Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
×
Home
  • Get access
    Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
  • Cited by 5
  • Cited by
    This chapter has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by CrossRef.

    Puolakka, Kalle 2008. Literature, Ethics, and Richard Rorty’s Pragmatist Theory of Interpretation. Philosophia, Vol. 36, Issue. 1, p. 29.

    Foley, Andrew 2008. Postmodern Liberal Literature: Richard Rorty's “Liberal Ironists”. Journal of Literary Studies, Vol. 24, Issue. 4, p. 19.

    Rolfe, Bradley 2013. Doing Project Management Ironically. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, Vol. 74, Issue. , p. 264.

    Kasdan, David Oliver 2015. Cruel to Be Kind: A Neopragmatist Approach to Teaching Statistics for Public Administration Students. Journal of Public Affairs Education, Vol. 21, Issue. 3, p. 435.

    Kasdan, David Oliver 2016. Public administration, social progress, and the utopian null: Reconfiguring the hypothesis test for neopragmatist bureaucracy. International Review of Public Administration, Vol. 21, Issue. 2, p. 163.

    ×
  • Print publication year: 2003
  • Online publication date: December 2009

7 - Don't Be Cruel: Reflections on Rortyan Liberalism

Summary

Richard Rorty is not only a leading light of the revival of pragmatism but one of its chief beneficiaries. His work has penetrated far and wide. He has become a kind of antiphilosopher philosopher. Rorty is an intelligent and canny thinker. He can be a powerful writer. But he tends invariably to undercut whatever gravitas might inhere in his own position with moves toward what is best called the “unbearable lightness of liberalism,” or at least one dominant contemporary version of it. There are many entry points into Rortyan discourse, although Rorty doesn't make the task of expositor and critic all that easy. How so? Because his arguments are often slippery and difficult to engage. Just when you think you've come up against something solid, it turns squishy. My hunch is that this is because Rorty wants to embrace, not to debate, to draw us all under the big tent of “we liberal ironists,” “we pragmatists,” “we antiessentialists,” we who “don't do things this way,” we … we … we. In Contingency, Irony, and Solidarity, Rorty uses the “we” word nine times in one short paragraph (CIS 79–80). Those of us who resist such “we-ness” are left to sort out just how, why, and where we disagree. I will begin with a few assorted discontents that evolve into deeper engagements, including a fleshed-out counterpoint to Rorty's positions on Freud, cruelty and self-creation, and redescription.

Recommend this book

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this book to your organisation's collection.

Richard Rorty
  • Online ISBN: 9780511613951
  • Book DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511613951
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to *
×