Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-wxhwt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-10T20:25:54.902Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

13 - Transfer pricing disputes in Brazil

from Part IV - BRIC Countries

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 November 2014

Eduardo Baistrocchi
Affiliation:
London School of Economics and Political Science
Ian Roxan
Affiliation:
London School of Economics and Political Science
Get access

Summary

Introduction

The objective of this chapter is to discuss the development of transfer pricing legislation in Brazil, analysing the law as well as the leading cases on transfer pricing disputes. It is important to keep in mind that the Brazilian transfer pricing legislation was enacted only in 1996 (Law no. 9.430/96). Since its enactment, there have been significant changes in the Law, fiscal authorities' interpretation and courts' decisions. This signifies that Brazilian transfer pricing rules are evolving gradually. However, there are still significant deviations between the Brazilian transfer pricing law and the arm's length principle. The arguments presented in this chapter will demonstrate that further reforms are necessary if Brazil wants to adopt rules that are closer to the international standard implemented by the OECD's member countries.

This chapter is structured as follows: (i) the economic context; (ii) the historical background of transfer pricing legislation; (iii) the main aspects of the Brazilian transfer pricing legislation; (iv) the domestic approach to transfer pricing disputes; (v) administrative procedures to minimise transfer pricing disputes; (vi) bilateral and multilateral approaches to transfer pricing disputes; (vii) recent developments in the Law; (viii) concluding remarks. Sections 13.3, 13.4 will present the economic context, historical background and the main aspects of the Brazilian transfer pricing legislation. Section 13.5 will present some leading cases on transfer pricing disputes. Sections 13.6 and 13.7 will discuss the administrative procedures adopted to minimise transfer pricing litigation, including the feasibility of adopting the advanced pricing agreement (APA) or implementing a mutual agreement procedure (MAP) through double taxation conventions (DTCs). Section 13.8 will briefly analyse the recent changes introduced by Provisory Measures no. 472/09 and 478/09 and whether they reduced the gap between the Brazilian legislation and the international standard. Last, in section 13.9, we will conclude by demonstrating the importance of further adjustments in the Brazilian transfer pricing legislation in order to converge to the international standard, i.e. arm's length principle.

Type
Chapter
Information
Resolving Transfer Pricing Disputes
A Global Analysis
, pp. 519 - 554
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

IMF, International Financial Statistics, Annual Series (August 2010).
OECD, Revenue Statistics 1965–2008 (Paris: OECD, 2009).Google Scholar
Xavier, A., The Brazilian International Tax Law (Rio de Janeiro: Forense, 2004), p. 439.Google Scholar
OECD, Transfer Pricing Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises and Tax Administrations (Paris: OECD, 2009), p. 25Google Scholar
OECD, Review of Comparability and of Profit Method: Revision of Chapter I–III of the Transfer Pricing Guidelines (22 July 2010)
Rolim, J. D. and Moreira, G. A., ‘La experiencia de Brasil en el area de litigious de precio de transferencia’ in Baistrocchi, Eduardo (ed.), Litigios de Precios de Transferencia: Teoria y Practica (Argentina: LexisNexis, 2008), p. 188.Google Scholar
van Raad, Kees, Materials on International and EC Tax Law (Leiden: International Tax Center, 2008), vol. 1, p. 447.Google Scholar
Carlos dos Santos Almeida, The Experience of Brazil in Tax Treaties: Linkages between OECD Member Countries and Dynamic Non-member Economies (OECD: Paris, 1996), p. 178.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×