Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-x4r87 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T19:44:45.968Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

9 - Impassible compassion? From divine pathos to divine patience

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 May 2010

Kevin J. Vanhoozer
Kevin J. Vanhoozer
Affiliation:
Wheaton College
Get access

Summary

O Lord … thou art compassionate in terms of our experience, and not compassionate in terms of thy being … When thou beholdest us in our wretchedness, we experience the effect of compassion, but thou dost not experience the feeling.

(Anselm)

The impassibility of God cannot … mean that it is impossible for Him really to feel compassion. … [the innermost being of God] is not closed but open to feel the distress of man. God cannot be moved from outside, but from inside His own being He shares it in sympathetic communion.

(Barth)

Divine compassion is the goodness God directs to suffering others. Anselm and Barth express this truth in two apparently contradictory ways, the one denying any emotional content (i.e., feeling) to the divine compassion, the other affirming it, at least in qualified fashion. Is God unmoved (Anselm), moved (relational theists and panentheists), or self-moved (Barth) by human suffering?

The compassion of God is a recurring theme at several nodal points in the scriptural account (e.g., Ex. 34:6–7). As the contrasting quotes from Anselm and Barth attest, compassion resembles both action and passion. It therefore serves as an excellent test case with which to sum up our case for remythologizing theology. Accordingly, this chapter contrasts a remythologized conceptual elaboration of divine compassion as a form of communicative action with the kenotic-relational ontotheological version that currently prevails in the theological marketplace.

According to Luke 1:78, Jesus is the splanghna theou: the “compassion of God.”

Type
Chapter
Information
Remythologizing Theology
Divine Action, Passion, and Authorship
 , pp. 434 - 468
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×