Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-x24gv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-14T07:46:02.210Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

8 - When is the birth rate the key factor associated with population dynamics?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 January 2010

Tim Coulson
Affiliation:
Department of Zoology, University of Cambridge, Downing Street, Cambridge CB2 3EJ, U.K.
Elodie Hudson
Affiliation:
Renewable Resources Assessment Group, T.H. Huxley School of Environment, Earth Sciences and Engineering, Royal School of Mines, Imperial College London, Prince Consort Road, London SW7 2BP, U.K.
William V. Holt
Affiliation:
Zoological Society of London
Amanda R. Pickard
Affiliation:
Zoological Society of London
John C. Rodger
Affiliation:
Marsupial CRC, New South Wales
David E. Wildt
Affiliation:
Smithsonian National Zoological Park, Washington DC
Get access

Summary

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES

The role of reproductive technology in conservation biology, and the conditions under which the application of such technology is likely to succeed, will in part depend on the importance of fecundity rates on the dynamics of populations. For example, if a population is declining as a result of depressed fecundity rates, any improvement in the birth rate using reproductive technology may be of benefit. Conversely, if a population is declining because of depressed survival rates or increased emigration rates, then action that reverses these factors would be more relevant.

Birth, death, immigration and emigration generate patterns in the change of size of populations over time. Detecting and describing these patterns using field and statistical techniques are the mainstay of many population ecologists. They are also the first stage in understanding population dynamics well enough to make predictions or generalisations for the purposes of management, exploitation and conservation.

The size of a population in any year equals the size of the population in the previous year plus the number of individuals that have been recruited into the population by birth or immigration, minus the number of individuals that have been removed by death or emigration. The first step in trying to understand the processes associated with variation in the size of a population over time is to identify which vital rate (birth rate, survival rate or dispersal rate) is most strongly correlated with increases or decreases in population size.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2002

