Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-jbqgn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-21T22:39:14.057Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

18 - Promoting Resilience through Early Childhood Intervention

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2012

Arthur J. Reynolds
Affiliation:
School of Social Work, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI
Suh-Ruu Ou
Affiliation:
School of Social Work, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI
Suniya S. Luthar
Affiliation:
Columbia University, New York
Get access

Summary

INTRODUCTION

In the past decade, research on resilience has grown dramatically beyond the field of clinical psychology from which it arose. Applications in education, social work, human development, health, and business have expanded the conceptualization of resilience from a psychosocial perspective to a multidimensional one (Wang & Gordon, 1994; Werner & Smith, 1992; Zimmerman & Arunkumar, 1994). Although much of the knowledge base has highlighted measurement and methodology, a major source of the appeal of the resilience concept is to enhance the well-being of individuals through social programs and policies. One major priority is the identification of personal and environmental factors that promote successful adjustment among the most vulnerable young people.

In this chapter, we review evidence about the effects of early childhood interventions in promoting resilience for children who have experienced high levels of social-environmental risk due to economic disadvantage. We address several contemporary issues including the measurement of resilience, interventions as protective factors, and the pathways through which the effects of interventions lead to positive developmental outcomes.

Despite continuing concerns about construct and measurement validity (Luthar, Cicchetti, & Becker, 2000; Tolan, 1996), resilience as a subject of investigation has been a major influence on developmental research. Four characteristics explain its influence. First, resilience is a positive outcome of development and thus provides an alternative perspective to dysfunctional behavior that has long been associated with the field of psychology. Undue focus on individual pathology and disease can have stigmatizing effects, and this is largely avoided with resilience.

Type
Chapter
Information
Resilience and Vulnerability
Adaptation in the Context of Childhood Adversities
, pp. 436 - 460
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2003

