Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Dedication
- Contents
- Foreword: The Harmful Legacy of Lawlessness in Vietnam
- Preface
- Acknowledgments
- PART I THE US ROLE IN VIETNAM AND INTERNATIONAL LAW
- PART II WAR AND WAR CRIMES
- PART III THE VIETNAM WAR AND THE NUREMBERG PRINCIPLES
- PART IV THE LEGACY OF THE VIETNAM WAR
- 12 Learning from Vietnam
- 13 The Vietnam Syndrome: From the Gulf of Tonkin to Iraq
- 14 “The Vietnam Syndrome”: The Kerrey Revelations Raise Anew Issues of Morality and Military Power
- 15 Why the Legal Debate on the Vietnam War Still Matters: The Case for Revisiting the International Law Debate
- Index
15 - Why the Legal Debate on the Vietnam War Still Matters: The Case for Revisiting the International Law Debate
from PART IV - THE LEGACY OF THE VIETNAM WAR
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 28 December 2017
- Frontmatter
- Dedication
- Contents
- Foreword: The Harmful Legacy of Lawlessness in Vietnam
- Preface
- Acknowledgments
- PART I THE US ROLE IN VIETNAM AND INTERNATIONAL LAW
- PART II WAR AND WAR CRIMES
- PART III THE VIETNAM WAR AND THE NUREMBERG PRINCIPLES
- PART IV THE LEGACY OF THE VIETNAM WAR
- 12 Learning from Vietnam
- 13 The Vietnam Syndrome: From the Gulf of Tonkin to Iraq
- 14 “The Vietnam Syndrome”: The Kerrey Revelations Raise Anew Issues of Morality and Military Power
- 15 Why the Legal Debate on the Vietnam War Still Matters: The Case for Revisiting the International Law Debate
- Index
Summary
This volume rests on a simple proposition: The legal arguments against military intervention in Vietnam were wrongly rejected by the US government and, until these are reconsidered and reversed, failure abroad and deterioration at home are the likely results.
It may seem, with the passage of more than fifty years since the American military engagement in Vietnam became a serious commitment of national policy, that the legal controversy that accompanied the involvement should be forgotten, and that the most reasonable recommendation would be to move on. The world has changed drastically in this past half-century, as has – especially – the context in which force is used, creating a drastically different relationship between international law and recourse to force beyond the borders of a sovereign state.
Actually, the passage of time and the preoccupation with present security challenges have led to an unfortunate neglect of the Vietnam precedent, which retains an extraordinary relevance, especially for the development of American thought and practice relative to military intervention in foreign societies. As this collection of writings attempts to show, unlike more recent legally dubious interventions, especially associated with the attack on Iraq in 2003, there has been no high-profile government attempt to provide a convincing legal rationale for its recourse to force.
Until Vietnam, with some important exceptions relating to covert intervention as in Iran (1953) and Guatemala (1954), the United States was associated with the promotion of the rule of law in international political life and an attitude of respect toward the constraints on the use of force set forth, largely at the urging of Washington, in the Charter of the United Nations. Constructing a global legal order was a vital ingredient of its leadership role assumed at the end of World War II, and reinforced by the backing of the UN in the Korean War and the stand against recourse to war and acquisition of territory through force by its European allies and Israel in the 1956 Suez War.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Revisiting the Vietnam War and International LawViews and Interpretations of Richard Falk, pp. 388 - 400Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2017