Aolain, Fionnuala Ni, The Emergence of Diversity: Differences in Human Rights Jurisprudence, 19 Fordham International Law Journal101 (1995).
Bassok, Or, Television Coverage of the Israeli Supreme Court 1968–1992: The Persistence of the Mythical Image, 42 Israel Law Review306, 307 (2009).
Benvenisti, Eyal, Judicially Sponsored Checks and Balances, 31 Hebrew University Law Review797 (2001) (Hebrew).
Benvenisti, Eyal, Judicial Review and Democratic Failures: Minimizing Asymmetric Information Through Adjudication, 32 Tel Aviv University Law Review277 (2010) (Hebrew).
Benvenisti, Eyal, Reclaiming Democracy: The Strategic Uses of Foreign and International Law by National Courts, 102 American Journal of International Law241 (2008).
Benvenisti, Eyal, and Downs, George W., The Empire’s New Clothes: Political Economy and the Fragmentation of International Law, 60 Stanford Law Review595 (2007).
Berutti, Ronald A., The Cherokee Cases: The Fight to Save the Supreme Court and the Cherokee Indians, 17 American Indian Law Review291 (1992).
Brewster, Rachel, Unpacking the State’s Reputation, 50 Harvard International Law Journal231 (2009).
Cavallaro, James L., and Brewer, Stephanie Erin, Reevaluating Regional Human Rights Litigation in the Twenty-First Century: The Case of the Inter-American Court, 102 American Journal of International Law768 (2008).
Cohen, Amichai, The Supreme Court and the Israel-Arab Conflict: An International Law Perspective 6 Ono Academic College Law Journal263 (2006) (Hebrew).
Cooter, Robert D., The Objectives of Private and Public Judges, 41 Public Choice107 (1983).
Cross, Frank B., and Nelson, Blake J., Strategic Institutional Effects on Supreme Court Decisionmaking, 95 Northwestern University Law Review1437 (2001).
Cross, Frank B., and Tiller, Emerson H., Judicial Partisanship and Obedience to Legal Doctrine: Whistleblowing on the Federal Courts of Appeals, 107 Yale Law Journal2155 (1998).
Dagan, Hanoch, The Realist Conception of Law, 57 University of Toronto Law Journal607 (2007).
Delahunty, Robert J., and Yoo, John, Executive Power v. International Law, 30 Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy73 (2006–2007).
Dotan, Yoav, Judicial Rhetoric, Government Lawyers, and Human Rights: The Case of the Israeli High Court of Justice during the Intifada, 33 Law & Society Review319 (1999).
Dotan, Yoav, Pre-petitions and Constitutional Dilemmas Regarding the Role of Government Lawyers, 7 Mishpat Umimshal159 (2004) (Hebrew).
Dothan, Shai, Elasticizing the Remedy of Voidness Due to Flawed Administrative Action – Relative Voidness (Hebrew) (unpublished LLM thesis, Tel Aviv University 2003, on file with author).
Dothan, Shai, In Defence of Expansive Interpretation in the European Court of Human Rights, 3 Cambridge Journal of International and Comparative Law 508 (2014).
Dothan, Shai, How International Courts Enhance their Legitimacy, 14 Theoretical Inquiries in Law455 (2013).
Dothan, Shai, Judicial Tactics in the European Court of Human Rights, 12 Chicago Journal of International Law115 (2011).
Dothan, Shai, Luring NGOs to International Courts (unpublished draft).
Dothan, Shai, The Optimal Use of Comparative Law, forthcoming Denver Journal of International Law and Policy.
Eskridge Jr., William N., Overriding Supreme Court Statutory Interpretation Decisions, 101 Yale Law Journal331 (1991).
Eskridge, Jr., William N., Reneging on History? Playing the Court/Congress/President Civil Rights Game, 79 California Law Review613 (1991).
Farber, Daniel A., Rights as Signals, 31 Journal of Legal Studies83 (2002).
Fuld, Stanley H., The Voices of Dissent, 62 Columbia Law Review923 (1962).
Garoupa, Nuno, and Ginsburg, Tom, Reputation, Information and the Organization of the Judiciary, 4 Journal of Comparative Law228 (2009).
Garrett, Geoffrey, R. Kelemen, Daniel, and Schulz, Heiner, The European Court of Justice, National Governments, and Legal Integration in the European Union, 52 International Organization149 (1998).
Gearty, Conor, Unravelling Osman, 64 Modern Law Review159 (2001).
Geisinger, Alex, and Stein, Michael Ashley, A Theory of Expressive International Law, 60 Vanderbilt Law Review77 (2007).
Gibson, James, L., Caldeira, Gregory A., and Spence, Lester Kenyatta, Why Do People Accept Public Policies They Oppose? Testing Legitimacy Theory with a Survey-Based Experiment, 58 Political Research Quarterly187 (2005).
