Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-m8qmq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-16T14:33:27.166Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

3 - Beware intuition

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 February 2013

Gary Comstock
Affiliation:
North Carolina State University, Raleigh
Get access

Summary

Egoism has much to recommend it. For one thing, it seems consistent with what biology suggests about the way the moral system might have evolved. Imagine our ancestors on the African plain competing for the attention of mates. Individuals who were indifferent about, unaware of, or insufficiently attentive to their own interests would be at a decided disadvantage. If individuals didn’t look out for themselves, then who would look out for them? Those Homo sapiens skilled at getting what they wanted almost certainly had fitness advantages over individuals who were clueless, especially when it came to maximizing one’s chances of finding a partner willing to have children with them. It seems, therefore, that egoists would win out over non-egoists, for they would outcompete whoever was not willing to scratch and claw to fulfill their needs.

Egoists must be conscious of observation bias

But things may not be so simple for the egoist. The reason is that many self-interested individuals have survived over time and, following this line of thought, many egoists must now exist. All of them, according to this story, must have exquisite means of reading, anticipating, and responding to others’ behaviors, too. So if I’m an egoist today and I want to try to get away with slighting others in the contemporary research world, then, I will have my work cut out for me. In this chapter, we will explore the reasons that it’s hard out there for an egoist.

Type
Chapter
Information
Research Ethics
A Philosophical Guide to the Responsible Conduct of Research
, pp. 68 - 78
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2013

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Darley, J.M. & Batson, C.D. 1973. “From Jerusalem to Jericho”: a study of situational and dispositional variables in helping behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 27(1), 100–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Darwin, C. & Barlow, N. 1969. The Autobiography of Charles Darwin, 1809–1882: With Original Omissions Restored. Norton. Available at: .Google Scholar
Devlin, K. 2003. Monty Hall. Mathematical Association of America. Available at: .
Devlin, K. 2005. Monty Hall revisited. Mathematical Association of America. Available at: .
Ditto, P.H. & Lopez, D.F. 1992. Motivated skepticism: use of differential decision criteria for preferred and nonpreferred conclusions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63(4), 568–584.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Doris, J.M. 2005. Lack of Character: Personality and Moral Behavior. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Jeng, M. 2006. A selected history of expectation bias in physics. American Journal of Physics, 74(7), 578–583.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johansson, P. 2005. Failure to detect mismatches between intention and outcome in a simple decision task. Science, 310(5745), 116–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kruger, J. & Dunning, D. 1999. Unskilled and unaware of it: how difficulties in recognizing one’s own incompetence lead to inflated self-assessments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77(6), 1121–1134.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mill, J.S. 2004. On Liberty. Agora Publications.Google Scholar
Pelham, B., Mirenberg, M. & Jones, J. 2002. Why Susie sells seashells by the seashore: implicit egotism and major life decisions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82(4), 469–487.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Russo, J.E. & Schoemaker, P.J.H. 2002. Winning Decisions: Getting It Right the First Time. Random House Digital.Google Scholar
Tversky, A & Kahneman, D. 1981. The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. Science, 211(4481), 453–458.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tversky, A. & Kahneman, D. 1974. Judgment under uncertainty: heuristics and biases. Science, 185(4157), 1124–1131.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
von Hippel, W. & Trivers, R. 2011. The evolution and psychology of self-deception. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 34(01), 1–16.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zimmer, C. 2011. Why science struggles to correct its mistakes. The New York Times. Available at: [Accessed June 27, 2011].

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Beware intuition
  • Gary Comstock
  • Book: Research Ethics
  • Online publication: 05 February 2013
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511902703.005
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Beware intuition
  • Gary Comstock
  • Book: Research Ethics
  • Online publication: 05 February 2013
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511902703.005
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Beware intuition
  • Gary Comstock
  • Book: Research Ethics
  • Online publication: 05 February 2013
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511902703.005
Available formats
×