Book contents
- Resources, Production and Structural Dynamics
- Resources, Production and Structural Dynamics
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors
- Preface
- Book part
- 1 Resources, producibility and economic dynamics: a framework
- Part I Resources and distribution in a structural perspective
- Part II Structural dynamics: resources and multi-sectoral linkages
- 6 Limits,resources anddistributional trade-offs: structural constraints and opportunities
- 7 Producible resources and producibilityprices in a dynamic Leontief-typemodel
- 8 The transformative potential of input–outputeconomics for addressing criticalresource challenges of the twenty-first century
- 9 Capital mobility and natural resources dynamics: a classical-Keynesianperspective
- 10 The chimera of a complete analysis ofeconomicdynamics
- 11 Ricardian and Schumpeterian rents: fundamental ingredients for structural economic dynamics
- 12 Towards a structural political economy of resources
- Part III Resources, institutions and social structures
- Part IV Resources, industrial change and the structure of the world economy
- Part V Towards a political economy of resources and structural change
- Name Index
- Subject Index
- References
8 - The transformative potential of input–outputeconomics for addressing criticalresource challenges of the twenty-first century
from Part II - Structural dynamics: resources and multi-sectoral linkages
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 May 2015
By
Book contents
- Resources, Production and Structural Dynamics
- Resources, Production and Structural Dynamics
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors
- Preface
- Book part
- 1 Resources, producibility and economic dynamics: a framework
- Part I Resources and distribution in a structural perspective
- Part II Structural dynamics: resources and multi-sectoral linkages
- 6 Limits,resources anddistributional trade-offs: structural constraints and opportunities
- 7 Producible resources and producibilityprices in a dynamic Leontief-typemodel
- 8 The transformative potential of input–outputeconomics for addressing criticalresource challenges of the twenty-first century
- 9 Capital mobility and natural resources dynamics: a classical-Keynesianperspective
- 10 The chimera of a complete analysis ofeconomicdynamics
- 11 Ricardian and Schumpeterian rents: fundamental ingredients for structural economic dynamics
- 12 Towards a structural political economy of resources
- Part III Resources, institutions and social structures
- Part IV Resources, industrial change and the structure of the world economy
- Part V Towards a political economy of resources and structural change
- Name Index
- Subject Index
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Resources, Production and Structural Dynamics , pp. 136 - 154Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2015
References
Duchin, F. (2005) ‘A World Trade Model Based on Comparative Advantage with m Regions, n Goods, and k Factors’, Economic Systems Research, 17.2, pp. 141–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duchin, F., and Levine, S. H. (2011) ‘Sectors May Use Multiple Technologies Simultaneously: The Rectangular Choice-of-Technology Model with Binding Factor Constraints’, Economic Systems Research, 23.3, pp. 281–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duchin, F., and Levine, S. H. (2012) ‘The Rectangular Sector-by-Technology Model: Not Every Economy Produces Every Product and Some Products May Rely on Several Technologies Simultaneously’, Journal of Economic Structures, 1.3, pp. 1–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duchin, F., and Szyld, D. (1985) ‘A Dynamic Input-Output Model with Assured Positive Output’, Metroeconomica, 37, pp. 269–82. Reprinted in H. Kurz, C. Lager and E. Dietzenbacher (eds.) Input-Output Analysis, Cheltenham: E. Elgar.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kondo, Y., and Nakamura, S. (2005) ‘Waste Input-Output Linear Programming Model with Its Application to Eco-Efficiency Analysis’, Economic Systems Research, 17.4, pp. 393–408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leontief, W. (1953) Studies in the Structure of the American Economy, New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Leontief, W. (1970) ‘The Dynamic Inverse’ in Carter, A. and Brody, A. (eds.) Contributions to Input-Output Analysis: Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Input-Output Techniques, Amsterdam: North Holland, pp. 17–46.Google Scholar
Leontief, W. (1971) ‘Theoretical Assumptions and Nonobserved Facts’, American Economic Review, 61.1, pp. 1–7. (Presidential address delivered at the eighty-third meeting of The American Economic Association, Detroit, Michigan, December 1970.)Google Scholar
Leontief, W., Carter, A., and Petri, P. (1977) The Future of the World Economy, New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Nakamura, S., and Kondo, Y. (2002) ‘Input-Output Analysis of Waste Management’, Journal of Industrial Ecology, 6.1, pp. 39–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nakamura, S., and Kondo, Y. (2009) Waste Input-Output Analysis: Concepts and Application to Industrial Ecology, Berlin: Springer Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reuters (2010) ‘Chile Bill Ups Mine Royalty from 2018’, Mining Weekly, September 1, www.miningweekly.com/article/chile-bill-ups-mine-royalty-from-2018-2010-09-01, accessed 15 September 2010.Google Scholar
Strømman, A., and Duchin, F. (2006) ‘A World Trade Model with Bilateral Trade Based on Comparative Advantage’, Economic Systems Research, 18.3, pp. 281–97.Google Scholar
United States Geological Survey (USGS) (2010) Mineral Commodity Summaries. Washington, DC: US Geological Survey.Google Scholar
World Bank (2012) Renewable Energy Desalination: An Emerging Solution to Close the Water Gap in the Middle East and North Africa, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Zacharia, J. (2010) ‘Offshore Gas Discoveries in Israel Prompt Squabbling over Royalties’, The Washington Post, 29 August, 3 pp., www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/08/28/AR2010082803523.html, accessed 15 September 2010.Google Scholar
- 4
- Cited by