Tom Ginsburg, Bounded Discretion in International Judicial Lawmaking, 45 Virginia Journal of International Law631, 658 (2005).
Gneezy, Uri, and Rustichini, Aldo, A Fine Is a Price, 29 Journal of Legal Studies1 (2000).
Goutal, Jean Louis, Characteristics of Judicial Style in France, Britain and the U.S.A, 24 American Journal of Comparative Law43 (1976).
Gross, Miron, and Shachar, Yoram, Searching for Methods in Bench Selection in the Israeli Supreme Court: Quantitative Analysis, 29 Hebrew University Law Review567 (1998).
Harel, Alon, The Courts and Homosexuality: Dignity or Tolerance? 4 Mishpat Umimshal785 (1998) (Hebrew).
Hartman, Joan F., Derogation from Human Rights Treaties in Public Emergencies, 22 Harvard International Law Journal1 (1981).
Hathaway, Oona A., Do Human Rights Treaties Make a Difference?, 111 Yale Law Journal1935 (2002).
Helfer, Laurence R., Consensus, Coherence and the European Convention on Human Rights, 26 Cornell International Law Journal133, 134 (1993).
Helfer, Laurence R., and Slaughter, Anne-Marie, Toward a Theory of Effective Supranational Adjudication, 107 Yale Law Journal273 (1997).
Helfer, Laurence R., and Voeten, Eric, International Courts as Agents of Legal Change: Evidence from LGBT Rights in Europe, Forthcoming 68 International Organization77 (2014)
Holmes, Oliver Wendell, The Path of the Law, 10 Harvard Law Review457 (1897).
Huneeus, Alexandra, Courts Resisting Courts: Lessons from the Inter-American Court’s Struggle to Enforce Human Rights, 44 Cornell International Law Journal493 (2011).
Jackson, Joshua L., Broniowski v. Poland: A Recipe for Increased Legitimacy of the European Court of Human Rights as a Supranational Constitutional Court, 39 Connecticut Law Review759 (2006).
Klarman, Michael J., Brown and Lawrence (and Goodridge), 104 Michigan Law Review431 (2005).
Law, David S., A Theory of Judicial Power and Judicial Review, 97 Georgetown Law Journal723 (2009).
Lindblom, Charles E., The Science of “Muddling Through,” 19 Public Administration Review79 (1959).
Lupu, Yonatan, International Judicial Legitimacy: Lessons from National Courts, 14 Theoretical Inquiries in Law437 (2013).
Lupu, Yonatan, and Voeten, Erik, Precedent in International Courts: A Network Analysis of Case Citations by the European Court of Human Rights, 42 British Journal of Political Science413 (2011).
Mahoney, Paul, Judicial Activism and Judicial Self-Restraint in the European Court of Human Rights: Two Sides of the Same Coin, 11 Human Rights Law Journal57 (1990).
Mangan, Brendan, Protecting Human Rights in National Emergencies: Shortcomings in the European System and a Proposal for Reform, 10 Human Rights Quarterly372 (1988).
McKaskle, Paul L., The European Court of Human Rights: What It Is, How It Works, and Its Future, 40 University of San Francisco Law Review1 (2005).
McNollgast, Politics and the Courts: A Positive Theory of Judicial Doctrine and the Rule of Law, 68 Southern California Law Review1631 (1995).
Miller, Gregory D., Hypotheses on Reputation: Alliance Choices and the Shadow of the Past, 12 Security Studies40 (2003).
Moravcsik, Andrew, Explaining International Human Rights Regimes: Liberal Theory and Western Europe, 1 European Journal of International Relations157 (1995).
Mowbray, Alastair, The Creativity of the European Court of Human Rights, 5 Human Rights Law Review57 (2005).
Orakhelashvili, Alexander, Restrictive Interpretation of Human Rights Treaties in the Recent Jurisprudence of the European Court of Human Rights, 14 European Journal of International Law529 (2003).
Ost, François, The Original Canons of Interpretation of the European Court of Human Rights, in The European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights: International Protection Versus National Restrictions283 (Mireille Delmas-Marty, ed.). (Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers), 1992.
Popovic, Dragoljub, Prevailing of Judicial Activism over Self-Restraint in the Jurisprudence of the European Court of Human Rights, 42 Creighton Law Review361, 372 (2009).
Posner, Eric A., and Figueiredo, Miguel F. P. de, Is the International Court of Justice Biased?, 34 Journal of Legal Studies599 (2005).
Posner, Eric A., and Yoo, John C., Judicial Independence in International Tribunals, 93 California Law Review1 (2005).
Post, Robert, The Supreme Court Opinion as Institutional Practice: Dissent, Legal Scholarship, and Decisionmaking in the Taft Court, 85 Minnesota Law Review1267 (2001).
Priest, George L., and Klein, Benjamin, The Selection of Disputes for Litigation, 13 Journal of Legal Studies1 (1984).
Putnam, Robert D., Diplomacy and Domestic Politics: The Logic of Two-Level Games, 42 International Organization427 (1988).
