Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-r6qrq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T06:07:37.582Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

References

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 May 2018

Kent D. Messer
Affiliation:
University of Delaware
William L. Allen III
Affiliation:
The Conservation Fund, North Carolina
Get access
Type
Chapter
Information
The Science of Strategic Conservation
Protecting More with Less
, pp. 301 - 325
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2018

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Primary Sources

Allen, W. L., Amundsen, O. M., Dujmoviċ, J., and Messer, K. D.. 2011. Identifying and selecting strategic mitigation opportunities: criteria design and project evaluation using Logic Scoring of Preference and optimization. Journal of Conservation Planning 7: 6168.Google Scholar
Armsworth, P. R., Kendall, B. E., and Davis, F. W.. 2004. An introduction to biodiversity concepts for environmental economists. Resource and Energy Economics 26: 115136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Banzhaf, H. S. 2010. Economics at the fringe: non-market valuation studies and their role in land use plans in the United States. Journal of Environmental Management 91: 592602.Google Scholar
Diamond, H. L., and Noonan, P. F.. 1996. Land Use in America. Washington, DC: Island Press.Google Scholar
Duke, J. M., Dundas, S. J., and Messer, K. D.. 2013. Cost-effective conservation planning: Lessons from economics. Journal of Environmental Management 125: 126133.Google Scholar
Dujmović, J. 2018. Soft Computing Evaluation Logic: The LSP Decision Method and Its Applications. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ehrlich, P. R. 1968. The Population Bomb. New York: Ballantine Books.Google Scholar
Ferraro, P. J., and Pattanayak, S. K.. 2006. Money for nothing? A call for empirical evaluation of biodiversity conservation investments. PLoS Biology 4(4): e105.Google Scholar
Grand, L., Messer, K. D., and Allen, W.. 2017. Understanding and overcoming the barriers for cost-effective conservation. Ecological Economics 138: 139144.Google Scholar
Kreuter, M. W., De Rosa, C., Howze, E. H., and Baldwin, G. T.. 2004. Understanding wicked problems: A key to advancing environmental health promotion. Health Education & Behavior 31(4): 441454.Google Scholar
Lewis, M. 2004. Moneyball: The Art of Winning an Unfair Game. New York: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar
McCarthy, D. P., Donald, P. F., Scharlemann, J. P., Buchanan, G. M., Balmford, A., Green, J. M., Bennun, L. A., Burgess, N. D., Fishpool, L. D., Garnett, S. T., and Leonard, D. L.. 2012. Financial costs of meeting global biodiversity conservation targets: current spending and unmet needs. Science 338(6109): 946949.Google Scholar
McHarg, I. 1969. Design with Nature. Garden City, NY: Natural History Press.Google Scholar
Messer, K. D. 2006. The conservation benefits of land acquisition: a case study in Maryland. Journal of Environmental Management 79: 305315.Google Scholar
Messer, K. D., and Allen, W. L.. 2010. Applying optimization and the analytic hierarchy process to enhance agricultural preservation strategies in the state of Delaware. Agricultural and Resource Economics Review 39(3): 442456.Google Scholar
Messer, K. D., Allen, W., Kecinski, M., and Chen, C.. 2016. Agricultural preservation professionals' perception and attitudes about cost-effective land selection methods. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 71(2): 148155.Google Scholar
National Commission on the Environment. 1993. Choosing a Sustainable Future. Washington, DC: Island Press.Google Scholar
Prendergast, J. R., Quinn, R. M., and Lawton, J. H.. 1999. The gaps between theory and practice in selecting nature reserves. Conservation Biology 13: 484492.Google Scholar
Redford, K. H., Adams, W., and Mace, G. M.. 2013. Synthetic biology and conservation of nature: wicked problems and wicked solutions. PLoS Biology 11(4): e1001530.Google Scholar
US Environmental Protection Agency. 2016. FY 2017 EPA budget in brief. www.epa.gov/sites/production/files/2016–02/documents/fy17-budget-in-brief.pdf, accessed May 2, 2017.Google Scholar
US Fish and Wildlife Services. 2014. Federal and state endangered and threatened species expenditures. www.fws.gov/endangered/esa-library/pdf/20160302_final_FY14_ExpRpt.pdf, accessed May 2, 2017.Google Scholar

Secondary Sources

Aldrich, R., and Wyerman, J.. 2006. Land Trust Alliance 2005 Census. Washington, DC: Land Trust Alliance.Google Scholar
Ando, A., Camm, J., Polasky, S., and Solow, A.. 1998. Species distributions, land values, and efficient conservation. Science 279: 21262128.Google Scholar
Arnold, M., Duke, J. M., and Messer, K. D.. 2013. Adverse selection in reverse auctions for environmental services. Land Economics 89(3): 387412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Babcock, B. A., Lakshminarayan, P. G., Wu, J., and Zilberman, D.. 1997. Targeting tools for the purchase of environmental amenities. Land Economics 73(3): 325339.Google Scholar
Duke, J. M., Dundas, S. J., Johnston, R. J., and Messer, K. D.. 2014. Prioritizing payment for environmental services: using nonmarket benefits and costs for optimal selection. Ecological Economics 105: 319329.Google Scholar
European Union Directorate-General for Agriculture and Rural Development. 2009. Rural Development in the European Union: Statistical and Economic Information Report 2009. Brussels: European Union.Google Scholar
Ferraro, P. J. 2003. Assigning priority to environmental policy interventions in a heterogeneous world. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 22: 2743.Google Scholar
Fooks, J. R., and Messer, K. D.. 2012. Maximizing conservation and in-kind cost share: applying goal programming to forest protection. Forest Economics 18: 207217.Google Scholar
Fooks, J. R., and Messer, K. D.. 2013. Mathematical programming applications to land conservation and environmental quality. In Computational Intelligent Data Analysis for Sustainable Development. Yu, T., Chawla, N., and Simoff, S., editors. Boca Raton, FL: CRC/Taylor and Francis.Google Scholar
Gole, C., Burton, M., Williams, K. J., Clayton, H., Faith, D. P., White, B., Huggett, A., and Margules, C.. 2005. Auction for landscape recovery: final report. Sydney: WWF-Australia.Google Scholar
Langpap, C., and Kerkvilet, J.. 2010. Allocating conservation resources under the Endangered Species Act. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 92: 110124.Google Scholar
Lerner, J., Mackey, J., and Casey, F.. 2007. What's in Noah's wallet? Land conservation spending in the United States. BioScience 57(5): 419423.Google Scholar
Messer, K. D., and Allen, W. L.. 2010. Applying optimization and the analytic hierarchy process to enhance agricultural preservation strategies in the state of Delaware. Agricultural and Resource Economics Review 39(3): 442456.Google Scholar
Messer, K. D., Allen, W., Kecinski, M., and Chen, C.. 2016. Agricultural preservation professionals’ perception and attitudes about cost-effective land selection methods. Journal of Soil & Water Conservation 71(2): 148155. doi:10.2489/jswc.71.2.148.Google Scholar
Messer, K. D., and Borchers, A.. 2015. Choice for goods under threat of destruction. Economic Letters 135: 137140. doi:10.1016/j.econlet.2015.07.026.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
National Park Services. 2016. NPS Statistical Abstract. https://irma.nps.gov/Stats/Reports/AbstractsAndForecasts, accessed May 5, 2017.Google Scholar
National Sustainable Agriculture Coalition. 2016. Conservation Reserve Program: taking environmentally sensitive land out of production and establishing long-term ground cover. http://sustainableagriculture.net/publications/grassrootsguide/conservation-environment/conservation-reserve-program/, accessed on May 23, 2017.Google Scholar
Polasky, S., Camm, J. D., and Garber-Yonts, B.. 2001. Selecting biological reserves cost-effectively: an application to terrestrial vertebrate conservation in Oregon. Land Economics 77: 6878.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ribaudo, M. O. 1986. Consideration of offsite impacts in targeting soil conservation programs. Land Economics 62(4): 402411.Google Scholar
