Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-r6qrq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T13:46:52.266Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

References

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 August 2014

Daniel M. Butler
Affiliation:
Washington University, St Louis
Get access

Summary

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Representing the Advantaged
How Politicians Reinforce Inequality
, pp. 129 - 140
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2014

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adams, James F., Merrill, Samuel, III, and Grofman, Bernard. 2005. A Unified Theory of Party Competition. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adida, Claire L., Laitin, David D., and Valfort, Marie-Ann. 2010. “Identifying Barriers to Muslim Integration in France.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 107 (52): 22384–22390.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Adler, E. Scott, and Lapinski, John S.. 1997. “Demand-Side Theory and Congressional Committee Composition: A Constituency Characteristics Approach.” American Journal of Political Science 41 (3): 895–918.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Angrist, Joshua D., and Pischke, Jorn-Steffen. 2009. Mostly Harmless Econometrics: An Empiricist’s Companion. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Ansolabehere, Stephen. 2009. Cooperative Congressional Election Study, 2008: Common Content [Computer File]. Release 1: February 2, 2009. Cambridge, MA: M.I.T.
APSA Task Force. 2004. “American Democracy in an Age of Rising Inequality.” Perspectives on Politics 2 (4): 651–666.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arnold, R. Douglas, and Carnes, Nicholas. 2012. “Holding Mayors Accountable: New York’s Executives from Koch to Bloomberg.” American Journal of Political Science 56 (4): 949–963.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arrow, Kenneth J. 1998. “What Has Economics to Say about Racial Discrimination?Journal of Economic Perspectives 12 (2): 91–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barone, Michael, and Ujifusa, Grant. 1995. The Almanac of American Politics 1994. Washington, DC: National Journal.Google Scholar
Barreto, Matt. 2007. “¡Si Se Puede! Latino Candidates and the Mobilization of Latino Voters.” American Political Science Review 101 (3): 425–441.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barreto, Matt. 2010. Ethnic Cues: The Role of Shared Ethnicity in Latino Political Participation. University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bartels, Larry M. 1998. “Where the Ducks Are: Voting Power in a Party System.” In Politicians and Party Politics, ed. Geer, John G.. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press, 43–79.Google Scholar
Bartels, Larry M.. 2008. Unequal Democracy: The Political Economy of the New Gilded Age. New York: Russell Sage.Google Scholar
Beckwith, Karen. 2007. “Numbers and Newness: The Descriptive and Substantive Representation of Women.” Canadian Journal of Political Science 40 (1): 27–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bergan, Daniel E. 2009. “Does Grassroots Lobbying Work? A Field Experiment Measuring the Effects of an e-Mail Lobbying Campaign on Legislative Behavior.” American Politics Research 37 (2): 327–352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berkman, Michael B., and O’Connor, Robert E.. 1993. “Do Women Legislators Matter? Female Legislators and State Abortion Policy.” American Politics Research 21 (1): 102–124.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bertrand, Marianne, and Mullainathan, Sendhil. 2004. “Are Emily and Greg More Employable than Lakisha and Jamal? A Field Experiment on Labor Market Discrimination.” American Economic Review 94 (4): 991–1013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bianco, William T. 1994. Trust: Representatives and Constituents. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Black, Earl, and Black, Merle. 1987. Politics and Society in the South. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Blumenthal, Sidney. 1980. The Permanent Campaign: Inside the World of Elite Political Operations. Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
Bobo, Lawrence. 2001. “Racial Attitudes and Relations at the Close of the Twentieth Century.” In America Becoming: Racial Trends and Their Consequences, vol. 1, ed. Smelser, Neil J., Wilson, William J., and Mitchell, Faith. Washington, DC: National Academy Press, 264–301.Google Scholar
Bobo, Lawrence, and Zubrinsky, Camille L.. 1996. “Attitudes on Residential Integration: Perceived Status Differences, Mere In-Group Preference, or Racial Prejudice?Social Forces 74 (3): 883–909.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bratton, Kathleen A. 2005. “Critical Mass Theory Revisited: The Behavior and Success of Token Women in State Legislatures.” Politics and Gender 1 (1): 97–125.Google Scholar
Bratton, Kathleen A., and Haynie, Kerry L.. 1999. “Agenda Setting and Legislative Success in State Legislatures: The Effect of Gender and Race.” Journal of Politics 61 (3): 658–679.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Broockman, David E. 2013. “Black Politicians Are More Intrinsically Motivated to Advance Blacks’ Interests: A Field Experiment Manipulating Political Incentives.” American Journal of Political Science 57 (3): 521–536.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burden, Barry C. 2007. Personal Roots of Representation. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Burrell, Barbara C. 1994. A Woman’s Place in the House: Campaigning for Congress in the Feminist Era. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Butler, Daniel M. 2013. “Why Are Politicians Sometimes Unresponsive to Public Opinion? Experimental Evidence of How Public Officials Justify Discounting Constituents’ Opinions They Disagree With.” Prepared for the 2013 State Politics and Policy Conference, Iowa City, Iowa, May 23–25, 2013.