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Albon, S. D., Coulson, T. N., Brown, D., Guinness, F. E., Clutton-Brock, T. H. & Pemberton, J. M. (2000). Temporal changes in the key factors influencing the population dynamics of red deer. Journal of Animal Ecology 69, 1096–1109CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benton, T. G. & Grant, A. (1999). Optimal reproductive effort in stochastic, density-dependent environments. Evolution 53, 677–688CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Benton, T. G., Grant, A. & Clutton-Brock, T. H. (1995). Does environmental stochasticity matter: analysis of red deer life histories in Rum. Evolutionary Ecology 9, 559–574CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bro, E., Sarrazin, F., Clobert, J. & Reitz, F. (2000). Demography and the decline of the grey partridge Perdix perdix in France. Journal of Applied Ecology 37, 432–448CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, D. & Alexander, N. (1991). The analysis of the variance and covariance of products. Biometrics 47, 429–444CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, D., Alexander, N. D. E., Marrs, R. W. & Albon, S. (1993). Structured accounting of the variance of demographic change. Journal of Animal Ecology 62, 490–502CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caswell, H. (1989). Matrix Population Models. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, MA.
Caswell, H. (1997). Methods of matrix population analyses. In Structured-population Models in Marine, Terrestrial and Freshwater Systems (Eds. S. & C. H. Tuljipurkar), pp. 19–58. Chapman & Hall, New YorkCrossRef
Clutton-Brock, T. H. (1988). Reproductive Success: Studies of Individual Variation in Contrasting Breeding Systems. University of Chicago Press, Chicago
Clutton-Brock, T. H., Guinness, F. E. & Albon, S. D. (1982). Red Deer: Behaviour and Ecology of Two Sexes. University of Chicago Press, Chicago
Coulson, T., Albon, S., Pilkington, J. & Clutton-Brock, T. (1999). Small-scale spatial dynamics in a fluctuating ungulate population. Journal of Animal Ecology 68, 658–671CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coulson, T., Milner-Gulland, E. J. & Clutton-Brock, T. H. (2000). The relative roles of density and climatic variation on population dynamics and fecundity rates in three contrasting ungulate species. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B 267, 1771–1779CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Coughenour, M. B. & Singer, F. J. (1996). Elk population processes in Yellowstone National Park under the policy of natural regulation. Ecological Applications 6, 573–593CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crooks, K. R., Sanjayan, M. A. & Doak, D. F. (1998). New insights on cheetah conservation through demographic modeling. Conservation Biology 12, 889–895CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cross, T. F. (2000). Genetic implications of translocation and stocking of fish species, with particular reference to Western Australia. Aquatic Research 31, 83–94CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kroon, H., Groenendael, J. & Ehrlen, J. (2000). Elasticities: A review of methods and model limitations. Ecology 81, 607–618CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Diamond, S. L., Cowell, L. G. & Crowder, L. B. (2000). Population effects of shrimp trawl bycatch on Atlantic croaker. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 57, 2010–2021CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eldridge, M. D. N., King, J. M., Loupis, A. K., Spencer, P. B. S., Taylor, A. C., Pope, L. C. & Hall, G. P. (1999). Unprecedented low levels of genetic variation and inbreeding depression in an island population of the black-footed rock-wallaby. Conservation Biology 13, 531–541CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Escos, J., Alados, C. L. & Emlen, J. M. (1994). Application of the stage projection model with density dependent fecundity to the population dynamics of Spanish ibex. Canadian Journal of Zoology 72, 731–737CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Festa-Bianchet, M., Jorgenson, J. T., Berube, C. H., Portier, C. & Wishart, W. D. (1997). Body mass and survival of bighorn sheep. Canadian Journal of Zoology 75, 1372–1379CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fisher, D. O., Hoyle, S. D. & Blomberg, S. P. (2000). Population dynamics and survival of an endangered wallaby: a comparison of four methods. Ecological Applications 10, 901–910CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fling, P. L., Grand, J. B. & Rockwell, R. F. (1998). A model of northern pintail productivity and population growth rate. Journal of Wildlife Management 62, 1110–1118Google Scholar
Gaillard, J. M., Andersen, R., Delorme, D. & Linnell, J. D. C. (1998). Family effects on growth and survival of juvenile roe deer. Ecology 79, 2878–2889CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gaillard, J.-M., Festa-Bianchet, M., Yocooz, N. G., Loison, A. & Toigo, C. (2000). Temporal variation in fitness components and population dynamics of large herbivores. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 31, 367–393CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Godinez-Alvarez, H., Valiente-Banuet, A. & Banuet, L. V. (1999). Biotic interactions and the population dynamics of the long-lived columnar cactus Neobuxbaumia tetetzo in the Tehuacan Valley, Mexico. Canadian Journal of Botany 77, 203–208CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heppell, S. S. (1998). Application of life-history theory and population model analysis to turtle conservation. Copeia 1998, 367–375CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heppell, S., Pfister, C. & Kroon, H. (2000). Elasticity analysis in population biology: methods and applications. Ecology 81, 605–606Google Scholar
Johnson, K. H. & Braun, C. E. (1999). Viability and conservation of an exploited sage grouse population. Conservation Biology 13, 77–84CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kirsch, E. (1996). Habitat selection and productivity of least terns on the lower Platte River, Nebraska. Wildlife Monographs 132, 5–48Google Scholar
Pemberton, J. M., Smith, J. A., Coulson, T. N., Marshall, T. C., Slate, J., Paterson, S., Albon, S. D. & Clutton-Brock, T. H. (1996). The maintenance of genetic polymorphism in small island populations: large mammals in the Hebrides. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B 351, 745–752CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pfister, C. A. (1998). Patterns of variance in stage-structured populations: evolutionary predictions and ecological implications. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 95, 213–218CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Royama, T. (1996). A fundamental problem in key factor analysis. Ecology 77, 87–93CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saether, B. & Bakke, O. (2000). Avian life history variation and contribution of demographic traits to the population growth rate. Ecology 81, 642–653CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saether, B. E., Ringsby, T. H., Bakke, O. & Solberg, E. J. (1999). Spatial and temporal variation in demography of a house sparrow metapopulation. Journal of Animal Ecology 68, 628–637CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmutz, J. A., Rockwell, R. F. & Petersen, M. R. (1997). Relative effects of survival and reproduction on the population dynamics of emperor geese. Journal of Wildlife Management 61, 191–201CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sibly, R. M. & Smith, R. H. (1997). Identifying key factors using λ contribution analysis. Journal of Animal Ecology 67, 17–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Varley, G. C. & Gradwell, G. R. (1960). Key factors in population studies. Journal of Animal Ecology 29, 399–401CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, S. E. & Hero, J. M. (1998). Rainforest frogs of the Australian Wet Tropics: guild classification and the ecological similarity of declining species. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B 265, 597–602CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wisdom, M. J. & Mills, L. S. (1997). Sensitivity analysis to guide population recovery: prairie-chickens as an example. Journal of Wildlife Management 61, 302–312CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wisdom, M. J., Mills, L. S. & Doak, D. F. (2000). Life stage simulation analysis: estimating vital-rate effects on population growth for conservation. Ecology 81, 628–641CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×