Stoneham, G., Chaudhri, V., Ha, A., and Strappazzon, L. 2003. Auctions for conservation contracts: an empirical examination of Victoria's BushTender trial. Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics 47(4): 477500.Google Scholar
UNEP-WCMC. 2016. Global statistics from the World Database on Protected Areas (WDPA). www.protectedplanet.net/country/USA, accessed September 20, 2017.Google Scholar
US Department of Agriculture. 2009. Projected spending under the 2014 Farm Bill. www.ers.usda.gov/topics/farm-economy/farm-commodity-policy/projected-spending-under-the-2014-farm-bill/, accessed September 20, 2017.Google Scholar
Wiest, W. A., Shriver, W. G., and Messer, K. D.. 2014. Incorporating climate change with conservation planning: A case study for tidal marsh bird conservation in Delaware, USA. Journal of Conservation Planning 10: 2542.Google Scholar
Wilson, K. A., Carwardine, J., and Possingham, H. P.. 2009. Setting conservation priorities. The Year in Ecology and Conservation Biology 1162: 237264.Google Scholar
Wu, J. 2004. Using sciences to improve the economic efficiency of conservation policies. Agricultural and Resource Economics Review 33: 1823.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wu, J., Zilberman, D., and Babcock, B. A.. 2001. Environmental and distributional impacts of conservation targeting strategies. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 41: 333350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Xu, J., Tao, R., Xu, Z., and Bennett, M. T.. 2010. China's sloping land conversion program: does expansion equal success? Land Economics 86(2): 219244.Google Scholar
Allen, W. L., and Messer, K. D.. 2009. Optimizing project selection for the U.S. Army Compatible Use Buffer Program. Prepared for the US Army Environmental Center, Aberdeen Proving Ground, MD. McLean, VA: LMI Government Consulting.Google Scholar
Amundsen, O. M. 2004. Implementing strategic conservation: Establishing criteria. Exchange 25(3).Google Scholar
Ando, A., Camm, J., Polasky, S., and Solow, A.. 1998. Species distributions, land values, and efficient conservation. Science 279: 21262128.Google Scholar
Arponen, A., Cabeza, M., Eklund, J., Kujala, H., and Lehtomaki, J.. 2010. Costs of integrating economics and conservation planning. Conservation Biology 24: 11981204.Google Scholar
Azzaino, Z., Conrad, J. M., and Ferraro, P. J.. 2002. Optimizing the riparian buffer: Harold Brook in the Skaneateles Lake Watershed, New York. Land Economics 78(4): 501514.Google Scholar
Babcock, B. A., Lakshminarayan, P. G., Wu, J., and Zilberman, D.. 1996. The economics of a public fund for environmental amenities: a study of CRP contracts. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 78: 961971.Google Scholar
Babcock, B. A., Lakshminarayan, P. G., Wu, J., and Zilberman, D.. 1997. Targeting tools for the purchase of environmental amenities. Land Economics 73: 325339.Google Scholar
Cherry, A. 2016a. Farmers cry foul over New Castle County farmland deal. WDEL, August 2. www.wdel.com/news/farmers-cry-foul-over-new-castle-county-farmland-deal/article_eed7218d-fb3b-5fde-8d6d-0c874c86c571.html, accessed January 6, 2017.Google Scholar
Cherry, A. 2016b. Del. farmers alarmed at proposed farm preservation deal. Lancaster Farming, August 12. www.lancasterfarming.com/news/southern_edition/del-farmers-alarmed-at-proposed-farm-preservation-deal/article_fdc29944-b38b-50f9-8c48-140904dd3085.html, accessed January 6, 2017.Google Scholar
Cherry, A. 2017. A better deal for Delaware taxpayers: farmland preservation at a fraction of the cost. www.wdel.com/news/video-a-better-deal-for-delaware-taxpayers-farmland-preservation-at/article_44731214-4d55-11e7-9c33-63ba1a703573.html, accessed June 15, 2017.Google Scholar
Duke, J. M., Dundas, S. J., and Messer, K. D.. 2013. Cost-effective conservation planning: lessons from economics. Journal of Environmental Management 125: 126133.Google Scholar
Ferraro, P. J. 2003. Assigning priority to environmental policy interventions in a heterogeneous world. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 22: 2743.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferraro, P., Messer, K. D., and Wu, S.. 2017. Applying behavioral insights to improve water security. Choices 32(4): 16.Google Scholar
Fooks, J. R., and Messer, K. D.. 2013. Mathematical programming applications to land conservation and environmental quality. In Computational Intelligent Data Analysis for Sustainable Development. Yu, T., Chawla, N., and Simoff, S., editors. Boca Raton, FL: CRC/Taylor and Francis.Google Scholar
Gowdy, J., Hall, C., Klitgaard, K., and Krall, L.. 2010. What every conservation biologist should know about economic theory. Conservation Biology 24: 14401447.Google Scholar
Grand, L., Messer, K. D., and Allen, W.. 2017. Understanding and overcoming the barriers for cost-effective conservation. Ecological Economics 138: 139144.Google Scholar
Messer, K. D. 2006. The conservation benefits of land acquisition: a case study in Maryland. Journal of Environmental Management 79: 305315.Google Scholar
Messer, K. D., and Allen, W. L.. 2010. Applying optimization and the analytic hierarchy process to enhance agricultural preservation strategies in the state of Delaware. Agricultural and Resource Economics Review 39(3): 442456.Google Scholar
Messer, K. D., Allen, W., Kecinski, M., and Chen, C.. 2016a. Agricultural preservation professionals’ perception and attitudes about cost-effective land selection methods. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 71(2): 148155. doi:10.2489/jswc.71.2.148.Google Scholar
Naidoo, R., Balmford, A., Ferraro, P. J., Polasky, S., Ricketts, T. H., and Rouget, M.. 2006. Integrating economic costs into conservation planning. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 21: 681687.Google Scholar
Newburn, D., Reed, S., Berck, P., and Merenlender, A.. 2005. Economics and land-use change in prioritizing private land conservation. Conservation Biology 19: 14111420.Google Scholar
Odling-Smee, L. 2005. Conservation: dollars and sense. Nature 437: 614616.Google Scholar
Olmsted, F. L. 1868. Address to [the] Prospect Park Scientific Association [May 1868]. The Papers of Frederick Law Olmsted, Supplementary Series 1: 147157.Google Scholar
Pease, J. R., and Coughlin, R. E.. 1996. Land Evaluation and Site Assessment: A Guidebook for Rating Agricultural Lands. Ankeny, IA: Soil and Water Conservation Society.Google Scholar
Polasky, S., Camm, J. D., and Garber-Yonts, B.. 2001. Selecting biological reserves cost-effectively: an application to terrestrial vertebrate conservation in Oregon. Land Economics 77: 6878.Google Scholar
Ribaudo, M. O. 1986. Consideration of offsite impacts in targeting soil conservation programs. Land Economics 62(4): 402411.Google Scholar
Smith, K. R. 2006. Public payments for environmental services from agriculture: precedents and possibilities. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 88: 11671173.Google Scholar
Szczygiel, B., and Hewitt, R.. 2000. Nineteenth-century medical landscapes: John H. Rauch, Frederick Law Olmsted, and the search for salubrity. Bulletin of the History of Medicine 74(4): 708734.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, K. A., McBride, M. F., Bode, M., and Possingham, H. P.. 2006. Prioritizing global conservation efforts. Nature 440(7082): 337340.Google Scholar
Wilson, X. 2017. NCCo farmland deal a departure from controversy. The News Journal. www.delawareonline.com/story/news/2017/05/30/county-preserves-farm-through-state-departure-previous-administration/355502001/, accessed June 6, 2017.Google Scholar
Wu, J., Zilberman, D., and Babcock, B. A.. 2001. Environmental and distributional impacts of conservation targeting strategies. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 41: 333350.Google Scholar
Ando, A., Camm, J., Polasky, S., and Solow, A.. 1998. Species distributions, land values, and efficient conservation. Science 279: 21262128.Google Scholar
Arnold, M., Duke, J. M., and Messer, K. D.. 2013. Adverse selection in reverse auctions for environmental services. Land Economics 89(3): 387412.Google Scholar