Butler, Daniel M., and Broockman, David E.. 2011. “Do Politicians Racially Discriminate against Constituents? A Field Experiment on State Legislators.” American Journal of Political Science 55 (3): 463–477.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Butler, Daniel M., and Butler, Matthew J.. 2006. “Splitting the Difference? Causal Inference and Theories of Split-party Delegations.” Political Analysis 14 (4): 439–455.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Butler, Daniel M., and Kousser, Thad. 2013. “How do Public Goods Providers Play Public Goods Games?” Paper prepared for the 13 Annual State Politics and Policy Conference, Iowa City, Iowa, May 23–25, 2013.
Butler, Daniel M., and Nickerson, David W.. 2011. “Can Learning Constituency Opinion Affect how Legislators Vote? Results from a Field Experiment.” Quarterly Journal of Political Science 6 (1): 55–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Butler, Daniel M., and Powell, Eleanor Neff. 2014. “Understanding the Party Brand: Experimental Evidence on the Role of Valence.” Journal of Politics 76 (2): 492–505.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Butler, Daniel M., Karpowitz, Christopher, and Pope, Jeremy C.. 2011. “Who Gets the Credit? Legislative Responsiveness and Evaluations of Members, Parties, and the US Congress.” Working Manuscript. Yale University.
Butler, Daniel M., Karpowitz, Christopher, and Pope, Jeremy C.. 2012. “A Field Experiment on Legislators’ Home Style: Service versus Policy.” Journal of Politics 74 (2): 474–486.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cain, Bruce E., Ferejohn, John, and Fiorina, Morris P.. 1987. The Personal Vote: Constituency Service and Electoral Independence. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Callander, Steven. 2008. “A Theory of Policy Expertise.” Quarterly Journal of Political Science 3 (2): 123–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cameron, Charles, Epstein, David, and O’Halloran, Sharyn. 1996. “Do Majority-Minority Districts Maximize Substantive Black Representation in Congress?American Political Science Review 90 (4): 794–812.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Canon, David T. 1999. Race, Redistricting, and Representation: The Unintended Consequences of Black Majority Districts. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Carnes, Nicholas. 2012. “Does the Numerical Underrepresentation of the Working Class in Congress Matter? Evidence from Roll Call Voting in the House of Representatives.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 37 (1): 5–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Census of Governments, U.S. Census Bureau. 2007. Current Spending of Public Elementary-Secondary School Systems by State, State and Local Government Finances by Level of Government and State, and Public School System Finances for Elementary-Secondary Education by State.
Center for American Women and Politics (CAWP). 2011. “Women in State Legislatures 2011.”
Chandler, Davidson, and Grofman, Bernard, eds. 1994. Quiet Revolution in the South: The Impact of the Voting Rights Act, 1965–1990. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Chattopadhyay, Raghabendra, and Duflo, Esther. 2004. “Women as Policy Makers: Evidence from a Randomized Policy Experiment in India.” Econometrica 72 (5): 1409–1443.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Considine, Mark, and Deutchman, Iva Ellen. 1994. “The Gendering of Political Institutions: A Comparison of American and Australian State Legislators.” Social Science Quarterly 75 (4): 854–866.Google Scholar
Converse, Philip E. 1964. “The Nature of Belief Systems in Mass Publics.” In Ideology and Discontent ed., David Apter, pages 206–261.
