Book contents
- Reuse and Renovation in Roman Material Culture
- Reuse and Renovation in Roman Material Culture
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Illustrations
- Contributors
- Acknowledgments
- Introduction: Reuse, Renovation, Reiteration
- Chapter One The Reuse and Redisplay of Honorific Statues in Pompeii
- Chapter Two The Vigiles, Dynastic Succession, and Symbolic Reappropriation in the Caserma dei Vigili at Ostia
- Chapter Three Epigraphy of Appropriation: Retrospective Signatures of Greek Sculptors in the Roman World
- Chapter Four Gateways to the Past: The Hadrianic Architecture of Procession in Pisidian Antioch and Athens
- Chapter Five Visual Literacy and Reuse in the Architecture of Late Imperial Rome
- Chapter Six Urban Transformations at Aphrodisias in Late Antiquity: Destruction or Intentional Preservation?
- Chapter Seven Acquiring the Antique in Byzantine Rome: The Economics of Architectural Reuse at Santa Maria Antiqua
- Chapter Eight The Afterlife of the Amphitheater: Cultural Biography and Social Memory at Tarragona
- Notes
- Index
- References
Chapter Five - Visual Literacy and Reuse in the Architecture of Late Imperial Rome
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 17 September 2018
Book contents
- Reuse and Renovation in Roman Material Culture
- Reuse and Renovation in Roman Material Culture
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Illustrations
- Contributors
- Acknowledgments
- Introduction: Reuse, Renovation, Reiteration
- Chapter One The Reuse and Redisplay of Honorific Statues in Pompeii
- Chapter Two The Vigiles, Dynastic Succession, and Symbolic Reappropriation in the Caserma dei Vigili at Ostia
- Chapter Three Epigraphy of Appropriation: Retrospective Signatures of Greek Sculptors in the Roman World
- Chapter Four Gateways to the Past: The Hadrianic Architecture of Procession in Pisidian Antioch and Athens
- Chapter Five Visual Literacy and Reuse in the Architecture of Late Imperial Rome
- Chapter Six Urban Transformations at Aphrodisias in Late Antiquity: Destruction or Intentional Preservation?
- Chapter Seven Acquiring the Antique in Byzantine Rome: The Economics of Architectural Reuse at Santa Maria Antiqua
- Chapter Eight The Afterlife of the Amphitheater: Cultural Biography and Social Memory at Tarragona
- Notes
- Index
- References
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Reuse and Renovation in Roman Material CultureFunctions, Aesthetics, Interpretations, pp. 140 - 159Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2018
References
Alchermes, J. 1994. “Spolia in Roman Cities of the Late Empire: Legislative Rationales and Architectural Reuse.” DOP 48:167–78.Google Scholar
Asgari, N. 1988. “The Stages of Workmanship of the Corinthian Capital in Proconnesus and its Export Form.” In Classical Marble: Geochemistry, Technology, Trade, edited by Herz, N. and Waelkens, M., 115–21. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
Asgari, N. 1992. “Observations on Two Types of Quarry-Items from Proconnesus: Column-Shafts and Column-Bases.” In Ancient Stones: Quarrying, Trade and Provenance, edited by Waelkens, M., Herz, N., and Moens, L., 73–80. Leuven: Leuven University Press.Google Scholar
Barattolo, A. 1973. “Nuove ricerche sull’architettura del Tempio di Venere e Roma all’epoca di Adriano.” BullCom 84:133–48.Google Scholar
Barattolo, A. 1978. “Il tempio di Venere e di Roma: un tempio ‘Greco’ nell’urbe.” RM 85:397–410.Google Scholar
Barker, S. J. 2012. “Roman Marble Salvaging.” In Interdisciplinary Studies on Ancient Stone: Proceedings of the IX Association for the Study of Marbles and Other Stones in Antiquity (ASMOSIA) Conference (Tarragona 2009), edited by Gutiérrez Garcia-M., A., Lapuente Mercadal, P., and Rodà de Llanza, I., 22–30. Tarragona: Institut Català d’Arqueologia Clàssica.Google Scholar
