Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-5g6vh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T08:15:41.536Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

2 - Toward a New Epistemology of Psychiatry

from Section One - Restoring Phenomenology to Psychiatry

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 July 2015

By
German E. Berrios  and
Ivana S. Marková
Edited by
Laurence J. Kirmayer ,
Robert Lemelson  and
Constance A. Cummings
Laurence J. Kirmayer
Affiliation:
McGill University, Montréal
Robert Lemelson
Affiliation:
University of California, Los Angeles
Constance A. Cummings
Affiliation:
Foundation for Psychocultural Research, California
Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Re-Visioning Psychiatry
Cultural Phenomenology, Critical Neuroscience, and Global Mental Health
 , pp. 41 - 64
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2015

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bayer, R. (1987). Homosexuality and American psychiatry: The politics of diagnosis. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Bennett, M. R., & Hacker, P. M. S. (2003). Philosophical foundations of neuroscience. Oxford, England: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Berrios, G. E., & Marková, I. S. (2012). The construction of hallucinations. In Bloom, J. D. & Sommer, I. E. C. (Eds.), Hallucinations: Research and practice (pp. 55–75). New York, NY: Springer. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-0959-5_5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berrios, G. E. (1988). Historical background to abnormal psychology. In Miller, E. & Cooper, P. (Eds.), Adult abnormal psychology (pp. 26–51). London, England: Churchill Livingstone.Google Scholar
Berrios, G. E. (1996). The history of mental symptoms. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511526725CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berrios, G. E. (1998). Folie à deux – A mad family by W. W. Ireland. History of Psychiatry, 9, 383–95. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0957154X9800903506Google Scholar
Berrios, G. E. (1999). Pieterson's Haematoma Auris. History of Psychiatry, 10, 371–83. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0957154X9901003906CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Berrios, G. E. (2000). The history of psychiatric concepts. In Henn, F., Sartorius, N., Helmchen, H., & Lauter, H. (Eds.), Contemporary psychiatry: Vol. 1. Foundations of psychiatry (pp. 1–30). Heidelberg, Germany: Springer.Google Scholar
Berrios, G. E. (2005). On the fantastic apparitions of vision by Johannes Müller. History of Psychiatry, 16, 229–46. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0957154X05055179CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Berrios, G. E. (2006). ‘Mind in general’ by Sir Alexander Crichton. History of Psychiatry, 17, 469–97. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0957154X06071679CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berrios, G. E. (2011). Psychiatry and its objects. Revista de Psiquiatría y Salud Mental, 4, 179–82. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rpsmen.2011.09.001Google ScholarPubMed
Berrios, G. E., & Marková, I. S. (2001). Psychiatric disorders mimicking dementia. In Hodges, J. R. (Ed.), Early-onset dementia. A multidisciplinary approach (pp. 104–23). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Berrios, G. E., & Marková, I. S. (2002). Conceptual issues. In D'haenen, H., den Boer, J. A., & Willner, P. (Eds.), Biological psychiatry (pp. 9–39). Chichester, England: John Wiley & Sons. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/0470854871.chiGoogle Scholar
Berrios, G. E., & Marková, I. S. (2006). Symptoms – historical perspectives and effect on diagnosis. In Blumenfiels, M. & Strain, J. J. (Eds.), Psychosomatic medicine (pp. 27–38). Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.Google Scholar
Blanc, C.-J. (1998). Psychiatrie et pensée philosophique. Paris, France: L'Harmattan.Google Scholar
Bolton, D., & Hill, J. (2003). Mind, meaning & mental disorder (2nd ed.). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Braunstein, J.-F. (2009). La philosophie de la médicine d'Auguste Comte. Paris, France: PUF.Google Scholar
Budd, A. (2009). The modern historiography reader. London, England: Routledge.Google Scholar
Bunnin, N., & Yu, J. (Eds.). (2004). The Blackwell dictionary of Western philosophy. Oxford, England: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Butterfield, H. (1965). The Whig interpretation of history. New York, NY: Norton.Google Scholar
Canguilhem, G. (1996). Le normal et le pathologique. Paris, France: PUFGoogle Scholar
Choudhury, S., & Slaby, J. (Eds.). (2012). Critical neuroscience. Oxford, England: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Churchland, P. S. (1986). Neurophilosophy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Conrad, P., & Schneider, J. W. (1992). Deviancy and medicalization (2nd ed.). Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
Culler, J. (1982). On deconstruction. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Dummet, M. (1993). The origins of analytical philosophy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Epistemology. (1989). Oxford English dictionary (2nd ed.). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ferrier, D. (1856). Institutes of metaphysic (2nd ed.). Edinburgh, Scotland: Blackwood and Sons.Google Scholar
Foucault, M. (1961). Histoire de la folie à l’âge classique: Folie et déraison. Paris, France: Plon.Google Scholar
Fox, C., Porter, R., & Wokler, R. (Eds.). (1995). Inventing human science: Eighteenth century domains. Berkeley: University of California Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1525/california/9780520200104.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frie, R. (1997). Subjectivity and intersubjectivity in modern philosophy and psychoanalysis. London, England: Rowman.Google Scholar
