Andersson, L. M., & Pearson, C. M. (1999). Tit for tat? The spiraling effect of incivility in the workplace. Academy of Management Review, 24, 452–471.Google Scholar

Aquino, K., & Douglas, S. (2003). Identity threat and antisocial behavior in organizations: The moderating effects of individual differences, aggressive modeling, and hierarchical status. Organizational Behavioral and Human Decision Processes, 90, 195–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Aquino, K., Douglas, S., & Martinko, M. J. (2004). Overt anger in response to victimization: Attributional style and organizational norms as moderators. Journal of. Occupational. Health Psychology, 9, 152–164.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Aquino, K., & Lamertz, K. (2004). A relational model of workplace victimization: Social roles and patterns of victimization in dyadic relationships. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89, 1023–1034.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Aquino, K., & Thau, S. (2009). Workplace victimization: Aggression from the target’s perspective. Annual Review of Psychology, 60, 717–741.Google Scholar

Aquino, K., Tripp, T. M., & Bies, R. J. (2006). Getting even or moving on? Power, procedural justice and types of offense as predictors of revenge, forgiveness, and avoidance in organizations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91, 653–668.Google Scholar

Ashforth, B. E. (1994). Petty tyranny in organizations: A preliminary examination of antecedents and consequences. Canadian Journal of Administrative Science, 14, 126–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: W. H. Freeman.Google Scholar

Baron, R. A., & Neuman, J. H. (1996). Workplace violence and workplace aggression: Evidence on their relative frequency and causes. Aggressive Behavior, 22, 161–173.3.0.CO;2-Q>CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ben-Zur, H., & Yagil, D. (2005). The relationship between empowerment, aggressive behaviours of customers, coping, and burnout. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 14, 81–99.Google Scholar

Bies, R. J., & Tripp, T. M. (1996). Revenge in organizations: The good, the bad, and the ugly. In Griffin, R. W., O’Leary‐Kelly, A., & Collins, J. M. (Eds.), Dysfunctional behavior in organizations: Violent and deviant behavior (pp. 246–260). Stamford, CT: JAI Press.Google Scholar

Björkqvist, K. (1997). Learning aggression from models: From social learning toward a cognitive theory of modeling. In Feshbach, S. & Zagrodzka, J. (Eds.), Aggression: Biological, developmental, and social perspectives (pp. 69–82). New York: Plenum Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bjorkqvist, K., Osterman, K., & Hjelt-Back, M. (1994). Aggression among university employees. Aggressive Behavior, 20, 173–184.Google Scholar

Bowling, N. A., & Beehr, T. A. (2006).Workplace harassment from the victim’s perspective: A theoretical model and meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91, 998–1012.Google Scholar

Brees, J. R., Mackey, J., & Martinko, M. J. (2013). An attributional perspective of aggression in organizations. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 28, 252–272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brotheridge, C. M., & Lee, R. T. (2002). Testing a conservation of resources model of the dynamics of emotional labor. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 7, 57–67.Google Scholar

Brotheridge, C. M., (2006). Examining the relationship between the perceived work environment and workplace bullying. Canadian Journal of Community Mental Health: Special Issue on Work and Mental Health, 25, 31–44.Google Scholar

Brotheridge, C. M., (2010). Restless and confused: Emotional responses to workplace bullying in men and women. Career Development International, 15, 687–707.Google Scholar

Brotheridge, C. M., Lee, R. T., & Power, J. L. (2012). Am I my own worst enemy? The experiences of bullying targets who are also aggressors. Career Development International, 17, 358–374.Google Scholar

Camodeca, M., & Goossens, F. A. (2005). Aggression, social cognitions, anger and sadness in bullies and victims. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 46, 186–197.Google Scholar

Cortina, L. M., & Magley, V. J. (2003). Raising voice, risking retaliation: Events following interpersonal mistreatment in the workplace. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 8, 247–265.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Cortina, L. M., (2009). Patterns and profiles of response to incivility in the workplace. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 14, 272–288.Google Scholar

Daniels, K., Jones, D., Fergusson, E., Perryman, S., & Rick, J. (2004). Cognitive factors’ influence on the expression and reporting of work related stress. Research Report 170, Loughborough University, University of Nottingham and Institute for Employment Studies for the Health and Safety Executive, Norwich, UK.Google Scholar

Douglas, S. C., Kiewitz, C., Martinko, M. J., Harvey, P., Kim, Y., & Chun, J. U. (2008). Cognitions, emotions, and evaluations: An elaboration likelihood model for workplace aggression. Academy of Management Review, 33, 425–451.Google Scholar

Douglas, S. C., & Martinko, M. J. (2001). Exploring the role of individual differences in the prediction of workplace aggression. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 547–559.Google Scholar

Duffy, D., & Sperry, L. (2007). Workplace mobbing: Individual and family health consequences. The Family Journal: Counseling and Therapy for Couples and Families, 15, 398–404.Google Scholar

Folkman, S., & Moskowitz, J. T. (2004). Coping pitfalls and promise. Annual Review of Psychology, 55, 745–774.Google Scholar

Freedman, S. R., & Enright, R. D. (1996). Forgiveness as an intervention goal with incest survivors. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 64, 983–992.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Glasl, F. (1982). The process of conflict escalation and roles of third parties. In Bomers, G. B. J. & Peterson, R. (Eds.), Conflict management and industrial relations (pp. 119–140). Boston, MA: Kluwer-Nijhoff.Google Scholar