Banerjee, S., De Vries, F. P., Hanley, N., and van Soest, D. P.. 2014. The impact of information provision on agglomeration bonus performance: an experimental study on local networks. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 96(4): 10091029.Google Scholar
Banerjee, S., Kwasnica, A. M., and Shortle, J. S.. 2012. Agglomeration bonus in small and large local networks: a laboratory examination of spatial coordination. Ecological Economics 84: 142152.Google Scholar
Cattaneo, A., Hellerstein, D., Nickerson, C., and Myers, C.. 2006. Balancing the Multiple Objectives of Conservation Programs. Publication no. 19. Washington, DC: USDA Economic Research Service.Google Scholar
Costello, C., and Polasky, S.. 2004. Dynamic reserve site selection. Resource and Energy Economics 26: 157174.Google Scholar
Drechsler, M., Watzold, F., Johst, K., and Shogren, J. F.. 2010. An agglomeration payment for cost-effective biodiversity conservation in spatially structured landscapes. Resource and Energy Economics 32: 261275.Google Scholar
Duke, J. D., Dundas, S. J., Johnston, R. J., and Messer, K. D.. 2014. Prioritizing payment for environmental services: using nonmarket benefits for optimal selection. Ecological Economics 105: 319329.Google Scholar
Duke, J. D., Dundas, S. J., Johnston, R. J., and Messer, K. D.. 2015. The effect of spatial interdependencies on prioritization and payments for environmental services. Land Use Policy 48: 341350.Google Scholar
Duke, J. M., Dundas, S. J., and Messer, K. D.. 2013. Cost-effective conservation planning: lessons from economics. Journal of Environmental Management 125: 126133.Google Scholar
Department of Agriculture's Bureau of Farmland Preservation. 2009. Farmland preservation in Pennsylvania. http://mapmaker2.millersville.edu/pamaps/FarmlandPreserv/#defs, accessed January 18, 2018.Google Scholar
Fooks, J. R., Higgins, N., Messer, K. D., Duke, J. M., Hellerstein, D., and Lynch, L.. 2016. Conserving spatially explicit benefits in ecosystem service markets: experimental tests of network bonuses and spatial targeting. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 98(2): 468488.Google Scholar
Fooks, J. R., and Messer, K. D.. 2013. Mathematical programming applications to land conservation and environmental quality. In Computational Intelligent Data Analysis for Sustainable Development. Yu, T., Chawla, N., and Simoff, S., editors. Boca Raton, FL: CRC/Taylor and Francis.Google Scholar
Fooks, J., Messer, K. D., and Duke, J.. 2015. Dynamic entry, reverse auctions, and the purchase of environmental services. Land Economics 91(1): 5775.Google Scholar
Fooks, J., Messer, K. D., and Kecinski, M.. 2017. A cautionary note on the use of benefit metrics for cost-effective conservation. Environmental and Resource Economics.Google Scholar
Gardner, B. D. 1977. The economics of agricultural land preservation. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 59: 10271036.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grove, J. M., Harlan, S. L., Kaye, J. P., and Knapp, A. K.. 2011. An integrated conceptual framework for long-term social–ecological research. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 9(6): 351357.Google Scholar
Hajkowicz, S., Collins, K., and Cattaneo, A.. 2009. Review of agri-environmental indexes and stewardship payments. Environmental Management 43: 221236.Google Scholar
Jayachandra, S. 2017. Using the Airbnb model to protect the environment. New York Times, December 29.Google Scholar
Kaiser, H. M., and Messer, K. D.. 2011. Mathematical Programming for Agricultural, Environmental and Resource Economics. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley.Google Scholar
Kirwan, B., Lubowski, R. N., and Roberts, M. J.. 2005. How cost-effective are land retirement auctions? Estimating the difference between payments and willingness to accept in the Conservation Reserve Program. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 87: 12391247.Google Scholar
LancasterOnline. 2017. Map: The price of farmland preservation in Pennsylvania, February, 2014. http://lancasteronline.com/news/local/map-the-price-of-farmland-preservation-in-pennsylvania/article_b20c60f8-9fea-11e3-8982-001a4bcf6878.html, accessed January 18, 2018.Google Scholar
Li, J., Michael, J., Duke, J., Messer, K. D., and Suter, J.. 2014. Behavioral response to contamination risk information in a spatially explicit groundwater environment: experimental evidence. Water Resources Research 50: 63906405.Google Scholar
Lynch, L. 2006. Critical mass: does the number of productive farmland acres or of farms affect farmland loss? In Economics and Contemporary Land Use Policy: Development and Conservation at the Rural-Urban Fringe. Johnson, Robert J. and Swallow, Stephen K., editors. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley.Google Scholar
Messer, K. D. 2006. The conservation benefits of cost-effective land acquisition: a case study in Maryland. Journal of Environmental Management 79: 305315.Google Scholar
Messer, K. D. 2007. Transferable development rights programs: an economic framework for success. Journal of Conservation Planning 3: 4753.Google Scholar
Messer, K. D., and Allen, W. L.. 2010. Applying optimization and the analytic hierarchy process to enhance agricultural preservation strategies in the state of Delaware. Agricultural and Resource Economics Review 39(3): 442456.Google Scholar
Messer, K. D., and Borchers, A.. 2015. Choice for goods under threat of destruction. Economic Letters 135: 137140. doi:10.1016/j.econlet.2015.07.026.Google Scholar
Messer, K. D., Kecinski, M., Tang, X., and Hirsch, R.. 2016. Applying multiple knapsack optimization to improve the cost effectiveness of land conservation. Land Economics 92(1): 117130.Google Scholar
Newburn, D., Reed, S., Berck, P., and Merenlender, A.. 2005. Economics and land-use change in prioritizing private land conservation. Conservation Biology 19: 14111420.Google Scholar
Parkhurst, G. M., and Shogren, J. F.. 2007. Spatial incentives to coordinate contiguous habitat. Ecological Economics 63: 344355.Google Scholar
Parkhurst, G. M., Shogren, J. F., Bastian, C., Kivi, P., Donner, J., and Smith, R. B. W.. 2002. Agglomeration bonus: an incentive mechanism to reunite fragmented habitat for biodiversity conservation. Ecological Economics 41: 305328.Google Scholar
Pruetz, R., and Standridge, N.. 2008. What makes transfer of development rights work? Success factors from research and practice. Journal of the American Planning Association 75(1): 7887.Google Scholar
Stoms, D. M., Jantz, P. A., Davis, F. W., and DeAngelo, G.. 2009. Strategic targeting of agricultural conservation easements as a growth management tool. Land Use Policy 26(4), 11491161.Google Scholar
Sullivan, P., et al. 2004. The Conservation Reserve Program: Economic Implications for Rural America. Agricultural Economic Report no. 834. Washington, DC: Economic Research Service.Google Scholar
Wu, J. 2004. Using sciences to improve the economic efficiency of conservation policies. Agricultural and Resource Economics Review 33: 1823.Google Scholar
Wu, J., Adams, R. M., and Boggess, W. G.. 2000. Cumulative effects and optimal targeting of conservation efforts: steelhead trout habitat enhancement in Oregon. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 82: 400413.Google Scholar
Wu, J., and Babcock, B. A.. 1996. Contract design for the purchase of environmental goods from agriculture. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 78: 935945.Google Scholar
Wu, J., and Skelton-Groth, K.. 2002. Targeting conservation efforts in the presence of threshold effects and ecosystem linkages. Ecological Economics 42: 313331.Google Scholar
Allen, W. L.. 2012. Advancing green infrastructure at all scales: from landscape to site. Environmental Practice 14(1): 1725.Google Scholar
Allen, W. L.. 2016. Strategic conservation planning really works: just ask Nashville. www.conservationfund.org/blog/1264-strategic-conservation-planning-really-works-just-ask-nashville, accessed February 20, 2017.Google Scholar