Cover, Albert D. and Brumberg, Bruce S.. 1982. “Baby Books and Ballots: The Impact of Congressional Mail on Constituent Opinion.” The American Political Science Review 76 (2): 347–359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cyert, Richard M., and March, James G.. 1963. A Behavioral Theory of the Firm. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Dahl, Robert A. 1967. Pluralist Democracy in the United States: Conflict and Consent. Chicago: Rand McNally.Google Scholar
Darcy, Robert. 1996. “Women in the State Legislative Power Structure: Committee Chairs.” Social Science Quarterly 77 (4): 888–898.Google Scholar
Dawson, Michael C. 1994. Behind the Mule: Race and Class in African-American Politics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Dexter, Lewis A. 1964. “The Good Will of the Important People: More on the Jeopardy of the Interview.” Public Opinion Quarterly 28 (4): 556–563.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Diamond, Irene. 1977. Sex Roles in the State House. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Dodson, Debra L. 1998. “Representing Women’s Interests in the U.S. House of Representatives.” In Women and Elective Office: Past, Present, and Future. eds. Thomas, Sue and Wilcox, Clyde. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Dodson, Debra L.. 2006. The Impact of Women in Congress. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dodson, Debra L., and Carroll, Susan. 1991. Reshaping the Agenda: Women in State Legislatures. New Brunswick: Center for American Women and Politics, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey.Google Scholar
Dolan, Julie. 1997. “Support for Women’s Interests in the 103rd Congress: The Distinct Impact of Congressional Women.” Women & Politics 18 (4): 81–94.Dolan, Kathleen. 2006. “Symbolic Mobilization? The Impact of Candidate Sex in American Elections.” American Politics Research 34 (6): 687–704.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dolan, Kathleen, and Ford, Lynn. 1995. “Women in the State Legislatures: Feminist Identity and Legislative Behavior.” American Politics Quarterly 23 (1): 96–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Downs, Anthony. 1957. An Economic Theory of Democracy. New York: Harper Collins.Google Scholar
Druckman, James and Jacobs, Lawrence. 2011. “Segmented Representation: The Reagan White House and Disproportionate Responsiveness.” In Who Gets Represented?, ed. Enns, Peter and Wlezien, Christopher. New York: Russell Sage.Google Scholar
Ellis, Christopher. 2012. “Understanding Economic Biases in Representation: Income, Resources, and Policy Representation in the 110th House.” Political Research Quarterly 65 (4): 938–951.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Erikson, Robert and Bhatti, Yosef. 2011. “How Poorly are the Poor Represented in the US Senate?” In Who Gets Represented?Enns, Peter and Wlezien, Christopher, eds. pp. 223–246. New York: Russell Sage.Google Scholar
Esteban, Joan, and Ray, Debraj. 2006. “Inequality, Lobbying, and Resource Allocation.” American Economic Review 96 (1): 257–279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eulau, Heinz, and Karps, Paul D.. 1977. “The Puzzle of Representation: Specifying Components of Responsiveness.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 2 (3): 233–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fenno, Richard F. 1973. Congressmen in Committees. Boston: Little, Brown.Google Scholar
Fenno, Richard F.. 1978. Home Style: House Members in their Districts. Boston: Little, Brown and Company.Google Scholar
Fiorina, Morris P. 1981. Retrospective Voting in American Elections. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Fiorina, Morris P.. 1989. Congress: Keystone of the Washington Establishment, 2nd ed. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Fisher, Samuel H., III, and Herrick, Rebekah. 2013. “Old versus New: The Comparative Efficiency of Mail and Internet Surveys of State Legislators.” State Politics & Policy Quarterly 13(2): 147–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fitch, Brad, and Goldschmidt, Kathy. 2005. Communicating with Congress: How Capitol Hill is Coping with the Surge in Citizen Advocacy. Washington, DC: Congressional Management Foundation.Google Scholar
Fix, Michael and Turner, Margery A., eds. 1998. A National Report Card on Discrimination in America: The Role of Testing. Washington, DC: Urban Institute Press.
Foerstel, Karen, and Foerstel, Herbert. 1996. Climbing the Hill: Gender Conflict in Congress. Westport, CT: Praeger Publishers.Google Scholar
Fryer, Roland G., Jr., and Levitt, Steven D.. 2004. “The Causes and Consequences of Distinctively Black Names.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 119 (3): 767–805.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frymer, Paul. 1999. Uneasy Alliances: Race and Party Competition in America. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Gabel, Matthew, and Scheve, Kenneth. 2007. “Estimating the Effect of Elite Communications on Public Opinion Using Instrumental Variables.” American Journal of Political Science 51 (4): 1013–1028.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gamble, Katrina. 2007. “Black Political Representation: An Examination of Legislative Activity Within U.S. House Committees.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 32 (3): 421–447.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gerber, Alan, and Malhotra, Neil. 2008. “Do Statistical Reporting Standards Affect What is Published? Publication Bias in Two Leading Political Science Journals.” Quarterly Journal of Political Science 3 (3): 313–326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gerber, Alan S., Green, Donald P., and Nickerson, David. 2001. “Testing for Publication Bias in Political Science.” Political Analysis 9 (4): 385–392.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gerber, Alan S., Huber, Gregory A., Doherty, David, and Dowling, Conor M.. 2011. “Citizens’ Policy Confidence and Electoral Punishment: A Neglected Dimension of Electoral Accountability.” Journal of Politics 73 (4): 1206–1224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gerrity, Jessica C., Osborn, Tracy, and Mendez, Jeanette Morehouse. 2007. “Women and Representation: A Different View of the District.” Politics & Gender 3 (2): 179–200.Google Scholar