Grandey, A. A. (2004). The customer is not always right: Customer aggression and emotional regulation of service employees. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 25, 397–418.Google Scholar

Hansen, T. (2008). Critical conflict resolution theory and practice. Conflict Resolution Quarterly, 25, 403–427.Google Scholar

Harvey, P., Martinko, M. J., & Gardner, W. L. (2006). Promoting authentic behavior in organizations: An attributional perspective. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 12, 1–11.Google Scholar

Harvey, P., Stoner, J., Hochwarter, W., & Kacmar, C. (2007). Coping with abusive supervision: The neutralizing effects of ingratiation and positive affect on negative employee outcomes. Leadership Quarterly, 18, 264–280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hershcovis, M. S., Reich, T. C., Parker, S. K., & Bozeman, J. (2012). The relationship between workplace aggression and target deviant behaviour: The moderating roles of power and task interdependence. Work & Stress, 26, 1–20.Google Scholar

Hobfoll, S. E. (1989). Conservation of resources: A new attempt at conceptualizing stress. American Psychologist, 44, 513–524.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Hogh, A., & Dofradottir, A. (2001). Coping with bullying in the workplace. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 10, 485–495.Google Scholar

Hough, A., Mikkelsen, E. G., & Hansen, A. M. (2011). Individual consequences of workplace bullying. In Einarsen, S., Hoel, H., Zapf, D., & Cooper, C. L. (Eds.), Bullying and harassment in the workplace (2nd ed., pp. 107–128). Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press, Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar

Johnson‐Laird, P. N., & Oatley, K. (1992). Basic emotions, rationality, and folk theory. Cognition and Emotions, 6, 201–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Judge, T. A., Erez, A., & Bono, J. E. (1998). The power of being positive: The relation between positive self-concept and job performance. Human Performance, 11, 167–187.Google Scholar

Karatuna, I. (2015). Targets’ coping with workplace bullying: A qualitative study. Qualitative Research in Organizations and Management: An International Journal, 10(1), 21–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Keashly, L., Trott, V., & MacLean, L. (1994). Abusive behavior in the workplace: A preliminary investigation. Violence and Victims, 9, 341–357.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Kivimäki, M., Elovainio, M., & Vahtera, J. (2000). Workplace bullying and sickness absence in hospital staff. Occupational Environmental Medicine, 57, 656–660.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Kulik, C. T., & Rowland, K. M. (1989). The relationship of attributional frameworks to job seekers’ perceived success and job search involvement. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 10, 361–367.Google Scholar

Kwan, S. S. M., Tuckey, M. R., & Dollard, M. F. (2014). The role of the psychosocial safety climate in coping with workplace bullying: A grounded theory and sequential tree analysis. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 1–15. doi:10.1080/1359432X.2014.982102.Google Scholar

Lazarus, R. S. (1991). Emotion and adaptation. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Lazarus, R. S., & Folkman, S. (1984). Stress, appraisal, and coping. New York: Springer.Google Scholar

Lazarus, R. S., (1987). Transactional theory and research on emotions and coping. European Journal of Personality, 1, 141–169.Google Scholar

Lee, D. (2000). An analysis of workplace bullying in the UK. Personnel Review, 29, 593–612.Google Scholar

Lee, R. T., & Brotheridge, C. M. (2006). When prey turns predatory: Workplace bullying as a predictor of counter-aggression/bullying, coping and well-being. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 15, 352–377.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Levy, P. E. (1993). Self-appraisal and attributions: A test of a model. Journal of Management, 19, 51–62.Google Scholar

Lewis, S. E., & Orford, J. (2005), Women’s experiences of workplace bullying: Changes in social relationships. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology, 15, 29–47.Google Scholar

Leymann, H. (1996). The content and development of mobbing at work. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 5, 165–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Leymann, H., & Gustafsson, A. (1996). Mobbing at work and the development of posttraumatic stress disorders. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 5, 251–275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Loerbroks, A., Weigl, M., Li, J., Glaser, J., Degen, C., & Angerer, P. (2015). Workplace bullying and depressive symptoms: A prospective study among junior physicians in Germany. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 78, 168–172.Google Scholar

Lovell, B. L., & Lee, R. T. (2011). Impact of workplace bullying on emotional and physical well-being: A longitudinal collective case study. Journal of Aggression, Maltreatment & Trauma, 20, 344–357.Google Scholar

Malamut, A. B., & Offermann, L. R. (2001). Coping with sexual harassment: Personal, environmental, and cognitive determinants. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 1152–1166.Google Scholar

Mann, R. (1996). Psychological abuse in the workplace. In McCarthy, P., Sheehan, M., & Wilkie, W. (Eds.), Bullying: From backyard to boardroom (pp. 83–92). Alexandria, Australia: Millennium Books.Google Scholar

Martinko, M. J., & Gardner, W. L. (1982). Learned helplessness: An alternative explanation for performance deficits. Academy of Management Review, 7, 195–204.Google Scholar

Martinko, M. J., Gundlach, M. J., & Douglas, S. C. (2002). Toward an integrative theory of counterproductive workplace behavior: A causal reasoning perspective. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 10, 36–50.Google Scholar

Neuman, J. H., & Baron, R. A. (1998). Workplace violence and workplace aggression: Evidence concerning specific forms, potential causes, and preferred targets. Journal of Management, 24, 391–419.Google Scholar

Niedl, K. (1996). Mobbing and wellbeing: Economic and personal development implications. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 5, 239–249.Google Scholar