American Planning Association. 2016a. Greater Baltimore wilderness regional resilience green infrastructure local implementation toolkit. www.planning.org/nationalcenters/green/gbwc/, accessed February 20, 2017.Google Scholar
American Planning Association. 2016b. Supporting a regional green infrastructure network through local policy and action: best practices for using green infrastructure to enhance resilience to coastal storms and climate change. www.planning.org/nationalcenters/green/gbwc/, accessed February 20, 2017.Google Scholar
Benedict, M. A., and McMahon, E. T.. 2006. Green Infrastructure: Linking Landscapes and Communities. Washington, DC: Island Press.Google Scholar
Center for Neighborhood Technology and American Rivers. 2010. The Value of Green Infrastructure: A Guide to Recognizing Its Economic, Environmental and Social Benefits. Washington, DC: American Rivers.Google Scholar
Conservation Fund. 2008. Cecil County green infrastructure plan. www.conservationfund.org/images/projects/files/Green-Infrastructure-Plan-Cecil-County-Maryland-The-Conservation-Fund.pdf, accessed February 21, 2017.Google Scholar
Conservation Fund. 2011. Nashville open space plan: creating, enhancing and preserving the places that matter. www.conservationfund.org/projects/open-space-plan-for-nashville, accessed February 20, 2017.Google Scholar
Conservation Fund. 2012. R Chicago Wilderness Green Infrastructure Vision 2.1. https://datahub.cmap.illinois.gov/dataset/green-infrastructure-vision-2–2-giv-refinement/resource/511ba9c9–803d-47e9–87f5-d4cf41f56058, accessed August 7, 2017.Google Scholar
Conservation Fund. 2013. Houston-Galveston green infrastructure and ecosystem services assessment. www.conservationfund.org/images/projects/files/Houston_Galveston_Report.pdf, accessed February 21, 2017.Google Scholar
Conservation Fund. 2014. Houston-Galveston: green infrastructure and ecosystem services assessment. www.conservationfund.org/projects/green-infrastructure-plans-for-houston-galveston, accessed February 20, 2017.Google Scholar
Conservation Fund. 2015. Chicago Wilderness Green Infrastructure Vision 2.3: ecosystem service valuation. https://datahub.cmap.illinois.gov/dataset/green-infrastructure-vision-2–3-ecosystem-valuation, accessed August 7, 2017.Google Scholar
Conservation Fund and Lake County Forest Preserve District. 2016. Lake County green infrastructure strategy. www.conservationfund.org/projects/lake-county-green-infrastructure-strategy, accessed February 21, 2017.Google Scholar
Corridor Design. 2013. GIS tools for connectivity, corridor, or habitat modeling www.corridordesign.org/designing_corridors/resources/gis_tools, accessed August 7, 2017.Google Scholar
Ehrlich, P. R., and Mooney, H. A.. 1983. Extinction, substitution, and ecosystem services. BioScience 33(4): 248254.Google Scholar
Farber, S. C., Costanza, R., and Wilson, M. A.. 2002. Economic and ecological concepts for valuing ecosystem services. Ecological Economics 41: 375392.Google Scholar
Firehock, K. 2015. Strategic Green Infrastructure Planning: A Multi-Scale Approach. Washington, DC: Island Press.Google Scholar
Forman, R. T. T., and Godron, M.. 1986. Landscape Ecology. New York: John Wiley.Google Scholar
Galatowitsch, S., Frelich, L., and Philips-Mao, L.. 2009. Regional climate change adaptation strategies for biodiversity conservation in a midcontinental region of North America. Biological Conservation 142: 20122022.Google Scholar
Johnston, R. J., Boyle, K. J., Adamowicz, W., Bennett, J., Brouwer, R., Cameron, T. A., Hanemann, W. M., Hanley, N., Ryan, M., Scarpa, R., Tourangeau, R., and Vossler, C. A.. 2017. Contemporary guidance for stated preference studies. Journal of the Association of Environmental and Resource Economists 4(2): 319405.Google Scholar
Kaiser, E. J., Godschalk, D. R., and Chapin, F. S.. 1995. Urban Land Use Planning. 4th ed. Chicago: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
Lerner, J., and Allen, W. L.. 2012. Landscape scale green infrastructure investments as a climate adaptation: a case example for the Midwest United States. Environmental Practice 14(1): 4556.Google Scholar
Lindenmayer, D. B., and Nix, H. A.. 1993. Ecological principles for the design of wildlife corridors. Conservation Biology 7(3): 627630.Google Scholar
McDonald (King), L. A., Allen, W. L., Benedict, M. A., and O'Connor, K.. 2005. Green infrastructure plan evaluation frameworks. Journal of Conservation Planning 1: 625.Google Scholar
Millar, C. I., Stephenson, N. L., and Stephens, S. L.. 2007. Climate change and forest of the future: managing in the face of uncertainty. Ecological Applications 17(8): 21452151.Google Scholar
Natural Resources Conservation Service. N.d. LESA system design and uses. www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/portal/nrcs/detail/national/technical/nra/nri/?cid=stelprdb1043786, accessed August 7, 2017.Google Scholar
Nature Conservancy. 2016. Maryland Coastal Resiliency Assessment. Canick, M. R., Carlozo, N., and Foster, D., editors. Bethesda, MD: Nature Conservancy. http://dnr.maryland.gov/ccs/Documents/MARCH-2016_MDCoastalResiliencyAssessment.pdf, accessed August 7, 2017.Google Scholar
Olander, L., Polasky, S., Kagan, J., Johnston, R. J., Wainger, L., Saah, D., Maguire, L., Boyd, J., and Yoskowitz, D.. 2017. So you want your research to be relevant? Building the bridge between ecosystem services research and practice. Ecosystem Services 26(A): 170182.Google Scholar
Schwab, J. C., ed. 2009. Planning the Urban Forest: Ecology, Economy, and Community Development. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Theobald, D. M., Reed, S. E., Fields, K., and Soulé, M.. 2012. Connecting natural landscapes using a landscape permeability model to prioritize conservation activities in the United States. Conservation Letters 5: 123133.Google Scholar
Weber, T., Wolf, J., and Sloan, A.. 2006. Maryland's green infrastructure assessment: development of a comprehensive approach to land conservation. Landscape and Urban Planning 77: 94110.Google Scholar
Carr, M. H., and Zwick, P. D.. 2007. Smart land-use analysis: The LUCIS model. Redlands, CA: Esri Press.Google Scholar
Duke, J. M., and Hyde, R. A.. 2002. Identifying public preferences for land preservation using the analytic hierarchy process. Ecological Economics 42(1–2): 131145.Google Scholar
Esri. 2017. The geoprocessing framework – Help | ArcGIS Desktop. http://desktop.arcgis.com/en/arcmap/latest/analyze/main/geoprocessing-framework.htm, accessed August 7, 2017.Google Scholar
Expert Choice. 2017. www.expertchoice.com, accessed August 7, 2017.Google Scholar
Hajkowicz, S. A., McDonald, G. T., and Smith, P. N.. 2000. An evaluation of multiple objective decision support weighting techniques in natural resource management. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management 43(4): 505518.Google Scholar
Homer, C. G., Dewitz, J. A., Yang, L., et al. 2015. Completion of the 2011 National Land Cover Database for the conterminous United States – representing a decade of land cover change information. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing 81(5): 345354.Google Scholar
Manning, W. H. 1923. National plan study brief. Landscape Architecture 13(4): 3.Google Scholar
McHarg, I. 1967. Design with Nature. Garden City, NY: Natural History Press.Google Scholar
Messer, K. D., and Allen, W. L.. 2010. Applying optimization and the analytic hierarchy process to enhance agricultural preservation strategies in the state of Delaware. Agricultural and Resource Economics Review 39(3): 442456.Google Scholar
Nutt, P. C. 1980. Comparing methods for weighting decision criteria. Omega 8(2): 163172.Google Scholar
Saaty, T. L. 1982. Decision Making for Leaders: The Analytical Hierarchy Process for Decisions in a Complex World. Pittsburgh, PA: Lifetime Learning Publications.Google Scholar
Springer, C. 2016. The Conservation Fund helps energy company fuel collaborative results. www.conservationfund.org/blog/1457-the-conservation-fund-helps-energy-company-fuel-collaborative-results, accessed August 7, 2017.Google Scholar
Stevens, S. S. 1946. On the theory of scales of measurement. Science 103(2684): 677680.Google Scholar
Triantaphyllou, E. 2000. Multi-Criteria Decision Making Methods: A Comparative Study, Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer.Google Scholar