Barresi, P. 2002. “Il ruolo delle colonne nel costo degli edifici pubblici.” In I marmi colorati della Roma imperial, edited by de Nuccio, M. and Ungaro, L., 69–81. Venice: Marsilio.Google Scholar
Berenson, B. 1954. The Arch of Constantine: or, The Decline of Form. New York: Macmillan Company.Google Scholar
Brandenburg, H. 2011. “The Use of Older Elements in the Architecture of Fourth- and Fifth-Century Rome: A Contribution to the Evaluation of Spolia.” In Reuse Value: Spolia and Appropriation in Art and Architecture from Constantine to Sherrie Levine, edited by Brilliant, R. and Kinney, D., 53–74. Burlington, VT: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Brenk, B. 1993. “Türen als Spolien und Baureliquien: Nova construere, sed amplius vetusta servare.” In Künstlerischer Austausch: Artistic Exchange, edited by Gaehtgens, T., vol. 1, 43–54. Berlin: Akademie.Google Scholar
Brilliant, R. 1982. “I piedistalli del giardino di boboli: spolia in se, spolia in re.” Prospettiva 31:2–17.Google Scholar
Buttrey, T. V. 1983. “The Dates of the Arches of ‘Diocletian’ and Constantine.” Historia 32:375–83.Google Scholar
Cima, M. 1981. “Decorazione architettonica.” In Il “Tempio di Romolo” al Foro Romano. Quaderni dell’Istituto de Storia dell’Architettura 157–162, 103–20. Rome: Multigrafica Editrice.Google Scholar
Coarelli, F. 1986. “L’urbs e il suburbio. I. Ristrutturazione urbanistica e ristrutturazione amministrativa nella Roma di Massenzio.” In Società romana e impero tardoantico, edited by Giardina, A., vol. 2, 1–35. Rome: Laterza.Google Scholar
Coates-Stephens, R. 2003. “Attitudes towards Spolia in Some Late Antique Texts.” In Theory and Practice in Late Antique Archaeology, edited by Lavan, L. and Bowden, W., 341–58. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Colini, A. M. 1935. “I frammenti di architettura e di rilievi rinvenuti presso la chiesa di S. Maria in Via Lata.” RendPontAcc 11:41–61.Google Scholar
Cullhed, M. 1994. Conservator Urbis Suae: Studies in the Politics and Propaganda of the Emperor Maxentius. Stokholm: Paul Åströms.Google Scholar
Deichmann, F. W. 1975. Die Spolien in der spätantiken Architektur. Munich: Verlag der Bayerischen Akademie der Wissenschaften.Google Scholar
De Lachenal, L. 1995. Spolia. Uso e reimpeigo dell’antico dal III al XIV secolo. Milan: Longanesi.Google Scholar
De Maria, S. 1998. Gli archi onorari di Roma e dell’Italia romana. Rome: “L’Erma” di Bretschneider.Google Scholar
Dumser, E. 2005. “The Architecture of Maxentius: A Study in Architectural Design and Urban Planning in Early Fourth-Century Rome.” Ph.D. diss., University of Pennsylvania.Google Scholar
Dumser, E. 2006. “The Maxentian AETERNAE MEMORIAE Coinage: An Issue of Symbolic Intent.” In Imaging Ancient Rome, edited by Haselberger, L. and Humphrey, J., 84–96. JRA Suppl. 61. Portsmouth, RI: Journal of Roman Archaeology.Google Scholar
Dumser, E. Forthcoming. “The Influence of Reuse on Architectural Practices in Late Imperial Rome.” In Building the Classical World: Bauforschung as a Contemporary Approach, edited by Borbonus, D. and Dumser, E.. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Elsner, J. 2000. “From the Culture of Spolia to the Cult of Relics: The Arch of Constantine and the Genesis of Late Antique Forms.” PBSR 68:149–84.Google Scholar
Fant, J. C. 1992. “The Roman Imperial Marble Yard at Portus.” In Ancient Stones: Quarrying, Trade and Provenance, edited by Waelkens, M., Herz, N., and Moens, L., 115–19. Leuven: Leuven University Press.Google Scholar
Faust, S. 2011. “Original und Spolie. Interaktive Strategien im Bildprogramm des Konstantinsbogens.” RM 117:377–408.Google Scholar
Gradara, C. 1918. “Restauri Settecenteschi fatti all’Arco di Costantino.” BullCom 46:161–64.Google Scholar