Gertzog, Irwin. 1995. Congressional Women: Their Recruitment, Integration, and Behavior, 2nd ed. Westport, CT: Praeger Publishers.Google Scholar
Gilens, Martin. 2005. “Inequality and Democratic Responsiveness.” Public Opinion Quarterly 69 (5): 778–796.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gilens, Martin. 2009. “Preference Gaps and Inequality in Representation.” PS: Political Science and Politics 42(2): 335–341.Google Scholar
Gilens, Martin. 2012. Affluence and Influence: Economic Inequality and Political Power in America. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Gilligan, Thomas W., and Krehbiel, Keith. 1989. “Asymmetric Information and Legislative Rules with a Heterogeneous Committee.” American Journal of Political Science 33 (2): 459–490.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gilligan, Thomas W., and Krehbiel, Keith. 1990. “Organization of Informative Committees by a Rational Legislature.” American Journal of Political Science 34 (2): 531–564.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldschmidt, Kathy, and Ochreiter, Leslie. 2008. Communicating with Congress: How the Internet has Changed Citizen Engagement. Washington, DC: Congressional Management Foundation.Google Scholar
Gramlich, Edward M., and Laren, Deborah S.. 1984. “Migration and Income Distribution Responsibilities.” Journal of Human Resources 19 (4): 489–511.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grey, Sandra. 2006. “Numbers and Beyond: The Relevance of Critical Mass in Gender Research.” Politics & Gender 2 (4): 492–502.Google Scholar
Griffin, John D., and Keane, Michael. 2006. “Descriptive Representation and the Composition of African American Turnout.” American Journal of Political Science 50 (4): 998–1012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Griffin, John D. and Newman, Brian M.. 2007. “The Unequal Representation of Latinos and Whites.” Journal of Politics 69 (4): 1032–1046.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Griffin, John D. and Newman, Brian M.. 2008. Minority Report: Evaluating Political Equality in America. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Griffin, John D., Newman, Brian, and Wolbrecht, Christina. 2012. “A Gender Gap in Policy Representation in the U.S. Congress?Legislative Studies Quarterly 37 (1): 35–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grose, Christian R. 2011. Congress in Black and White: Race and Representation in Washington and at Home. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grose, Christian R., Mangum, Maruice, and Martin, Christopher. 2007. “Race, Political Empowerment, and Constituency Service: Descriptive Representation and the Hiring of African-American Congressional Staff.” Polity 39 (4): 449–478.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guinier, Lani. 1994. The Tyranny of the Majority: Fundamental Fairness in Representative Democracy. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Hajnal, Zoltan L. 2009. “Who Loses in American Democracy? A Count of Votes Demonstrates the Limited Representation of African Americans.” American Political Science Review 103 (1): 35–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, Richard L. 1996. Participation in Congress. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Hall, Richard L., and Deardorff, Alan V.. 2006. “Lobbying as Legislative Subsidy.” American Political Science Review 100 (1): 69–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hamburger, Tom, and Wallsten, Peter. 2005. “Parties Are Tracking Your Habits. Though Both Democrats and Republicans Collect Personal Information, the GOP’s Mastery of Data Is Changing the Very Nature of Campaigning.” Los Angeles Times, July 25, p. 1.
Harden, Jeffrey J. 2013. “Multidimensional Democracy: The Determinants of Legislators’ Representational Priorities.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 38 (2): 155–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haynie, Kerry. 2001. African American Legislators in the American States. New York: Columbia University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heath, Roseanna Michelle, Schwindt-Bayer, Leslie A., and Taylor-Robinson, Michelle M.. 2005. “Women on the Sidelines: Women’s Representation on Committees in Latin American Legislatures.” American Journal of Political Science 49 (2): 420–436.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heckman, James J. 1998. “Detecting Discrimination.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 12 (2): 101–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heckman, James J. and Siegelman, Peter. 1992. “The Urban Institute Audit Studies: Their Methods and Findings.” in Fix, Michael and Struyk, Raymond J., eds. Clear and Convincing Evidence: Measurement of Discrimination in America. Lanham, MD: Urban Institute Press.Google Scholar
Hernandez, Raymond. 2006. “After Challenges, House Approves Renewal of Voting Act.” New York Times, July 14.