Trust for Public Land. 2006. The Upper Neuse Clean Water Initiative Conservation Plan. www.ctnc.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/10/final-conservation-plan.pdf, accessed August 7, 2017.Google Scholar
Upper Neuse Clean Water Initiative. 2015. https://issuu.com/rebeccahankins/docs/2015–2045_conservation_strategy, accessed August 7, 2017.Google Scholar
Walters, D. 2007. Designing Community, Charrettes, Master Plans and Form-Based Codes. Oxford, UK: Taylor and Francis.Google Scholar
Weistroffer, H. R., Smith, C. H., and Narula, S. C.. 2005. Multiple criteria decision support software. In Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis: State of the Art Surveys Series. Figueira, J., Greco, S., and Ehrgott, M., editors. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
Williams, . 2017. Atlantic Sunrise – about the project – overview. http://atlanticsunriseexpansion.com/about-the-project/overview, accessed August 7, 2017.Google Scholar
Allen, W. L., Amundsen, O. M., Dujmović, J. J. et al. 2011. Identifying and selecting strategic mitigation opportunities: criteria design and project evaluation using Logic Scoring of Preference and optimization. Journal of Conservation Planning 7: 6168.Google Scholar
Dujmović, J. J. 2007. Continuous preference logic for system evaluation. IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems 15(6): 10821099.Google Scholar
Dujmović, J. J. 2014. An analysis of penalty and reward for partial absorption aggregators. In Proceedings of the 2014 World Conference on Soft Computing, Berkeley, CA.Google Scholar
Dujmović, J. J. 2018. Soft Computing Evaluation Logic: The LSP Decision Method and Its Applications. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley.Google Scholar
Dujmović, J. J., and Larsen, H. L.. 2007. Generalized conjunction/disjunction. International Journal of Approximate Reasoning 46: 423446.Google Scholar
Dujmović, J. J., and Nagashima, H.. 2006. LSP method and its use for evaluation of Java IDE's. International Journal of Approximate Reasoning 41(1): 322.Google Scholar
Dujmović, J. J., and Scheer, D.. 2010. Logic aggregation of suitability maps. Paper presented at the IEEE International Conference on Fuzzy Systems, Barcelona.Google Scholar
Dujmović, J. J., Tré, G. D., and Van de Weghe, N.. 2010. LSP suitability maps. Soft Computing 14: 421434.Google Scholar
Gregory, R., Failing, L., Harstone, M., Long, G., McDaniels, T., and Ohlson, D.. 2012. Structured Decision Making: A Practical Guide to Environmental Management Choices. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley.Google Scholar
Hatch, K., Dragićević, S., and Dujmović, J.. 2014. Logic Scoring of Preference and spatial multicriteria evaluation for urban residential land use analysis. In International Conference on Geographic Information Science. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
Klir, G. J., and Yuan, B.. 1996. Fuzzy Sets, Fuzzy Logic, and Fuzzy Systems: Selected Papers by Lotfi A. Zadeh. Singapore: World Scientific.Google Scholar
Miller, G. A. 1956. The magical number seven, plus or minus two: some limits on our capacity for processing information. Psychological Review 63(2): 8197.Google Scholar
US Fish and Wildlife Service. 2008. Structured decision making fact sheet. www.fws.gov/science/doc/structured_decision_making_factsheet.pdf, accessed August 7, 2017.Google Scholar
US Fish and Wildlife Service. 2014. Region 3 Indiana bat resource equivalency analysis model for wind energy projects. Version 4. Unpublished.Google Scholar
US Fish and Wildlife Service. 2017. Midwest wind multi-species habitat conservation plan. www.fws.gov/Midwest/endangered/permits/hcp/r3wind/index.html, accessed August 7, 2017.Google Scholar
Zadeh, L. A. 1965. Fuzzy sets. Information and Control 8(3): 338353.Google Scholar
Abbitt, R. J., Scott, J. M., and Wilcove, D. S.. 2000. The geography of vulnerability: incorporating species geography and human development patterns into conservation planning. Biological Conservation 96(2): 169175.Google Scholar
Allen, W. L., Weber, T. C., and Hoellen, K. A.. 2010. Green infrastructure design and benefit-cost optimization in transportation planning: maximizing conservation and restoration opportunities in four southern Maryland watersheds. In A Sustainable Chesapeake: Better Models for Conservation. Burke, D. G. and Dunn, J. E., editors. Arlington, VA: The Conservation Fund.Google Scholar
Ando, A., Camm, J., Polasky, S., and Solow, A.. 1998. Species distributions, land values, and efficient conservation. Science 279: 21262128.Google Scholar
Babcock, B. A., Lakshminarayan, P. G., Wu, J., and Zilberman, D.. 1996. The economics of a public fund for environmental amenities: a study of CRP contracts. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 78: 961971.Google Scholar
Ballestero, E., Alarcón, S., and Garcı́a-Bernabeu, A.. 2002. Establishing politically feasible water markets: a multi-criteria approach. Journal of Environmental Management 65(4): 411429.Google Scholar
Balmford, A., Gaston, K. J., Rodrigues, A. S. L., and James, A.. 2000. Integrating costs of conservation into international priority setting. Conservation Biology 14: 567605.Google Scholar
Boice, L. P. 2014. Threatened and endangered species on DoD lands. www.dodnaturalresources.net/TES_fact_sheet_12-17-14.pdf, accessed July 2, 2017.Google Scholar
Center for Dirt and Gravel Road Studies. 2009. Better Roads, Cleaner Streams. www.dirtandgravel.psu.edu, accessed January 18, 2018.Google Scholar
Costello, C., and Polasky, S.. 2004. Dynamic reserve site selection. Resource and Energy Economics 26: 157174.Google Scholar
Douglas, B. C. 1991. Global sea level rise. Journal of Geophysical Research 96: 69816992.Google Scholar
Drynan, R. G., and Sandiford, F.. 1985. Incorporating economic objectives in goal programs for fishery management. Marine Resource Economics 2(2): 175195.Google Scholar
Duke, J. D., Dundas, S. J., Johnston, R. J., and Messer, K. D.. 2014. Prioritizing payment for environmental services: using nonmarket benefits for optimal selection. Ecological Economics 105: 319329.Google Scholar
Ferraro, P. J. 2003. Conservation contracting in heterogeneous landscapes: an application to watershed protection with threshold constraints. Agricultural and Resource Economics Review 32(1): 5364.Google Scholar
Fooks, J. R., and Messer, K. D.. 2012a. Maximizing conservation and in-kind cost share: applying goal programming to forest protection. Forest Economics 18: 207217.Google Scholar
Fooks, J. R., and Messer, K. D.. 2013. Mathematical programming applications to land conservation and environmental quality. In Computational Intelligent Data Analysis for Sustainable Development. Yu, T., Chawla, N., and Simoff, S., editors. Boca Raton, FL: CRC/Taylor and Francis.Google Scholar
Fooks, J., Messer, K. D., and Duke, J.. 2015. Dynamic entry, reverse auctions, and the purchase of environmental services. Land Economics 91(1): 5775.Google Scholar
Fooks, J., Messer, K. D., and Kecinski, M.. 2017. A cautionary note on the use of benefit metrics for cost-effective conservation. Environmental and Resource Economics.Google Scholar
Gjerdrum, C., Elphick, C. S., and Rubega, M.. 2005. Nest site selection and nesting success in saltmarsh breeding sparrows: the importance of nest habitat, timing, and study site differences. The Condor 107: 849862.Google Scholar
Gjerdrum, C., Sullivan-Wiley, K., King, E., Rubega, M. A., and Elphick, C. S.. 2008. Egg and chick fates during tidal flooding of saltmarsh sharp-tailed sparrow nests. The Condor 110: 579584.Google Scholar
Greenburg, R. 2006. Tidal marshes: home for the few and the highly selected. In Terrestrial Vertebrates of Tidal Marshes: Evolution, Ecology, and Conservation. Greenburg, R., Maldonado, J. E., Droege, S., and McDonald, M. V., editors. Camarillo, CA: Cooper Ornithological Society.Google Scholar
Higgins, A. J., and Hajkowicz, S.. 2008. A model for landscape planning under complex spatial conditions. Environmental Modeling and Assessment 13(4): 459471.Google Scholar