Ólafsson, R. F., & Jóhannsdóttir, H. L., (2004). Coping with bullying in the workplace: The effect of gender, age and type of bullying. British Journal of Guidance & Counselling, 32, 319–333.Google Scholar

Penley, J. A., Tomaka, J., & Wiebe, J.S. (2002). The association of coping to physical and psychological health outcomes: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 25, 551–603.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Richman, J. A., Rospenda, K. M., Flaherty, J. A., & Freels, S. (2001). Workplace harassment, active coping, and alcohol-related outcomes. Journal of Substance Abuse, 13, 347–366.Google Scholar

Rodríguez-Muñoz, A., Moreno-Jiménez, B., & Sanz-Vergel, A. I. (2015). Reciprocal relations between workplace bullying, anxiety and vigor: A two-wave longitudinal study. Anxiety, Stress, & Coping, 28(5), 514–530CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Roseman, I. J., Antoniou, A. A., & Jose, P.E. (1996). Appraisal determinants of emotions: Constructing a more accurate and comprehensive theory. Cognition and Emotion, 10, 241–277.Google Scholar

Salin, D., Tenhiälä, A., Roberge, M.-É., & Berdahl, J. L. (2014). ‘I wish I had ...’: Target reflections on responses to workplace mistreatment. Human Relations, 67, 1189–1211.Google Scholar

Schat, A. C. H., & Kelloway, E. K. (2000). Effects of perceived control on the outcomes of workplace aggression and violence. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 5, 386–402.Google Scholar

Schat, A. C. H., (2003). Reducing the adverse consequences of workplace aggression and violence: The buffering effects of organizational support. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 8, 110–122.Google Scholar

Shaver, K. G., & Drown, D. (1986). On causality, responsibility, and self-blame: A theoretical note. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 50, 697–702.Google Scholar

Silver, W. S., Mitchell, T. R., & Gist, M. (1995). Responses of successful and unsuccessful performance: The moderating effect of self-efficacy on the relationship between performance and attributions. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 62, 286–299.Google Scholar

Thacker, R. A., & Ferris, G. R. (1991). Understanding sexual harassment in the workplace: The influence of power and politics within the dyadic interaction of harasser and target. Human Resource Management Review, 1, 23–37.Google Scholar

Thacker, R. A., & Gohmann, S. F. (1996). Emotional and psychological consequences of sexual harassment: A descriptive study. Journal of Psychology, 130, 429–446.Google Scholar

Weiner, B. (1986). An attributional theory of motivation and emotion. New York: Springer.Google Scholar

Weiner, B. (1995). Judgments of responsibility: A foundation of a theory of social conduct. New York: Guilford.Google Scholar

Wilkie, W. (1996). Understanding the behavior of targetised people. In McCarthy, P., Sheehan, M., & Wilkie, W. (Eds.), Bullying: From backyard to boardroom (pp. 1–11). Alexandria, Australia: Millennium Books.Google Scholar

Winstanley, S., & Whittington, R. (2002). Anxiety, burnout and coping styles in general hospital staff exposed to workplace aggression: A cyclical model of burnout and vulnerability to aggression. Work & Stress, 16, 302–315.Google Scholar

Zapf, D., & Gross, C. (2001). Conflict escalation and coping with workplace bullying: A replication and extension. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 10, 497–522.Google Scholar

Alliger, G. M., & Dwight, S. A. (2000). A meta-analytic investigation of the susceptibility of integrity tests to faking and coaching. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 60, 59–72.Google Scholar

Alliger, G. M., Lilienfield, S. O., & Mitchell, K. E. (1996). The susceptibility of overt and covert integrity tests to coaching and faking. Psychological Science, 7, 32–39.Google Scholar

Becker, T. E. (2005). Development and validation of a situational judgment test of employee integrity. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 13(3), 225–232.Google Scholar

Berry, C. M., Carpenter, N. C., & Barratt, C. L. (2012). Do other-reports of counterproductive work behavior provide an incremental contribution over self-reports? A meta-analytic comparison. Journal of Applied Psychology, 97(3), 613–636.Google Scholar

Berry, C. M., Ones, D. S., & Sackett, P. R. (2007). Interpersonal deviance, organizational deviance, and their common correlates: A review and meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92, 410–424.Google Scholar

Berry, C. M., Sackett, P. R., & Tobares, V. (2010). A meta-analysis of conditional reasoning tests of aggression. Personnel Psychology, 63, 361–384.Google Scholar

Berry, C. M., Sackett, P. R., & Wiemann, S. (2007). A review of recent developments in integrity test research. Personnel Psychology, 60, 271–301.Google Scholar

Birkeland, S. A., Manson, T. M., Kisamore, J. L., Brannick, M. T., & Smith, M. A. (2006). A meta-analytic investigation of job applicant faking on personality measures. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 14, 317–335.Google Scholar

Clevenger, J., Pereira, G. M., Wiechmann, D., Schmitt, N., & Harvey, V. S. (2001). Incremental validity of situational judgment tests. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 410–417.Google Scholar

Conway, J. S. (2014). The invention of lying (at work): The development and validation of a situational judgment. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. University of South Florida, Tampa, FL.Google Scholar

Crick, N. R., & Dodge, K. A. (1994). A review and reformulation of social information-processing mechanisms in children’s social adjustment. Psychological Bulletin, 115, 74–101.Google Scholar