Hero, Rodney E., and Tolbert, Caroline J.. 1995. “Latinos and Substantive Representation in the U.S. House of Representatives: Direct, Indirect, or Nonexistent?American Journal of Political Science 39 (3): 640–652.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hillygus, S. Sunshine, and Shields, Todd G.. 2008. The Persuadable Voter: Wedge Issues in Presidential Campaigns. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoffman, L. Richard, and Maier, Norman R. F.. 1961. “Quality and acceptance of problem solutions by members of homogenous and heterogeneous groups.” Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology 62 (2): 401–407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hood, M.V. III, and Morris, Irvin L.. 1998. “Boll Weevils and Roll-Call Voting: A Study in Time and Space.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 23 (2): 245–69.Google Scholar
Hutchings, Vincent. 1998. “Issue Salience and Support for Civil Rights Legislation among Southern Democrats.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 23 (4): 521–544.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hutchings, Vincent L., and Valentino, Nicholas A.. 2004. “The Centrality of Race in American Politics.” Annual Review of Political Science 7: 383–408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Imbens, Guido W., and Lemieux, Thomas. 2008. “Regression Discontinuity Designs: A Guide to Practice.” Journal of Econometrics 142 (2): 615–635.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Iyengar, Shanto, and Greenhouse, Joel B.. 1988. “Selection Models and the File Drawer Problem.” Statistical Science 3 (1): 109–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Iyengar, Shanto, Hahn, Kyu S., Krosnick, Jon A., and Walker, John. 2008. Selective Exposure to Campaign Communication: The Role of Anticipated Agreement and Issue Public Membership.” Journal of Politics 70 (1): 186–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jacobs, Lawrence R., and Page, Benjamin I.. 2005. “Who Influences U.S. Foreign Policy?American Political Science Review 99 (1): 107–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jacobs, Lawrence R., and Shapiro, Robert Y.. 2000. Politicians Don’t Pander: Political Manipulation and the Loss of Democratic Responsiveness. Chicago: University Of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Jacobs, Lawrence R., and Shapiro, Robert Y.. 2005. “Polling Politics, Media, and Election Campaigns.” Public Opinion Quarterly 69 (5): 635–641.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jacobs, Lawrence R., Lawrence, Eric D., Shapiro, Robert Y., and Smith, Steven S.. 1998. “Congressional Leadership of Public Opinion.” Political Science Quarterly 113 (1): 21–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kanter, Rosabeth Moss. 1977. “Some Effects of Proportions on Group Life: Skewed Sex Ratios and Responses to Token Women.” American Journal of Sociology 82 (5): 965–990.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kellman, Laurie. 2006. “House Renews Voting Rights Act Unchanged.” Associated Press, July 14.
Kerr, Brinck, and Miller, Will. 1997. “Latino Representation, It’s Direct and Indirect.” American Journal of Political Science 41 (3): 1066–1071.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
King, Gary. 1991. “Constituency Service and Incumbency Advantage.” British Journal of Political Science 21 (1): 119–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kingdon, John W. 1981. Congressmen’s Voting Decisions, 2nd ed. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Krehbiel, Keith. 1991. Information and Legislative Organization. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krosnick, Jon A. 1990. “Americans’ Perceptions of Presidential Candidates: A Test of the Projection Hypothesis.” Journal of Social Issues 46 (2): 159–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lauderdale, Benjamin E., 2010. Does Congress Represent Public Opinion as it is or as it Might Be? APSA 2010 Annual Meeting Paper. Available at SSRN: .
Lawless, Jennifer L. 2004. “Politics of Presence: Congresswomen in the House and Symbolic Representation.” Political Research Quarterly 57 (1): 81–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, David S. 2008. “Randomized Experiments from Non-Random Selection in U.S. House Elections.” Journal of Econometrics 142 (2): 675–697.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lijphart, Arend. 1997. “Unequal Participation: Democracy’s Unresolved Dilemma.” American Political Science Review 91 (1): 1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lodge, Milton, and Taber, Charles. 2000. “Three Steps toward a Theory of Motivated Political Reasoning.” In Elements of Reason: Cognition, Choice, and the Bounds of Rationality, eds. Lupia, Arthur, McCubbins, Mathew, and Popkin, Samuel. London: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lublin, David I. 1997. The Paradox of Representation: Racial Gerrymandering and Minority Interests in Congress. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Mahoney, Michael J. 1977. “Publication Prejudices: An Experimental Study of Confirmatory Bias in the Peer Review System.” Cognitive Therapy and Research 1 (2): 161–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Manley, John F. 1983. “Neo-Pluralism: A Class Analysis of Pluralism I and Pluralism II.” American Political Science Review 77 (2): 368–383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mansbridge, Jane. 1999. “Should Blacks Represent Blacks and Women Represent Women? A Contingent ‘Yes.’Journal of Politics 61 (3): 628–657.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marley, Patrick, Glauber, Bill, and Schultze, Steve. 2011. “Caller Posing as Major GOP Contributor Dupes Walker.” Milwaukee Journal Sentinel, February 23.