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. 2007. Climate Change 2007 – the Physical Science Basis: Contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment Report of the IPCC. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kaiser, H. M., and Messer, K. D.. 2011. Mathematical Programming for Agricultural, Environmental and Resource Economics. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley.Google Scholar
Lynch, L., and Musser, W. N.. 2001. A relative efficiency analysis of farmland preservation programs. Land Economics 77(4): 577594.Google Scholar
Machado, E. A., Stoms, D. M., Davis, F. W., and Kreitler, J.. 2006. Prioritizing farmland preservation cost-effectively for multiple objectives. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 61(5): 250258.Google Scholar
Mallawaarachchi, T., and Quiggin, J.. 2001. Modelling socially optimal land allocations for sugar cane growing in North Queensland: a linked mathematical programming and choice modelling study. Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics 45(3): 383409.Google Scholar
Mardle, S., and Pascoe, S.. 1999. A review of applications of multiple-criteria decision-making techniques to fisheries. Marine Resource Economics 14(1): 4163.Google Scholar
Mardle, S., Pascoe, S., Tamiz, M., and Jones, D.. 2000. Resource allocation in the North Sea demersal fisheries: a goal programming approach. Annals of Operations Research 94(1): 321342.Google Scholar
Maryland Department of Planning. 2014a. Demographic and Socio-economic Outlook. Baltimore: Maryland Department of Planning. http://planning.maryland.gov/MSDC/County/ stateMD.pdf, accessed March 20, 2014.Google Scholar
Maryland Department of Planning. 2014b. Farms and Farmland. Baltimore: Maryland Department of Planning. http://planning.maryland.gov/msdc/census_agriculture/Farm_Farmland/Table1_Farms2012.pdf, accessed May 6, 2014.Google Scholar
McSweeny, W. T., and Kramer, R. A.. 1986. The integration of farm programs for achieving soil conservation and nonpoint pollution control objectives. Land Economics 62(2): 159173.Google Scholar
Messer, K. D. 2006. The conservation benefits of cost-effective land acquisition: a case study in Maryland. Journal of Environmental Management 79: 305315.Google Scholar
Messer, K. D. (ed.). 2010. Achieving Cost Effective Conservation: ORES801 Case Studies of Applying Optimization to Wetland Mitigation from Highway Expansions in Maryland, Improving Water Quality from the Impact of Dirt and Gravel Roads in Pennsylvania, Increase Cost-Sharing for Forest Protection, and Preserving Agricultural Lands in Delaware and Baltimore County, Maryland. Food and Resource Economics Research Report no. RR10-01. Newark: University of Delaware.Google Scholar
Messer, K. D., Kecinski, M., Liu, Z., Korch, M. A., and Bounds, T.. 2016. Military readiness and environmental protection through cost-effective land conservation. Land Economics 92(3): 433449.Google Scholar
Messer, K. D., Kecinski, M., Tang, X., and Hirsch, R.. 2016. Applying multiple knapsack optimization to improve the cost effectiveness of land conservation. Land Economics 92(1): 117130.Google Scholar
Neely, W. P., North, R. M., and Fortson, J. C.. 1977. An operational approach to multiple objective decision making for public water resources projects using integer goal programming. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 59(1): 198203.Google Scholar
Newburn, D., Reed, S., Berck, P., and Merenlender, A.. 2005. Economics and land-use change in prioritizing private land conservation. Conservation Biology 19: 14111420.Google Scholar
Nijkamp, P. 1977. Theory and application of environmental economics. Studies in Regional Science and Urban Economics.Google Scholar
Önal, H. 1997. Trade-off between structural diversity and economic objectives in forest management. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 79(3): 10011012.Google Scholar
Rahmstorf, S. 2007. A semi-empirical approach to projecting future sea-level rise. Science 315: 368370.Google Scholar
REPI. 2014. 8th annual report to Congress. www.repi.mil/Portals/44/Documents/Reports_to_Congress/2014REPI%20RTC_030414_Final.pdf, accessed February 3, 2015.Google Scholar
REPI. 2015. Readiness and environmental protection integration. www.repi.mil/AboutREPI.aspx, accessed February 23, 2015.Google Scholar
Sarkar, S., et al. 2006. Biodiversity conservation planning tools: present status and challenges for the future. Annual Review of Environment and Resources 31: 123159.Google Scholar
Shriver, W. G., Vickery, P. D., Hodgman, T. P., and Gibbs, J. P.. 2007. Flood tides affect breeding ecology of two sympatric sharp-tailed sparrows. The Auk 124: 552560.Google Scholar
Silva, D., and Nakata, T.. 2009. Multi-objective assessment of rural electrification in remote areas with poverty considerations. Energy Policy 37(8): 30963108.Google Scholar
Stein, B. A., Scott, C., and Benton, N.. 2008. Federal lands and endangered species: the role of military and other federal lands in sustaining biodiversity. AIBS Bulletin 58(4): 339347.Google Scholar
Underhill, L. G. 1994. Optimal and Suboptimal Reserve Selection Algorithms. Biological Conservation 70(1): 8587.Google Scholar
US Department of Defense. 2015. Base Structure Report, Fiscal Year 2015 Baseline. Washington, DC: US Department of Defense. www.acq.osd.mil/eie/Downloads/BSI/Base%20Structure%20Report%20FY15.pdf, accessed July 2, 2017.Google Scholar
Weber, T. C., and Allen, W. L.. 2010. Beyond on-site mitigation: an integrated, multi-scale approach to environmental mitigation and stewardship for transportation projects. Landscape and Urban Planning 96: 240256.Google Scholar
Wiest, W., Shriver, G., and Messer, K. D.. 2014. Incorporating climate change with conservation planning: a case study for tidal marsh bird conservation in Delaware, USA. Journal of Conservation Planning 10: 2542.Google Scholar
Williams, J. C., and Snyder, S. A.. 2005. Restoring habitat corridors in fragmented landscapes using optimization and percolation models. Environmental Modeling and Assessment 10(3): 239250.Google Scholar
Wu, J. 2004. Using sciences to improve the economic efficiency of conservation policies. Agricultural and Resource Economics Review 33: 1823.Google Scholar
Wu, J., Zilberman, D., and Babcock, B. A.. 2001. Environmental and distributional impacts of conservation targeting strategies. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 41: 333350.Google Scholar
Allcott, H. 2011. Social norms and energy conservation. Journal of Public Economics 95(9): 10821095.Google Scholar
Allcott, H., and Mullainathan, S.. 2010. Behavior and energy policy. Science 327(5970): 12041205.Google Scholar
Allcott, H., and Rogers, T.. 2014. The short-run and long-run effects of behavioral interventions: Experimental evidence from energy conservation. The American Economic Review 104(10): 30033037.Google Scholar
American Farmland Trust. 1997. Farming on the Edge. Washington, DC: AFT.Google Scholar
Arnold, M., Duke, J. M., and Messer, K. D.. 2013. Adverse selection in reverse auctions for environmental services. Land Economics 89(3): 387412.Google Scholar
Bajari, P., and Hortacsu, A.. 2003. The winner's curse, reserve prices, and endogenous entry: empirical insights from eBay auctions. RAND Journal of Economics 34(2): 329355.Google Scholar
Banerjee, S., Shortle, J. S., and Kwasnica, A. M.. 2011. An iterative auction for spatially contiguous land management: an experimental analysis. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, Pittsburgh, PA.Google Scholar
Bernedo, M., Ferraro, P. J., and Price, M.. 2014. The persistent impacts of norm-based messaging and their implications for water conservation. Journal of Consumer Policy 37(3): 437452.Google Scholar
Butler, J., Fooks, J., Palm-Forster, L., and Messer, K.. 2017. How public information, mascots, and data graphics can help the environment: an experimental study related to nonpoint source pollution. Working paper.Google Scholar
Cason, T. N., and Gangadharan, L.. 2004. Auction design for voluntary conservation programs. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 86(5): 12111217.Google Scholar
Cason, T. N., Gangadharan, L., and Duke, C.. 2003. A laboratory study of auctions for reducing non-point source pollution. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 46(3): 446471.Google Scholar