Dalal, R. S. (2005). A meta-analysis of the relationship between organizational citizenship behavior and counterproductive work behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90(6), 1241–1255.Google Scholar

de Meijer, L. A., Born, M. P., van Zielst, J., & van der Molen, H. T. (2010). Construct-driven development of a video-based situational judgment test for integrity: A study in a multi-ethnic police setting. European Psychologist, 15(3), 229–236.Google Scholar

Deffenbacher, J. L., Oetting, E. R., Thwaites, G. A., Lynch, R. S., Baker, D. A., et al. (1996). State-trait anger theory and the utility of the trait anger scale. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 43, 131–148.Google Scholar

Dilchert, S., Ones, D. S., Davis, R. D., & Rostow, C. D. (2007). Cognitive ability predicts objectively measured counterproductive work behaviors. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92, 616–627.Google Scholar

Einarsen, S., & Raknes, B. I. (1997). Harassment in the workplace and the victimization of men. Violence and Victims, 12, 247–263.Google Scholar

Foldes, H. J., Duehr, E. E., & Ones, D. S. (2008). Group differences in personality: Meta-analyses comparing five US racial groups. Personnel Psychology, 61, 579–616.Google Scholar

Glomb, T. M. (2002). Workplace anger and aggression: Informing conceptual models with data from specific encounters. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 7, 20–36.Google Scholar

Gonzalez-Mule, E., Mount, M. K., & Oh, I.S. (2014). A meta-analysis of the relationship between general mental ability and nontask performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 99, 1222–1243.Google Scholar

Gottfredson, L. S. (1997). Mainstream science on intelligence: An editorial with 52 signatories, history and bibliography. Intelligence, 24, 79–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gruys, M. L. (2000). The dimensionality of deviant employee behavior in the workplace. Doctoral Dissertation. Retrieved from Proquest Dissertations & Theses.Google Scholar

Hershcovis, M. S., & Barling, J. (2010). Towards a multi-foci approach to workplace aggression: A meta-analytic review of outcomes from different perpetrators. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 31, 24–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hershcovis, M. S., Turner, N., Barling, J., Arnold, K. A., Dupre, K. E., et al. (2007). Predicting workplace aggression: A meta- analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92, 228–238.Google Scholar

Hunter, J. E. (1980). Validity generalization for 12,000 jobs: An application of synthetic validity and validity generalization to the General Aptitude Test Battery (GATE). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Labor, Employment Service.Google Scholar

Hunter, J. E., & Schmidt, F. L. (2004). Methods of meta-analysis: Correcting error and bias in research findings. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar

Hurtz, G. M., & Alliger, G. M. (2002). Influence of coaching on integrity test performance and unlikely virtues scale scores. Human Performance, 15, 255–273.Google Scholar

James, L. R. (1998). Measurement of personality via conditional reasoning. Organizational Research Methods, 1(2), 131–163.Google Scholar

James, L. R., & LeBreton, J. M. (2012). Assessing the implicit personality through conditional reasoning. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar

James, L. R., & McIntyre, M. D. (2000). Conditional Reasoning Test of Aggression test manual. Knoxville, TN: Innovative Assessment Technology.Google Scholar

James, L. R., McIntyre, M. D., Glisson, C. A., Green, P. D., Patton, T. W., et al. (2005). A conditional reasoning measure for aggression. Organizational Research Methods, 8(1), 69–99.Google Scholar

Marcus, B., Lee, K., & Ashton, M. C. (2007). Personality dimensions explaining relationships between integrity tests and counterproductive behavior: Big five, or one in addition? Personnel Psychology, 60, 1–34.Google Scholar

McCrae, R. R., & CostaJr., P. T. (2003). Personality in adulthood: A five-factor theory perspective. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar

McCrae, R. R., (1997). Personality trait structure as a human universal. American Psychologist, 52(5), 509–516.Google Scholar

McDaniel, M. A., Hartman, N. S., Whetzel, D. L., & Grubb, W. L. (2007). Situational judgment tests, response instructions, and validity: A meta-analysis. Personnel Psychology, 60(1), 63–91.Google Scholar

Morf, C. C., & Rhodewalt, F. (2001). Unraveling the paradoxes of narcissism: A dynamic self- regulatory processing model. Psychological Inquiry, 12(4), 177–196.Google Scholar

Neuman, J. H., & Baron, R. A. (2005). Aggression in the workplace: A social–psychological perspective. In Fox, S. & Spector, P. E. (Eds.), Counterproductive Work Behavior: Investigations of actors and targets, (pp. 13–40). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar

Neuman, J. H., (1998). Workplace violence and workplace aggression: Evidence concerning specific forms, potential causes, and preferred targets. Journal of Management, 24, 391–419.Google Scholar

Neuman, J. H., (1996). Aggression in the workplace. In Giacalone, R. A., & Greenberg, J. (Eds.), Antisocial behavior in organizations (pp. 37–67). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Press.Google Scholar

O’Boyle, E. H., Forsyth, D. R., Banks, G. C., & McDaniel, M. A. (2012). A meta-analysis of the dark triad and work behavior: A social exchange perspective. Journal of Applied Psychology, 97(3), 557–579.Google Scholar

O’Boyle, E. H., Forsyth, D. R., Banks, G. C., Story, P. A., & White, C. D. (2015). A meta‐ analytic test of redundancy and relative importance of the Dark Triad and Five‐Factor model of personality. Journal of Personality, 83(6), 644–664.Google Scholar