Mayhew, David R. 2008. “Incumbency Advantage in U.S. Presidential Elections: The Historical Record.” Political Science Quarterly 123 (2): 201–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McConnell, Sheena, Stuart, Elizabeth A., and Devaney, Barbara. 2008. “The Truncation-by-Death Problem: What to do in an Experimental Evaluation When the Outcome is Not Always Defined.” Evaluation Review 32 (2): 157–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McDermott, Rose. 2002. “Experimental Methods in Political Science.” Annual Review of Political Science 5: 31–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McDermott, Rose. 2013. “The Ten Commandments of Experiments.” PS: Political Science & Politics 46 (3): 605–610.Google Scholar
McPherson, Miller, Smith-Lovin, Lynn, and Cook, James M.. 2001. “Birds of a Feather: Homophily in Social Networks.” Annual Review of Sociology 27: 415–444.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mendelberg, Tali. 2001. The Race Card: Campaign Strategy, Implicit Messages, and the Norm of Equality. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miler, Kristina C. 2007. “The View from the Hill: Legislative Perceptions of Constituents.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 33 (4): 597–628.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miler, Kristina C.. 2010. Constituency Representation in Congress: The View from Capitol Hill. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Minta, Michael D. 2009. “Legislative Oversight and the Substantive Representation of Black and Latino Interests in Congress.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 34 (2): 193–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Minta, Michael D.. 2011. Oversight: Representing the Interests of Blacks and Latinos in Congress. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
National Conference of State Legislators. 2013. “Former State Legislators in Congress.” . Accessed: July 17, 2013.
Norton, Noelle H., 1999. “Committee Influence over Controversial Policy: The Reproductive Policy Case.” Policy Studies Journal 27 (2): 203–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Orey, Byron D’Andra, Smooth, Wendy, Adams, Kimberly S., and Harris-Clark, Kisha. 2006. “Race and Gender Matter: Rethinking Models of Legislative Policy making in State Legislatures.” Journal of Women, Politics & Policy 28 (3/4): 97–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ornstein, Norman J., and Mann, Thomas E., eds. 2000. The Permanent Campaign and its Future. Washington, D.C.: American Enterprise Institute; Brookings Institution.
Overby, L. Marvin, and Cosgrove, Kenneth M.. 1996. “Unintended Consequences? Racial Redistricting and the Representation of Minority Interests.” Journal of Politics 58: 540–550.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pager, Devah. 2007. “The Use of Field Experiments for Studies of Employment Discrimination: Contributions, Critiques, and Directions for the Future.” Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 609 (1): 104–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pager, Devah, and Quillian, Lincoln. 2005. “Walking the Talk? What Employers Say Versus What They Do.” American Sociological Review 70 (3): 355–380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pager, Devah, Western, Bruce, and Bonikowski, Bart. 2009. “Discrimination in a Low Wage Labor Market: A Field Experiment.” American Sociology Review 74 (October): 777–799.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Palmer, Barbara, and Simon, Dennis. 2006. Breaking the Political Glass Ceiling: Women and Congressional Elections. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Pande, Rohini. 2003. “Can Mandated Political Representation Increase Policy Influence from Disadvantaged Minorities? Theory and Evidence from India.” American Economic Review 93 (4): 1132–1151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peterson, Paul E., and Rom, Mark C.. 1989. “American Federalism, Welfare Policy and Residential Choices.” American Political Science Review 83 (3): 711–728.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peterson, Paul E., and Rom, Mark C.. 1990. Welfare Magnets: A New Case for a National Standard. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.Google Scholar
Pitkin, Hanna F. 1967. The Concept of Representation. Berkeley: University California Press.Google Scholar
Piven, Frances Fox and Cloward, Richard A.. 1988. Why Americans Don’t Vote. New York: Pantheon.Google Scholar
Poole, Keith T. 2007. “Changing Minds? Not in Congress!Public Choice 131 (3/4): 435–451.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Putnam, Robert D. 1993. Making Democracy Work: Civic Traditions in Modern Italy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Putnam, Robert D., and Campbell, David E.. 2010. American Grace: How Religion Divides and Unites Us. New York: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
Radcliff, Benjamin, and Saiz, Martin. 1995. “Race, Turnout, and Public Policy in the American States.” Political Research Quarterly 48 (4): 775–794.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rainey, James. 2011. “On the Media: NPR Video Stings Ethics Too.” Los Angeles Times, March 11.
