Google Scholar
Savigny, Friedrich Carl von 1831. Of the Vocation of Our Age for Legislation and Jurisprudence [1814]. Hayward, Abraham (ed.). London: Littlewood and Co.Google Scholar
Schiavone, Aldo 2012. The Invention of Law in the West. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Schlag, Pierre 2003. “The aesthetics of American law,” Harvard Law Review 115: 1049–118.Google Scholar
Schlag, Pierre 2015. “L'autonomie des avocats: une conception problématique parmi des développements démoralisants,” in Assier-Andrieu, (ed.), pp. 103–14.Google Scholar
Smith, Adam 1987. An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations, [1776]. London: Penguin Classics.Google Scholar
Spivak, Gayatri 1995. “Constitutions and culture studies,” in Leonard, (ed.), pp. 155–74.Google Scholar
Stelmach, Jerzy, Brozek, Bartosz, and Hohol, Mateusz (eds.) 2013. The Many Faces of Normativity. Kraków: Copernicus Center Press.Google Scholar
Trubek, David M. and Santos, Alvaro (eds.) 2006. The New Law and Social Development: A Critical Appraisal. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Tucker, Robert C. (ed.) 1978. The Marx-Engels Reader. New York: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar
Tylor, Edward Burnett 2012. Primitive Culture. Researches into the Development of Mythology, Philosophy, Religion, Art, and Custom, [1871]. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Unger, Roberto Mangabeira 1976. Law in Modern Society. Toward a Criticism of Social Theory. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
Van Hoecke, Mark (ed.) 2004. Epistemology and Methodology of Comparative Law. Oxford: Hart.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×