Ones, D. S., & Dilchert, S. (2013). Counterproductive work behaviors: Concepts, measurement, and nomological network. In Geisinger, K. F. (Ed.), APA handbook of testing and assessment in psychology (pp. 643–659). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar

Ones, D. S., Dilchert, S., & Viswesvaran, C. (2012). Cognitive abilities. In Schmitt, N. (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of personnel assessment and selection (pp. 179–224). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Ones, D. S., (2001). Integrity tests and other criterion-focused occupational personality scales (COPS) used in personnel selection. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 9, 31–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ones, D. S., & Viswesvaran, C. (1998). Gender, age, and race differences on overt integrity tests: Results across four large-scale job applicant datasets. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83, 35–42.Google Scholar

Ones, D. S., (2001). Integrity tests and other criterion-focused occupational personality scales (COPS) used in personnel selection. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 9, 31–39.Google Scholar

Ones, D. S., Viswesvaran, C. & Schmidt, F. L. (1993). Comprehensive meta-analysis of integrity test validities: Findings and implications for personnel selection and theories of job performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78(4), 679–703.Google Scholar

Robinson, S. L., & Bennett, R. J. (1995). A typology of deviant workplace behaviors: A multidimensional scaling study. Academy of Management Journal, 38(2), 555–572.Google Scholar

Rotundo, M., & Sackett, P. R. (2002). The relative importance of task, citizenship, and counterproductive performance to global ratings of job performance: A policy-capturing approach. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 66–80.Google Scholar

Sackett, P. R., Burris, L. R., & Callahan, C. (1989). Integrity testing for personnel selection: An update. Personnel Psychology, 42, 491–529.Google Scholar

Sackett, P. R., & DeVore, C. J. (2001). Counterproductive behaviors at work. Handbook of Industrial, Work, and Organizational Psychology, 1, 145–164.Google Scholar

Sackett, P. R., & Schmitt, N. (2012). Reconciling conflicting meta-analytic findings regarding integrity test validity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 97, 550–556.Google Scholar

Sackett, P. R., Schmitt, N., Ellingson, J. E., & Kabin, M. B. (2001). High-stakes testing in employment, credentialing, and higher education: Prospects in a post-affirmative action world. American Psychologist, 56, 302–318.Google Scholar

Sackett, P. R., & Walmsley, P. T. (2014). Which personality attributes are most important in the workplace? Perspectives on Psychological Science, 9(5), 538–551.Google Scholar

Sackett, P. R., Zedeck, S., & Fogli, L. (1988). Relations between measures of typical and maximum job performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 73, 482–486.Google Scholar

Schmidt, F. L., & Hunter, J. E. (1998). The validity and utility of selection methods in personnel psychology: Practical and theoretical implications of 85 years of research findings. Psychological Bulletin, 124(2), 262–274.Google Scholar

Spector, P. E., & Fox, S. (2005). A model of counterproductive work behavior. In Fox, S. & Spector, P. E. (Eds.), Counterproductive workplace behavior: Investigations of actors and targets (pp. 151–174). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar

van der Linden, D., Nijenhuis, J., & Bakker, A. B. (2010). The general factor of personality: A meta-analysis of Big Five intercorrelations and a criterion-related validity study. Journal of Research in Personality, 44(3), 315–327.Google Scholar

Van Iddekinge, C. H., Roth, P. L., Raymark, P. H., & Odle-Dusseau, H. N. (2012). The criterion-related validity of integrity tests: An updated meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 97, 499–530.Google Scholar

Viswesvaran, C., & Ones, D. S. (1999). Meta-analyses of fakability estimates: Implications for personality measurement. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 59, 197–210.Google Scholar

Watson, D., & Clark, L. A. (1984). Negative affectivity: The disposition to experience aversive emotional states. Psychological Bulletin, 96, 465–490.Google Scholar

White, J. L., Moffitt, T. E., & Silva, P. A. (1989). A prospective replication of the protective effects of IQ in subjects at high risk for juvenile delinquency. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 57, 719–724.Google Scholar

Andersson, L. M., & Pearson, C. M. (1999). Tit for tat? The spiraling effect of incivility in the workplace. The Academy of Management Review, 24, 452–471.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Baker, C. N. (2007). The emergence of organized feminist resistance to sexual harassment in the United states in the 1970s. Journal of Women’s History, 19(3), 161–184.Google Scholar

Berdahl, J. L., & Raver, J. L. (2011). Sexual harassment. In Zedeck, S. (Ed.), APA handbook of industrial and organizational psychology (Vol. 3, pp. 641–669). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar

Bowen, B., Privitera, M. R., & Bowie, V. (2011). Reducing workplace violence by creating healthy workplace environments. Journal of Aggression, Conflict and Peace Research, 3(4), 185–198.Google Scholar

Bowling, N. A., Beehr, T. A., Johnson, A. L., Semmer, N. K., Hendricks, E. A., & Webster, H. A. (2004). Explaining potential antecedents of workplace social support: Reciprocity or attractiveness? Journal of Occupational Psychology, 9, 339–350.Google ScholarPubMed

Chan, D. K. S., Lam, B. C., Chow, S. Y., & Cheung, S. F. (2008). Examining the job-related, psychological, and physical outcomes of workplace sexual harassment: A meta-analytic review. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 32, 362–376.Google Scholar

Clarke, J. A. (2011). Beyond equality? Against the universal turn in workplace protections. Indiana Law Journal, 86, 1219–1287.Google Scholar