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anderson, S., Auquier, A., Hauck, W. W., Oakes, D., Vandaele, W., & Weisberg, H. I. (1980). Statistical methods for comparative studies: Techniques for bias reduction. New York: Wiley
Barnett, W. S., & Boocock, S. S. (Eds.). (1998). Early care and education for children in poverty. Albany: State University of New York Press
Barnett, W. S., Young, J. W., & Schweinhart, L. J. (1998). How preschool education influences long-term cognitive development and school success: A causal model. In W. S. Barnett & S. S. Boocock (Eds.), Early care and education for children in poverty (pp. 167–184). Albany: State University of New York Press
Berrueta-Clement, J. R., Schweinhart, L. J., Barnett, W. S., Epstein, A. S., &Weikart, D. P. (1984). Changed lives: The effects of the Perry Preschool Program on youths through age 19. Ypsilanti, MI: High/Scope
Bronfenbrenner, U. (1975). Is early intervention effective? In M. Guttentag & E. Struening (Eds.), Handbook of evaluation research (Vol. 2, pp. 519–603). Beverly Hills: Sage
Chen, H. T. (1990). Theory-driven evaluations. Newbury Park, CA: Sage
Chicago Board of Education. (1988). Chicago EARLY: Instructional activities for ages 3 to 6. Vernon Hills, IL: ETA.
Coie, J. D., Watt, N. F., West, S. G., Harkins, J. D., Asarnow, J. R., Markman, H. J., Ramey, S. L., Shure, M. B. & Long, B. (1993). The science of prevention: A conceptual framework and some directions for a national research program. American Psychologist, 48, 1013–1022CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Consortium for Longitudinal Studies. (1983). As the twig is bent … lasting effects of preschool programs. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum
Cook, T. D., & Campbell, D. T. (1979). Quasi-experimentation: Design and analysis issues for field settings. Chicago: Rand McNally
Cronbach, L. J. (1982). Designing evaluations for educational and social programs. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass
Currie, J., & Thomas, D. (1998). School quality and the longer-term effects of Head Start. NBER Working Paper No. 6362. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research
Durlak, J. A., & Wells, A. M. (1997). Primary prevention of mental health programs for children and adolescents: A meta-analytic review. American Journal of Community Psychology, 25, 115–152CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Guralnick, M. (Ed.). (1997). The effectiveness of early intervention. Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes
Karoly, L. A., Greenwood, P. W., Everingham, S. S., Hoube, J., Kilburn, M. R., Rydell, C. P., Sanders, M., & Chiesa, J. (1998). Investing in our children: What we know and don't know about the costs and benefits of early childhood interventions. Santa Monica, CA: RAND.
Lally, J. R., Mangione, P. L., Honig, A. S., & Wittner, D. S. (1988, April 13–18). More pride, less delinquency: Findings from the ten-year follow-up study of the Syracuse University Family Development Research Program. Zero to Three, 8(4), 13–18Google Scholar
Lazar, I., Darlington, R. B., Murray, H. W., & Snipper, A. S. (1982). Lasting effects of early education: A report from the consortium for longitudinal studies. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 47 (2/3, Serial No. 195)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, V. E., & Loeb, S. (1995). Where do Head Start attendees end up? One reason why preschool effects fade out. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 17, 62–82CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lipsey, M. W. (1993). Theory as method: Small theories as treatments. In L. Sechrest & A. Scott (Eds.), Understanding causes and generalizing about them. New directions for program evaluation (No. 57, pp. 5–38). San Francisco: Jossey-BassCrossRef
Lipsey, M. W., & Wilson, D. B. (1993). The efficacy of psychological, educational, and behavioral treatment: Confirmation from meta-analysis. American Psychologist, 48, 1181–1209CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Luthar, S. S., Cicchetti, D., & Becker, B. (2000). The construct of resilience: A critical evaluation and guidelines for future workChild Development, 71, 543–562CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Naisbitt, N. (1968). Child–Parent Education Centers, ESEATitle I, Activity I. Unpublished report, Chicago
Powell, D. R. (1999). Early childhood development. In A. J. Reynolds, H. J. Walberg, & R. P. Weissberg (Eds.), Promoting positive outcomes: Issues in children's and families' lives (pp. 45–71). Washington, DC: Child Welfare League of America
Ramey, S. L, & Ramey, C. T. (1992). Early educational intervention with disadvantaged children – To what effect?Applied and Preventive Psychology, 1, 131–140CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ramey, C. T., & Ramey, S. L. (1998). Early intervention and early experience. American Psychologist, 53, 109–120CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Reynolds, A. J. (1998a). Confirmatory program evaluation: A method for strengthening causal inference. American Journal of Evaluation, 17, 21–35Google Scholar
Reynolds, A. J. (1998b). Resilience among black urban youth: Prevalence, intervention effects and mechanisms of influence. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 68, 84–100CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reynolds, A. J. (2000). Success in early intervention: The Chicago Child–Parent Centers. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press
Reynolds, A. J. (1999, April). Pathways of long-term effects in the Title I Child–Parent Center Program. Paper presented at the biennial meeting of the Society for Research in Child Development, Albuquerque, NM.
Reynolds, A. J., & Temple, J. A. (1995). Quasi-experimental estimates of the effects of a preschool intervention: Psychometric and econometric comparisons. Evaluation Review, 19, 347–373CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reynolds, A. J., & Temple, J. A. (1998). Extended early childhood intervention and school achievement: Age 13 findings from the Chicago Longitudinal Study. Child Development, 69, 231–246CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reynolds, A. J., Mavrogenes, N. A., Bezruczko, N., & Hagemann, M. (1996). Cognitive and family-support mediators of preschool effectiveness: A confirmatory analysis. Child Development, 67, 1119–1140CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Reynolds, A. J., Chang, H., & Temple, J. A. (1998). Early childhood intervention and juvenile delinquency: An exploratory analysis of the Child–Parent Centers. Evaluation Review, 22, 341–372CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Reynolds, A. J., Mann, E., Miedel, W., & Smokowski, P. (1997). The state of early childhood intervention: Effectiveness, myths and realities, new directions. Focus, 19(1), 3–11Google Scholar
Reynolds, A. J., Temple, J. A., Robertson, D. L., & Mann, E. A. (2001). Long-term effects of an early childhood intervention on educational achievement and juvenile arrest: A 15-year follow-up of low-income children in public schools. Journal of the American Medical Association, 285 (18), 2339–2346CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rutter, M., Champion L., Quinton, D., Maughan, B., & Pickles, A. (1995). Understanding individual differences in environment-risk exposure. In P. Moen, G. H. Elder, Jr., & K. Lüscher (Eds.), Examining lives in context: Perspectives on the ecology of human development. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association
Schweinhart, L. J., & Weikart, D. P. (1980). Young children grow up: The effects of the Perry Preschool Program on youths through age 15. Ypsilanti, MI: High/Scope Educational Research Foundation
Schweinhart, L. J., Barnes, H. V., & Weikart, D. P. (1993). Significant benefits: The High/Scope Perry Preschool study through age 27. Ypsilanti, MI: High/Scope Educational Research Foundation
Seitz, V. (1990). Intervention programs for impoverished children: A comparison of educational and family support models. Annals of Child Development, 7, 73–103Google Scholar
Susser, M. (1973). Causal thinking in the health sciences, concepts and strategies of epidemology. New York: Oxford University Press
Tolan, P. H. (1996). How resilient is the concept of resilience?Community Psychologist, 29, 12–15Google Scholar
U. S. General Accounting Office. (1997). Head Start: Research provides little information on impact of current program. Report no, HEHS-97–59. Washington, DC: GAO.
Yoshikawa, H. (1995). Long-term effects of early childhood programs on social outcomes and delinquency. Future of Children, 5(3), 51–75CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wang, M. C., & Gordon, E. W. (Eds.). (1994). Educational resilience in inner-city America: Challenges and prospects. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum
Weissberg, R. P., & Greenberg, M. T. (1998). School and community competence-enhancement and prevention programs. In W. Damon (Ed.) Handbook of child psychology: Child psychology in practice (Vol. 4, pp. 877–954). New York: Wiley
Werner, E. E., & Smith, R. S. (1992). Overcoming the odds: High risk children from birth to adulthood. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press
Zigler, E., & Butterfield, E. C. (1968). Motivational aspects of change in IQ test performance of culturally deprived nursery school children. Child Development, 39, 1–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zigler, E., & Styfco S. (1993). Head Start and beyond: A national plan for extended childhood intervention. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press
Zigler, E., Abelson, W., Trickett, P. K., & Seitz, V. (1982). Is an intervention program necessary in order to improve economically disadvantaged children's IQ scores?Child Development, 53, 340–348CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zimmerman, M. A., & Arunkumar, R. (1994). Resiliency research: Implications for schools and policy. Social policy report (Vol. VIII, No. 4, pp. 1–17). Ann Arbor, MI: Society for Research in Child Development

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×