Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-495rp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-12T17:42:16.347Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

fourteen - Social renting

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 September 2022

Madhu Satsangi
Affiliation:
University of Stirling
Nick Gallent
Affiliation:
University College London
Mark Bevan
Affiliation:
University of York
Get access

Summary

Renewed support for direct housing provision by local authorities, noted in Chapter 12, appeared to be gaining momentum in policy and academic circles in the early years of this century (Monk and Ni Luanaigh, 2006). In the rural context, having a wider variety of mechanisms available is valuable, not just an attempt to lever a higher rate of non-market housing into communities, but also to provide alternative ways of overcoming the inherent difficulties of developing affordable housing in such localities. Despite post-1990s’ policy exhorting a range of social rented and intermediate options in developments (for example, DCLG, 2006a), such intermediate housing products seemed to have very limited presence in smaller settlements (Hoggart and Henderson, 2005). Furthermore, a narrow focus on home ownership in national policies scarcely extended viable housing options for people on lower incomes in rural localities. Monk et al (2006) used the notion of ‘housing staircases’ to highlight how the lack of available properties at lower prices in many rural communities caused affordability problems for households on lower incomes. Also falling prices do not necessarily ease affordability problems. The following section considers the issue of housing affordability and the net need for low-cost housing in order to provide a context for the discussion on the role of social rented accommodation in rural localities.

In 2007, England's Commission for Rural Communities (CRC, 2007a) calculated the affordability of market housing in the smallest settlements in terms of the ratio between household incomes and house prices (Table 14.1). Wilcox (2007), however, has pointed out that it is not sufficient to look at house prices alone as a measure of affordability and that analysis of this issue needs to consider the capacity of households to pay market rents. This conclusion chimes with the findings of Bramley and Watkins (2009) in relation to the relative affordability of private rents in many rural localities, and their call to address not only the supply of homes for sale, but also the supply of homes for rent from a mix of landlords.

Scotland and England have the benefit of calculations by Glen Bramley and others on the level of net needs for affordable housing in these countries.

Type
Chapter
Information
The Rural Housing Question
Community and Planning in Britain's Countrysides
, pp. 155 - 168
Publisher: Bristol University Press
Print publication year: 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Social renting
  • Madhu Satsangi, University of Stirling, Nick Gallent, University College London, Mark Bevan, University of York
  • Book: The Rural Housing Question
  • Online publication: 01 September 2022
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.46692/9781847423863.015
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Social renting
  • Madhu Satsangi, University of Stirling, Nick Gallent, University College London, Mark Bevan, University of York
  • Book: The Rural Housing Question
  • Online publication: 01 September 2022
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.46692/9781847423863.015
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Social renting
  • Madhu Satsangi, University of Stirling, Nick Gallent, University College London, Mark Bevan, University of York
  • Book: The Rural Housing Question
  • Online publication: 01 September 2022
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.46692/9781847423863.015
Available formats
×