Cooper, W. H., & Withey, M. J. (2009). The strong situation hypothesis. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 13, 62–72.Google Scholar

Cortina, L. M. (2008). Unseen injustice: Incivility as modern discrimination in organizations. Academy of Management Review, 33, 55–75.Google Scholar

Crawford, N. (1997). Workplace aggression at work: A psychoanalytic perspective. Journal Of Community & Applied Social Psychology, 7, 219–225.Google Scholar

Duffy, M. (2009). Preventing workplace workplace aggression and workplace aggression with effective organizational consultation, policies, and legislation. Consulting Psychology Journal: Practice and Research, 61, 242–262.Google Scholar

Edward, K. L., Ousey, K., Warelow, P., & Lui, S. (2014). Nursing and aggression in the workplace: A systematic review. British Journal of Nursing, 23, 653–659.Google Scholar

Estes, B., & Wang, J. (2008). Workplace incivility: Impacts on individual and organizational performance. Human Resource Development Review, 7, 218–240.Google Scholar

Felblinger, D. M. (2008). Incivility and workplace aggression in the workplace and nurses’ shame responses. Journal of Obstetric, Gynecologic, & Neonatal Nursing, 37, 234–242.Google Scholar

Ferris, P. (2004). A preliminary typology of organisational response to allegations of workplace workplace aggression: See no evil, hear no evil, speak no evil. British Journal of Guidance & Counselling, 32(3), 389–395.Google Scholar

Gedro, J., & Wang, J. (2013). Creating civil and respectful organizations through the scholar-practitioner bridge. Advances in Developing Human Resources, 15(3), 284–295.Google Scholar

Ghosh, R., Jacobs, J. L., & Reio, Jr., T. G. (2011). The toxic continuum from incivility to violence: What can HRD do? Advances in Developing Human Resources, 13(1), 3–9.Google Scholar

Giumetti, G. W., McKibben, E. S., Hatfield, A. L., Schroeder, A. N., & Kowalski, R. M. (2012). Cyber incivility @ work: The new age of interpersonal deviance. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 15(3), 148–154.Google Scholar

Hargrave, G. E., Hiatt, D., Dannenbaum, S. E., & Shaffer, I. A. (2007). Effectiveness of a telephone-based EAP anger management program for referred employees. Journal of Workplace Behavioral Health, 22(4), 17–27.Google Scholar

Harvey, S., & Keashly, L. (2005) Emotional abuse: How the concept sheds light on the understanding of psychological harassment (in Quebec). Perspectives Interdisciplinaries sur le Travail et la Santé, 7(3), 1–14.Google Scholar

Hasle, P., Limborg, H. J., & Nielsen, K. T. (2014). Working environment interventions – Bridging the gap between policy instruments and practice. Safety Science, 68, 73–80.Google Scholar

Hershcovis, M. S., & Barling, J. (2010). Towards a multi‐foci approach to workplace aggression: A meta‐analytic review of outcomes from different perpetrators. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 31(1), 24–44.Google Scholar

Keashly, L. (1998). Emotional abuse in the workplace: Conceptual and empirical issues. Journal of Emotional Abuse, 1(1), 85–117.Google Scholar

Leiter, M. P. (2012). Analyzing and theorizing the dynamics of the workplace incivility crisis. Amsterdam: Springer.Google Scholar

Leiter, M. P., Day, A., Gilin-Oore, D., & Laschinger, H. K. S. (2012). Getting better and staying better: Assessing civility, incivility, distress, and job attitudes one year after a civility intervention. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 17(4), 425–434.Google Scholar

Leiter, M. P., Day, A., & Price, L. (2015). Attachment styles at work: Measurement, collegial relationships, and burnout. Burnout Research, 2, 25–35. doi 10.1016/j.burn.2015.02.003.Google Scholar

Leiter, M. P., Laschinger, H. K. S., Day, A., & Gilin-Oore, D. (2011). The impact of civility interventions on employee social behavior, distress, and attitudes. Journal of Applied Psychology, 96(6), 1258–1274.Google Scholar

Meyer, R. D., Dalal, R. S., & Hermida, R. (2010). A review and synthesis of situational strength in the organizational sciences. Journal of Management, 36, 121–140.Google Scholar

Meyer, R. D., Dalal, R. S., José, I. J., Hermida, R., Chen, T. R., Vega, R. P., et al. (2014). Measuring job-related situational strength and assessing its interactive effects with personality on voluntary work behavior. Journal of Management, 40, 1010–1041.Google Scholar

Namie, G., & Namie, R. (2009). US workplace workplace aggression: Some basic considerations and consultation interventions. Consulting Psychology Journal: Practice and Research, 61(3), 202–219.Google Scholar

Nunenmacher, J., & Schnepf, B. (2012). Battle of the bulge: The impact of pregnancy and motherhood in the workplace. International Journal of Interdisciplinary Social Sciences, 6(11), 167–176.Google Scholar

Osatuke, K., Moore, S. C., Ward, C., Dyrenforth, S., & Belton, L. (2009). Civility, respect, engagement in the workforce (CREW): Nationwide organization development intervention at veterans health administration. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 45, 384–410.Google Scholar

Reio, Jr., T. G., & Ghosh, R. (2009). Antecedents and outcomes of workplace incivility: Implications for human resource development research and practice. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 20(3), 237–264.Google Scholar

Runyan, C. W., Zakocs, R. C., & Zwerling, C. (2000). Administrative and behavioural interventions for workplace violence prevention. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 18, 116–127.Google Scholar