Gutterridge, A. 2010. “The Depiction of Time on the Arch of Constantine.” In Archaeology and Memory, edited by Boric, D., 158–70. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Herrmann, Jr., J. J. 2012. “Late Roman Sarcophagi in Central Italy Made from Scavenged Blocks.” In Interdisciplinary Studies on Ancient Stone: Proceedings of the IX Association for the Study of Marbles and Other Stones in Antiquity (ASMOSIA) Conference (Tarragona 2009), edited by Gutiérrez Garcia-M., A., Lapuente Mercadal, P., and Rodà de Llanza, I., 93–103. Tarragona: Institut Català d’Arqueologia Clàssica.Google Scholar
Hölscher, T. 2004. The Language of Images in Roman Art. Translated by A. Snodgrass and A. Künzl-Snodgrass. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hölscher, T. 2006. “Greek Styles and Greek Art in Augustan Rome: Issues of the Present versus Records of the Past.” In Classical Pasts: The Classical Traditions of Greece and Rome, edited by Porter, J., 237–59. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Hughes, J. 2014. “Memory and the Roman Viewer: Looking at the Arch of Constantine.” In Memoria Romana, edited by Galinsky, K., 103–15. MAAR Suppl. 10. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Kalas, G. 2015. The Restoration of the Roman Forum in Late Antiquity. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Kinney, D. 1995. “Rape or Restitution of the Past? Interpreting Spolia.” In The Art of Interpreting, edited by Scott, S., 52–67. University Park, PA: Penn State University Press.Google Scholar
Kinney, D. 2011. “Introduction.” In Reuse Value: Spolia and Appropriation in Art and Architecture from Constantine to Sherrie Levine, edited by Brilliant, R. and Kinney, D., 1–11. Burlington, VT: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Laubscher, H. P. 1976. “Arcus Novus und Arcus Claudii, zwei Triumphbögen an der Via Lata in Rom.” NAkG 3:64–108.Google Scholar
Liverani, P. 2004. “Reimpiego senza ideologia. La lettura antica degli spolia dall’Arco di Costantino all’età carolingia.” RM 111:383–444.Google Scholar
Liverani, P. 2005. “L’arco di Costantino.” In Costantino il Grande, edited by Donati, A and Gentili, G., 64–9. Milan: Silvana Editoriale.Google Scholar
Liverani, P. 2009. “The Fragment in Late Antiquity: A Functional View.” In The Fragment. An Incomplete History, edited by Tronzo, W., 23–36. Los Angeles: Getty Publications.Google Scholar
Liverani, P. 2011. “Reading Spolia in Late Antiquity and Contemporary Perception.” In Reuse Value: Spolia and Appropriation in Art and Architecture from Constantine to Sherrie Levine, edited by Brilliant, R. and Kinney, D., 33–52. Burlington, VT: Ashgate.Google Scholar
L’Orange, H. P. with von Gerkan, A.. 1939. Der spätantike Bildschmuck des Konstantinsbogens. Berlin: W. de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Lukaszewicz, A. 1979. “Some Remarks on P. Lond. III 755 and the Problem of Building Materials in the Fourth Century A.D.” Archeologia 30:115–18.Google Scholar
Maischberger, M. 1997. Marmor in Rom: Anlieferung, Lager-und Werkplätze in der Kaiserzeit. Palilia 1. Wiesbaden: Reichert.Google Scholar
Marlowe, E. 2006. “Framing the Sun: The Arch of Constantine and the Roman Cityscape.” ArtB 88.2:223–42.Google Scholar
Mattern, T. 2000. “Vom Steinbruch zur Baustelle. Kaiserzeitlicher Baugliedhandel und normierte Architektur?” In Munus. Festschrift für Hans Wiegartz, edited by Mattern, T., 171–88. Münster: Scriptorium.Google Scholar
Melucco Vaccaro, A. 2000. “L’Arco di Adriano e il riuso di Costantino.” In Adriano: architettura e progetto, 113–30. Milan: Electa.Google Scholar
Melucco Vaccaro, A. and Ferroni, A. M.. 1993–4. “Chi costruì l’Arco di Costantino? Un interogativo ancora actuale.” RendPontAcc 66:1–60.Google Scholar