Chestnut, L. G., and Mills, D. M.. 2005. A fresh look at the benefits and costs of the US acid rain program. Journal of Environmental Management 77(3): 252266.Google Scholar
Cialdini, R. B., Kallgren, C. A., and Reno, R. R.. 1991. A focus theory of normative conduct: a theoretical refinement and reevaluation of the role of norms in human behavior. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology 24: 201234.Google Scholar
CJC Consulting. 2004. Economic evaluation of the central Scotland forest and grampian challenge funds. Final report for Forest Commission Scotland.Google Scholar
Connor, J. D., Ward, J. R., and Bryan, B.. 2008. Exploring the cost effectiveness of land conservation auctions and payment policies. Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics 52(3): 303319.Google Scholar
Cowling, R. M. 2014. Let's get serious about human behavior and conservation. Conservation Letters 7(3): 147148.Google Scholar
Cramton, P., Shoham, Y., and Steinberg, R.. 2006. Combinatorial Auctions. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Cummings, R. G., Holt, C. A., and Laury, S. K.. 2004. Using laboratory experiments for policymaking: an example from the Georgia irrigation reduction auction. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 23(2): 341363.Google Scholar
Delaware Population Consortium. 2016. Annual population projections. http://stateplanning.delaware.gov/information/dpc/DPC2016v0.pdf, accessed on July 12, 2017.Google Scholar
Devetag, G. 2003. Coordination and information in critical mass games: an experimental study. Experimental Economics 6(1): 5373.Google Scholar
Duffy, J., and Feltovich, N.. 2002. Do actions speak louder than words? An experimental comparison of observation and cheap talk. Games and Economic Behavior 39(1): 127.Google Scholar
Duke, J., Messer, K. D., Lynch, L., and Li, T.. 2017. The effect of information on discriminatory-price and uniform-price reverse auction efficiency: An experimental economics study of the purchase of ecosystem services. Strategic Behavior and the Environment 7(1–2): 4171.Google Scholar
Environmental Protection Agency. 2006. Acid Rain Program, 2005 progress report. www.epa.gov/sites/production/files/2015-08/documents/2005report.pdf, accessed July 18, 2017.Google Scholar
Environmental Protection Agency. 2016. 2014 program progress – Clean Air Interstate Rule, Acid Rain Program, and former NOx Budget Trading Program. www3.epa.gov/airmarkets/progress/reports/index.html, accessed July 18, 2017.Google Scholar
Environmental Working Group. 2017. Conservation Reserve Program payments in the United States totaled $34.9 billion from 1995–2014. https://farm.ewg.org/progdetail.php?fips=00000&progcode=total_cr, accessed September 26, 2017.Google Scholar
Ferraro, P. J. 2008. Asymmetric information and contract design for payments for environmental services. Ecological Economics 65(4): 810821.Google Scholar
Ferraro, P., Messer, K. D., and Wu, S.. 2017. Applying behavioral insights to improve water security. Choices 32(4): 16.Google Scholar
Ferraro, P. J., and Price, M. K.. 2013. Using nonpecuniary strategies to influence behavior: evidence from a large-scale field experiment. Review of Economics and Statistics 95(1): 6473.Google Scholar
Festinger, L. 1954. A theory of social comparison processes. Human Relations 7(2): 117140.Google Scholar
Fooks, J. R., Higgins, N., Messer, K. D., Duke, J. M., Hellerstein, D., and Lynch, L.. 2016. Conserving spatially explicit benefits in ecosystem service markets: experimental tests of network bonuses and spatial targeting. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 98(2): 468488.Google Scholar
Fooks, J., Messer, K. D., and Duke, J.. 2015. Dynamic entry, reverse auctions, and the purchase of environmental services. Land Economics 91(1): 5775.Google Scholar
Garcia-Sierra, M., van den Bergh, J. C., and Miralles-Guasch, C.. 2015. Behavioural economics, travel behaviour and environmental-transport policy. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment 41: 288305.Google Scholar
Glebe, T. W. 2013. Conservation auctions: should information about environmental benefits be made public? American Journal of Agricultural Economics 95(3): 590605.Google Scholar
Goldstein, N. J., Cialdini, R. B., and Griskevicius, V.. 2008. A room with a viewpoint: using social norms to motivate environmental conservation in hotels. Journal of Consumer Research 35(3): 472482.Google Scholar
Gole, C., Burton, M., Williams, K. J., Clayton, H., Faith, D. P., White, B., Huggett, A., and Margules, C.. 2005. Auction for Landscape Recovery: Final Report. Sydney: WWF-Australia.Google Scholar
Hackett, K. F., and Messer, K. D.. 1998. Bilateral negotiations versus reverse auctions: cost effective water procurement in the Snake River basis. University of Michigan. Unpublished.Google Scholar
Hailu, A., and Schilizzi, S.. 2004. Are auctions more efficient than fixed price schemes when bidders learn? Australian Journal of Management 29(2): 147168.Google Scholar
Hanley, N., Banerjee, S., Lennox, G. D., and Armsworth, P. R.. 2012. How should we incentivize private landowners to “produce” more biodiversity? Oxford Review of Economic Policy 28(1): 93113.Google Scholar
Harrison, G. W., and List, J. A.. 2004. Field experiments. Journal of Economic Literature 42(4): 10091055.Google Scholar
Haruvy, E., and Katok, E.. 2013. Increasing revenue by decreasing information in procurement auctions. Production and Operations Management 22(1): 1935.Google Scholar
Hellerstein, D., and Higgins, N.. 2010. The effective use of limited information: do bid maximums reduce procurement cost in asymmetric auctions? Agricultural and Resource Economics Review 39(2): 288304.Google Scholar
Horowitz, J. K., Lynch, L., and Stocking, A.. 2009. Competition-based environmental policy: an analysis of farmland preservation in Maryland. Land Economics 85(4): 555575.Google Scholar
Johnson, E. J., and Goldstein, D.. 2003. Do defaults save lives? Science 302(5649): 13381340.Google Scholar
Kahneman, D., and Tversky, A. (eds.). 2000. Choices, Values, and Frames. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Klemperer, P. 2002. What really matters in auction design. Journal of Economic Perspectives 16(1): 169189.Google Scholar
Krishna, V. 2010. Auction Theory. 2nd ed. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Latacz-Lohmann, U., and Schilizzi, S.. 2005. Auctions for Conservation Contracts: A Review of the Theoretical and Empirical Literature. Report to the Scottish Executive Environment and Rural Affairs Department, Project no. UKL/001/05.Google Scholar
Latacz-Lohmann, U., and Van der Hamsvoort, C.. 1997. Auctioning conservation contracts: a theoretical analysis and an application. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 79(2): 407418.Google Scholar
List, J. A., and Price, M. K.. 2016. The use of field experiments in environmental and resource economics. Review of Environmental Economics and Policy 10(2): 206225.Google Scholar
List, J. A., and Shogren, J. F.. 1999. Price information and bidding behavior in repeated second-price auctions. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 81(4): 942949.Google Scholar
Lynch, L., and Musser, W. N.. 2001. A relative efficiency analysis of farmland preservation programs. Land Economics 77(4): 577594.Google Scholar
Katkar, R., and Reiley, D. H.. 2007. Public versus secret reserve prices in eBay auctions: results from a Pokémon field experiment. BE Journal of Economic Analysis and Policy 6(2).Google Scholar
Khanna, M., and Ando, A. W.. 2009. Science, economics and the design of agriculture programs in the US. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management 52: 575592.Google Scholar
Kirwan, B., Lubowski, R. N., and Roberts, M. J.. 2005. How cost-effective are land retirement auctions? Estimating the difference between payments and willingness to accept in the Conservation Reserve Program. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 87: 12391247.Google Scholar
McAfee, R. P., and McMillan, J.. 1987. Auctions and bidding. Journal of Economic Literature 25(2): 699738.Google Scholar