Salin, D. (2008a). Organisational responses to workplace harassment: An exploratory study. Personnel Review, 38, 26–44.Google Scholar

Salin, D. (2008b). The prevention of workplace workplace aggression as a question of human resource management: Measures adopted and underlying organizational factors. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 24, 221–231.Google Scholar

Schat, A. C. H., & Kelloway, E. K. (2005). Workplace aggression. In Barling, J., Frone, M., & Kelloway, E. K. (Eds.), Handbook of work stress (pp. 189–218). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar

Schat, A. C. H., (2006). Training as a workplace aggression intervention strategy. In Kelloway, E. K., Barling, J., & Hurrell, J. J., Jr. (Eds.), Handbook of workplace violence (pp. 579–605). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar

Schein, E. (2004). Organizational culture and leadership (3rd Ed.). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar

Tinkler, J. E., Li, Y. E., & Mollborn, S. (2007). Can legal interventions change beliefs? The effect of exposure to sexual harassment policy on men’s gender beliefs. Social Psychology Quarterly, 70, 480–494.Google Scholar

Vessey, J. A., DeMarco, R. F., Gaffney, D. A., & Budin, W. C. (2009). Workplace aggression of staff registered nurses in the workplace: A preliminary study for developing personal and organizational strategies for the transformation of hostile to healthy workplace environments. Journal of Professional Nursing, 25, 299–306.Google Scholar

Yang, L. Q., Caughlin, D. E., Gazica, M. W., Truxillo, D. M., & Spector, P. E. (2014). Workplace aggression climate and potential employee and organizational outcomes: A meta-analytic review from the target’s perspective. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 19, 315–335.Google Scholar

Andersson, L. M., & Pearson, C. M. (1999). Tit for tat? The spiraling effect of incivility in the workplace. Academy of Management Review, 24, 452–471.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Aquino, K., Grover, S. L., Goldman, B., & Folger, R. (2003). When push doesn’t come to shove: Interpersonal forgiveness in workplace relationships. Journal of Management Inquiry, 12, 209–216.Google Scholar

Aquino, K., & Thau, S. (2009). Workplace victimization: Aggression from the target’s perspective. Annual Review of Psychology, 60, 717–741.Google Scholar

Aquino, K., Tripp, T. M., & Bies, R. J. (2006). Getting even or moving on? Power, procedural, justice, and types of offense as predictors of revenge, forgiveness, reconciliation, and avoidance in organizations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 81, 653–688.Google Scholar

Barling, J., Rogers, G. A., & Kelloway, K. E. (2001). Behind closed doors: In-home workers’ experience of sexual harassment and workplace violence. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 6, 255–269.Google Scholar

Beattie, L., & Griffin, B. (2014). Day-level fluctuations in stress and engagement in response to workplace incivility: A diary study. Work and Stress, 28, 124–142.Google Scholar

Bjorkqvist, K., Osterman, K., & Lagerspetz, K. M. J. (1994). Sex differences in covert aggression among adults. Aggressive Behavior, 20, 27–33.Google Scholar

Bowling, N. A., & Beehr, T. A. (2006). Workplace harassment from the victim’s perspective: A theoretical model and meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91, 998–1012.Google Scholar

Bowling, N. A., Camus, K. A., & Blackmore, C. E. (2015). Conceptualizing and measuring workplace abuse: Implications for the study of abuse’s predictors and consequences. In Mistreatment in organizations (pp. 225–263). New York: Emerald Group Publishing Limited.Google Scholar

Bunk, J. A., Karabin, J., & Lear, T. (2011). Understanding why workers engage in rude behaviors: A social interactionist perspective. Current Psychology, 30, 74–80.Google Scholar

Cortina, L. M. (2008). Unseen injustice: Incivility as modern discrimination in organizations. Academy of Management Review, 33, 55–75.Google Scholar

Cortina, L. M., Magley, V. J., Williams, J. H., & Langhout, R. D. (2001). Incivility in the workplace: Incidence and impact. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 6, 64–80.Google Scholar

Duffy, M. K., Ganster, D. C., & Pagon, M. (2002). Social undermining in the workplace. Academy of Management Journal, 45, 331–351.Google Scholar

Edwards, J.R. (2011). The fallacy of formative measurement. Organizational Research Methods, 14, 370–388.Google Scholar

Ferris, D. L., Brown, D. J., Berry, J. W., & Lian, H. (2008). The development and validation of the Workplace Ostracism Scale. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93, 1348–1366.Google Scholar

Fisher, C. D., & To, M. L. (2012). Using experience sampling methodology in organizational behavior. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 33, 865–877.Google Scholar

Fitzgerald, L. F., Drasgow, F., Hulin, C. L., Gelfand, M. J., & Magley, V. J. (1997). The antecedents and consequences of sexual harassment in organizations: A test of an integrated model. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82, 578–589.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Gallus, J. A., Bunk, J. A., Mathews, R. A., Barnes-Farrell, J. L., & Magley, V. J. (2014). An eye for an eye? Exploring the relationship between workplace incivility experiences and perpetration. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 19, 143–154.Google Scholar

Gephart, Jr., R. P. (2013). Doing research with words: Qualitative methodologies and industrial/organizational psychology. In Cortina, J. M. & Landis, R. S. (Eds.), Modern research methods for the study of behavior in organizations (pp. 265–317). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Ghosh, R., Dierkes, S., & Falletta, S. (2011). Incivility spiral in mentoring relationships: Re-conceptualizing negative mentoring as deviant workplace behavior. Advances in Developing Human Resources, 13, 22–39.Google Scholar