Papi, E. 2004. “A New Golden Age? The Northern Praefectura Urbi from the Severans to Diocletian.” In Approaching Late Antiquity, edited by Swain, S. and Edwards, M., 53–81. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Peacock, D. P. S. and Maxfield, V. A.. 1997. Mons Claudianus, vol. 1. Cairo: Institut français d’archéologie orientale.Google Scholar
Peirce, P. 1989. “The Arch of Constantine: Propaganda and Ideology in Late Roman Art.” Art History 12:387–418.Google Scholar
Peña, J. T. 1989. “P.Giss. 69: Evidence for the Supplying of Stone Transport Operations in Roman Egypt and the Production of Fifty-Foot Monolithic Column Shafts.” JRA 2:126–32.Google Scholar
Pensabene, P. 1993. “Il reimpiego nell’età costantiniana a Roma.” In Costantino il Grande, edited by Bonamente, G. and Fusco, F., vol. 2, 749–68. Macerata: Università degli Studi di Macerata.Google Scholar
Pensabene, P. ed. 1998. Marmi antichi II: cave e tecnica di lavorazione, provenienze e distribuzione. Rome: “L’Erma” di Bretschneider.Google Scholar
Pensabene, P. 2000. “Reimpiego e depositi di marmi a Roma e a Ostia.” In Aurea Roma, edited by Ensoli, S. and La Rocca, E., 341–50. Rome: “L’Erma” di Bretschneider.Google Scholar
Pensabene, P. 2002. “Il fenomeno del marmo nel mondo romano.” In I marmi colorati della Roma imperial, edited by de Nuccio, M. and Ungaro, L., 3–67. Venice: Marsilio.Google Scholar
Pensabene, P. 2006. “Depositi e maggazzini di marmi a Porto e Ostia in epoca tardo-antica.” In Frühes Christentum zwischen Rom und Konstantinopel, edited by Harreither, R. et al. 561–88. Vatican City: Pontifico Istituto di Archeologia Cristiana.Google Scholar
Pensabene, P. and Panella, C.. 1993–4. “Reimpiego e progettazione architettonica nei monumenti tardo-antichi di Roma.” RendPontAcc 66:111–283.Google Scholar
Pensabene, P. 1999. Arco di Costantino: tra archeologia e archeometria. Studia archaeologica 100. Rome: “L’Erma” di Bretschneider.Google Scholar
Prusac, M. 2011. From Face to Face. Recarving of Roman Portraits and the Late-Antique Portrait Arts. Monumenta Graeca et Romana 18. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Righetti, P. 1981. “La porta bronza.” In Il “Tempio di Romolo” al Foro Romano. Quaderni dell’Istituto de Storia dell’Architettura 157–162, 121–8. Rome: Multigrafica Editrice.Google Scholar
Russell, B. 2013. The Economics of the Roman Stone Trade. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Sande, S. 2012. “The Arch of Constantine – Who Saw What?” In Patrons and Viewers in Late Antiquity, edited by Birk, S. and Poulson, B., 277–90. Aarhus Studies in Mediterranean Antiquity 10. Aarhus: Aarhus University Press.Google Scholar
Sande, S. Il “Tempio di Romolo” al Foro Romano. 1981. Quaderni dell’Istituto de Storia dell’Architettura 157–162. Rome: Multigrafica Editrice.Google Scholar
Thomas, E. and Witschel, C.. 1992. “Constructing Reconstruction: Claim and Reality of Roman Rebuilding Inscriptions from the Latin West.” PBSR 60:135–77.Google Scholar
Tucci, P. L. 2001. “Nuove acquisizioni sulla basilica dei Santi Cosma e Damiano.” StRom 49:275–93.Google Scholar
Varner, E. 2014. “Maxentius, Constantine, and Hadrian: Images and the Expropriation of Imperial Identity.” In Using Images in Late Antiquity, edited by Birk, S., Kristensen, T. M., and Poulsen, B., 48–77. Oxford: Oxbow Books.Google Scholar
Wilson Jones, M. 2000a. Principles of Roman Architecture. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Wilson Jones, M. 2000b. “Genesis and Mimesis. The Design of the Arch of Constantine in Rome.” JSAH 59:50–77.Google Scholar
Wohl, B. L. 2001. “Constantine’s Use of Spolia.” In Late Antiquity: Art in Context, edited by Fleischer, J., Lund, J., and Nielsen, M., 85–115. Acta Hyperborea 8. Copenhagen: Museum Tusculanum Press.Google Scholar
- 2
- Cited by