Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-hfldf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-01T23:15:39.071Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

9 - Environmental Law

Lexical Semantics in the Quest for Conceptual Foundations and Legitimacy

from Part II - Recollection

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 March 2023

Sandy Lamalle
Affiliation:
Concordia University, Montréal
Peter Stoett
Affiliation:
Ontario Tech University
Get access

Summary

The rapid rise and success of environmental law and regulation has come with the price that the content and legitimacy of the underlying concepts and principles of environmental protection and governance have been given insufficient attention and time to evolve. Consequently, environmental law could not ‘expand organically’ in view of the rapidity, urgency and its political content and context. Yet it is the presence or absence of such legal conceptual underpinnings that will condition whether environmental law develops into a fully fledged and permanent body of law, or whether environmental protection is to be merely a factor in a problem-specific context that will be taken into account in a diversity of established substantive contexts. This chapter describes how corpus linguistics and concordances-based methodologies were used to examines specific terms typically associated with the impact of human activities on the environment, and in order to reveal how conceptual meanings have shifted throughout the twentieth century and from one decade to the other since the 1960s.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2023

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Biber, D. (1993). Representativeness in corpus design. Literary and Linguistic Computing 8(4): 243–57.Google Scholar
British National Corpus (BNC) (2007). BNC XML Edition, www.natcorp.ox.ac.ukGoogle Scholar
Brunner, O., Conze, W. and Koselleck, R. (eds.) (2004). Geschichtliche Grundbegriffe. Historisches Lexikon zur Politisch-sozialen Sprache in Deutschland. Stuttgart: Klett-Cotta, 9 vols.Google Scholar
Butt, D., Fahey, R., Feez, S., Spinks, S. and Yallop, C. (eds.) (2000). Using Functional Grammar. An Explorer’s Guide. Sydney: Macquarie University.Google Scholar
Dan Tarlock, A. (2003–04). Is there a there there in environmental law? Journal of Land Use and Environmental Law 19(2): 213–54.Google Scholar
Fairclough, N. (1992). Discourse and Social Change. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
Fairclough, N. (1999). Linguistic and intertextual analysis within discourse analysis. In Jaworski, A. and Coupland, N. (eds.), The Discourse Reader. London: Routledge, 183211.Google Scholar
Felber, H. (2001). Allgemeine Terminologielehre, Wissenslehre und Wissenstechnik. Theoretische Grundlagen und philosophische Betrachtungen. Wien: Termnet.Google Scholar
Fowler, R., Hodge, B., Kress, G and Trew, T. (1979). Language and Control. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Halliday, M. (1985/1994). An Introduction to Functional Grammar. London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
Higgins, P. (2010). Eradicating Ecocide. London: Shepheard Walwyn.Google Scholar
Higgins, P., Short, D. and South, N (2013). Protecting the planet: A proposal for a law of ecocide. Crime Law Social Change 59: 257.Google Scholar
van Hoecke, M. and Warrington, M. (2010). Legal Cultures, Legal Paradigms and Legal Doctrine: Towards a New Model for Comparative Law. First published 1998, reprinted in Del Mar, M., Twinning, W. and Giudice, M. (eds.), Legal Theory and the Legal Academy, Library of Essays in Contemporary Legal Theory, vol. III. Aldershot, UK: Ashgate, 291332.Google Scholar
Hohfeld, W. N. (1913–14). Some fundamental legal conceptions as applied in judicial reasoning. Yale Law Journal 23: 1659.Google Scholar
Koselleck, K. (1979). Begriffsgeschichte und Sozialgeschichte, in: Vergangene Zukunft. Zur Semantik geschichtlicher Zeiten. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
Kress, G. and Hodge, B (1979). Language as Ideology. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Laske, C. (2013). Translators and legal comparatists as objective mediators. In Husa, J. and van Hoecke, M (eds.), Objectivity in Law and Legal Reasoning. Oxford: Hart, 213–28.Google Scholar
Laske, C (2020). Law, Language and Change. A Diachronic Semantic Analysis of Consideration in the Common Law. Leiden: Brill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mattila, H. (2012). Legal vocabulary. In Tiersma, P. and Solan, L. (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Language and Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2751.Google Scholar
Mattila, H. (2013). Comparative Legal Linguistics, Language of Law, Latin and Modern Lingua Francas. Aldershot, UK: Ashgate.Google Scholar
O’Halloran, K. (2011). Critical discourse analysis. In Simpson, J. (ed.), The Routledge Handbook of Applied Linguistics. London: Routledge, 109–25.Google Scholar
Reichardt, R., Schmitt, E., Lüsebrink, H. J. and Leonard, J. (1985–). Handbuch politisch-sozialer Grundbegriffe in Frankreich 1680–1820. Munich: Oldenbourg Wissenschaftverlag.Google Scholar
Ritter, J., Gründer, K. and Gabriel, G. (eds.) (1971–2007). Historisches Wörterbuch der Philosophie. Basel: Schwabe.Google Scholar
Saussure, F. de (1916/2005). Cours de linguistique générale. Paris: Payot & Rivages.Google Scholar
ECOLEX – The Gateway to Environmental Law, www.ecolex.orgGoogle Scholar
Stoett, P. (2000). Human and Global Security: An Exploration of Terms. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
Thompson, G. (1996). Introducing Functional Grammar. London: Arnold.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×