Ramseyer, J. Mark, The Puzzling (In)Dependence of Courts: A Comparative Approach, 23 Journal of Legal Studies721 (1994).
Rudolf, Beate, Constitutional Developments: European Court of Human Rights: Legal Status of Postoperative Transsexuals, 1.4 International Journal of Constitutional Law716 (2003).
Ruth, Alexandra, and Trilsch, Mirja, Bankovic v. Belgium (Admissibility), 97 American Journal of International Law168 (2003).
Ryssdal, R., The Enforcement System Set up under the European Convention on Human Rights, inCompliance with Judgments of International Courts, 49 (M.K. Bulterman and M. Kuijer eds.). (The Hague: Brill Academic Publishing), 1996.
Sadurski, Wojciech, Partnering with Strasburg: Constitutionalisation of the European Court of Human Rights, The Accession of Central and East European States to the Council of Europe and the Idea of Pilot judgments, 9 Human Rights Law Review397 (2009).
Schauer, Frederick, Forward: The Court’s Agenda and the Nation’s, 120 Harvard Law Review4 (2006).
Schulz, Heiner, The Political Foundations of Decision Making by the European Court of Justice, 99 ASIL Proceedings132 (2005).
Shachar, Yoram, Solidarity and Generational Sequencing in the Israeli Supreme Court, 16 Bar Ilan University Law Review161 (2000).
Shachar, Yoram, The Citation Space of the Supreme Court 1950–2004, 50 Hapraklit29 (2008).
Shachar, Yoram, Gross, Miron, and Harris, Ron, Anatomy of Discourse and Dissent in the Supreme Court: Quantitative Analyses, 20 Tel Aviv University Law Review749 (1997) (Hebrew).
Shachar, Yoram, Harris, Ron, and Gross, Miron, Citation Practices of the Supreme Court: Quantitative Analyses, 27 Hebrew University Law Review119 (1996).
Shamir, Ronen, “Landmark Cases” and the Reproduction of Legitimacy: The Case of Israel’s High Court of Justice, 24 Law & Society Review781 (1990).
Shany, Yuval, Assessing the Effectiveness of International Courts: A Goal-Based Approach, 106 American Journal of International Law225 (2012).
Shany, Yuval, Bosnia, Serbia and the Politics of International Adjudication, 45 Justice21 (2008).
Shany, Yuval, Jurisdiction and Admissibility, in The Oxford Handbook of International Adjudication (Cesare P.R. Romano, Karen J. Alter, and Yuval Shany, eds.) (New York: Oxford University Press), 2013.
Shany, Yuval, The Entry into Force of the Rome Statute: What Are the Implications for the State of Israel? 9 Hamishpat51 (2004) (Hebrew).
Shapiro, Martin, Judges as Liars, 17 Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy155, 156 (1994).
Spence, Michael, Job Market Signaling, 87 The Quarterly Journal of Economics355 (1973).
Strauss, Peter L., One Hundred Fifty Cases per Year: Some Implications of the Supreme Court’s Limited Resources for Judicial Review of Agency Action, 87 Columbia Law Review1093 (1987).
Swindler, William F., Politics as Law: The Cherokee Cases, 3 American Indian Law Review7 (1975).
Tamir, Michal, Sunk Cost and Stare Decisis, 1 Haifa Law Review211, 285–286 (2004) (Hebrew).
Voeten, Erik, Public Opinion and the Legitimacy of International Courts, 14 Theoretical Inquiries in Law411 (2013).
Voeten, Erik, The Impartiality of International Judges: Evidence from the European Court of Human Rights, 102 American Political Science Review417 (2008).
Voeten, Erik, The Politics of International Judicial Appointments: Evidence from the European Court of Human Rights, 61 International Organization669 (2007).
Weiler, J. H. H., The Transformation of Europe, 100 Yale Law Journal2403 (1991).
Wildhaber, Luzius, The European Court of Human Rights: The Past, The Present, The Future, 22 American University International Law Review521 (2007).
Wolfson, Yossi,
Punitive House Demolitions: HCJ 1730/96 Sabih v. Major General Ilan Biran commander of IDF Forces in the Judea and Samaria Region (judgment dated March 19,
1996) available at
www.hamoked.org/Document.aspx?dID=Documents1272 Wright, Jane, The Retreat from Osman: Z v. United Kingdom in the European Court of Human Rights and Beyond in Tort Liability of Public Authorities in Comparative Perspective 55 (Duncan Fairgrieve, Mads Andenas, and John Bell, eds.). (London: British Institute of International and Comparative Law), 2002.
Yadlin, Omri, Judicial Activism and Judicial Discretion as a Strategic Game, 19 Bar Ilan University Law Review665 (2003) (Hebrew).
Zamir, Itzhak, On Justice Zvi Berenson, 2 Mishpat Umimshal325 (1994) (Hebrew).