Fulford, K. W. K., Thornton, T., & Graham, G. (2006). Oxford textbook of philosophy and psychiatry. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gillespie, A., & Cornish, F. (2009). Intersubjectivity: Towards a dialogical analysis. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 40, 19–46. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5914.2009.00419.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glock, H.-J. (2008). What is analytical philosophy? Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511841125Google Scholar
Griffiths, A. P. (Ed.). (1994). Philosophy, psychology and psychiatry. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Henderson, D. K., & Horgan, T. (2011). The epistemological spectrum. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199608546.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Iggers, G. G., & Wang, Q. E. (2008). A global history of modern historiography. Edinburgh, Scotland: Pearson.Google Scholar
Kehrer, F. A. (1951). Das Verstehen und Begreifen in der Psychiatrie. Stuttgart, Germany: Thieme.Google Scholar
Kellert, S. H., Longino, H. E., & Waters, C. K. (Eds.). (2006). Scientific pluralism. Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science XIX. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Kendler, K. S., & Parnas, J. (Eds.). (2008). Philosophical issues in psychiatry. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lanteri-Laura, G. (1963). La psychiatrie phénoménologique. Paris, France: PUF.Google Scholar
Laporte, J. (2004). Natural kinds and conceptual change. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Laugier, S. (1999). Expérience cruciale. In Lecourt, D. (Ed.), Dictionnaire d'histoire et philosophie des sciences (pp. 404–6). Paris, France: PUF.Google Scholar
Lewis, A. A. (1967). Empirical or rational? The nature and basis of psychiatry. Lancet, 2(7505), 1–9. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(67)90055-4CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Manicas, P. T. (1987). A history and philosophy of the social sciences. Oxford, England: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Marková, I. S., & Berrios, G. E. (2009). Epistemology of mental symptoms. Psychopathology, 42, 343–9. http://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000236905CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Marková, I. S., & Berrios, G. E. (2012). Epistemology of psychiatry. Psychopathology, 45, 220–7. http://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000331599CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Martin, M. (2000). Verstehen: The uses of understanding in social science. London, England: Transaction Publishers.Google Scholar
Murphy, D. (2006). Psychiatry in the scientific image. Cambridge, MA: MIT.Google Scholar
Natanson, M. (Ed.). (1969). Psychiatry and philosophy. Berlin, Germany: Springer-Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neurath, O., Carnap, R., & Morris, C. F. W. (Eds). (1971). Foundations of the unity of science (Vols. 1 & 2). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Palem, R.-M. (Ed.). (2010). Psychiatrie et philosophie. Les Cahiers Henri Ey, 25–26.Google Scholar
Palmer, H. (1952). The philosophy of psychiatry. New York, NY: Philosophical Library.Google Scholar
Power, H., & Sedgwick, L. W. (1882). The New Sydenham Society's lexicon of medicine and the allied sciences (Vol. 2). London, England: The New Sydenham Society.Google Scholar
Radden, J. (Ed.). The philosophy of psychiatry: A companion. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reznek, L. (1991). The philosophical defence of psychiatry. London, England: Routledge.Google Scholar
Sáez-Rueda, L. (2002). El conflicto entre continentales y analíticos: Dos tradiciones filosóficas. Barcelona, Spain: Crítica.Google Scholar
Savitt, T. L. (2002). Medicine and slavery: The diseases and health care of Blacks in antebellum Virginia. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
Sendrail, M. (1880). Histoire culturelle de la maladie. Toulouse, France: Privat.Google Scholar
Scull, A. (1993). The most solitary of afflictions: Madness and society in Britain 1700–1900. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Siegler, M., & Osmond, H. (1974). Models of madness, models of medicine. New York, NY: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Soler, L. (2000). Introduction à l’épistémologie. Paris, France: Ellipses.Google Scholar
Spiegelberg, H. (1972). Phenomenology in psychology and psychiatry. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
Spiegelberg, H. (1982). The phenomenological movement. The Hague, Netherlands: Nijhoff. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-7491-3Google Scholar
Spitzer, M., & Maher, B. A. (Eds.). (1990). Philosophy and psychopathology. Berlin, Germany: Springer-Verlag. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-9028-2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stein, E. (1917). Zum Problem der Einfühlung. München, Germany: Kaffke.Google Scholar
Strasser, S. (1963). Phenomenology and the human sciences. Pittsburgh, PA: Duquesne University Press.Google Scholar
Strauss, E. B. (1958). Psychiatry in the modern world. London, England: Michael Joseph.Google Scholar
Taylor, F. K. (1979). The concepts of illness, disease and morbus. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Tiles, M., & Tiles, J. (1993). An introduction to historical epistemology. Oxford, England: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Toombs, S. K. (Ed.). (2001). Handbook of phenomenology and medicine. Dordrecht, Germany: Kluwer. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-0536-4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woleński, J. (2004). The history of epistemology. In Niiniluoto, I., Sintonen, M., & Woleński, J. (Eds.), Handbook of epistemology (pp. 3–54). Dordrecht, Germany: Kluwer. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-1986-9_1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
World Health Organization. (2003). The gap between the burden of mental disorders and resources. In Investing in mental health (p. 36). Retrieved from www.who.int/mental_health/publications/investing_mental_health/en/Google Scholar
Wulff, H. R., Pedersen, S. R., & Rosenberg, R. (1986). Philosophy of medicine. Oxford, England: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×