Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
  • Print publication year: 2013
  • Online publication date: February 2013

13 - Treat humanely

Summary

If you work in a discipline such as toxicology, psychology, or neurology, you may well find yourself in the position of having to decide whether you will harm animals in research. Those who decide to perform harmful animal research are either doing it for the benefit of the actual animals used, as in veterinary work with sick or injured animals, or have been able to find for themselves an answer to the question: what gives us the right to inflict pain and suffering on innocent creatures? The justifications offered for harming animals are almost always consequentialist in form; by harming a small number of animals in as limited a way as possible, goes the argument, we can produce great benefits for humans and other animals. In this chapter we will explore this utilitarian way of thinking.

According to the US Department of Agriculture, 1,134,693 vertebrate animals were used in research in the USA in 2010 (Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service 2011). Of that number, 71,317 were nonhuman primates and roughly 85,000 were cats or dogs. More than 300,000 animals were used in experiments involving pain that was treated with drugs, and almost 100,000 were caused pain with no drugs administered.

By all accounts, these figures vastly underestimate the actual numbers of animals used because the Animal Welfare Act does not require researchers to report figures on the most commonly used species: rats, mice, birds, fish, and frogs. According to Larry Carbone, the number of rodents alone used in 2001 was 80 million (Carbone 2004). (The numbers are also a fraction of the total numbers of animals killed for food and fiber in the USA, which the US Department of Agriculture estimates at 35 million cows, 110 million hogs, and 8.8 billion chickens (United States Department of Agriculture 2011).) The commonly accepted rationale for using animals in biomedical research is to advance basic knowledge of human disease and function and so to improve human life without having to subject humans to the experiments being run on the animals.

Journal of Applied Philosophy 12, no. 1 (April 1995): 13–25
Elswood, B.F. and Striker, R.B. (1993) in Research in Virology vol. 144, pp. 175–6
Lancet (1978) August, pp. 354–5
Health United States (1988) Publication of the Department of Health and Human Services
Schardein, J.L. (1985) Chemically Induced Birth Defects, New York: Marcel Dekker, pp. 20, 23
Hood, R.D. (1990) “Animal Models of Effects of Prenatal Insult” in Developmental Toxicology: Risk Assessment and the Future (ed) Hood, R.D., New York: van Nostrand, pp. 184–185
Palmer, A.K. (1978) “Design of Subprimate Animal studies”, in The Handbook of Teratology, (eds) Wilson, J.G. and Fraser, F.C., vol. 4, New York: Plenum Press, p. 219
Giere, R.N. (1991) Understanding Scientific Reasoning, 3rd edition (Ft. Worth: Harcourt, Brace, Jovanovich), p. 74
Bibliography
Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service. 2011. Annual Report Animal Usage by Fiscal Year. Available at: .
Carbone, L. 2004. What Animals Want: Expertise and Advocacy in Laboratory Animal Welfare Policy, 1st edn. New York: Oxford University Press.
Hackam, D.G. & Redelmeier, D.A. 2006. Translation of research evidence from animals to humans. JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association, 296(14), 1731–1732.
LaFollette, H. & Shanks, N. 1995. Util-izing animals. Journal of Applied Philosophy, 12(1), 13–25.
Office of Responsible Research Practices, I.A.C. and U.C. 2010. Pain and Distress in Laboratory Animals. Available at: [Accessed March 3, 2012].
Perel, P. et al. 2007. Comparison of treatment effects between animal experiments and clinical trials: systematic review. BMJ: British Medical Journal, 334(7586), 197–200.
Regan, T. 1983. The Case for Animal Rights. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Russell, W.M.S. & Burch, R.L. 1959. The Principles of Humane Experimental Technique. London: Methuen. Available at: .
Sponsored Programs and Regulatory Compliance. n.d. Animal Care and Use Policy. Available at: .
United States Code, 2009 edition. 2009. Title 7 – Agriculture, Chapter 54 – Transportation, Sale, and Handling of Certain Animals. Available at: .
United States Department of Agriculture. 2011. Poultry Slaughter – 2010 Summary.
University of Minnesota Research Animal Resources. 2000. Experiment Guidelines for the Prevention, Assessment and Relief of Pain and Distress in Laboratory Animals. Available at: .