Rasmusen, Eric. 1993. “Lobbying When the Decisionmaker Can Acquire Independent Information.” Public Choice 77 (4): 899–913.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Redlawsk, David P. 2002. “Hot Cognition or Cool Consideration? Testing the Effects of Motivated Reasoning on Political Decision Making.” Journal of Politics 64 (4): 1021–1044.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reingold, Beth. 1992. Concepts of Representation Among Female and Male State Legislators.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 17 (4): 509–537.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reingold, Beth. 2008. “Women as Office Holders: Linking Descriptive and Substantive Representation.” In Political Women and American Democracy: Critical Perspectives on Women and Politics Research, ed. Wolbrecht, Christina, Beckwith, Karen, and Baldez, Lisa. New York: Cambridge University Press, 128–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rigby, Elizabeth and Wright, Gerald. 2011. “Whose Statehouse Democracy? Policy Responsiveness to Poor versus Rich Constituents in Poor versus Rich States.” In Who Gets Represented?, ed. Enns, Peter and Wlezien, Christopher. New York: Russell Sage.Google Scholar
Rocca, Michael S., Sanchez, Gabriel R., and Uscinski, Joseph. 2008. “Personal Attributes and Latino Voting Behavior in Congress.” Social Science Quarterly 89 (2): 392–405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosenstone, Steven J. and Hansen, John Mark. 1993. Mobilization, Participation, and Democracy in America. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Rothenberg, Lawrence S., and Sanders, Mitchell S.. 2000. “Severing the Electoral Connection: Shirking in the Contemporary Congress.” American Journal of Political Science 44 (2): 316–325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saint-Germain, Michelle A. 1989. “Does their Difference Make a Difference? The Impact of Women on Public Policy in the Arizona State Legislature.” Social Science Quarterly 70 (4): 956–968.Google Scholar
Salisbury, Robert H., and Shepsle, Kenneth A.. 1981a. “Congressional Staff Turnover and the Ties-That-Bind.” American Political Science Review 75 (2): 381–396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Salisbury, Robert H., and Shepsle, Kenneth A.. 1981b. “Congressman as Enterprise.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 6 (4): 559–576.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Santos, Adolfo, and Huerta, Carlos C.. 2001. “An Analysis of Descriptive and Substantive Latino Representation in Congress.” In Representation of Minority Groups in the U.S.: Implications for the Twenty-First Century, ed. Menifield, Charles E.. Lanham, Maryland: Austin and Winfield Publishers.Google Scholar
Schattschneider, E.E. 1960. The Semisovereign People: A Realist’s View of Democracy in America. New York: Holt, Reinhart, and Winston.Google Scholar
Schiller, Wendy J. 2000. Partners and Rivals: Representation in U.S. Senate Delegations. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Schlozman, Kay Lehman, Verba, Sidney, and Brady, Henry E.. 2012. The Unheavenly Chorus: Unequal Political Voice and the Broken Promise of American Democracy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sears, David O. 1986. “College Sophomores in the Laboratory: Influences of a Narrow Data Base on Social Psychology’s View of Human Nature.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 51 (3): 515–530.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Serra, George and Cover, Albert D.. 1992. “The Electoral Consequences of Perquisite Use: The Casework Case.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 17 (2): 233–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sinclair-Chapman, Valeria. 2002. Symbols and Substance. Ph.D. Dissertation. Ohio State University.Google Scholar
Sinclair-Chapman, Valeria, and Price, Melanie. 2008. “Black Politics, the 2008 Election, and the (Im)Possibility of Race Transcendence.” PS: Political Science and Politics 41 (October): 739–745.Google Scholar
Sniderman, Paul M., and Carmines, Edward G.. 1997. Reaching Beyond Race. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Snyder, James M., and Ueda, Michiko. 2007. “Do Multimember Districts Lead to Free-Riding?Legislative Studies Quarterly 32 (4): 649–679.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Squire, Peverill. 1992. “Legislative Professionalization and Membership Diversity in State Legislatures.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 17 (1): 69–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Squire, Peverill. 2007. “Measuring State Legislative Professionalism: The Squire Index Revisited.” State Politics and Policy Quarterly 7 (2): 211–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stimson, James A. 2009. “Perspectives on Unequal Democracy: The Political Economy of the New Gilded Age.” Perspectives on Politics 7 (1): 151–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Storing, Herbert J., ed. 1981. The Complete Anti-Federalist. 7 vols. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.CrossRef
Swain, Carol M. 1993. Black Faces, Black Interests: The Representation of African Americans in Congress. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University.Google Scholar
Swers, Michele L. 1998. “Are Women More Likely to Vote for Women’s Issue Bills than their Male Colleagues?Legislative Studies Quarterly 23 (3): 435–448.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Swers, Michele L.. 2001. “Understanding the Policy Impact of Electing Women: Evidence from Research on Congress and State Legislatures.” PS: Political Science and Politics 34 (2): 217–220.Google Scholar
Swers, Michele L.. 2002. The Difference Women Make: The Policy Impact of Women in Congress. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Swers, Michele L. and Rouse, Stella M.. 2011. “Descriptive Representation: Understanding the Impact of Identity on Substantive Representation of Group Interests.” In The Oxford Handbook of the American Congress, ed. Schickler, Eric and Lee, Frances E.. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Tamerius, Karin L. 1995. “Sex, Gender, and Leadership in the Representation of Women.” In Gender, Power, Leadership and Governance, ed. Duerst-Lahti, Georgia and Mae Kelly, Rita. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Tatalovitch, Raymond, and Schier, David. 1993. “The Persistence of Ideological Cleavage in Voting on Abortion Legislation in the House of Representatives, 1973–1988.” American Politics Research 21 (1): 125–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tate, Katherine. 2003. Black Faces in the Mirror: African Americans and their Representatives in Congress. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Tax Policy Center. 2013. “The Numbers: What is the breakdown of revenues among federal, state and local governments?” . Accessed July 16, 2013.