Messer, K. D., and Allen, W. L.. 2010. Applying optimization and the analytic hierarchy process to enhance agricultural preservation strategies in the state of Delaware. Agricultural and Resource Economics Review 39(3): 442456.Google Scholar
Messer, K. D., Duke, J., and Lynch, L.. 2014. Applying experimental economics to land economics: public information and auction efficiency in land preservation markets. In Oxford Handbook of Land Economics. Duke, J. and Wu, J., editors. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Messer, K. D., Duke, J., Lynch, L., and Li, T.. 2017. When does public information undermine the effectiveness of reverse auctions for the purchase of ecosystem services? Ecological Economics 134: 212226.Google Scholar
Messer, K. D., Kaiser, H. M., and Poe, G. L.. 2007a. Voluntary funding for generic advertising using a provision point mechanism: an experimental analysis of option assurance. Review of Agricultural Economics 29(3): 612631.Google Scholar
Messer, K. D., Kaiser, H. M., and Schulze, W. D.. 2008. The problem of free riding in voluntary generic advertising: parallelism and possible solutions from the lab. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 90(2): 540552.Google Scholar
Messer, K. D., Suter, J., and Yan, J.. 2013. Context effects in a negatively framed social dilemma experiment. Environmental and Resource Economics 55(3): 397405.Google Scholar
Messer, K. D., Zarghamee, H., Kaiser, H. M., and Schulze, W. D.. 2007b. New hope for the voluntary contribution mechanism: the effects of context. Journal of Public Economics 91(9): 17831799.Google Scholar
Metcalfe, R., and Dolan, P.. 2012. Behavioural economics and its implications for transport. Journal of Transport Geography 24: 503511.Google Scholar
Rassenti, S. J., Smith, V. L., and Wilson, B. J.. 2003. Discriminatory price auctions in electricity markets: low volatility at the expense of high price levels. Journal of Regulatory Economics 23(2): 109123.Google Scholar
Ribaudo, M., Hansen, L., Hellerstein, D., and Greene, C.. 2008. The Use of Markets to Increase Private Investment in Environmental Stewardship. Economic Research Report no. 64. Washington, DC: Economic Research Service, US Department of Agriculture.Google Scholar
Rolfe, J., Windle, J., and McCosker, J.. 2009. Testing and implementing the use of multiple bidding rounds in conservation auctions: a case study application. Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics/Revue Canadienne d'Agroeconomie 57(3): 287303.Google Scholar
Schilizzi, S., and Latacz-Lohmann, U.. 2007. Assessing the performance of conservation auctions: an experimental study. Land Economics 83(4): 497515.Google Scholar
Schmidt, A., Kecinski, M., Li, T., Messer, K. D., and Parker, J. J.. 2017. Measuring the impacts of different messengers on consumer preferences for products irrigated with recycled water: a field experiment. Paper presented at the Conference on Behavioral and Experimental Agri-Environmental Research: Methodological Advancements and Applications to Policy, Shepherdstown, WV.Google Scholar
Shawhan, D. L., Messer, K. D., Schulze, W. D., and Schuler, R. E.. 2011. An experimental test of automatic mitigation of wholesale electricity prices. International Journal of Industrial Organization 29(1): 4653.Google Scholar
Shoemaker, R. 1989. Agricultural land values and rents under the Conservation Reserve Program. Land Economics 65(2): 131137.Google Scholar
Shogren, J. F. 2004. Incentive mechanism testbeds: discussion. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 86(5): 12181219.Google Scholar
Shogren, J. F., and Taylor, L. O.. 2008. On behavioral-environmental economics. Review of Environmental Economics and Policy 2(1): 2644.Google Scholar
Shortle, J. 2013. Economics and environmental markets: lessons from water-quality trading. Agricultural and Resource Economics Review 42(1): 5774.Google Scholar
Smith, V. 1987. Experimental methods in economics. In The New Palgrave: A Dictionary of Economics. Eatwell, J., Milgate, M., and Newman, P., editors. New York: Palgrave.Google Scholar
Stoneham, G., Chaudhri, V., Ha, A., and Strappazzon, L.. 2003. Auctions for conservation contracts: an empirical examination of Victoria's BushTender trial. Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics 47(4): 477500.Google Scholar
Sunstein, C., and Thaler, R.. 2008. Nudge: The Politics of Libertarian Paternalism. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Tversky, A., and Kahneman, D.. 1991. Loss aversion in riskless choice: a reference-dependent model. Quarterly Journal of Economics 106(4): 10391061.Google Scholar
US Department of Agriculture. 2012. Conservation Reserve Program, annual summary and enrollment statistics, FY 2012. www.fsa.usda.gov/Assets/USDA-FSA-Public/usdafiles/Conservation/PDF/summary12.pdf, accessed January 18, 2018.Google Scholar
US Department of Agriculture. 2016. State agriculture overview. www.nass.usda.gov/Quick_Stats/Ag_Overview/stateOverview.php?state=DELAWARE, accessed January 18, 2018.Google Scholar
US Department of Agriculture. 2017. Conservation Reserve Program, monthly summary, May 2017. www.fsa.usda.gov/Assets/USDA-FSA-Public/usdafiles/Conservation/PDF/MAY2017summary1.pdf, accessed January 18, 2018.Google Scholar
Vincent, D. R. 1995. Bidding off the wall: why reserve prices may be kept secret. Journal of Economic Theory 65(2): 575584.Google Scholar
Vossler, C. A., Mount, T. D., Thomas, R. J., and Zimmerman, R. D.. 2009. An experimental investigation of soft price caps in uniform price auction markets for wholesale electricity. Journal of Regulatory Economics 36(1): 4459.Google Scholar
Vukina, T., Zheng, X., Marra, M., and Levy, A.. 2008. Do farmers value the environment? Evidence from a Conservation Reserve Program auction. International Journal of Industrial Organization 26(6): 13231332.Google Scholar
Weigel, C., Ferraro, P., Messer, K., and Li, T.. 2017. The influence of an identifiable victim in motivating household conservation actions. Unpublished.Google Scholar
Wu, J., and Babcock, B. A.. 1996. Contract design for the purchase of environmental goods from agriculture. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 78: 935945.Google Scholar
Wu, S., Zia, A., Ren, M., and Messer, K. D.. 2017. Simulating heterogeneous farmer behaviors under different policy schemes: integrating economic experiments and agent-based modeling. Journal on Policy and Complex Systems 3(2): 164195.Google Scholar
Zarghamee, H. S., Messer, K. D., Fooks, J. R., Schulze, W. D., Wu, S., and Yan, J.. 2017. Nudging charitable giving: three field experiments. Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics 66: 137149.Google Scholar
Messer, K. D. 2006. The conservation benefits of cost-effective land acquisition: a case study in Maryland. Journal of Environmental Management 79: 305315.Google Scholar
Messer, K. D. 2011. Maximizing conservation in Pangaea. Problem Based Learning Clearinghouse.Google Scholar
Messer, K. D., and Fooks, J. R.. 2013. ODSTweb Training Example: Maryland Highway 301 Step-by-Step Instructions and Results. Baltimore: Maryland State Highway Administration.Google Scholar
Dujmović, J. J. 2007. Continuous preference logic for system evaluation. IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems 15(6): 10821099.Google Scholar
Dujmović, J. J. 2014. An analysis of penalty and reward for partial absorption aggregators. In Proceedings of the 2014 World Conference on Soft Computing, Berkeley, CA.Google Scholar
Dujmović, J. J. 2018. Soft Computing Evaluation Logic: The LSP Decision Method and Its Applications. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley.Google Scholar
Dujmović, J. J., and Larsen, H. L.. 2007. Generalized conjunction/disjunction. International Journal of Approximate Reasoning 46: 423446.Google Scholar
Dujmović, J. J., and Nagashima, H.. 2006. LSP method and its use for evaluation of Java IDE's. International Journal of Approximate Reasoning 41(1): 322.Google Scholar
Miller, George A. 1956. The magical number seven, plus or minus two: some limits on our capacity for processing information. Psychological Review 63(2): 81.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×