Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-l82ql Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-31T10:21:19.248Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
This chapter is part of a book that is no longer available to purchase from Cambridge Core

Introduction: Revisioning Duras

James S. Williams
Affiliation:
University of Kent at Canterbury
Get access

Summary

Je dis simplement: il faut la [Duras] lire. Encore. Et l'aimer encore davantage. Il suffit de la lire pour être aimé d'elle.

(Y. Andréa)

Few women writers or intellectuals of the postwar period have provoked such extremes of response as Marguerite Duras. During her lifetime, when she became the most widely read living French author, she was the object both of adulation and denigration in France. On the one hand, she enjoyed the loyal and public support of friends, critics and exegetes such as Michelle Porte, Michèle Manceaux, Christiane Blot-Labarrère and Madeleine Borgomano. She was also championed, almost obsessively, by Alain Vircondelet, who wrote the first major study of her work in 1972. His subsequent hagiographical Marguerite Duras: vérité et légendes, complete with photographs selected by Duras's son Jean Mascolo, is very much the official version of the Duras story in which he upbraids her detractors. Such empathy and even collusion with the word of Duras is matched in La fiction d'Emmedée, a highly fictional portrayal of Duras by Jean-Pierre Ceton, a younger writer whom she had promoted during the 1980s along with Denis Belloc. On the other hand, however, many critics have taken the view of the writer and journalist Angelo Rinaldi that Duras became a sorry casualty of the French literary star system which simply indulged and exacerbated her narcissism. Her apparent self-absorption and overexposure during the 1980s was put under a harsh microscope by Frédérique Lebelley in Duras ou le poids d'une plume, which Duras tried to prevent from being published. In France her literary style has been comprehensively pastiched and parodied, or simply dismissed, by Philippe Sollers among others, as symptomatic of a late twentieth-century writer.

Certainly, the reception of Duras's work in France has run along familiar political lines.

Type
Chapter
Information
Revisioning Duras
Film, Race, Sex
, pp. 1 - 18
Publisher: Liverpool University Press
Print publication year: 2000

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×