Thomas, Sue. 1994. How Women Legislate. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Thomas, Sue. 1997. “Why Gender Matters: The Perceptions of Women Officeholders.” Women & Politics 17: 27–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomas, Sue, and Welch, Susan. 1991. “The Impact of Gender on Activities and Priorities of State Legislators.” Western Political Quarterly 44 (2): 445–456.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thurber, Timothy N. 2004. “Second Reconstruction,” in The American Congress: The Building of Democracy, ed. Zelizer, Julian E.. Boston: Houghton-Mifflin Company: 529–547.Google Scholar
Trounstine, Jessica. 2009. “All Politics is Local.” Perspectives on Politics 7 (3): 611–618.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Udall, Morris K. 1967. “The Right to Write: Some Suggestions on Writing Your Congressman.” Congressman’s Report Vol. 6, No. 1, January 20, 1967.
Ura, Joseph Daniel and Ellis, Christopher R.. 2008. “Income, Preferences, and the Dynamics of Policy Responsiveness.” PS: Political Science and Politics 41 (4): 785–794.Google Scholar
Van Knippenberg, Daan, De Dreu, Carsten K.W., Homan, Astrid C.. 2004. “Work Group Diversity and Group Performance: An Integrative Model and Research Agenda.” Journal of Applied Psychology 89 (6): 1008–1022.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Verba, Sidney. 2003. “Would the Dream of Political Equality Turn Out to Be a Nightmare?Perspectives on Politics 1 (4): 663–679.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Verba, Sidney, and Nie, Norman H.. 1972. Participation in America: Political Democracy and Social Equality. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
Verba, Sidney, Schlozman, Kay Lehman, and Brady, Henry E.. 1995. Voice and Equality: Civic Voluntarism in American Politics. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Wallace, Sophia J. 2010 “Beyond Roll Call Votes: Latino Representation in the 108–110th Sessions of the U.S. House of Representatives.” Ph.D. Dissertation. Department of Government. Cornell University.
Wasniewski, Matthew, ed. 2008. Black Americans in Congress, 1870–2007. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office.
Weingast, Barry R. and Marshall, William J.. 1988. “The Industrial Organization of Congress; or, Why Legislatures, Like Firms, Are Not Organized as Markets.” Journal of Political Economy 96 (1): 132–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Welch, Susan, and Hibbing, John. 1984. “Hispanic Representation in the U.S. Congress.” Social Science Quarterly 65 (2): 328–335. Reprinted in Latinos and the Political System, ed. F. Chris Garcia. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar
Whitby, Kenny J. 1997. The Color of Representation: Congressional Behavior and Black Interests. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wlezien, Christopher. 2004. “Patterns of Representation: Dynamics of Public Preferences and Policy.” Journal of Politics 66 (1):1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wlezien, Christopher and Soroka, Stuart N.. 2011. “Inequality in Policy Responsiveness?” Who Gets Represented?Enns, Peter and Wlezien, Christopher, Eds. New York: Russell Sage.Google Scholar
Wolbrecht, Christina. 2002. “Female Legislators and the Women’s Rights Agenda: From Feminine Mystique to Feminist Era.” In Women Transforming Congress, ed. Rosenthal, Cindy Simon. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press, 170–239.Google Scholar
Wolbrecht, Christina, and Campbell, David E.. 2007. “Leading by Example: Female Members of Parliament as Political Role Models.” American Journal of Political Science 51 (October): 921–939.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Word, David L., Coleman, Charles D., Nunziata, Robert, and Kominski, Robert. n.d. “Demographic Aspects of Surnames from Census 2000.” Technical Report for the U.S. Census Bureau. .

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • References
  • Daniel M. Butler, Washington University, St Louis
  • Book: Representing the Advantaged
  • Online publication: 05 August 2014
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139871969.008
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • References
  • Daniel M. Butler, Washington University, St Louis
  • Book: Representing the Advantaged
  • Online publication: 05 August 2014
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139871969.008
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • References
  • Daniel M. Butler, Washington University, St Louis
  • Book: Representing the Advantaged
  • Online publication: 05 August 2014
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139871969.008
Available formats
×