Giumetti, G. W., Hartfield, A. L., Scisco, J. L., Schroeder, A. N., Muth, E. R., & Kowalski, R. M. (2013). What a rude e-mail! Examining the differential effects of incivility versus support on mood, energy, engagement, and performance in an online context. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 18, 297–309.Google Scholar

Grembowski, D. (2001). The practice of health program evaluation. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar

Hershcovis, M. S. (2011). “Incivility, social undermining, bullying ... oh my!”: A call to reconcile constructs within workplace aggression research. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 32, 499–519.Google Scholar

Hershcovis, M. S., & Reich, T. C. (2013). Integrating workplace aggression research: Relational, contextual, and method considerations. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 34, S26–S42.Google Scholar

Hinkin, T. R. (1995). A review of scale development practices in the study of organizations. Journal of Management, 21, 967–988.Google Scholar

Hinkin, T. R. (1998). A brief tutorial on the development of measures for use in survey questionnaires. Organizational Research Methods, 1, 104–121.Google Scholar

Kath, L. M., Swody, C. A., Magely, V. J., Bunk, J. A., & Gallus, J. (2009). Workgroup climate for sexual harassment as a moderator of the relationship between individuals’ experiences of sexual harassment and job-related outcomes. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 82, 159–182.Google Scholar

Leiter, M. P., Day, A., Gilin-Oore, D., & Laschinger, H. K. (2012). Getting better and staying better: Assessing civility, incivility, distress, and job attitudes one year after a civility intervention. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 17, 425–435.Google Scholar

Leiter, M. P., Laschinger, H. K. S., Day, A., & Gilin-Oore, D. (2011). The impact of civility interventions on employee social behavior, distress, and attitudes. Journal of Applied Psychology, 96, 1258–1274.Google Scholar

Long, E. C., & Christian, M. S. (2015, March 9). Mindfulness buffers retaliatory responses to injustice: A regulatory approach. Journal of Applied Psychology. doi: 10/1037/apl0000019Google Scholar

Meier, L. L., & Spector, P. E. (2013). Reciprocal effects of work stressors and counterproductive work behavior: A five-wave longitudinal study. Journal of Applied Psychology, 98, 529–539.Google Scholar

Naylor, J. C., Pritchard, R. D., & Ilgen, D. R. (1980). A theory of behavior in organizations. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Ones, D. S., & Viswesvaran, C. (1996). Bandwidth-fidelity dilemma in personality measurement for personnel selection. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 17, 609–626.Google Scholar

Osatuke, K., Mohr, D., Ward, C., Moore, S. C., Dyrenforth, S., & Belton, L. (2009). Civility, respect, engagement in the workforce (CREW): Nationwide organization development intervention at Veterans Health Administration. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 45, 384–410.Google Scholar

Podsakoff, N. P., Shen, W., & Podsakoff, P. M. (2006). The role of formative measurement models in strategic management research: Review, critique, and implications for future research. Research Methodology in Strategy and Management, 3, 197–252.Google Scholar

Reich, T. C., & Hershcovis, M. S. (2015). Observing workplace incivility. Journal of Applied Psychology, 199, 203–215.Google Scholar

Schneider, B., Ehrhart, M.G., & Macey, W.H. (2011). Perspectives on organizational climate and culture. In Zedeck, S. (Ed.), APA handbook of industrial and organizational psychology (Vol. 1, pp. 373–414). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar

Spector, P. E., & Fox, S. (2005). A model of counterproductive work behavior. In Fox, S. & Spector, P. E. (Eds.), Counterproductive workplace behavior: Investigations of actors and targets (pp. 151–174). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar

Taylor, S. G., Bedeian, A. G., Cole, M. S., & Zhang, Z. (2014). Developing and testing a dynamic model of workplace incivility change. Journal of Management. doi: 10.1177/0149206314535432Google Scholar

Tedeschi, J. T., & Felson, R. B. (1994). Violence, aggression, and coercive actions. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar

Tepper, B. J. (2000). Consequences of abusive supervision. Academy of Management Journal, 43, 178–190.Google Scholar

Timmerman, G., & Bajema, C. (2000). The impact of organizational culture on perceptions and experiences of sexual harassment. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 57, 188–205.Google Scholar

Trudel, J., & Reio, Jr., T. G. (2011). Managing workplace incivility: The role of conflict management style – antecedents or antidote? Human Resource Development Quarterly, 22, 395–423.Google Scholar

Uy, M. A., Foo, M. D., & Aguinis, H. (2010). Using experience sampling methodology to advance entrepreneurship theory and research. Organizational Research Methods, 13, 31–54.Google Scholar

Weiss, H. M., & Cropanzano, R. (1996). Affective events theory: A theoretical discussion of the structure, causes and consequences of affective experiences at work. In Staw, B. M. & Cummings, L. L. (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior: An annual series of analytical essays and critical reviews (pp. 1–74). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.Google Scholar

Williams, J. H., Fitzgerald, L. F., & Drasgow, F. (1999). The effects of organizational practices on sexual harassment and individual outcomes in the military. Military Psychology, 11, 303–328.Google Scholar

Wilson, J. Q., & Kelling, G. L. (1982). Broken windows: The police and neighborhood safety. The Atlantic, 249, 29–38.Google Scholar